Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effect of Blade Thickness On The Hydraulic Performance of A Francis Hydro Turbine Model
Effect of Blade Thickness On The Hydraulic Performance of A Francis Hydro Turbine Model
Effect of Blade Thickness On The Hydraulic Performance of A Francis Hydro Turbine Model
Renewable Energy
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/renene
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Francis turbines are the most commonly used turbines for hydroelectric power generation. Preliminary
Received 18 June 2018 studies to verify turbine designs are often performed with small-scale models; however, when the
Received in revised form runner blade of a full-size turbine is geometrically scaled down to prepare a model for evaluating the
5 November 2018
design variables and performance characteristics, the blades become very thin and difficult to manu-
Accepted 15 November 2018
facture. Hence, the blockage effect of the runner blade should be considered to find a suitable blade
Available online 20 November 2018
thickness that satisfies the required hydraulic performance. Furthermore, a clear understanding of the
blockage ratio at the highest efficiency point and off-design condition is required to investigate different
Keywords:
Francis hydro turbine
blade thicknesses and performance characteristics. Here, the blockage effect of the runner blade on the
Blockage effect hydraulic performance and internal flow characteristics of a 300-class Francis hydro turbine was
Blade thickness investigated. Three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged NaviereStokes calculations were performed with a
Hydraulic performance shear stress transport turbulence model to analyze the internal flow characteristics near the runner blade
Internal flow characteristics and compare the blockage effect with various blade thicknesses on major performance parameters such
as the hydraulic efficiency. Flow analyses for the off-design conditions were also performed with various
blade thicknesses. The obtained results indicated that the power and efficiency gradually decreased with
increasing blockage ratio. The runner head loss increased due to the mismatches between the flow angle
and blade angle with changing the inlet velocity triangle components according to blockage ratio.
Especially the efficiency of approximate 3.4% decreased as the blockage ratio increased with 12.5%,
compared to the reference model. It was verified that the blockage effect significantly affects the design
of Francis turbine models.
© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.11.066
0960-1481/© 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
808 S.-J. Kim et al. / Renewable Energy 134 (2019) 807e817
gH
HnD ¼ (2)
n2 D2
Q
QnD ¼ (3)
nD3
nD
nED ¼ pffiffiffiffiffiffi (4)
gH
s1 In this study, the internal flow field of the Francis hydro turbine
Dt1 ¼ (6)
sinb1 model was analyzed in the steady state using the ANSYS CFX-17.1
commercial software [14]. The numerical grids for the blade and
In this study, a Francis hydro turbine model was numerically other parts were generated using the Turbo-Grid and ICEM-CFD
analyzed with various blockage ratios from 2.5% to 12.5%. The packages, respectively. ANSYS CFX-Pre, CFX-Solver, and CFX-Post
reference blockage ratio was 5%, and five cases were analyzed to were used to define the boundary conditions, solve governing
compare the overall performance and internal flow characteristics. equations, and post-process the results, respectively. The governing
equations used for the steady-state numerical analysis were dis-
cretized using the finite volume method. The working fluid of the
Table 1
Specification of the Francis hydro turbine. Francis hydro turbine model was water at 25 C. The area-averaged
total pressure and static pressure were set at the inlet and outlet of
Specifications Real size Model
the turbine, respectively. The same head condition and various
Specific speed, Ns (m, kW, min1) 310 310 blockage ratios were applied for the numerical analysis of the
Runner outlet diameter, D2 (m) 4.34 0.32
Francis hydro turbine model. Additionally, for numerical analysis of
Head coefficient, HnD () 3.16 3.16
Discharge coefficient, QED () 0.59 0.59 the off-design conditions, different guide vane openings were
Speed factor, nED () 0.56 0.56 applied to investigate the off-design conditions at constant head
Runner blade number (ea) 12 12 and various discharge conditions for various blockage ratios. When
Stay vane number (ea) 20 20 modeling fluid machinery, in order to decrease the computational
Guide vane number (ea) 20 20
time and improve convergence, numerical analysis usually applies
810 S.-J. Kim et al. / Renewable Energy 134 (2019) 807e817
P ¼ Tu (7)
P
h¼ (8)
rgHQ
Fig. 4. Normalized flow passage area in runner blade with various blockage ratios
along the meridional length from the leading edge (LE) to the trailing edge (TE).
Fig. 8. Performance curves with various blockage ratios of Francis hydro turbine model
at BEP condition.
Dptotal T u
Q
Hloss ¼ (9)
runner
rg
Fig. 10 shows the velocity vector distributions on the blade
surface at the mid-span of the runner blade under the BEP condi-
tion. The analyzed runner blades were located near the tongue of
the spiral casing, which demonstrated complex flows, as shown in
Fig. 10(a). As shown in Fig. 10(b) and (c), the flow passage area
between runner blades more decreased with a blockage ratio of
12.5% than the blockage ratio of 5%. Even though the same
boundary condition for both blockage ratios of 5% and 12.5% is
given for the analysis, the flow characteristics and flow angle are
changed totally because of different annulus flow passage area.
Thus, the detailed comparison for the flow characteristic analyses
Fig. 7. Performance curves of modeled (CFD) and experimental (EXP) results for a real- can be observed clearly with velocity triangle distributions as
scale Francis hydro turbine [18,19]. shown in Fig. 11. Vector triangles of the velocity are indicated near
the leading edge at the mid-span of runner for both blockage ratios
(5% and 12.5%) for investigating the internal flow characteristics at
5.2. Influence of the blockage effect at the BEP condition
the runner inlet. Here, U is the runner peripheral velocity, W is the
relative velocity, and Cm is the meridional velocity, which indicates
To investigate the blockage effect on the performance and in-
ternal flow characteristics of a Francis hydro turbine model, steady-
state 3D analyses were performed at the BEP condition. Fig. 8 shows
the numerical results (normalized P and h) for the Francis hydro
turbine model at the BEP condition with various blockage ratios;
the same effective head condition and guide vane opening was
used for all cases. The P and h values decreased as the blockage ratio
increased. In addition, the power at a blockage ratio of 2.5% (thin
blade) was slightly higher than of the reference model (blockage
ratio of 5%), while the efficiency was lower slightly. Although the
power was the highest at a blockage ratio of 2.5%, it can be seen that
the efficiency decreased due to the higher flowrate with the thinner
runner blade. For blockage ratios higher than the reference, the
power decreased with increasing blockage ratio due to a narrower
flow passage. Hence, both the output torque and input flowrate
decreased with increasing blockage ratio, where the output torque
was more sensitive to the blockage ratio.
Head loss calculations of the runner blade were performed at
the BEP condition for different blockage ratios (runner blade
thicknesses), as calculated using Eq. (9) [11]. The normalized head
losses are shown in Fig. 9. The loss distribution confirmed that the
runner head loss increased with increasing blockage ratio. Conse-
Fig. 9. Normalized head loss of the runner blades with various blockage ratios at the
quently the runner head loss had an adverse effect on the entire BEP condition.
812 S.-J. Kim et al. / Renewable Energy 134 (2019) 807e817
(a) Locations on the studied runner blade where vector distributions were analyzed (A, B, and C).
the flow rate at the runner inlet position. The reference model with The areas of the pressure distribution denote the pressure differ-
a blockage ratio of 5% showed that the angle of the relative velocity ence between the pressure and suction sides. As shown in Fig. 12,
component matched the blade angle in the velocity triangle well, as the streamwise direction along the abscissa represents the length
shown in Fig. 11(a). While the blockage ratio of 12.5% narrowed the from the leading edge (0) to the trailing edge (1) of the runner
flow passage area between blades, the Cm component decreased blade. Examining the normalized pressure distribution,
with decreasing flow rate. Thus, the relative velocity component Fig. 12(a)e(c) show that the pressure curves for a blade with a
depended on Cm. Consequently, the incidence angle between the blockage ratio of 5% showed a smooth curve between the pressure
flow angle and blade angle did not match, as shown in Fig. 11(b). and suction sides for the three observed spans. However, the
This flow phenomenon explains the considerable increase in the pressure curves for a blade with a blockage ratio of 12.5% showed
runner head loss with increasing blockage ratio, as shown in Fig. 9. that the areas between the pressure and suction sides were not
The values of the normalized pressure surrounding the blade clear, and irregular pressure distribution curves were observed for
pressure and suction sides along the streamwise direction were all three spans. In particular, comparing the pressure distribution at
compared quantitatively at the BEP condition, as shown in Fig. 12, at mid-span for blockage ratios of 5% and 12.5% (Fig. 12(b)), the suc-
the hub-, mid- and shroud-span of the runners with blockage ratios tion side was reversed to the pressure side at the near leading edge
of 5% and 12.5%. Position A was analyzed, as defined in Fig. 10(a). and the pressure distribution at the suction side with a blockage
ratio of 12.5% showed a pressure pulsation. This is because the
angle of the flow matched the blade angle at a blockage ratio of 5%,
as confirmed by the vector distribution at the mid-span. Smooth
flow along the pressure and suction surfaces was observed,
resulting in a clear pressure difference between the pressure and
suction sides of the blade. On the other hand, at a blockage ratio of
12.5%, the flow angle did not match the blade angle, and irregular
flow occurred at the near leading edge of the runner and the suc-
tion pressure surface, which affected the pressure distribution on
the suction side surface.
Fig. 13. Efficiency curves with various blockage ratios of (a) overall view and (b)
Expanded view for Francis hydro turbine models at off-design conditions.
6. Conclusions
References
[7] C. Sarraf, H. Nouri, F. Ravelet, F. Bakir, Experimental study of blade thickness Optimization, 2018, pp. 1e14.
effects on the overall and local performances of a controlled vortex designed [13] M. Teodor, Impeller design using CAD techniques and conformal mapping
axial-flow fan, 35(4) (2011) 684-693. method, in: D. Papantonis (Ed.), Centrifugal Pumps, InTech, 2012.
[8] Z. Chen, P.M. Singh, Y.D. Choi, The effect of runner blade loading on the [14] ANSYS CFX-17.1, ANSYS CFX-solver Theory Guide, ANSYS Inc, 2017.
performance and internal flow of a Francis hydro turbine model, J. Mech. Sci. [15] F.R. Menter, Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering
Technol. 30 (4) (2016) 1617e1623. application, AIAA J. 32 (8) (1994) 1598e1605.
[9] E. Kocak, S. Karaaslan, N. Yucel, F. Arundas, A numerical case study: Bovet [16] J.E. Bardina, P.G. Huang, T. Coakley, Turbulence modeling validation, in: Proc.
approach to design a Francis turbine runner, Energy Procedia 111 (2017) 28th Fluid Dynamics Conference, Snowmass Village, CO, 1997, p. 2121.
885e894. [17] M.W. Heo, J.H. Kim, T.W. Seo, K.Y. Kim, Aerodynamic and aeroacoustic opti-
[10] I. Kassanos, J. Anagnostopoulos, D. Papantonis, Numerical investigation of mization for design of a forward-curved blades centrifugal fan, Proc. Inst.
draft tube pressure pulsations in a Francis turbine with splitter blades, J. Phys. Mech. Eng. Part A: J Power Energy 230 (2) (2016) 154e174.
Conf. 813 (1) (2017) 012049. [18] S.J. Kim, Y.I. Kim, Y.S. Choi, K.Y. Lee, I.S. Ahn, J. Cho, J.H. Kim, Effect of a leakage
[11] Z. Chen, P.M. Singh, Y.D. Choi, Francis turbine blade design on the basis of port wall on hydraulic performance of spiral casing tongue in a Francis hydro
area and loss analysis, Energies 9 (3) (2016) 164. turbine, KSFM J. Fluid Mach. 21 (2018) 5-11 (in Korean).
[12] D.V. Chirkov, A.S. Ankudinova, A.E. Kryukov, S.G. Cherny, V.A. Skorospelov, [19] Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement. reportDevelop-
Multi-objective Shape Optimization of a Hydraulic Turbine Runner Using Ef- ment of Construction Technology for Medium Sized Hydropower Plant (1st
ficiency, Strength and Weight Criteria, Structural and Multidisciplinary Year Report) (2017), Report No. 17IFIP-B128598-01.