Ghetu Vlad-Mihail

MMIB, 966
Utopia

Review – Risk Management Perspective

Utopia is a location that isn't real in reality; the word comes from the Greek words
"ou" (which means "not") and "topos" (which means "place"). Utopias have been shown in a
variety of media, including philosophical writings and literary works, and involve idealized
civilizations that uphold the values of equality, liberty, and mutual benefit. The fascination of
utopia resides not just in its picture-perfect settings and flawless procedures, but also on its
capacity to spur change and compel introspective thought. Our present societal structures, as
well as the defects and injustices that afflict them, are all things that utopias force us to
examine.

One risk to which such a utopian society is exposed is represented by the spontaneous
revolt of the people. These societies, from my point of view, have a totalitarian system as
presented in the book. The regime wants to combat risks from the same category, such as
hunger, rebellion against the system, placing a premium on trades more than studies, placing
a premium on physical work, people work and have resources. Moreover, this regime tries to
take care of everyone, not just the rich. They wanted to stop the occupation of the lands by
the rich in order to offer fewer opportunities for laziness. They wanted agriculture to be
reorganized and the manufacture of wool to be regulated, so that work would be found for
those without occupation whom want had driven to thieving or who, being lazy vagabonds,
would eventually become thieves.

It is mentioned that in a society the punishments you apply should not be increased
because they are not always useful. Preventive measures must be taken to reduce the number
of crimes. For example, in the book it is mentioned that if it is tolerated for people to be
poorly educated and for their morals to be corrupted from childhood, and then to be punished
for the respective crimes to which their first education directed them, we can talk here about
the fact that robbers are born in order to be punished later, which is a totally wrong and
inappropriate ethical principle.

I can say that this regime presented a low strategic risk, because, thanks to the
measures taken, people led a good, prosperous life. Just like during the communist regime,
they wanted to eliminate social and economic inequalities, advocating for a classless society.
Ghetu Vlad-Mihail
MMIB, 966
It sought to distribute resources and wealth equitably among all members of society, ensuring
that everyone has access to basic necessities and opportunities. The focus on equality and
social justice is seen as a significant advantage as it aims to address systemic inequalities and
promote a fairer society.

For example, as 40 years ago, there were security collaborators who knew everything
that was happening in society, and whoever wanted to rebel was deported. On the other hand,
the cities were divided equally in terms of the number of inhabitants, for example if there
were more than 16 people in a family, the rest were taken to another family or to a
neighboring island. Everything was planned by the regime so well that, as I said above, the
risk of this regime not working anymore was small, but still there was. Private ownership of
the means of production was abolished, and the state or community owned and controlled
resources and industries. This approach seeks to eliminate the exploitation of workers by
capitalist owners, ensuring that the benefits of production are shared more equally among the
population. By removing the profit motive, Utopia society seeks to prioritize the welfare and
needs of individuals over the accumulation of wealth by a few.

Basically, what the regime wanted was to prevent the emergence or development of a
risk that would destroy the regime and the entire society. The idea of Utopia is a highly
centralized society ruled by a single person. Although this concentration of authority may
improve efficiency and decision-making, it also runs the danger of authoritarianism and
opens the door for power abuse. Lack of mechanisms for balance may result in insufficient
accountability and few chances for citizen involvement in government.

The possibility of progress that cannot be hastened because of a lack of incentives

also it represents a risk for this utopian government. For instance, all residents must work,
and there are no personal incentives or financial rewards. Although certain basic necessities
may be met, the person's lack of drive results in lower productivity and initiative. In addition,
a community with stringent economic rules and little chances for commerce is labeled as
Utopia. This may encourage a fair allocation of resources, but it may also limit economic
development and adaptation. When there is little economic variety and competition, there is a
risk of innovation being stifled, markets being inefficient, and consumer choice being
decreased.

In conclusion, this book was written as a work of satire and social commentary, not as
a presentation of a perfect society. Each regime has its risks, there will always be risks, but
Ghetu Vlad-Mihail
MMIB, 966
they will be different from society to society. We must take them into account, analyze them
even more, take initiatives regarding the implementation of solutions to decrease the
probability of occurrence or increase of some risks.