Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Longevity of Unfertilized Gametes
Longevity of Unfertilized Gametes
Longevity of Unfertilized Gametes
INTRODUCTION
Observations which have been reported on the aging process of
unfertilized gametes and upon chemicalphenomena associatedwith
fertilization make it desirable that these processes be studied in several
widely separatedspecies.It isimportant to know whether the de
scribed phenomena are of wide or of limited occurrence.
The conclusionof Goldforb that the eggs of different individuals
of the same species are very diverse, and that failure to take this into
account may vitiate experimental studies upon these eggs is a matter
deservingconsideration, especially by thosewhose work involvesthe
use of eggsand developingembryos.
The suggestion made by F. R. Lillie that the gametes, both eggs
and spermatozoa, contain substances which are essential to fertiliza
tion deserves critical attention. It is assumed that these particular
chemicalsubstancesare graduallylostby the gametes to the water,
so that,ifa spermatozoondoes not promptly meet with an egg after
being shed, it loses its ability to fertilize an egg or to initiate the fer
tilization reaction. This theory accounts for the well-known phenom
enon that spermatozoa in dilute suspensions lose their power to fer
tilize more quickly than is the case with concentrated suspensions.
This phenomenon, however,may be accountedforon the theorythat
the more concentratedsuspensionscontain more of the longer-lived
spermatozoa and therefore appear to retain vitality longer than dilute
suspensions. Cohn (1918) explains it by saying that spermatozoa
are endowed with a limited amount of energy. When this is used up
theirmovements cease. In concentratedsuspensions, becauseof in
creased hydrogen ion concentration brought about by the production
of carbon dioxide,the activityof the spermatozoa is lessened,and
they livefora longertime.
Asidefrom thesemore fundamentalproblems,we have had inmind
to determinehow longeggs may retainvitality and be capableof fer
tilizationand normal development in casethey failto meet a sperma@
tozoOn. In a former paper the seniorauthor publishedresults of ex
perimentsupon the eggs and sperm of the lamellibranch, Cumingia
233
234 BENJAMIN H. GRAVE AND JOSEPH F. OLIPHANT
LONGEVITY OF EGGS
In each of our experiments the eggs of eight to ten females, spawned
during the same hour, were kept without fertilization in as many
Stender dishes. The water was changed frequently to provide aëra
tion and reduce infection. At regular intervals a few eggs from each
lot were examined microscopically and note was made of physical
changes which indicate deterioration or death by disintegration. At
the same intervals a few eggs of each lot were inseminated with fresh
sperm to ascertain the rate of deterioration as indicated by the per
centage that failed to fertilize and cleave. Numerous experiments
of this type were carried out, the results of which show that the poorest
lots of eggs disintegrate within six or eight hours, while the longest
lived eggs survive for thirty-two hours. The variation in longevity
‘¿â€œVitality
of the Gametes of Cumingia lellinoides,― Biol. Bull. 1928.
LONGEVITY OF UNFERTILIZED GAMETES 235
within a single lot of eggs is greater than in the cases of eggs of other
species studied to date. The average longevity of the unfertilized
eggs of this species appears to be between eighteen and twenty-four
hours. It was shown that the most vigorous lots of eggs that were
fertilized afterthey were from eighteento twenty-fQurhoursold,gave
rise to abundant normal trochophore larva@. The oldest eggs that gave
riseto normal larva@ were twenty-sixhoursold. Many eggseven from
thefirst dieincleavagestages, and thepercentagewhich failto become
normal larvaeincreaseswith age. Table I shows the variationob
served in the longevity of unfertilized eggs. It includes selected ex
amples to show the whole range of variation which has been found by
two yearsstudy of thisspecies.
The shortest-lived lots are given at the top of the table, and it is
shown that all of the eggs of females I and II died in eight or nine hours,
while a small percentage of the longest-lived eggs of females X and XII
were capable of fertilization afterthirty-twohours. The average
longevityappearsto be about eighteento twenty-fourhours.
The longevity of the eggs was tested also by the method of disinte
gration, a living egg being readily distinguished from one that is dead.
When an egg dies, the vitelline membrane remains intact, but the proto
plasmic contents either become compact and lobulated like a rasp
berry or a golf ball, or it disintegrates and the egg becomes swollen.
TABLE I
The comparative longeeity of the unfertilized eggs of various females of hydroides
hexagonis as indicated by the decreasing percentage of cleavage with age. A few eggs of
each lot were fertilized at intervals as shown in the several columns of the table.
TABLE I—Continued
TABLE II
TABLE III
Longevity of Spermatozoa of Hydroides, Aug. 16, 1929
BIBLIOGRAPHY
COHN, E. J., 1916. The Relation between the Hydrogen Ion Concentration of Sperm
Suspensions and their Fertilizing Power. Anal. Rec., 11: 530.
COHN, E. J., 1918. Studies in the Physiology of Spermatozoa. Biol. Bull., 34: 167.
GEMMILL, J. F., 1900. On the Vitality of the Ova and Spermatozoa of Certain
Animals. Jour. Anal. and Physiol., 34: (N.S., 14) 163.
GOLDFORB, A. J., 1917. Variability of Eggs and Sperm of Sea-Urchins. Pub. No.
251, Carneg. Inst. Washington, p. 71.
GOLDFORB, A. J., 1918. Effects of Aging upon Germ Cells and upon Early Develop
ment. Biol. Bull., 34: 372.
Gn@vn, B. H., 1925. Vitality of the Gametes of Cumingisstellinoides. Biol. Bull.,
54: 351.
GRAvE, B. H., 1928. The Longevity and Swimming Ability of Spermatozoa. Jour
Exper. Zoöl.,51: 383.
LILLIE, F. R., 1913. The Behavior of the Spermatozoa of Nereis and Arbacia with
Special Reference to Egg-Extractives. Jour. Exper. Zoöl.,14: 515.
LILLIE, F. R., 1915. Analysis of Variations in the Fertilizing Power of Sperm Sus
pensions of Arbacia. Biol. Bull., 28: 229.
LILLIE, F. R., 1915. Sperm Agglutination and Fertilization. Biol. Bull., 28: 18.
LILLIE F. R., 1923. The Problems of Fertilization. Chicago University Press.
NELSON, T., 1921. Report of the Biologist. N. J. Agr. Exper. Sta., Year ending
June 30, p. 297.
17