Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Book Review "Abdullah Ansari"
Book Review "Abdullah Ansari"
Abdullah Ansari of Herat: An Early Sufi Master by A. G. Ravan Farhadi; The Concept of
Sainthood in Early Islamic Mysticism by B. Radtke; J. O'Kane
Review by: Oliver Leaman
British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, Vol. 24, No. 2 (Nov., 1997), pp. 301-302
Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd.
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/195801 .
Accessed: 08/05/2014 10:40
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Taylor & Francis, Ltd. and British Society for Middle Eastern Studies are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize,
preserve and extend access to British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies.
http://www.jstor.org
301
which he was joined by Ibn Taymiyya later in the fourteenth century CE. Farhadi is
surely mistaken in suggesting that the latter was critical of Sufism;like Ansari, he was
only critical of a particulartype of Sufism, the ecstatic version. After a brief but very
clear introductionto the life of Ansarl, Farhadipresents translationsof selections from
the major writings. Many of these will be unfamiliar,since they exist originally in Dari-
Persian, and do give something of the flavour of his writings. We should remember,of
course, that what we have as his writings are mainly the notes of his students, but there
is a remarkableconsistency none the less between the differentworks we can read here,
whether on theology or serving as Sufi training texts. It is certainlydifficultto reconcile
the hostility which he felt for ecstatic Sufism with his Munajat(Intimate Invocations),
which continue to be very popular with all kinds of Sufis.
Al-Hakim al-Tirmidhiwas a very different kind of mystic. A much earlier thinker,
born in the ninth century CE, he was enthusiasticallytaken up by Ibn al-'ArabT,but is
little mentioned in the intervening centuries. The authors argue plausibly that al-
TirmidhTis representativeof a type of theosophy which existed before the introduction
of the formal falsafah tradition within the Islamic world. On the contrary, his works
are full of references to the Gnostics and the Neoplatonists, Shi'i as well as Sunni
theories, mystical experience,cosmology and the whole range of Islamic theology. The
translations of his works, which constitute most of the text, are careful and clear, and
give something of the flavour of his thought. His autobiographyis interestingboth for
being the earliest such text in Arabic, and for its inclusion of dreams in appropriate
mystical style as a genuine source of knowledge. The authors are well-advisedto stress
his writings on the notion of being a friend of God, since this is perhapsthe only aspect
of al-Tirmidhi'sthought which has survived.The text has a disputationalstructure,and
one imagines that it was written during a protractedcontroversyconcerningthe precise
definition of what the criteria for a friend of God are. He explains here how turning
one's back on the world can lead to spiritual growth, to being confirmed in one's
spiritualrank by God leading to the appropriatedescriptionas the friend of God. There
are obviously many errors one can make on the way, since the text is replete with
warnings and accounts of how easy it is to go awry, which is also interesting, as it
shows that even at this comparatively early period there must have been a lot of
argumentsabout the precise nature of the friend of God.
The only reservationI have with the book is the title. Is the friend of God really a
saint? The notion of 'saint' is such a Christian one that its application to an Islamic
concept is always likely to be questionable, and it certainly is here. The friend of God
has a special relationshipwith God, he has reached a high spirituallevel and as a result
of this and what God will do for him he can acquire great understanding, and the
ability to interpretthe direction and nature of reality. Describing this person as holy is
roughlyacceptable,but making the furtherclaim that sainthood is involvedis misleading.
Fortunately,it is not a misunderstandingwhich in any way is allowed to intrude in the
clear account of al-Tirmidhi'sviews in the book.
302