Professional Documents
Culture Documents
S.Matlou.201515625.Themo Heat Exchanger
S.Matlou.201515625.Themo Heat Exchanger
TECHNOLOGY
UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG
Doornfontein Campus
By Shaffi Matlou
Subject: Thermodynamics 3A
I confirm that this assignment is my original work, that it is not a copy of someone else's
work, and that it has never been submitted for evaluation at the University of Johannesburg or
elsewhere.
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY..............................................................................................2
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT...........................................................................................................3
NOMENCLATURE....................................................................................................................5
LIST OF FIGURES....................................................................................................................6
1. AIM....................................................................................................................................7
2. ASSUMPTIONS.................................................................................................................7
3. BACKGROUND.................................................................................................................7
4. APPARATUS......................................................................................................................9
5. PROCEDURE..................................................................................................................10
6. RESULTS.........................................................................................................................11
7. RESULTS ANALYSIS.......................................................................................................11
7.1. Counter flow Calculations....................................................................................11
7.2. Parallel flow Calculations....................................................................................12
8. DISCUSSION...................................................................................................................13
9. CONCLUSION................................................................................................................14
10. REFERENCES.............................................................................................................15
NOMENCLATURE
Symbol Variable units
T1 Hot water inlet to the heat o
C
exchanger
T2 Hot water outlet from the o
C
heat exchanger
T3 Cold water inlet to the heat o
C
exchanger
T4 Cold water outlet from the o
C
heat exchanger
T5 Cold water mid position (for o
C
concentric tubes)
T6 Cold water mid position (for o
C
concentric tubes)
Vcold Cold stream flow rate g/s
Vhot Hot stream flow rate g/s
∆ T cold Increase in hot fluid K
temperature
∆ T hot Decrease in hot fluid K
temperature
ρhot Density of the hot stream Kg/L
ρ cold Density of the cold stream Kg/L
LMTD Logarithmic Mean K
ηThermal Thermal efficiency %
ηMean Mean temperature efficiency %
ηCold Temperature efficiency of %
the cold stream
ηHot Temperature efficiency of %
the hot stream
C p cold Specific heat of the cold KJ/KgK
stream
C p hot Specific heat of the hot KJ/KgK
stream
dTmin Minimum temperature K
difference across the heat
exchanger
dTmax Maximum temperature K
difference across the heat
exchanger
Qhot Power emitted from the hot Watts
stream
Qcold Power absorbed by the cold Watts
stream
Table 1. Nomenclature
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Parallel flow in heat exchanger (Source: McConkey)................................................8
Figure 2. Counter flow in heat exchanger (Source: McConkey)...............................................8
Figure 3. Set up for counter flow.............................................................................................10
Figure 4. Setup for parallel flow...............................................................................................10
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Nomenclature...............................................................................................................5
Table 2. Counter flow data collected.......................................................................................11
Table 3. Parallel flow data collected........................................................................................11
Table 4. Counter flow Calculations.........................................................................................12
Table 5. Parallel flow Calculations..........................................................................................13
1. AIM
The purpose of this study is to examine the differences between counterflow and
parallel flows, furthermore Investigate heat transfer across fluids (water) by
examining indirect heating or cooling of fluids by heat transfer from one fluid to
another.
The effect of a shell and tube heat exchanger on heat transfer temperature
efficiency and temperature profiles was investigated.
With counter flow and parallel current flow, determine the effect of the
temperature differential between a hot stream and a cold stream.
2. ASSUMPTIONS
Counter-flow, in which fluids move in opposite directions and in parallel.
It is presumed that the process is isobaric.
Parallel flow, in which fluids flow in the same direction and in parallel.
The entire process is supposed to be adiabatic, meaning that no heat is exchanged
with the environment.
Throughout the heat exchanger, heat transfer coefficients and thermophysical
characteristics of fluids remain constant.
3. BACKGROUND
The amount of thermal energy contained in a substance can be expressed as temperature.
Heat exchangers are used to transmit this thermal energy from one fluid to another. Heat
exchanges are critical in the process sector because they ensure that the intake and output
flow streams are kept separate for maximum efficiency. A heat exchanger is a device that
allows thermal energy to be transferred from one fluid to another. Heat is transferred
indirectly in most heat exchangers via a heat transfer surface that isolates the fluids,
preventing them from coming into direct contact and leaking.
As seen in Figure 2 below, counter flow is the absolute opposite of parallel flow, in which the
hot and cold fluids enter the heat exchanger from opposing ends and flow in opposite
directions.
The heat exchanger between moving fluids is one of the most significant operations in
engineering. In heat exchangers the temperature of each fluid varies as it goes through the
heat exchanger. In practice, flow influence exchange heats our air intercoolers and preheaters,
steam plant condensers and boilers, refrigeration unit condensers and evaporators, and many
other industrial operations in which a liquid or gas must be chilled or heated.
Calculations for heat exchangers are done using the formulars below
Reduction in hot fluid temperature:
∆Thot = T1 - T2
∆Thot = T4 - T3
4. APPARATUS
1. Shell and tube heat exchanger
2. Thermocouples stations
3. Water pipes and regulations valves
4.1. Picture
Figure 3. Set up for counter flow
5. PROCEDURE
1. We set the machine to work in the opposite direction of the flow.
2. The water input line was connected, and water was delivered from the water pump.
3. The main switch and the heat switch were both turned on.
4. The hot water temperature controller was set to 600 degrees Celsius.
5. The flow rate of cold water was adjusted at [V cold] 15 g/sec.
6. The hot water flow rate was set to [V hot] 50 g/sec.
7. We kept an eye on the temperature of the stream as well as the hot and cold flow
rates to make sure they stayed close to the original settings.
8. We waited for the situation to settle before taking measurements from [T1-T6].
9. The cooling water flow was increased to 30 g/sec.
10. We double-checked that the heat flow rate remained constant at 50 g/sec.
11. We waited for the situation to settle before taking measurements from [T1-T6].
12. We switched the machine to parallel flow and went through the process again.
6. RESULTS
For counter flow
7. RESULTS ANALYSIS
7.1. Counter flow Calculations
Sample calculations from Table 2 (1st row data)
Reduction in hot fluid temperature:
∆Thot = T1 - T2
∆ T hot =81−76.9=4.1 K
∆Tcold = T4 - T3
∆ T cold =44.4−23.4=21 K
∆Thot = T1 - T2
∆ T hot =74−67.4=6.6 K
∆Tcold = T4 - T3
∆ T cold =34.4−23.2=11.2 K
The temperature efficiency of the hot stream:
T 1−T 2 74−67.4
ηHot = = ×100=12.99 %
T 1−T 3 74−23.2
The temperature efficiency of the cold stream
T 4−T 3 34.4−23.2
ηCold= = ×100=22.05 %
T 1−T 3 74−23.2
The mean temperature efficiency
ηHot +ηCold 12.99+22.05
ηMean= = =17.52%
2 2
The power emitted from the hot stream
Qhot =C phot∗ρ hot∗V hot ( T 1−T 2 )
8. DISCUSSION
We can see from the calculations that the LMTD of the counter flow is bigger than that of the
parallel flow. We may deduce that counter flow is more efficient than parallel flow since it
has a greater LMTD. In counter flow, the power absorbed by the cold fluid is much greater
than the power released in this experiment. As a result, the heat exchanger surface area
needed for a parallel flow heat exchanger will be greater than for a counter flow heat
exchanger with the identical intake and exit temperatures for the hot and cold fluids.
9. CONCLUSION
The flow distribution of counter flow is the most favored heat exchanger because it is more
efficient than parallel flow. This is due to the fact that counter flow heat exchangers provide a
more consistent temperature differential between the fluids over the whole fluid path. With
counter flow heat exchangers, the cold fluid can leave at a greater temperature than the hot
fluid. As a result, we may infer that the experiment was a success.
10. REFERENCES