Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Spe 1860 Pa
Spe 1860 Pa
BLOWOUT
PREVENTION
r
Mathematical Model DRILL PIPE
A theoretical approach to the determination of annular r SIC
backpressure as a function of the volumetric behavior of PRESSURE
non-ideal gases may be mathematically modeled by a hy-
drostatic balance of the fluids existing in the wellbore at
any given time (Fig. 1).
Annular backpressure = reservoir pressure – annular
liquid hydrostatic -- annular gas head . . . . (1)
The summation of the initial static pressures within the
drill pipe due to a stabilized dilTerential surface pressure CASING POINT
and the originaI drilling mud hydrostatic pressure provides
an accurate determination of the reservoir pressure. The
annular liquid hydrostatic pressures is affected simultane- OR IGNAL
OPEN HOLE –
ously by the displacement mechanism and the volumetric + DRILLING
behavior of the gas during its ascent and egress from tiie
an~~!~~. The annu!~r gas head can he calculated frOrn
GAS —
initial conditions and remains constant for the interim it
is confined in the annulus. As the gas is produced the INFLUX
annular gas head varies according to the remaining gas . . . .
.’ .,.
/ . ,.. .
volume in the annulus. Following the complete clkplace-
ment of the gas from the annuius, the annuiar Oacicpres-
J“:,
,,.
. ..””’’
, . . .
”..
. . .
.’.. ”.. l
. . . . . .
sure varies linearly and is a function of the remaining
liquid densities within the wellbore. Fig. l-Gas kick at initial shut-in.
&
static for the annular liquid hydrostatic in Eq, 1 leads to mud by the containable fluid increases the annular liquid
the equivalent form: hydrostatic and tends to reduce the annular backpressure.
The terminal point of this stage occurs when the upper
‘A”‘PCS + Iv’:
L -A “][(%LIJ=
‘dp ‘--/ ‘umJ
(4) interface of the gas intersects the top of the wellbore. At
.L:.
U1lS
.--—: --1
LC1 IIlllltll
--:-.
pumL
.&-
LUG
,.- .-....--4
G1l U appcu
--.--..,.:-
1 CSG1 VU1l
-,.
gas
. . . .
Ilda
:..
10
A) (c) (D) As the gas is produced, the annular gas head is a func-
1000 s tion of the gas volume remaining in the annulus. The
Psl I
0-
e
655
0
659
0
3 2 -
0
PSI PSI
4 -
x
1-
L 6 -
1
:
n 8 -
u
n
J 10
~,21
0 100 171 900
VOLUME OF NEW MUD PUMP ED- BBLS.
START DI SP. DRILL NEW GAS WELL GAS DISP. WELL
OF DRILL PIPE MUC IN AT PRODUCING OUT ORIG. OPERATION
OPERATIOk PIPE DISPLACED ANNULUS SURFACE GAS MUD COMPLETE
Fig. 2A—Fluid position during a well control operation. Fig. 2B-Fluid position during a well control operation.
. . . . . . . . . . . . (11)
P..= 702 – (50) (y. ) . . (17)
The substitution of Eqs. 10 and 11 in Eq. 1 provides in-
TP. = 213.5 + (245) (y.) . . . . . . (18)
stantaneous annular backpressure solutions for this stage:
These equations represent linear relationships derived
Iv, - ~d,l [(~) _ (l!!l\ 1 + by a method of averages and are valid for the interval
PAB = ~,q
- ‘LH’- [ c. J [\dx)c.,, fdx)o..”] between 0.6 and 0.7 specific gravities.
The temperatures encountered during the gas expansion
[ *’4-::-W*)J 1
[“”0187’w$’:)(hG)
v,ma=<vc<va . . . . . . . . . (i2)
phase can be represented by pseudo-reduced temperatures
between 1.5 and 2.2. The individual plots of the correla-
tion curvesf for this interval reveaied an essentially iitiear
relationship between the gas deviation factor, pseudo-
The fluid positions during this stage are illustrated in sche-
reduced pressure and temperature for pseudo-reduced pres-
matic F of Fig. 2B.
sures greater than nine. A linear empirical equation
Stage 4 — Final Displacement expressing this relationship was derived by a method of
The complete displacement of the extraneous gas from averages. The derivation initially considered one variable
the wellbore initiates this final stage of the well control T,, temporarily constant and related z and p,, for each
cycle. According y, the annular liquid hydrostatic varies value of TP, by an equation of the type.
as a function of the transition in liquid densities resulting
from the displacement of the remaining original drilling
mud by the containable fluid. The relationship defining For each value of T., corresponding values of z and pp.
this incremental pressure transformation has been formu- were divided into two groups of three each and added. A
lated in Eq. 5. simultaneous solution of the summation equations yielded
The total liquid hydrostatic represents the summation values of m and b for each TP,. Beyond this point, the
of the initial liquid hydrostatic and the pressure increment procedure required that 171and h be expressed as functions
from Eq. 5: of T,,,
ALH= ALH,., + (Ap), . . . . . . . (13) ~=+(T9r) . . . . . . . . . .. (20)
The substitution of Eq. 13 in Eq. 1 yields the instan- b=h(Tp,) . . . . . . . . . . .(21)
taneous annular backpressure as a function of the volume
of the containable fluid circulated during this stage: The final equation becomes.
891
interpolations, succeeded by an interlinear interpolation, tively. The measured increase in the active pit volume indi-
provided suitable values of the gas deviation factor. A cated that approximately 21 bbl of the extraneous gas had
higher accuracy in the interpolated solutions could be ob- entered the annulus prior to initial shut-in. A 3 Y2 -in. OD
tained by other finite dfierence methods if approximating drill string in an average hole size of 7% in. formed the
curves for this interval of the graph were derived. hole geometry. Two hours elapsed between initial shut-in
and the start of the well control operation. A computer
Discussion solution for these data was compared with the actual sur-
face casing pressures recorded during the well control op-
Computation and Verification of Model eration.
Awell control operation’ typically encountered in South
Fig. 4 illustrates considerable disagreement between the
Louisiana was selected for this study. A hand-calculated
model annular backpressure profile and the surface casing
solution to annular backpressure introduced by Records
pressure profile recorded for the well control operation.
et al? provided a reference for the justification of the
The disagreement may be attributed largely to the ascent
iterative computer t~hnique presented in this work. The
of the gas bubble in the annulus during the 2-hour shut-in
mathematical model developad in the previous section
period prior to the start of the well control operation, and
formulated the basis for a source deck programmed in the circulating friction loss in the annulus. This is indicated
Kingston FORTRAN II and analyzed by a 40-K IBM 1620
by the maximum surface casing backpressure occurring
digital computer. approximately 90 bbl earlier than the maximum annular
A comparison of the model output with the hand-calcu- backpressure predicted by the model. The maximum back-
lated solution is shown in Fig. 3. An excellent agreement pressure in both cases correspond to the arrival of the
between the two profiles occurs in stages 1, 3 and 4 where gas at the surface and are 1,450 and 1,710 psi, respec-
the two curves are virtuaiiy superimposed. Tiie smaii cievi-
ation between the two profiles in stage 2 is probably due
to the differences in the initial temperature gradients used
and the interpolated z values computed by the model. The casing pressure of 1,000 psi was applied at the surface
hand-calculated method utilized a static mud temperature during the total displacement of the drill pipe by the con-
gradient of 1F/ft for calculating an initial gas tempera- tainable fluid. Shut-in pressures taken at total displacement
ture. Successive gas temperature calculations were based of the drill pipe indicated a 200 psi differential between
on a circulating mud temperature gradient of 0.00625 F/ft,
plus a surface temnw~.ture of 120F. All gas temperature Considering these results, it may be that the applied
calculations by the model were based on a circulating mud casing pressure during the total displacement of the drill
temperature gradient equal to the hand-calculated one. A pipe could have been too low, permitting a limited infil-
maximum departure between the two profiiea occurred for tration of additional gas into the annulus. Since the gas
:-*-.--1..*-A
m LG1 puId LGU .Z V~i”U6 lj@ bWWW~fi j3Seii&i-iMkiCed piZS-
was at a point up in the annuh.is at the start of the well
sures of three and four where a maximum curvature of control operation, it underwent a more rapid expansion
the correlation curves occurs. Since the maximum pressure during this stage and subsequently would have required
difference for this interval was 32 psi, or a 1.79 percent de- greater surface casing pressures to balance formation pres-
viation between the profiles, the model provides a vafid sure. The additional 88 bbl in excess of the total hole
prediction of annular backpressure for all stages of a well volume required to complete the well control operation
control operation. also supports this possibility, since it is about equal to the
n;.x~ n.... nlsumy
r lCIUWs U2...--. dri!i nine
~.~-
riicnla nf S!7 ~~!. ~~~
-----------------
cement
-. --
~~ffi-~l~!~~ ~~ rn-~~~-
To illustrate the effect ot field variables on annular taining the correct surface casing pressure in this type of
backpressure profiles, an actual case history of a gas kick situation is realized since a constant drill pipe pressure
was investigated. The well control data recorded at the cannot be maintained due to the displacement of the
wellsite revealed that a 15.32 lb/gal formation gas kick original drilling mud in the drill pipe by the containable
occurred at 10,800 ft while drilling below 7s%-in. casing fluid; and an increase in pit volume must be anticipated
.w#uh,~ ~~.~ Il.
lU/
/.-.-1
Sal
-..,.!
lllUU .
7%-
1 llG
:-:+:..1
Illltlal
.L...
S1lUL-lll
:- --- . ...--”
JJl mSU1 CS
--
U1l
due tQ !h~ ~~nansinn
r-.------ of ~he g~~.
the drill pipe and casing were 350 and 1,000 psi, respec- This field case demonstrates that careful judgment on
IF1ELDRE7
x x
‘1
-20 A 1 AS
m
n.
,!,
32
I — MODEL
m
m
u
ti9
L
F=n
!;L VOLUME
FI~
200
OF
3-Comparison
CONTAINABLE
400
600
CIRCULATE
800
D-BBL
100IJ
L---_hd
o
VOLUME
Fig. 4-Comparison
100
OF CONTAINABLE
200
casing
x
-t _ 15
CURVE A - ANN/DP = 4.5
CURVE B - ANN/OP ❑ 9.0
y 10
z
u-l CURVE B = ANN/OP = 9.0
a
> I 2
>
St—e———d
o
VOLUME OF
400
CONTAINABLE
800
MUD
1200
CIRCULATED-BBL
1600
?s~
J
Fig. 9-Eflect of s;ecific gravity on equivalent fluid Fig. 11—Eflect of hole geometry on equivalent fluid
density profiles. density profiles.
earlier work by W. A. Rehm indicated the maximum Figs. 8 and 9 show that the annular backpressure and
annular backpressure is directly proportional to the square equivalent fluid densities for a 0.6 specific gravity gas are
ran+
, ““.
r.f
“,
A-
U,U
“..
p,”v,”cw
~as “.,,.s,
:“s.. ”
pl, a,,, c.c, a a,=
I,,,,”*,
.
,,=,”
. . . . ..M.4 Atr. m. ,.. ..--+-.. ..- I.-1A -..= ....= ~. —.-.
cliuhtlv urt=atc=.r (),7 ~--
~h~~mavitv
.-., gas, whfle the
~~Qs~ f~~ ~
constant. Thus, the maximum annular backpressure for a gas remains within the annuhts. Fig. 9 indicates that a
40 bbl gas influx would be twice that of a 10 bbl gas kick. fracture gradient of 0.7 psi/ft at the critical depth would
r+ .r.fil.l~
IL a,,”u, u r.-“G ..,.+a~
,I” LGLJA..+
u,a L d.:. -.-+:- il..
tills, saaG’,L’a,,y, :. ...Lm+m,.
,> W,,at , LE. ,c “,
-~ not h~v~ ~~~~~in~d either Qf fhese fwn gas kicks. A frac-
the subject paper indicates. ture gradient of 0.8 psi/ft at critical depth would have
Fig. 6 reveals an interesting relationship between the tolerated either gas kick if precision backpressure control
equivalent fluid densities resulting at critical depth and had been observed.
volume of containable fluid circulated as a function of ~ff~gf Qf Ho!~ Genmetrv
--- —-- .
gas influx volumes. The shape of the profiles is changed Figs. 10 and 11 illustrate the adverse effect of small
significantly as a different fluid traverses this critical point. hole geometries on annular backpressure and equivalent
The interval between points 1 and 3 for each influx curve fluid density profiles. A reduction in hole geometry com-
represents the traversal of the original drilling mud in the presses the profiles and creates higher annular backpres-
annul us across the critical depth and into the casing. The sure and equivalent fluid densities. This is due to the
shape of this segment of the equivalent fluid density pro- longer annular space occupied by the gas in smaller hole
file is similar to the corresponding interval on the annular geometries.
L,.,.b.. -... ”..-a
ud&qJ1cmulc U1ll C, allu
-.-al-
lcpl
pl
.-A
CSC1l L> d ualllpcllrxr cxpulltm-
----------- - J. —----A ---------
‘1 I
:12 CURVE A - 12.88#/GAL “MUD
1 x
CURVE B - 12.38+i/GAL MUD
-15
m CURVE C - 11.58#/GAL MUD
‘lo -
m —-.
L “\
1
~8 ---- +.
2
m
:6
n. F A -,
U
:4
CURVE A - MUD NOT GAS-CUT
m
CURVE B - 0.3 #/GAL GAS-CUT MUD
w CURVE C - 0.5 #/GAL GAS-CUT MUD
52
3 I H
2 -o
z 400 800 1200 1600
ao VOLUME OF NEW MUD CIRCULATED-BBL
o 400 800 1200 16OO
VOLUME OF CONTAINABLE MUD CIRCULATED-BBL
Flg.14-Eflect of circiilating mud densities onannulur
:Fig.12-Efiect of gas-cut annuli cm annular backpressur epro,files.
backpressure profiles.
(1) - 11.58#/GAL
(2) - 12.oo#/GAL
\Yy, (3) - 12.38#/GAL
i
J
8A
400 800 1200 1600
VOLUME OF CONTAINABLE MUD CIRCULATED-BBL VOLUME OF NEW MUD CIRCULATED-BBL
Fig. 13-E,f)ect of gas-cut annuli on equivalent fluid Fig. 15-Eflect of circulating mud densities on equivalent
density profiles. fluid density profiles.
Nomenclature
ALH = annular liquid hydrostatic, psi
V = fluid volume, bbl
C = annular capacity between drill pipe and aver-
age hole size, bbl/ft
dp/dX = Liquid pressure gradient, psi/ft
p = pressure, psi
T = temperature at bottom of gas column, “R
z = non-ideal gas deviation factor, dimensionless
AGH- = annuiar gas head, psi
y, = gas specific gravity, dimensionless I
h = annular height, ft 0.8 ; 1600
400 800 1200
D = depth. ft VOLUME OF CONTAINABLE MUD CIRCULATEO-BBL
sib
-.=. 17_var~a~~on
-, jn ga$ deviation factor
during a well
control operation.
0
0 s -
0
.
: p=. :
0 60
0 400 800 1200 1600
VOLUME OF CONTAINABLE MUD CIRCULATED-BBL VOLUME OF CONTAINABLE MUD CIRCULATEO-BBL
~~g. ~~.~flnli!gr gas expansion curves for simulated well Fig. 18-Ga.s pressure and temperature profiles /or a well
control operations. control operation.