Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Leadership For Online English As A Second Language in Higher Education
Leadership For Online English As A Second Language in Higher Education
22022657
Introduction
Leadership is conceptualised variously and abundantly (Dugan 2017: p. 3,; Bush and
Middlewood 2013: no pagination). Determining a universal definition of leadership is
practically impossible due to its ever-evolving nature and subjectivity (Dugan 2017: p. 8;
Bush and Middlewood 2013: no pagination). Leadership’s role is of vital importance for
the success of an educational institution (Bush and Middlewood 2013). Bush (2013: no
pagination) is convinced by evidence that suggests ‘successful leaders are those that
focus on motivating and developing people’. I would argue that this reasoning
determines that the focus of educators and leaders should be synonymous for success.
Leadership in education
In traditional educational settings it is the principal who is responsible for the leadership
of the institution. In this case, the responsibility of motivating and developing people falls
on the shoulders of the principal. This includes teachers, staff and students. Leaders do
this by affecting social influence within the educational institution’s environment (Bush
and Middlewood 2013: no pagination). The norms and values they envision for the
institute will, ideally, be internalised. Though, they will vary depending on the many
environmental and social variables of each individual institute and the personal and
professional values of the individual or group in the leadership role (Bush and
Middlewood 2013). Internalisation of norms and values will develop the organisational
culture needed to enable change within the institute (Bush and Middlewood 2013). A
leader is able to influence the culture of an institute to create unanimity regarding goals,
norms and values. Thus generating the synergy needed to develop or strengthen a
team. If the teacher’s goals and values are aligned with the principal's then they are
more likely to feel “ownership” of the changes being made (Bush and Middlewood
2013).
Male (2013: no pagination) states that ‘one of the primary elements of pedagogical
leadership’ is providing ‘an effective learning environment for all students’. There are
many elements which can influence the learning environment and there is no-one-size-
fits-all approach. It is the responsibility of those in roles of leadership to determine the
most suitable approach based on the pertaining societal and organisational factors.
Although management is symbiotically associated with leadership and the two are
interdependent they are not selfsame or interchangeable. Management duties
encompass the “maintenance” activities that are essential for the effective functionality
of the school (Bush and Middlewood 2013).
Defining the school’s mission and articulating the goals is essential and each party must
be both aware of them and satisfied by them. This is one of the three dimensions of the
instructional leadership model proposed by Hallinger and Murphy (1985; 2010: p. 5) and
is considered the most fully tested (Southworth 2010: p. 77). Defining the mission is
best achieved, in this case, with ‘professional dialogue and discussion’ between the
leader and the relevant parties, otherwise described as ‘conferencing’ (Bush and
Middlewood 2013: no pagination; Southworth 2002: 80-81). Ensuring that the students
and teachers understand their personal goals is of paramount importance. They must
also support them and find them appropriate which denotes how instructional leadership
can be “transformational” in shaping the culture of the company (Hallinger 2010: p. 11).
The third dimension is also very relevant to the necessary approach for this context;
‘managing the instructional program’ (Hallinger 2010: pp. 6-7). This accounts for the
bulk of the day-to-day duties of leadership. However, the management of the
instructional program is of no more or less importance than the other two dimensions
(Bush and Middlewood 2013). Again, conferencing ensures the needs of the institute
and the students are being met. It’s also effective for teachers and students to
understand what is required and to provide feedback.
References
Phillip Hallinger, and Joseph Murphy. (1985). Assessing the instructional leadership
behavior of principals. Elementary School Journal, 86(2), 217–248. [Online] Available
at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249134255_Assessing_the_Instructional_Man
agement_Behavior_of_Principals
[Accessed: 25 May 2022]
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Philip-Hallinger/publication/
225931199_Developing_Instructional_Leadership/links/55c942ce08aebc967df90fb9/
Developing-Instructional-Leadership.pdf
Trevor Male, and Ioanna Palaiologou (2017) ‘Pedagogical leadership in action: two case
studies in English schools’ in International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20:6,
733-748, DOI: 10.1080/13603124.2016.1174310
[Accessed: 11 May 2022]
Tony Bush, and David Middlewood (2013) Leading and Managing People in Education.
Los Angeles, California: SAGE Publications Ltd (Educational Leadership for Justice
Series). [Online] Available at:
https://web.p.ebscohost.com/ehost/ebookviewer/ebook/bmxlYmtfXzIzNzc3OTRfX0FO0
?sid=64bfade2-97d6-473f-acc2-7c2c5f9e4a8d@redis&vid=0&format=EK&rid=1
[Accessed: 11 May 2022]