Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 9
Chapter 9
1
This is a variation on the example on pages 300-301.
ε2 ε1
n ε2 g ε2
.exp k .T
n ε1 g ε1
ε1 ε2 ε1 ε2
k .T T
n ε2 g ε1 n ε2 g ε1
ln . k .ln .
n ε1 g ε2 n ε1 g ε2
ε1 ε2
T
n 2 g1
k .ln .
n 1 g2
T = 1.427 .10
4
____________________________________________________________________________
Problem 9.2
This is another variation on the example on pages 300-301.
ε2 ε1
n ε2 g ε2
.exp k .T
n ε1 g ε1
1
g( m ) . ( ε( m) ε( n ) )
ratio( m , n ) exp
g( n ) k .T
____________________________________________________________________________
Problem 9.7
1 3
vbar vbar = 2 m/s
2
2 2
1 3
vrms vrms = 2.236 m/s
2
____________________________________________________________________________
Problem 9.8
T 273 20
8.62 .10
5
k Boltzmann's constant in units of eV/K
The average energy per molecule is
3. .
E kT E = 0.038 eV
2
This is much less than the 10.2 eV needed to raise a hydrogen atom from its
ground state to its first excited state:
E
= 3.71421 .10
3
10.2
____________________________________________________________________________
Problem 9.9
k 8.62 .10
5
Boltzmann's constant in units of eV/K
E 13.6 Binding energy of hydrogen in eV
3. .
We need to solve E kT for T.
2
2 .E
T
3 .k
T = 1.052 .10
5
or about 10500 K
____________________________________________________________________________
2
Problem 9.10
6.63 .10 1.38 .10
34 23
T 20 273 h k Boltzmann's constant in mks units
2 .16 .1.66 .10
27
m mass of oxygen
3. .
E kT average oxygen molecule energy p 2 . m .E oxygen
2
momentum
h
λ = 2.612 .10
11
λ de Broglie wavelength
p
λ
= 0.065 so the de Broglie wavelength is only about
4 .10
10
6.5 percent of the molecular diameter
____________________________________________________________________________
Problem 9.14
The flux is the number of neutrons per square meter per second.
If we divide the flux by the average neutron velocity, we get the number
of neutrons per cubic meter at any time in the beam port:
neutrons neutrons . seconds_for_neutron_to_travel_1_meter
m .s
volume 2 1_meter
S
ρ
ρ = 3.986 .10
8
vbar neutrons/m3
____________________________________________________________________________
Problem 9.19
According to the Stefan-Boltzmann law, an object at a temperature T radiates an
energy R per second per unit time
e .σ .T
4
R
where e is the object's emissivity and σ is a constant.
For skin at two temperatures,
4
R2 T2
R1 4 T2 273 35 T1 273 34
T1
4
T2
ratio
4
T1
ratio = 1.013 A 1.3 percent difference; not huge, but measurable.
____________________________________________________________________________
3
Problem 9.20
This is "just like" problem 9.19.
T2 5800 T1 5000
4
T2
ratio ratio = 1.811 almost a factor of two different
4
T1
____________________________________________________________________________
Problem 9.23
e .σ .T 1 e .σ .T 2
4 4
R1 R2
4
R2 R2 T2
2
R1 R1 4
T1
T1 400 273
T 1 .2
4
T2
____________________________________________________________________________
Problem 9.24
5.67 .10
8
e 0.3 T 400 273 σ
e .σ .T
4
R
R = 3.49 .10
3
This is in units of watts/square meter
To find the rate at which this particular sphere radiates, we need to
multiply R by the surface area of the sphere.
5. 2
r 10
2
R .4 . π . r
2
rate
rate = 27.407 watts
____________________________________________________________________________
Problem 9.25
In the absence of a given emissivity, let's treat the hole as a blackbody, so e 1
that
Also T 700 273 σ 5.67 .10
8
e .σ .T
4
R
4
R = 5.082 .10
4
This is the number of watts/m2 radiated by the hole.
To find the rate at which radiation escapes from the hole, multiply R by the
area of the hole. Don't forget to convert cm2 to m2.
R .10 .10
4
rate
rate = 50.82
watts
____________________________________________________________________________
Problem 9.26
e .σ .T 2
4
R2
e .σ .T 1
R1 4
4
T2
R2 R 1.
4
T1
R 2 = 3.067 kW
____________________________________________________________________________
Problem 9.30
According to Wien's displacement law,
λ max .T 2.898 .10
3
in MKS units
T 500 273
2.898 .10
3
λ max
T
This wavelength of 3749 nanometers is lower energy than the lowest energy
visible photon, which has a wavelength of about 400 nm. Thus, these photons
are in the infrared. See figure 2.2 on page 51 for a confirmation of this.
____________________________________________________________________________
Problem 9.31
290 .10
9
λ max
2.898 .10
3
T = 9.993 .10
3
T equation 9.40, page 316 about 10000 K
λ max
____________________________________________________________________________
5
Problem 9.33
T 34 273
2.898 .10
3
λ max equation 9.40, page 316
T
Problem 9.38
The average energy of the free electrons in copper can be found from equation 9.51
εF 7.04
3.
ε avg εF
5
ε avg = 4.224 eV
Problem 9.39
Part a. The average energy is given by equation 9.51.
εF 5.51
3.
ε avg εF
5
ε avg = 3.306 eV
6
Part c. It's safe to do a classical calculation of the velocity of an electron having
an energy of 3.306 eV, because the energy is very much less than the electron
rest energy of 511 keV.
2 .E
v
9.11 .10
31
v = 1.078 .10
6
m/s a fairly high, but still nonrelativistic velocity
____________________________________________________________________________
Problem 9.40
Part a. Use equation 9.50. This is relatively easy in Mathcad, not so easy with paper
and pencil.
Let's just pick N=1
1.6 .10 1.38 .10
19 23
N 1 e k
εF 7.04 .e
ε
Electrons in excited states are those with ε>ε.F. Since we defined N=1, we can find
the fraction in excited states by integraging n(ε) from ε.F to infinity.
7
∞ I did this on purpose. Mathcad gripes
fraction n( ε , T ) d ε because some numbers involved in
εF calculating n(ε) are getting too big, so I
should integrate not to ∞, but to some "big"
number, say 3 times ε.F
3 .ε F
fraction n( ε , T ) d ε
If I go any bigger than 3ε.F, I get an
εF
overflow.
Part b. At T=1083K,
T 1083 273
n ε ,T
ε
10 .ε F
fraction n( ε , T ) d ε
Now I can go higher in
εF
energy without overflowing.
The above solution is too much for a paper-and-pencil type test problem.
All of the excited electrons will have energies just slightly greater than ε.F.
Therefore, it is a reasonable approximation to replace
ε
in equation 9.50 by ε F
Also, for ε greater than εF, the 1 in the denominator of equation 9.50 is much
smaller than the exponential. The equation then becomes
εF
n( ε ) 3.
N .
ε F .exp
1 .exp ε
2 .
kT k .T
8
The antiderivative of n(ε) is
ε
1 . 3 . N .ε 1 .exp F .exp ε
F
1 2 k .T k .T
.
kT
When you integrate from ε.F to infinity, the value of the antiderivative
is 0 at ∞, and evaluated at ε.F it gives
N 1 εF εF
integral( T ) ( k .T ) . 3 . . .exp .exp
2 εF k .T k .T
N 1
integral( T ) ( k .T ) . 3 . .
2 εF
Problem 9.44
The Fermi energy is calculated from
2
h . 3 .N
2 3
εF
2 . m 8 .π . V
3 .n
2 3
h .
or ε F
2 . m 8 .π
9
1 . 2 3. 1 . 1
n 3 .2.70 . 10
10
3 26.97 1.66 .10 27
The 1/103 converts g-->kg, the (102)3 converts cm3-->m3, and the1/1.66*10-27
converts amu-->kg.
2
3 .n
2 3
h .
εF
2 . m 8 .π
ε F = 1.929 .10
18
Joules
εF
= 12.055 Fermi energy in eV
1.6 .10
19
10