Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Artificial Selection & Domestication
Artificial Selection & Domestication
Artificial Selection & Domestication
People decide who breeds and who doesn´t try to influence specific “traits” that they
want to change in future generations
Today´s dogs are descended from wolves. Now it´s your turn to start with wolves and breed
them until you have chihuahuas. How would you do this? What traits will you select for
breeding? What changes would you expect?
Less fearful
Less aggressive
Smaller
Changes in coat colour
Changes in body shape
Respond to commands
bark
Pleiotropy
Occurs when one gene influence two or more seemingly
unrelated phenotypic traits. Therefore, mutation in a pleiotropic
gene may have an effect on several traits simultaneously due to
the gene coding for a product used by many different cells
Why would these wildly different traits be linked? the clue
is that they aren´t really radical changes in the phenotype of the
dog, but rather most these represent the “puppy” stage of development
So by selecting for “tameness” a few genes that regulate development from being a
playful puppy to a wary adult can affect a whole bunch of things that also change as the
animal matures from youth to adulthood
Artificial selection often focuses on extreme traits for production or just for show
Artificial selection can focus on simply finding differences and magnifying them
But how do you magnify these effect from one generation to the next?
Problems with inbreeding: smaller gene pool available for future selection
Many alleles provide larger phenotypic
variation to select amongst for natural
selection or artificial selection
Thus, species can adapt quicker to
environmental change, or breeders can create
new breeds or exaggerate traits more easily
Fewer alleles provide little phenotypic variation to select amongst for natural selection or
artificial selection
Thus, species will adapt slower to environmental change, or breeders can´t improve or
change traits in their breeds
Parapatric speciation
Poor movement of individuals within a population created poor gene flow, leading to
divergence across the population range and eventually different species
Sympatric speciation
Is the evolution of a new species from a surviving ancestral species while both continue to
inhabit the same geographic region
So, we can think about the domestication of animals as a form of sympatric “speciation”
There is a focal point in the population where selection will be pushed in a different direction
Stage 3: Humans start managing their animals and isolating them from
wild populations
The next stage is that people start managing their animals, by controlling predation of
their livestock, by continuing selective culling of young males and increasingly using
females as the basis of their herds, and by restricting their chances of breeding with their
“wild” cousins, and providing supplementary food
Gene flow between captive and wild
animals is reduced, accelerating their
adaptation to local “captive” conditions by
natural selection
Thus, animals become much easier to
handle than their wild siblings
Sexual selection is further reduced as
females have little choice in sexual partners. Thus, difference between males and females
is reduces
By controlling predation and providing food the stabilizing effect of natural selection on
extreme forms is partly relaxed
Thus, we start to see new color forms (e.g., white or spotted)
Landraces
A landrace is a domesticated, locally adapted, traditional
variety of animal that has developed over time, through
adaptation to its natural and cultural environment of
agriculture and pastoralism, and due to isolation from
other population of the species
Its morphologically distinctive and identifiable (i.e., has
particular and recognizable characteristics or properties)
Its genetically adapted to, and has a reputation for being
able to withstand, the conditions of the local
environment, including climate, disease, pests, and
cultural practices
It’s not the product of formal breeding programs, and may lack systematic selection,
development, and improvement by breeders
Its maintained and fostered less deliberately than a standardized breed, with its genetic
isolation principally a matter of geography acting upon whatever animals that happened
to be brought by humans to a given area
It has a historical origin in a specific geographic area, will usually have its own local
name(s), and will often be classified according to intended purpose
At the level of genetic testing, its heredity will show a degree of integrity, but still some
genetic diversity