Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chap 2,3,4
Chap 2,3,4
TOPIC 2
GOVERNMENT
STRUCTURES AND
LEGAL FRAMEWORK
INTRODUCTION
2
)
Objectives of Financial Provisions
5
Average cost in
maintaining a X Mileage of state
mile of state road roads
State Reserve Fund
15
Total 250
)
Expenditure
18
)
Financial Procedures for Virements
35
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–3
Federal and State Level
Organizations
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–5
Local Government
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–6
Malaysian Government
Machinery
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–7
Malaysian Administration
Modernisation Planning Unit
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–8
Malaysian Administration
Modernisation Planning Unit
(cont.)
Facilitate modernization and transformation of the
government machinery for improved public service
delivery
Conduct research in public sector planning and
administration
Promote the improvements in public service delivery.
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–9
Public Service Department
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–10
Economic Planning Unit
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–11
Implementation Coordination
Unit
Performs periodic collection and analysis of financial
and physical data concerning development projects are
being implemented in the country
Identify the problems encountered in implementation
and the reasons for any gaps between planned and
actual performance
Provides advice, consultation and technical support for
the planning, implementation, monitoring and project
management to all government agencies.
Prepare reports on outcome evaluation of development
programmes.
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–12
Malaysian Financial
Machinery
Ministry of Finance
Bank Negara Malaysia
Khazanah Nasional
Royal Malaysian Customs and Excise
Department
Inland Revenue Board Malaysia
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–13
Ministry of Finance
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–14
Bank Negara Malaysia
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–16
Royal Malaysian Customs and
Excise Department
The main revenue collector for the government,
predominantly of indirect taxes
Provides trade facilitation through enforcement of and
compliance with applicable law (trade agreements)
Manages all policies and procedures matters related to
industries, import, export and border control
Protects the national borders and revenue by combating
all forms of smuggling and fraud
Headed by a Director General of Customs who is
appointed by the Prime Minister. The Director General
reports to the Minister of Finance.
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–17
Inland Revenue Board
Malaysia
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–18
Public Policy Formulation and
Implementation
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–19
Policy Instruments
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–20
Policy Instruments (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–21
Public Policy process
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–22
Laws and Regulations Governing
Government Revenues
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–23
Laws and Regulations Governing
Government Procurement and
Expenditure
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–24
Laws and Regulations
Governing Borrowings
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–25
Laws and Regulations
Governing Borrowings (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–26
Malaysia Incorporated
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–27
Modes of Procurement
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–28
Direct Purchase
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–30
Tender
Specifications
Tenders are meant for large and
complex projects Tender documents
Selection of
successful bidder
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–31
Learning Outcomes
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–32
Summary
Levels of • Federal
Government • State
• Malaysian Administration
Modernisation Planning Unit
Administrative Machinery
• Policy
Policy instruments
• Policy process
• Ministry of Finance
Financial • Bank Negara Malaysia
Machinery • Khazanah Nasional
• Revenue collection agencies
• Revenue Collection
Laws and
• Procurement and Expenditure
Regulations • Borrowing
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 2–33
TOPIC 3
BUDGETARY CONTROL
OUTLINE
\ 3
BUDGETARY CONTROL PROCESS
\ 4
BUDGETARY CONTROL PROCESS
\ 5
FEATURES BUDGETARY
CONTROL SYSTEM
1. The organisations are broken down into various
responsibility centres where each centre is to carry out
identified activities. A detailed plan is formulated into a
comprehensive budget
2. The objectives, output and outcomes of the organization
are used as the bases of measuring performance
3. A performance indicator is developed to monitor and
evaluate the performance and progress of each responsibility
centre of the organisation
4. A continuous performance evaluation is carried out to
determine the performance of the organization (output or
outcomes) in comparison with the budget
\
TYPES OF BUDGETARY CONTROL
• Fund Control
This type of control refers to the procedures set up to ensure that the
fund is properly kept and used in the right way.
• Revenue Control
This type of control refers to the procedures set up to ensure the
collection of revenues of the governments are from properly identified
sources, there are proper monitoring of such collections and the revenues
collected are accounted for properly in the correct funds and proper books
of accounts.
• Expenditure Control
This is the control procedure within the spending organisation to ensure
that all spending is done exactly for the purposes that has been agreed. This
is also known as Vote Control and is exercised by the accounting officer of
the organisation.
TYPES OF BUDGETARY
CONTROL
• Cost Control
This is the control procedure to ensure the total cost incurred for any
activity of an organisation is within the right valuation.
• Cash Control
This type of control ensures that spending plans for a period are made by a
department based on approved vouchers. Cash forecast need to be done to
avoid any overspending request that would lead to deficit.
• Payment/Disbursement Control
This procedure is to ensure that payment for any activities through
preparation of payment vouchers is properly authorised.
• Salary/Payroll Control
This control is to ensure that right amounts are paid to the right people in
the organisation and at the right time to avoid fraud and payment to non-
existing workers.
ADVANTAGES OF BUDGETING
AND BUDGETARY CONTROL
1. Requires and forces management to think about the future, to look ahead, to
set out detailed plans for achieving the targets for each department, and to
anticipate and give the organisation purpose and direction.
2. Promotes coordination and communication.
3. Clearly defines areas of responsibility where managers of budget centres are to
be made responsible for the achievement of budget targets for the operations
under their personal control.
4. Provides a basis for performance appraisal where actual performance is
measured and assessed. Control is provided by comparisons of actual results
against budget plan. Deviations from budget can then be investigated. The
reasons for the deviations can be divided into controllable and non-
controllable factors.
5. Enables remedial action to be taken as variances emerge.
6. Motivates employees by participating in the preparation of budgets.
7. Improves the allocation of scarce resources.
8. Economises management time by using the management by exception
principle.
THE CONCEPT OF
DECENTRALIZATION
• The concept of decentralization is the key concept related to the devolution of
higher authority to the lower management
• The concept of decentralization began in the late 1960s and 1970s in many western
countries such as England, United States and Australia. This reform took placed in
the government sectors which moved from the conventional style of bureaucracy.
• Decentralization was identified as a tool for more effective decision making while
delegating autonomy and responsibility to the lower management level specifically
for those who are accountable
10
THE CONCEPT OF
DECENTRALIZATION IN MALAYSIA
11
RESPONSIBILITY CENTRE
12
RESPONSIBILITY CENTRE
13
RESPONSIBILITY CENTRE
BUDGETING IN PUBLIC
SECTOR
1
Outline of the topic
Define budget
Importance of budget
Legal Requirement of preparing the budget
Functions of budget
Components of budget
Budget formulation process
2
Introduction
• Management accounting system provides information to
managers, assisting them in planning, organising, controlling
and co-ordinating activities within their authority
• Budgeting is the process of putting together the financial
demands of government institutions to be met through
various financial sources
• A budget is an authorised financial plan of the anticipated
revenues and expenditures of the government’s organisation
• Budget is a short term financial planning tools
3
Definition of Budget
“ Budget is a detailed plan that shows the financial consequences of an
organization operating activities for a specified future time period.
It acts as a financial model that summaries future operations and is
usually viewed as a core component of an organization’s planning
and control”
Langfield-Smith, Thorne and Hilton (2012)
4
Role &Importance of Budget
1. As an instrument for planning and management of financial
resources to ensure objectives are achieved as planned
6
Art 99 (1)
FC
Art 99 (2)
TI 29-51
& (3)
Framework
for Budget
Art 101
FC
7
Regulatory framework for preparation of budget
• Art 99 (1) FC
“In respect of every financial year, the YDPA shall cause to
be laid before the House of Representative a statements
of the estimated receipt & expenditure of the
Federation for a that year and shall laid before the
commencement of that year unless parliament decided
not to.”
• Art 99 (2) & (3)
“.. The estimates of expenditure shall show the total sums
required to meet the expenditure charged on the CF , and
the sums required to meet expenditure for other
purposes proposed to be met from the CF”
8
Regulatory framework for preparation of budget
Art 100 FC
• Expenditure to be met from the CF (except charged exp) to
be included in a bill known as Supply Bill. Supply Bill
aprroved by parliament known as Supply Act
Art 101 FC
• ‘Supplementary estimates’
Sec 15 FPA 1957
• Budget prepared must show division & subdivision of
expenditure proposed, amount expected to be received &
spent on the year & purpose of the expenditure
TI 29-51
• Budget preparation for Federal & States is the
responsibility of Secretary General reporting to Treasury or
State Financial Officer respectively.
9
Functions of Budget
• Expansion
Fiscal Policy
• Contraction
Instrument
• Neutral
• Planning
• Co-ordination
Management • Communication
Instrument • Control
• Evaluation
• Motivation
10
Functions of Budget – Fiscal Policy Instrument
Government spending policies that influence
macroeconomic conditions of the country
Involves taxation measures to provide revenue for
the government to spend on the development
programmes of the country.
Budget serves as an allocation, distribution and
stabilisation functions.
11
Functions of Budget – Fiscal Policy Instrument
3 possible position of fiscal policy
i. Expansion- increase in govt expenditure / a decrease in
taxes that causes the government’s budget deficit to
increase or its budget surplus to decrease
12
Functions of Budget – Management Instrument
• Budget plays a greater role in the planning, control
and evaluation of governmental operations
• Six component /purposes of Budget process cycle
i. Planning
ii. Co-ordination
iii. Communication
iv. Control
v. Evaluation
vi. Motivation
13
Planning
• To develop objectives and preparing various budgets to
achieve those objectives.
• Long term plan (systematic and formal)– strategic or
corporate planning
• Short term plan (accept present environment)–
budgeting
• Set forth the objectives of the organization and the
proposed way of accomplishing them.
• Achieved by expressing in monetary terms the inputs
needed to achieve the planned activities of the budget
period.
14
Planning (contd)
15
Coordination
• Serves as a useful tool through which the actions
of the different parts of an organization can be
brought and reconciled into a common plan.
• Compels managers to examine the relationship
between their department’s operation and those
of other departments to identify and resolve
conflicts
16
Communication
• Must be definite line of communication in an
organization -to be kept informed of plans,
constraints and policies to which the organistion
is expected to conform
• E.g. Top management communicate its
expectations to lower level management, so that
all parties understand the expectations and can
co-ordinate their activities to attain them
17
Control
• To ensure objectives set at planning stage will
be achieved and all divisions of the
organization are cooperating to achieve that
goal.
• Control Devices – Legislative control over
Executive & Executive control over
Government Agencies or departments.
• Budget prepared should shows clearly the
input and resources allocated to each
governmental organization's divisions to
permit them to undertake the tasks for which
they are responsible. 18
Control
• Exercised by comparing Budgeted results
with Actual results to ensure exp level not
• Accounting system exceeded budget level
must provide information that enables the
agencies or departments to keep their
expenditures within limitation imposed.
• Good system of budgetary control is to set
up accounts for the collecting data on
inputs and output at the lowest distinct
level of activity.
19
Evaluation
• Provides definite objectives for evaluating
performance at each level of responsibility.
• A financial report (compare the budgeted & actual
revenue & expenditure) – basis for evaluating
compliance to accounting standards.
• Any variances between budget and actual represent
a divergence from what was planned to happen.
• Reasons for variances need to be analysed & to be
corrected to ensure planned performance is
achieved.
• All levels of management should have a relevant,
accurate and timely report of actual and budgeted
position. 20
Motivation
21
Components of Budget
• Federal Revenues
National • State Revenues
Revenue • Local Government Revenues
• Operating Expenditure
National • Development Expenditure
Expenditure
22
Federal Revenues
Government Accounting Standard No.3 (PPK)
1. Tax revenue
-Duties & Tax imposed by law (direct & indirect tax
revenue)
2. Non-tax revenue
-Receipts from registration payments, licences &
permits, receipt from sales of good, rent, etc.
3. Other receipts
-Repayments from expenditure, inter departmental
credits, etc.
4. Revenue from Federal Territories
-Tax & non-tax revenue collected on behalf of the
government. E.g. receipts from licences & permits,
premium & quit rent, sales of assets.
23
State Revenues
Part III, 10th Schedule of FC
• Revenue from toddy shops
• Revenue from lands, mines and forests
• Revenue from licenses other than those connected with
mechanically propelled vehicles, electrical installations &
registration of businesses
• Entertainment duty
• Fees in courts other than federal courts
• Fees and receipts in respect of specific services rendered by
department of the State Governments.
• Receipts in respect of water supplies, including water rates
• Rents on State property
• Fines and Forfeiture in courts other than federal courts
• Zakat, Fitrah and Baitumal and similar Islamic religious
revenue
• Treasure trove 24
State Revenues (contd)
25
Local Government Revenues
Section 39, Part V, Local Government Act 1976;
i. All taxes, rates, rent, licence fees, dues &
other sums or charges payable to the local
authority
ii. All charges or profits arising from any trade,
service or undertaking carried on by the local
authority
iii. All interest in any monies invested by the
local authority and all income arising from or
out of the property of the local authority
iv. All Other revenue accruing to the local
authority from the Federal or State
Government, statutory body, other local
authority or other sources.
26
National Expenditure
1. Operating or Management Ependiture
i. Art 98 FC – Charged Expenditure
ii. Art 100 FC – Supply Expenditure
2. Development expenditure
i. Incurred for development purposes, amount
usually large.
ii. To finance, govt will borrow from internal or
external fin. Institutions.
iii. Allocated to Domestic Social Services such as
education and health,economic services such as
transport and public utilities, internal security
and defence
27
Budget Management Division (BMD)
28
Budget Management Division (BMD)
• BMD functions;
i. To determine that allocation of federal resources
is in line with the national objective and policy.
ii. To make sure that all Ministries / Depts /
Agencies spend allocation effectively and
efficiently according to the approved budget.
iii. To manage grants allocated to the State and
local authorities base on FC and decision of the
Cabinet and NFC
29
Public Service Department (PSD)
Control personnel in the public service mainly
concerned with the operating budget
Main objectives- to be high –performance public
service personnel agencies in developing personnel
workforce that provide quality services through
policy formulation and HR management
The function include planning, management and
development
30
Economic Planning Unit (EPU)
• Responsible for the preparation of development
plans for the nation.
• The objectives & Function
• Function on budget related activities: Concern on
the 5-years development plan
31
Budget Preparation Process
• Prior 2002, budget is prepared & approved on annual
basis.
• Beginning 2002, budget preparation & examination
process will be carried out once for every 2 years.
• Changes purely administrative – do not effect FC & FPA
1957.
• National budget will continue to be submitted to
parliament for consideration & approval annually.
• Treasury have to prepare allocation annually for
submission to parliament, the detail examination and
reviews of ministries’ proposal will be done once every 2
years.
32
Rationale for the changes in
budget examination & reviews
• Help to increase quality & efficiency of budget allocations –
allow consideration of both ‘short term fiscal policies’ and
‘medium-term objectives & policies’ such as the ‘5 years
Development Plan’ & ‘Outline Perspective Plan’
• Facilitates assessment on fiscal position of the govt which
lead to improvement in govt’s cash flow planning &
management.
• Allow govt’s borrowing programmes to be determined
accurately in advance to minimize under / over borrowing.
• Resources – manpower, time, money at the Treasury
Ministries, Govt’ agencies can be redirected to other
beneficial programmes & activities – such as to ensure
faster project implementation. 33
Agencies prepare and JANUARY
submit new year estimates Call circular for new year
estimates
MARCH
Receive submissions and BRO
makes individual study
APRIL
Preliminary Hearing
MAY-JULY
Budget Hearing
AUGUST-SEPTEMBER
Approval of new year estimates by the
Ministry of Finance and Cabinet
SEPTEMBER SEPTEMBER-DECEMBER
Budget document printed and Parliament debates and
submitted to Parliament approves new year budget
34
TYPES OF BUDGETING TECHNIQUES
TOPIC 3
2
Total Allocation =
Last years spending level +
Current year budget+
Increase in cost of material &
labour due to inflation +
Costs for new project or programme
4
Identifying
Objectives
Programme
Planning &
Structuring
Developing
Performance
Indicator
Performance
Evaluation
5
3 perspectives
Efficiency Effectiveness
OBB- Introduction
Objectives of OBB
• Provide structural mechanism to translate policy
and concept of National Transformation
Programme (NTP) to outcome and results.
• Empowering Controlling Officer to manage
resources under their control.
• Increase accountability at all levels through
strengthening of governance framework.
• Ensure government will achieve the concept of
value for money for budget expenditure
management.
9
National RM200
100% Literacy Eradication of 80% Reduction
Programmes million
Rate Poverty in crime
RM30 million RM120 million RM50 million
Operating Expenditure
Development Expenditure
Source: Ministry of Finance (www.treasury.gov.my)
15
Input Process
Output
Resources Operation
Direct
used by or work Outcome Impact
product &
program process The final
services
me/activit where Effect & outcomes
produced
ies to input is result from as the
from
generate uitilised to programme results of
activities
output & produce output program
under
achieve specific
program
outcome output
16
Reporting of Results
Benefits of OBB
• Set clear priorities at national, ministry and activity level
• Integration the De and OE will provide a holistic view of nationa
priorities
• Remove duplication and better manage
• Provides a framework for eliminating overlapping programmes
• Provides a basis for better integration of M& E systems
• Better focus on results especially on outcomes
• Allow online budget preparation and submission
• Provide availability of audit trail
• Enables to facilitate any ad hoc requests
• Allow analytical on budget utilisation and results
21
Challenges of OBB
• The level of acceptance and understanding still low
• Requires commitment from the top level management
of ministries and agencies
• Quality of information in the results framework need to
be improved
• The government need to review the existing structure of
programmes and activities to adapt to OBB
• The structure of OBB requires more work and more
commitment from the officer. Thus workload may be
more
TYPES OF BUDGETING
TECHNIQUES
TOPIC 3
2
Budgeting techniques applicable in Malaysia;
1. Traditional Budgeting System (TBS) – prior
1969
2. Programme & Performance Budgeting
System (PPBS) -1969-1989
3. Modified Budgeting System (MBS) -1990-
2012
4. Outcome Based Budgeting - 2013-present
3
Used prior to 1969
Also known as incremental budgeting or line item
budgeting
Based entirely on line item expenditure or objects
of expenditure.
Total Allocation =
Last years spending level +
Current year budget+
Increase in cost of material &
labour due to inflation +
Costs for new project or programme
4
Code ABC Department Amount (RM) Total (RM)
5
Assumptions used to calculate total
allocation;
All activities making up last years
spending were essential to achieve the
ongoing objectives
All activities must be continued during
the coming years & more urgent than
newly created programmes
All increases are due to material and
labour inflation
6
Allocation Based on TBS
NP
Inc, inf
past
Focuses on extrapolating past spending levels into the next year &
incrementing the level for inflation & new programmes or projects.
7
3 facet of budget allocation process;
8
Simple budgeting technique can be easily
understand by the users which will facilitate
users in preparing budget.
Information presented can easily be
incorporated into the accounting system.
Budgeted & actual revenues & expenditure
ensures detailed comparisons to be made
9
Data provided is useful primarily for the short term planning
only.
TBS tend to complies with legal requirement rather than
providing useful information for management decision
making.
In the budget preparation process, government agencies
tend to focus on object of expenditure rather than on overall
goals & programmes of the organization
Since budget is prepared in terms of objects of expenditure,
little information is known on the programmes & activities
carried out.
The performance of the budget is measured only from the
financial aspect that is on actual expenditure incurred
(based on actual exp incurred not on the outcomes of
programmes & activities undertaken.
10
Used by majority of developing countries
in the world.
The adoption was fostered by United
Nation (UN) – 1967 UN workshop in
Denmark
Introduced in Malaysia in 1969 under
Treasury Circular 5/1968.
Helps management make better
decisions on the allocation of resources
and achieve government objectives.
11
Increasing complexity of modern life
Increase on demands for government services
Shortage of funds to meet the demand & the
need to determine priorities
Design programmes & control budgets.
Programme budgeting refer to a planning-
oriented approach & communication -oriented
Component of Programme – functions,
objectives, activities & responsibility centers
Component of Performance – appropriateness,
adequacy, effectiveness & efficiency of the
programmes
12
Identifying Objectives
Programme Planning & Structuring
Developing Performance Indicator
Performance Evaluation
13
To set out clearly the purpose for an
organization existence
Provide framework for a better &
meaningful planning
Also allow consideration on various
alternatives to achieve objectives
Allow management to avoid duplication of
functions between department.
Efficient management shall identify and
formulate objectives in a clear, precise and
concise manner
14
Ministry of Education- to educate Malaysian
through a national education system to make
them knowledgeable, responsible and capable of
enjoying a comfortable standard of living
Ministry of Health – to raise the health status of
Malaysians by providing promotive, preventive,
curative and rehabilitative health services.
15
Programme is a set of activites that have a
common objectives
Programme planning involves selection of best
alternatives in terms of programmes for the
purpose of achieving identified objectives.
Programme structuring refers to hierarchical
listing of programmes, activities & sub activities
to achieve objectives.
Ministry of Education- Higher Education, Primary
Education, Secondary education
Medical Care services – general patient care
services, laboratory services, psychiatry services
and medical admin services.
Example : table 7.2 og 124
16
The purpose: To evaluate physical & financial
performance of the programmes
Involves the identification of suitable units of
measurement to measure output of each activity
& programme in qualitative or quantitative terms.
Allow comparisons to be made between actual
output with targeted output & to find causes for
variance between the two,
17
Example : Table 7.3 Annual target setting
18
Used to access the relevance ,results and impact
of programmes for each agency using
performance indicator which has been
developed.
Involves process of making comparison between
actual output with targeted output for the same
period & to identify cause for variance.
Results from comparison will provide information
whether programmes have been planned
realistically and properly managed.
The most important element for the purpose of
modifying & revising plans.
19
Comparison between the Planned and Actual
Output
100
80
60 Plan
40 Actual
20
0
Over Proper Conserve
20
Through performance evaluation the agency can
identify whether;
1. Objective are realistic and reasonable
2. Programmes have been selected properly and it’s
the best alternative to achieve objectives.
3. Programmes have been properly planned and
provided adequately with resources.
4. Programmes were effective to achieve
objectives.
21
Make the manager to think and plan in terms of
programme objectives and the most efficient and
economical way of achieving them. This will provide
information on effectiveness of management of
every ministry and department and will facilitate
and improve coordination between economic
planning and financial planning.
The systematic and continuing methods of
evaluating performance will furnish government
and officials with information for future planning
and making decision.
Programme planning and structuring will facilitate
the setting of budget priorities between competing
programmes.
22
Goals, objectives of government agencies not clear as
compared to private.
Difficult to develop indicator under PPBS which result in
efficient performance evaluation.
The budget preparation, examination and implementation
still focus on line-items or object of expenditure
Performance indicator is considered not important in the
management of resources
Approach of budget preparation is bottom-up
Delegation of power or authority to make decision is limited
23
Modification of PPBS - 1988 TC No. 11
Implemented in 1990 through issuance of
TC No.8
Is a management system that focuses on
the relationship between input, output &
impact
24
e.g. supply & svs, emoluments, Measures directly by referring to the
assets, grants, expenditures changes that can be traced directly to
the output of act/ program
3
perspectives
Efficiency Effectiveness
25
Ministry of Transport – objectives
“to deliver qty services towards customers”
26
Positive or negative changes on
targeted activities.
Achievement level of actual objective
(efficiency of the activity)
Changes to overcome the problem
(compare the situation before and after)
Advantage- enables us to understand
thoroughly the logic of such activities.
27
Phase 1 – 3 ministries (1990)
Phase 2 – 7 ministries/ dept (1992)
Phase 3 – 7 ministries /dept (1993)
Phase 4 -17 ministries / dept (1994)
Phase 5 -17 ministries / dept (1995)
28
Improve allocation of resources to
government program
Improve effectiveness & efficiency of
government program
Strengthen mechanisms for the
accountability of Controlling officers and
programme managers
29
Expenditure Target
Programme Agreement & Exception
Report
A Cycle of Programme Evaluation
A More Generalized Approach to
Expenditure Control
30
Identfying
Objectives Expenditure Target
Programme Programme
Planning & Agreement &
Structuring Exception Report
Developing A Cycle of
Performance Programme
Indicator Evaluation
31
Treasury’s estimate of base level of resources
required by government agencies to conduct
existing programmes in the same manner as
previous year
Allow usage of previous year ET as base for next
year’s ET
Amount is fixed by Treasury at the beginning of
Budgetary process
The amount cannot exceeded when agencies
proposed its expenditure.
Treasury can reviewed the ET if there are changes
in the government policy before the total
allocation for each agency is finalised
32
Preparation of estimates For Operating
Expenditure
Preparation for Estimates for
Development Expenditure
33
Formula: ET
ET(2010) = Existing Policy (2009) + (New Policy 2009 – Allocation
for Assets) – New policies 2008 not implemented
+ 2% increment for emolument-2% Efficiency Dividend
Pg 129
34
Proposal for new policies, one-0ff, Efficiency Dividend and
Programmne Agreement are submitted for two years.
For New Policy Controlling Officer should take into account a
few factors:
i) Proposal for new policies have been approved by Cabinet
or Central Agency
ii) The threshold value is deducted from the proposed
expenditure for the new policy or one-off
iii) Efficiency dividend has to be submitted in line with the cost
savings principle due to reduction in scope or abolishment of
Existing policy or changes in the process
35
According to TC no.2, Year 2009 since 2010 is the
last year for the 9th Malaysia Plan, the CO has to
ensure that all project is successfully implemented
and completed.
Government agencies are required to make
preliminary plan for project to be implemented in
the 10th Malaysia Plan
Criteria for financed by way of loan
i) Commercial like project and ‘future oriented
project’
ii) Agency is able to secure the loan
CO has to submit loan application to the Treasury
(Loan Management and Financial Policy Division)
36
Existing Policies – programmes already approved
by law or constitution; by Cabinet, Ministry or
Treasury or other equivalent parties.
New policies – new programmes / activities (e.g.
development of new units, development of new
posts, training of new activities and rental
increment for office space)
One-off is unavoidable & non annual expenses
(e.g. office renovation, moving to new office,
painting of building & general election)
Threshold – amount fixed by Treasury to determine
the allocation of New Policies & One-off
Expenditure
37
Efficiency Dividend – deducted for
expected efficiency improvements
associated with the learning effect and
with the implementation of improved
methods of programme delivery.
38
Allow immediate recognition of govt’s fiscal
policy position by government agencies
Eliminate poker game attributes
Increase financial discipline in ministries as they
have to decide priorities & trade off on
available programme & activities within budget
constraints
Greater integration of decision making on
policy & finance matters
Greater opportunity-Ministries can be
comfortable to use top-down approach in
preparing budget & to use budget as
management tool.
39
PA – contract between manager & subordinate
managers to certain authority has been
delegated.
PA at Federal Level – Accountability obtain by
Treasury from controlling officers to disclose
programme output & impact.
PA at Agency Level – Accountability obtain by top
management from lower level management who
are required to submit periodic & progress report
on exception basis.
40
ER- used to identify performance indicators
that do not agree with agreed target.
ER – must also include explanation on the
extent & reasons for inconsistent
performance & remedial actions
Upper Level Of Mgt
Authority Delegated Accountability through
through Programme Exception Report
Agreement
41
Improve accountability at all level of
management.
Emerging programme can be identify
earlier
Highlights areas on strength & weaknesses
Evaluation is made to allow preventable
measures to be taken
43
Performance Evaluation- tool for management
and decision making and provide the basis for
annual adjustments to ET.
‘Value for Money’- overall social economic
benefits of an activity are evaluated in relation
to the cost.
Under PPBS- all programmes evaluated once a
year
Under MBS – only selected programmes will be
evaluated in any one year to ensure in depth
evaluations – and later to be evaluated after 5
years unless urgent evaluation required.
Results will act as the basis for annual
adjustment of ET
44
Pre-evaluation stage – enable decision makers
to ensure an appropriate focus and approach
is adopted
Evaluation Study- involve searching files and
papers, conducting interviews, preparing
questionnaires, surveys, compiling and
analysing data and interpretation of findings
Evaluation Report- results of the evaluation are
communicated to decision makers and other
interested parties.
45
Based on 2 main elements:
1. Devolution of Authority – provision of greater
flexibility or authority to managers particularly line
management level in deciding on how to deploy
given amount of resources
2. Accountability to Match Authority – stricter control
on allocated resources whereby supplementary
allocations rarely provided. Breaches of
aggregate control are dealt with swiftly &
effectively.
46
‘Let Managers Manage’
The CO devolve as much authority as possible to
the lower level managers to control and manage
resources.
The nature & extent to which managers are to be
held accountable must match the authority
delegated to them.
47
Central Budget Level
Improve identification of priority budget expenditure in
budget submission
Shifting the focus of budget expenditure from’cutting
expenditure to identifying the best mix of resources.
Reduce paperwork in the preparation of budget
submission ands and the conduct of budget
examination
Allow more time to discuss new policy proposals and its
modification
To provide BMD with better information on programme
performance and enable it to more effectively hold
departments accountable for programme
performance 48
Departmental Headquarters Level
Increase the department’s opportunity to use strategic
planning as the basis for budget preparation
Enable more top-down approach to budgeting
Enable controlling officer to play a more active role in
budgeting and to use it as a management device
Improve communication of top management priorities to
lower level managers and staff
Allow finance divisions in HQ to become more involved in
matters of programme policy and programme evaluation
and less in matters of line item control
49
Line- management Level
To improve motivation among line managers through
increasing awareness and understanding of top
management priorities through programme agreement
Greater flexibility in the deployment of resources within the
aggregate constraints
To enable budget preparation at the line management level
to take place at the same time as the preparation of work
plans
Enable the financial plans regarding input, output and
impact to be used as management tools
To enable better integration of decision-making of financial
and programme policy
50
Lack of trained staff
Lack of top and lower level
management commitment
Argument for devolution
) 51
Outcome Based Budgeting-
Introduction
The planning for outcome begins with the National Plan where
the Economic Planning Unit developed the National Result
Framework (NRF) under the 10th Malaysia Plan.
NRF is based on five National Strategic Thrusts covering 24 Key
Result Area (KRA), 24 National Outcomes and 30 National
Programmes.
Outcome Based Budgeting (OBB) is a continuous process
under Outcome Based Approach (OBA) with the objectives to
achieve the results determined under NRF.
OBA is the planning framework used by the Economic
Planning Unit of the Prime Minister’s Department to plan the
outcome at national level.
Outcome Based Budgeting-
Introduction
The Ministry of Finance issued Treasury Circular No. 2 Year 2012
to introduce and give guidelines regarding the policy and
implementation of OBB.
Five selected ministries used OBB as test-bedded in year 2012
and will be rolled out across all ministries starting from the year
2013 onwards.
Many of the fundamental philosophies of MBS are used in
OBB.
It uses the strengths of MBS, with added value from other
international best practices adapted to Malaysian use.
The key enhancements of OBB from MBS are program
approach, focusing on outcomes, addressing issues of
horizontal and vertical integration at all levels of
implementation, improved monitoring and evaluation
framework, and better reporting formats.
Outcome Based Budgeting-
Introduction
OBB is a strategic management tool designed to improve
resource management and public sector accountability.
It is a tool to allocate resources effectively and efficiently in
order to achieve specific target.
It explains why the money is being spent by using statements
of missions, goals and objectives.
It differs from traditional approaches because it focuses on
what the money buys and the outcome of the purchase.
This is in line with government’s emphasis on outcomes rather
than output and will enable policymakers to determine what
activities are cost-effective in accomplishing their final
outcome.
Objectives of OBB
Provide structural mechanism to translate policy
and concept of National Transformation
Programme (NTP) to outcome and results.
Empowering Controlling Officer to manage
resources under their control.
Increase accountability at all levels through
strengthening of governance framework.
Ensure government will achieve the concept of
value for money for budget expenditure
management.
8 Principles of Designing OBB
Main committees:
National OBB Steering Committee (NOSC)
Central Performance Management Committee (CPMC)
Programme Rationalisation Committee (PRC)
Ministry OBB Implementation Committee (MOIC)
Subcommittees:
Programme Performance Management Committee (PPMC)
Activity Performance Management Committee (APMC)
Strategic Process of Implementing OBB
Strategic Process of Implementing
OBB
National RM200
100% Literacy Eradication of 80% Reduction
Programmes million
Rate Poverty in crime
RM30 million RM120 million RM50 million
Operating Expenditure
Development Expenditure
Source: Ministry of Finance (www.treasury.gov.my)
Input Process
Output
Resources Operation
Direct
used by or work Outcome Impact
product &
program process The final
services
me/activit where Effect & outcomes
produced
ies to input is result from as the
from
generate uitilised to programme results of
activities
output & produce output program
under
achieve specific
program
outcome output
62
Emphasis on the Method of
following issues; evaluation;
1. Appropriateness 1. Formative
2. Effectiveness 2. Summative
3. Efficiency
4. Economy
63
Quarterly and Annual Ministry’s Performance
Report
Quarterly and Annual Projected Cash Flow
MOIC Report
Quarterly and Annual Monitoring of OBB
Programme or Activities Report
Formative Assessment of OBB Programme or
Activities Report
Summative Assessment of OBB Programme or
Activities Report
) 64
Responsibility of Central Agencies under OBB
Economic Planning Unit
Prepare policy and strategy framework
Ministry of Finance
Coordinate, evaluate and approved Ministry’s budget proposal to be
presented in Parliament
66
Set clear priorities at national, ministry and activity level
Integration the De and OE will provide a holistic view of
nationa priorities
Remove duplication and better manage
Provides a framework for eliminating overlapping
programmes
Provides a basis for better integration of M& E systems
Better focus on results especially on outcomes
Allow online budget preparation and submission
Provide availability of audit trail
Enables to facilitate any ad hoc requests
Allow analytical on budget utilisation and results
67
The level of acceptance and understanding still
low
Requires commitment from the top level
management of ministries and agencies
Quality of information in the results framework need
to be improved
The government need to review the existing
structure of programmes and activities to adapt to
OBB
The structure of OBB requires more work and more
commitment from the officer. Thus workload may
be more
68
4 Budgetary Approaches
Learning Outcomes
1. Traditional Budgeting
2. Programme and Performance Budgeting
3. Modified Budgeting
4. Outcome-based budgeting
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–4
Traditional Budgeting
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–5
Traditional Budgeting (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–6
Traditional Budgeting (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–7
Traditional Budgeting (cont.)
RM million
Emoluments 23.64
Services and supplies 73.42
Assets 8.11
Fixed charges 0.98
Other expenses 1.37
Total administrative expenditure 107.52
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–8
Traditional Budgeting (cont.)
Incremental approach
Discussions and
approval Next year’s estimates
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–9
Traditional Budgeting (cont.)
Rationale
– Simple and easily incorporated in the accounting
system.
– Does not require extensive analysis on the
activities carried out, especially when most public
sector activities are either mandatory or very
required
– Reduces arguments during budget presentation
and approval
– Reflects rational economic policy.
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–10
Traditional Budgeting (cont.)
Shortcomings
– No consideration of whether a particular activity is
still compulsory in meeting the objectives
– Focuses on inputs (spending) instead of outputs
(achievement of objectives)
– There is no link between the allocation and the
objectives of the public sector
– Less information cost-effectiveness.
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–11
Traditional Budgeting (cont.)
Shortcomings
– Encourages departmentalism, budget padding
and unnecessary spending
– Fails to indicate the planned level of activity for
the services offered
– Limited to short-term planning
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–12
Programme and Performance
Budgeting
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–13
Programme and Performance
Budgeting (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–14
Programme and Performance
Budgeting (cont.)
Main components
– Programme budgeting
• Determination of objectives and programmes to
achieve the objectives
• Budget allocation is based on the programmes
– Performance budgeting
• Development of performance indicators as a way
for measuring performance and costs
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–15
Programme and Performance
Budgeting (cont.)
The implementation
– Identifying overall objectives
– Planning and structuring of programmes
– Analysing and selecting programmes
– Evaluating performance
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–16
Programme and Performance
Budgeting (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–17
Programme and Performance
Budgeting (cont.)
Implications
– Improvement of record keeping, classification and
coding scheme for revenue and expenditure, and
the introduction of vote book,
– Implementation of better financial management
system whereby cost controls were delegated to
the agencies
– Budget dialogues became more meaningful
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–18
Programme and Performance
Budgeting (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–19
Programme and Performance
Budgeting (cont.)
Shortcomings
– The local environment was not considered
leading to poor development of programmes
– The focus on line item and annual perspective
was retained
– Performance indicators were poorly developed
especially for measuring intangible benefits and
programmes with shared objectives
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–20
Programme and Performance
Budgeting (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–21
Modified Budgeting
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–22
Modified Budgeting (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–23
Modified Budgeting (cont.)
Elements:
– Expenditure target
– Programme agreement and exception report
– A cycle of programme evaluation
– A more generalise approach to expenditure
control.
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–24
Modified Budgeting (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–25
Modified Budgeting (cont.)
• A contract • Report on
• Delegation of performance
Programme
Agreement
authority deviations
• Accountability
Exception
• Agree on the input,
reporting
output and impact reporting
of programme • Contains:
• Indicate the • The variance
acceptable • Causes
performance • Remedial
variance actions
Lower level manager
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–26
Modified Budgeting (cont.)
Programme selection
Programme evaluation
– determines whether a programme
Evaluation planning
delivers the expected impact
– A form of monitoring
– provides feedback on the
Data collection
achievement of objectives,
efficiency, constraints, an Data analysis
usefulness
– one year in a cycle of five years Report preparation
and submission
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–27
Modified Budgeting (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–28
Modified Budgeting (cont.)
Implications
– Provides flexibility for managers to make
decisions within their authority and focus on
strategic planning
– Encourages accountability via clear delegation of
authority and feedback
– Clearly identify the customers
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–29
Modified Budgeting (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–30
Modified Budgeting (cont.)
Shortcomings
– Sole focus on the output in terms of quantity
rather than quality
– Budgeting become mere compliance
– Lack of structured monitoring framework
– Programme evaluation was carried out on an ad-
hoc basis
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–31
Outcome-based Budgeting
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–32
Outcome-based Budgeting
(cont.)
Characteristics:
– Programme-based approach
– Budget examination involving the Treasury, EPU
and PSD
– Programmes are linked to Malaysia Plan
– Adoption of medium-term perspective
– Delegation of authority
– Incentives linked results
– Systematic training
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–33
Outcome-based Budgeting
(cont.)
Main components:
– MyResults
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–34
Outcome-based Budgeting
(cont.)
National
Implementation National Plan
budget
– Outcome-based
– Monitoring, Ministry-level
programmes
Programmes’
evaluation and budget
reporting of
Ministry-level Activities’
results. activities budgets
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–35
Outcome-based Budgeting
(cont.)
Outcome-based planning
– A top-down approach
– All programmes and activities are integrated and
hierarchical in nature and could be traced to the
national strategies.
– Stakeholder needs, target performance, and
output are determined for each outcome
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–36
Outcome-based Budgeting
(cont.)
– Bottom-up
approach National Programmes’ budget
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–37
Outcome-based Budgeting
(cont.)
– Monitoring:
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–38
Outcome-based Budgeting
(cont.)
– Evaluation
• Complete programme evaluation within a five-year
period
• Identifies programmes that need to be reduced or
expanded
• Determines allocations that are to be retained,
reduced, increased or abolished
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–39
Outcome-based budgeting
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–40
Outcome-based Budgeting
(cont.)
Implications
– Strengthens the linkages between national
objectives and strategies, between short-term
plan and long-term plan
– Restructuring of programmes and activities
– Focus on programme performance and results
during budget examination
– Better budget examination and coordination
– Enhances performance
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–41
Outcome-based Budgeting
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–42
Summary
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 4–43
Learning Outcomes
GAM
CONSOLIDATED FUND
1
Introduction & Definition
2
Definition of Fund Accounting
3
4
REVENUE A/C TRUST A/C LOAN A/C
Supply
expenditure
5
Objectives Of Fund Accounting
6
Characteristics of Fund Accounting
7
Regulatory Framework Consolidated Fund
8
Consolidated Fund
9
Consolidated Fund
10
Consolidated Revenue Account
11
Consolidated Revenue Account
12
Consolidated Trust Account
13
Government Trust Fund
14
Development Fund
• Development Fund Act 1966 (Art406) with the key aim for the
economic development of the nation
• Consist of loans for development, contributions from Consolidated
Revenue Account & repayment of loan given out from this fund.
• Transfer from the Consolidated Loan Accounts represent the main
source of finance to the Development Fund
15
Housing Loan Fund
16
Miscellaneous Government Trust Funds
17
Pension Trust Fund
18
Pension Trust Fund
• Objectives:
• Assist government to finance pension liabilities
• Ensure proper management of funds to generate
optimum return
• Ensure Statutory bodies and Local Authority make
contributions for maximum collection level.
19
Public Trust Funds
20
Deposits
21
Consolidated Loan Account
22
Instruments for Internal Borrowing
23
Instruments for Internal Borrowing
24
Instruments for Internal Borrowing
25
Instruments for Internal Borrowing
26
Instruments for Internal Borrowing
4)Sukuk
• Arabic name for financial certificates. Equivalent to bonds
• Sukuk securities are structure to comply with the Islamic law
and its investment principles, which prohibit the charging
payment of interest.
• Government Funding Act 1983 with the aim to enable the
issuance of instruments that could serve as liquidity
management tools for the Islamic banks through issuance of
Shariah-compliance Government Investment Certificates
• Murabahah-certificates of intedebtness arising from a
deffered mark up sale transaction of an asset
27
Instruments for External Borrowing
29
Instruments for External Borrowing
1) Market Loans
• Loans obtained from International Financial Institutions,negotiated at
common market rates raised for general purposes.
• Duration – 14-20 years
• Comprise of Syndicated Loan, Bond Issues & Floating Rate Notes
• Governed by External Loan Act 1963(Act 403).
30
Market Loan
• Syndicated Loan
• A form of loan from a group of registered foreign
banks.
• The group comprises of 20-30 banks and one of the
banks will be the agent to secure the loan
• The interest paid is on floating rate basis of LIBOR,
YEN OR SWISS FRANC and the maturity period is 10
years
• Maturity period is approx.10 years
31
Market Loan
• Bond Issues
• Bond issue on ‘IOU’ method
• The issued price is determined by the common
market condition and the demand for those bonds
• The maturity period is between 5 to 15 years
• Obtained from the government in Tokyo, Frankfurt,
Amsterdam and Zurich
• Floating Rate Notes
• The interest is calculated based on floating rate in US
dollar
• The maturity period is between 10 to 30 years
32
Instruments for External Borrowing
2) Project Loans
• Borrowing in term of money, services & technical studies, which
are secured for development projects.
• Range from medium to long term loan.
• Examples; Penang Bridge & East West Highway
• Obtained from Multilateral & Bilateral government sources.
• Multilateral – World Bank, Asia Development Bank & Integrated
Development Bank
• Bilateral – Malaysia & Japan
33
Instruments for External Borrowing
34
34
35
TOPIC 4
CONSOLIDATED
FUND
1
DEFINITION: OBJECTIVES:
represents a system of • To determine the financial position and its
changes in the organisation
financial record keeping that • To know the results of operations of the
focuses on how an organisation
organisation uses its finances • To check its compliance with legal
restrictions.
CHARACTERISTICS:
• Independent Accounting CF
Entity REGULATORY
• Has its own set of FRAMEWORKS:
account with complete Art 97 (1) FC
with double entry & Art 97 (2) FC
financial statements Art 97 (3) FC
• Self –balancing and Sec 7 (a) –(c) of FPA
autonomous 1957
2
PRIVATE VS PUBLIC
3
REVENUE A/C TRUST A/C LOAN A/C
Supply
expenditure
4
CONSOLIDATED REVENUE
ACCOUNT
1. Sec 7 (a) FPA 1957 – all types of money or revenue received
except for loan & trusts are the sources to Consolidated
Revenue Account (except Islamic religious revenue).
2. Four types of revenue:
Tax revenue;
Non-tax revenue;
Other receipts; and
Revenue from Federal Territories
3. Used to pay for two types of operating expenditure:
Charged expenditure (Article 98, FC)
Supply expenditure (Articles 100 and 101, FC)
4. Any excess will be contributed to the Consolidated Trust
Account.
5
CONSOLIDATED TRUST ACCOUNT
6
GOVERNMENT TRUST FUND
7
DEVELOPMENT FUND
Development Fund Act 1966 (Art406) with the key aim for the
economic development of the nation
Consist of loans for development, contributions from
Consolidated Revenue Account & repayment of loan given out
from this fund.
Transfer from the Consolidated Loan Accounts represent the
main source of finance to the Development Fund
8
HOUSING LOAN FUND
Government Housing Loan Fund Scheme -Housing Loan Fund
Act 1971(Act42)
Provides housing loan facilities to members of Federal
Administration, members of Parliament, members of State
Administration and members of Legislative Assembly, Judges,
Government employees from Civil Service, Police Force and
Armed Force.
Receipts comprises of appropriation from Consolidated
Revenue Account & Development Fund, proceeds from loans
raised through transfer from Loan Account, housing loan
repayment & interest earned.
9
MISCELLANEOUS GOVERNMENT
TRUST FUNDS
Sec10 FPA 1957 (Act 61)– specific trust purposes in
line with Federal Constitution.
Source of the fund is from appropriations from the
government.
5 main categories- Clearance Account, Trading
Account, Loan Account, Contingency Fund and
Miscellanous Funds
Until 2012 176 accounts – including National Trust
Fund, Poor Student Fun, National Sport Fund
10
PENSION TRUST FUND
11
PENSION TRUST FUND
Objectives:
Assist government to finance pension liabilities
Ensure proper management of funds to generate
optimum return
Ensure Statutory bodies and Local Authority make
contributions for maximum collection level.
12
PUBLIC TRUST FUNDS
13
DEPOSITS
14
CONSOLIDATED LOAN ACCOUNT
15
INSTRUMENTS FOR INTERNAL
BORROWING
Law for domestic /internal loan
i. Act 188 Treasury Bills (Local) Act 1946
ii. Act 648 Loan (Local) Act 1957
iii. Act 637 Loan (Local) Act 1959
iv. Act 275 Government Funding Act 1983
v. Act A1242 Government Investment (Amendment) Act 2005
The current ceiling for borrowing is nor more than 55% of total
GDP
Aim is to finance the budget deficit and to meet the domestic
demand for debt securities
16
INSTRUMENTS FOR INTERNAL
BORROWING
1) Malaysian Government Securities (MGS)
17
INSTRUMENTS FOR INTERNAL BORROWING
18
INSTRUMENTS FOR INTERNAL
BORROWING
3) Government Investment Issues (GIIs)
Aims to meet the government papers based on Islamic principles as
well as to complement measures in controlling excess liquidity in the
financial system
Medium-term loan instruments
Maturity period 1-8 years
Main subscriber- Bank Islam & Islamic Financial Institutions offering
interest-free banking services in fulfilling their liquidity and investment
requirement
Governed by Act 275/83.
19
INSTRUMENTS FOR INTERNAL
BORROWING
4)Sukuk
Arabic name for financial certificates. Equivalent to bonds
Sukuk securities are structure to comply with the Islamic
law and its investment principles, which prohibit the
charging payment of interest.
Government Funding Act 1983 with the aim to enable the
issuance of instruments that could serve as liquidity
management tools for the Islamic banks through issuance
of Shariah-compliance Government Investment
Certificates
Murabahah-certificates of intedebtness arising from a
deffered mark up sale transaction of an asset
20
INSTRUMENTS FOR EXTERNAL
BORROWING
21
INSTRUMENTS FOR EXTERNAL
BORROWING
Law for external/foreign loans
i. Act 411 Loans (International Bank) Act 1958
ii. Act 403 External Loan Act 1963
iii. Act 405 Extended Credit Act 1966 (Amendment)
iv. Act 406 Development Fund Act 1966 (Amendment)
v. Act410 Loans (Asian Development Bank) Act 1968
vi. Act 187 Loans (Islamic Development Bank) Act 1977
vii. Act 484 Loans (International Fund for Agricultural
Development) Act 1992.
viii. Treasury Instruction No.308
22
INSTRUMENTS FOR EXTERNAL
BORROWING
1) Market Loans
Loans obtained from International Financial
Institutions,negotiated at common market rates raised for
general purposes.
Duration – 14-20 years
Comprise of Syndicated Loan, Bond Issues & Floating Rate
Notes
Governed by External Loan Act 1963(Act 403).
23
MARKET LOAN
Syndicated Loan
A form of loan from a group of registered foreign
banks.
The group comprises of 20-30 banks and one of the
banks will be the agent to secure the loan
The interest paid is on floating rate basis of LIBOR,
YEN OR SWISS FRANC and the maturity period is 10
years
Maturity period is approx.10 years
24
MARKET LOAN
Bond Issues
Bond issue on ‘IOU’ method
The issued price is determined by the common
market condition and the demand for those bonds
The maturity period is between 5 to 15 years
Obtained from the government in Tokyo, Frankfurt,
Amsterdam and Zurich
Floating Rate Notes
The interest is calculated based on floating rate in
US dollar
The maturity period is between 10 to 30 years
25
INSTRUMENTS FOR EXTERNAL
BORROWING
2) Project Loans
Borrowing in term of money, services & technical studies, which
are secured for development projects.
Range from medium to long term loan.
Examples; Penang Bridge & East West Highway
Obtained from Multilateral & Bilateral government sources.
Multilateral – World Bank, Asia Development Bank & Integrated
Development Bank
Bilateral – Malaysia & Japan
26
INSTRUMENTS FOR EXTERNAL
27 BORROWING
27
Accounting Standards
5 and Systems in the
Public Sector
Learning Outcomes
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–3
Introduction
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–4
Introduction (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–5
Fund Accounting System
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–6
Fund Accounting System
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–7
Fund Accounting System
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–8
Fund Accounting System
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–9
Fund Accounting System
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–10
Fund Accounting System
(cont.)
Revenue
Trust Account Loan Account
Account
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–11
Fund Accounting System
(cont.)
• Adjustment deposits -
temporary accounts that
are used before payments
or adjustments are made
to actual accounts
(Accountant General’s
Department, 2016).
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–13
Fund Accounting System
(cont.)
Consolidated Fund
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–14
Fund Accounting System
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–15
Fund Accounting System
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–16
Fund Accounting System
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 5–17
Fund Accounting System
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–3
Introduction
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–4
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–5
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–6
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–7
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
(cont.)
Case example
Let’s say, Ali just move in to the new house and he needs to pay
several deposit like meter or water deposit and electric deposit. Then
after 5 years, he move out from the house and rent other house.
So, in this case, Ali supposedly will get the deposit back after move out
from the house but maybe for the certain circumstances like TNB or
Department of Water Supply can’t contact or trace Ali, they will keep
the money first.
After one year, the institution will submit the report (Ali’s record and
amount of money) to the Accountant General’s Department and this is
referred to as UNCLAIMED MONEY.
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–8
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–10
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–11
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–12
Submission of Unclaimed
Moneys
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–13
Submission of Unclaimed
Moneys (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–14
Submission of Unclaimed
Moneys (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–15
Submission of Unclaimed
Moneys (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–16
Submission of Unclaimed
Moneys (cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–17
Submission of Unclaimed
Moneys (cont.)
Submission process of
unclaimed moneys for
2018 (Source:
Accountant General’s
Department of
Malaysia)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–18
Non-compliance with the
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–19
Non-compliance with the
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
(cont.)
The Registrar or any person authorized by him may also
seize any books, registers, records or documents in
order to furnish evidence of non-compliance of the
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965 by the company or firm
There are two important documents that need to be
produced to the company or firm by the authorized
officer to carry out the inspection:
(a) Authority warrant
(b) Secrecy declaration
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–20
Non-compliance with the
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
(cont.)
According to section 12(4) of the Act, a company or firm
and every officer of the company or firm may face a
penalty of a fine not exceeding RM5,000 or an
imprisonment for a term not exceeding three months or
both, if the company or firm or the officer:
(a) refuses to produce, avoid producing or prevent the
production of any such book (including minute
book), register, record or document when being
required by the Registrar or a person so
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–21
Non-compliance with the
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
(cont.)
(b) refuses or fail to correct any error found in any such
book (including minute book), register, record or
document when being required by the Registrar or a
person so authorized
(c) obstructs or hinders the Registrar or person
authorized while exercising any of the powers
referred to in section 12(1).
the Registrar may, with the consent in writing of the
public prosecutor, compound any offense committed by
a firm and every officer of the firm not exceeding 50% of
the amount of maximum fine for that offense by making
a written offer ‒ s 16(1), Unclaimed Moneys Act
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–22
Non-compliance with the
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
(cont.)
Section 16(2) of states that an offer under section 16(1)
may be made at any time after the offence has been
committed, and if the amount specified in the offer is not
paid within the time specified in the offer or within such
extended period as the Registrar may grant,
prosecution for the offence may be instituted at any
time.
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–23
Non-compliance with the
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
(cont.)
Suggestions to improve the ways unclaimed moneys
operate
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–24
Non-compliance with the
Unclaimed Moneys Act 1965
(cont.)
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–25
Learning Outcomes
Public Sector Accounting Governance and Accountability in the Malaysian Context All Rights Reserved
© Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. (008974-T), 2019 9–26