Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rockson Ohene Asante 2235026 - Epidemiology Assignment by Pratap Kumar Jena Sir
Rockson Ohene Asante 2235026 - Epidemiology Assignment by Pratap Kumar Jena Sir
2: Cohort study, in cohort study, the participants are selected based on the
exposure status, some of the participants may have the exposure and others do not
have the exposure at the time of initiation of the study, then both the exposed and
unexposed participants are followed over time to evaluate for the occurrence of
outcome of interest. The outcome may either develop or do not develop in the two
groups.
In analysis of cohort study, the parameters used are the two groups (exposed and
unexposed groups) and rates of outcome of interest (incidence rates) are measured
and compared in the two groups.
Smoking Smokers 30 10 40
status
Non smokers 20 40 60
Total 50 50 100
3) Descriptive studies are useful for estimating the burden of diseases in the
population, for example they can be used to estimate prevalence of cataract in a
particular city.
The indications of descriptive studies are;
I. To describe an event in relation to time, place and population.
II. To measure the burden of diseases in the population
The advantages of descriptive studies: they are simple to conduct and are
inexpensive. Also descriptive studies are helpful in generation of hypothesis. The
measures of association in descriptive studies like cross-sectional studies, include
prevalence odds ratio (POR) when prevalent cases are included, and the prevalence
ratio (PR). These measures of association can be calculated to compare the number
of events in two populations.
5. a) P-value can be defined as the probability that the observed result is due to
chance alone. The p value tells us whether what we have observed in the study is
statistically significant. The interpretation of p values is based on reference to a
particular level of significance which is conventionally set at 0.05. Hence p values
less than this number are significant while those above are not.
Confidence interval is the range of values within which we are reasonably confident
that the population parameter lies. Alternatively, we can say that we are 95%
confident that the true population value of what we are estimating in our study lies
within the interval. The most commonly reported interval is the 95% confidence
interval.
P-values and confidence intervals (CI) are used in almost all scientific writings for
interpreting results of statistical analysis.
6. Mean is the average of all values in a given sets of data, also it can be defined
as the total number of observation divided by number of observations.
For example, consider the given set of values {6, 7, 6, 9, and 8}
Mean = (6+7+6+9+8)/5 =7.2
Mode is the most frequent occurring value in the given set of data. For example,
the mode in the given numbers above is 6, because it is repeated two times. Median
is the middle number of a set of numbers arranged in numerical order, the median
in the above values is 7.
iii. Strength of association. Hill explained that, the larger an association between
exposure and outcome (disease), the more likely it is to be causal.
7. b) Sensitivity: is the ability of the test to correctly detect individuals who have
the disease, but specificity is the ability of the test to identify correctly those who
do not have the disease.
AUTUMN END SEMESTER EXAMNATION SOLUTIONS 2019.
1. a) The answer is D
b) The answer is A
c) The answer is A
d) The answer is B, because relative risk can be calculated in case-control
e) The answer is D, solution for this is given below,
Incidence in exposed (IE) = 5X
Incidence in unexposed (IU) =X
Therefore, from the formula, Attributable Risk Fraction (ARF)=IE-IU/IU*100%
= 5X-X/X*100% =80%
• Does exposure to tobacco smoke and precede the occurrence of lung cancer?
• Is there a strong association between smoking and subsequent occurrence of
lung cancer?
b) Criteria for causation
I. Strength of the association.
According to Hill, the stronger the association between a risk factor and
outcome, the more likely the relationship is to be causal.
II. Consistency of findings.
Hill’s emphasized that if there are same findings observed among different
populations, in different study designs and different times, then the exposure
is said to causal.
III. Coherence.
Does the relationship agree with the current knowledge of the natural
history/biology of the disease? If this is true, then the exposure is said to
causal.