Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1975 - New Materials Resistant To Wear and Corrosion To 1000 C
1975 - New Materials Resistant To Wear and Corrosion To 1000 C
1975 - New Materials Resistant To Wear and Corrosion To 1000 C
Summary
Introduction
*Paper presented at the 8th Plansee Seminar on Refractory and Wear Resistant
Materials, Reutte, Tyrol, 27 - 30 May, 1974.
**Registered trade name.
280
The wear mechanisms which apply to these systems are most convenient-
ly categorized as follows:
adhesive - the cold welding of high spots across the bearing interface,
followed by fracture and fragmentation which create wear debris and promote
abrasive wear. Friction is high and variable. The end result is gross cold
welding or galling.
abrasive --- either wear debris or particles from the environment lodge
between the surfaces and plow, score and remove metal so that surfaces
recede.
chemical - electrochemical or general attack on one or more surfaces
causes surface damage and/or recession. Commonly, solid-to-solid contact
will void passive layers which normally make a surface resistant to a chemical
environment.
These mechanisms may superpose and accelerate wear.
The conventional means of dealing with unlubricated wear systems is
L-.
cu.
make one side babbitt or bronze and design to allow recession,
use very hard metals or WC/Co and precision grind mating parts,
use carbon/graphite and/or solid lubricants.
All these methods suffer from being awkward, impractical or expensive. The
need, therefore, is for wear couples which:
do not cold weld across the interface,
have high shear strength (hardness) to resist plastic deformation,
have corrosion resistance which is intrinsic and not dependent on a
passive layer,
can accommodate local stresses by short range plastic deformation and/
or machining by micro-fragmentation,
are fabricable in a variety of shapes and sizes.
The alloys described in this paper have demonstrated an unusual capacity to
satisfy these characteristics.
LOAD
STRAIN GAGE
TEST PINS
Fig. 1. Rotary thrust tester. Normal load = 162 kg/cm2, maximum load = up to 630
kg/cm2, surface speed = 68.5 to 183 cm/s.
281
Some years ago a goal was set to devise metals systems which would
have low friction and resist wear in non-lubricating environments. A rotary
thrust tester, Fig. 1, was used to screen hundreds of metal pairs. Figure 2
shows the surface of nearly ideal performance: negligible wear recession
under high load and velocity conditions (PV = 1070 kg/cm2 X m/s) in an
ester. Similar performance was obtained in unleaded gasoline. The key
metallurgical factor was the identification of alloys containing a ternary
intermetallic compound known as a Laves phase in a eutectic matrix with a
solid solution having compatible properties and low coherency with many
mating materials, especially steel. These alloys have been registered in the
U.S. under the trademark Tribaloy.
Sliding direction
,
Fig. 2. Surface of PM (50% T-100 + 50% Cu) after rotary thrust wear test. P = 620 kg/cm2
65 h, PV = 1070 kg m/cm2 s., in ester. (X 50)
TABLE I
Tribaloy 100 55 -- 35 10 -
Tribaloy 400 62 - 28 2 8
Tribaloy 700 - 50 32 3 15
Tribatoy 800 52 - 28 3 17
Fig. 3. Microstructure of cast T-400; primary hexagonal Laves phase in eutectic with
softer solid solution. Marble’s etch. Oblique illumination. (X 750)
Carbon is kept low so that carbides will not form in preference to the
Laves phase. Structural cobalt base alloys without carbon have not previously
been commercial. All the alloys are hyper-eutectic. The eutectic temperature
283
is about 1230 “C and the Laves phase melts at about 1560 “C. Pertinent
hardnesses of cast alloys are:
Laves phase 1000 to 1300 HV
Solid solution 300 to 800 HV
Overall : T-400, T-800 54 to 60 HRC
T-700 42 to 48 HRC
At 1200 HV, the Laves phase is harder than the bulk hardness of the
hardest tool steel but is much softer than WC, Also,, TiC and other such
compounds commonly identified as wear resistant. Such materials tend to
wear away their mating surfaces unless surface finish is very fine and mating
geometry is very carefully prepared at high cost. In a matrix of the much
softer solid solution alloy, the structure of Tribaloy resists adhesive wear. At
the same time micro-machining processes can operate to accommodate high
stresses between mating parts. When the accommodation has been accom-
plished, further wear ceases and the two surfaces move with no tendency to
adhere. Figure 2 is an outstanding example of this. Note that the wear track
is actually smoother, more precisely defined than the test surface was prior
to the test.
The structure of Tribaloy is stable from cryogenic temperatures to just
below the eutectic temperature where some grain and phase growth does
occur. Consequently, the alloys are essentially not heat treatable. This
stability is useful for applications when temperature cycles over a wide range
as in refrigeration systems and aircraft. Another advantage is that Tribaloy
can be machined with ordinary tungsten carbide tools. Thread tapping is
difficult but all other machining methods produce excellent surfaces. Grinding
and lapping can be done with alumina or silicon carbide abrasives. Diamond
grinding is not necessary or recommended.
Properties
The mechanical and physical properties of T-400 are listed in Table II.
Essentially, the alloys have the density of copper or nickel, have high bearing
and fracture strengths but are nonductile. Impact energy is about the same as
WC + 10% to 15% Co. Toughness can be improved very significantly by
powder metallurgical processing as described later. Alloy T-100 is weakly
ferromagnetic and T-400 even less so. Alloys T-700 and T-800 are para-
magnetic.
A major difference among the several alloys of Tribaloy is their
corrosion resistance. Table III shows corrosion rates uersus those of some
common, commercial alloys which are designed for corrosion resistance and
are typically poor in wear resistance. Especially T-400, T-700 and T-800,
therefore, are described as alloys resistant to both corrosion and wear over
broad temperature and environmental ranges. This combination makes the
alloys unique in their properties.
284
TABLE II
Typical properties of Tribaloy 400
(for investment castings unless otherwise indicated)
Fabrication
Tribaloy 400 101 1365 0.3 0.2 N(1) 194 :& 218
Tribaloy 700 84 12 N N N 30 -
Tribaloy 800 9.0 39 N N N 1.5 1.6 34
Commercial
Compositions
Nickel Base Super
Alloys
Hastelloy C 1.0 22 0.3 N N 18 3.1 26
Hastelloy B 102 9860 0.5 0.6 N 10 0.9 2.0
Hastelloy N X000 970 - - - 17 - 22
Nickel Base Alloys
Inconel600 440 28 - 14 123 37 220
Monei 400 >lOOO >50:: 1.0 - 2.8 26 0.8 16
Stainless Steel
Type 316 X000 11 0.5 -_ 2.0 > 500 500 900
Type 304 X000 8.0 1.0 - 300 X000 1700 >5000
Cobalt Alloy
No. 6B 80 8.0 0.3 0.3 N 4100 28 240
Tungsten Carbide/
6% Cobalt - 133 - - - 82 31 160
---
Legend (1) N: Nil corrosion < 0.1 millyear. (2) - : Not tested. * Average of 3 to 5 24-hour periods. ** 5 to 7 days exposure. *** Boiling. :
286
Wear tests
LOAD
3/8”DIA PIN
a2
M 8
0.2 - ;;~fkd
D Q 35 kg
a 105 kg
A 210 kg
0.1 -
0 I I , I 1
0 5 IO I5 20 25 30
TIME, MINUTES
LOAD
ROTATING DRUM
Figure 7 summarizes the data. In the Tribaloy tests both the rider and
drum were castings of the same composition. Cobalt alloy 6 was also run
against itself. Other dissimilar metals, having generally good corrosion
resistance, were tested for comparison. Each tested component has its
surface rating indicated at the end of its “weight loss bar” in Fig. 7.
Clearly, cobalt base Tribaloy was outstanding in these tests. There were
no signs of corrosion on the test surfaces and weight loss was low or
moderate. The nickel base Tribaloy showed some corrosion and moderate
weight loss. Cobalt Alloy 6 had moderate weight loss but both surfaces had
signs of galling and corrosion. Cobalt Alloy 6 uersus 316 stainless steel and
uersus Hastelloy C gained weight because of galling. The hard chromium
plate on one drum was stripped off the wear surface during test.
316 6i’6 II)317w
, * ’ ’ ’ I
iOoM6O4OxlOP#6OmtallE.Ql4Oi6O
OF DRUM OF RICER
WEIGHT LOS, mg
Fig. ‘7. Corrosive wear tests with drum and rider apparatus. 1 h in 5% HCI, speed 2.0 m/s
under a load of 6.8 kg.
Applications
Parts and surfaces of Tribaloy are being used in test programs, proto-
types and commercial parts in Europe as well as in the United States. Some
examples will convey the breadth of these applications.
Gear pumps are costly, precision devices which are subject to high
stresses, wear and sometimes corrosion from the process fluid. Cast T-800
has lasted twice as long as its Hastelloy C predecessor in an application where
the nickel base alloy has adequate static corrosion resistance but inadequate
wear resistance. Conversely, no previous known wear resistant alloy had the
required corrosion resistance.
Tribaloy 480 (20% T-400 + 80% 316 stainless steel) has been specified
by a large automotive company for P/M processing of bushings for the
diverter valve in its 1975 automobiles. The motion is unlubricated and is
exposed to temperature in the range 600” to 1050 “C.
A manufacturer of torque converters for snowmobiles has specified
P/M parts of bronze + 15% T-400 in sleeve bearings which are unlub~cat~.
Service life has been 6 times that of the bronze without Tribaloy.
Half the production of a manufacturer’s plug valves for polymer
processing have been plasma spray coated with T-400. The valve operates
against a type 316 or 440 C stainless steel seat. Commercial experience for
over two years has been equivalent to using D-gun applied WC-Co which has
been used for the other half of this company’s production. This company is
now changing to 100% Tribaloy.
Computer tape heads have been plasma coated with a blend of 75%
T-100 + 25% T-400 and processed to a near-mirror finish, Head life has
doubled and tape life has been extended 3 to 5 times over that experienced
with competitive coatings.
A toe bearing submerged in a molten polymer blender was wearing
away on the sleeve side. The conventional Co- 0-W-C alloy hardfacing was
replaced by T-400. Life was increased 300% with concomitant benefits in
production and reduced maintenance.
289
Acknowledgements
References
1 E. I. Gladyshevskii and Yu. B. Kuz’ma, Zh. Strukt. Khim., 1 (1) (1960) 66.
2 E. I. Gladyshevskii, Porosh. Met., 4 (10) (1962) 46.
3 R. V. Skolozdra, E. I. Gladysherskii and Ya. P. Yarmolyuk, Izv. Akad. Nauk USSR
Metal., 5 (1966) 148.
4 D. H. Buckley and R. L. Johnson, Trans. ASLE, 9 (1966) 121.