(TERM PAPER)

SCORING RUBRICS AND TWO KINDS OF RUBRICS; ANALYTIC AND HOLISTIC

KIEH ARYLLE A. MINGOY

BSED-ENGLISH III

RONEL T. LABASTIDA
INSTRUCTOR
I. Introduction

A. Identify & Explain Your Topic

The topic of this term paper is scoring rubrics and the two main types: analytic rubrics
and holistic rubrics. Scoring rubrics are structured frameworks used in education to
assess student performance, providing clear criteria for evaluation. Analytic rubrics
involve breaking down the evaluation criteria into separate components, while holistic
rubrics assess the overall quality of student work as a unified whole.

B. State your reaction on the topic subject

As an educator, I find the topic of scoring rubrics intriguing and highly relevant to my
profession. Assessment plays a crucial role in evaluating student progress and
providing feedback for improvement. Exploring the different types of rubrics and their
impact on assessment practices has the potential to enhance my understanding of
effective evaluation strategies.

C. Agree/Disagree?
I agree that scoring rubrics are essential tools in education and contribute to the
effectiveness of assessment. Rubrics provide clarity and transparency by clearly
defining the expectations and criteria for evaluating student work. They enable
educators to provide constructive feedback and guide students towards improvement.

D. Did you change your mind?

No, my initial belief in the value of scoring rubrics has not changed. However, through
further research and exploration, I anticipate gaining a deeper understanding of the
nuances and applications of different rubric types.

E. Did the topic subject meet your expectation?

The topic subject has met my expectation by addressing the significance of scoring
rubrics and introducing the two main types: analytic and holistic rubrics. I look forward
to delving into the details and exploring their specific characteristics, advantages, and
limitations.

F. What did you learn?

Through preliminary research, I have learned that scoring rubrics serve as valuable
assessment tools that promote fairness, consistency, and transparency. Analytic
rubrics provide a detailed breakdown of performance criteria, while holistic rubrics
assess overall quality. Both approaches offer unique benefits in evaluating student
work and providing meaningful feedback for growth.
II. Thesis Statement: Scoring rubrics, including analytic and holistic approaches,
serve as effective assessment tools in education by providing clear criteria for
evaluating student work, promoting consistency and transparency, and guiding
constructive feedback. In this term paper, we will examine the characteristics,
advantages, and limitations of analytic and holistic rubrics, exploring their impact on
assessment practices in educational settings.
III. Body of the Paper

A. Define Main Points of Your Research

1. Scoring Rubrics: An Overview

Scoring rubrics are structured frameworks used in education to assess student
performance and provide clear criteria for evaluation. They consist of a set of
predetermined criteria or dimensions that define the expectations for student work.
The primary purpose of scoring rubrics is to provide a standardized and transparent
method of assessing student work, ensuring fairness and consistency in evaluation.
By clearly articulating the criteria and performance levels, rubrics help both educators
and students understand the expectations and goals of the assignment.

2. Analytic Rubrics: Breaking Down Criteria

Analytic rubrics involve the assessment of different aspects or criteria of student work
separately. Each criterion is defined and described in the rubric, allowing educators to
evaluate and provide feedback on specific dimensions of performance. This approach
offers a detailed breakdown of the strengths and weaknesses of student work,
facilitating targeted feedback and improvement. By providing a comprehensive
assessment of various criteria, analytic rubrics enable educators to provide specific
guidance to students on how to enhance their performance in specific areas.

One advantage of using analytic rubrics is the ability to provide students with detailed
and specific feedback on their work. By breaking down the criteria into separate
components, educators can offer targeted suggestions for improvement, helping
students understand their strengths and areas for growth. Analytic rubrics also
promote a more granular assessment, allowing educators to evaluate different
dimensions of performance independently, which can be particularly beneficial for
complex tasks that require multiple skills or competencies.

3. Holistic Rubrics: Assessing Overall Performance

Holistic rubrics, in contrast to analytic rubrics, assess the overall quality of student
work as a unified whole. Rather than evaluating individual criteria separately, holistic
rubrics provide a more holistic view of student performance by considering the
integration and coherence of their work. This approach is often used when assessing
complex tasks or assignments that require a comprehensive evaluation.

The primary advantage of holistic rubrics is their ability to capture the overall quality
and essence of student work. By considering the work as a unified entity, holistic
rubrics provide a broader perspective on the student's performance, taking into
account the interplay between different criteria and dimensions. This approach is
particularly valuable when assessing tasks that require creativity, critical thinking, or
synthesis of ideas, as it acknowledges the complex nature of such work.
In summary, scoring rubrics, whether analytic or holistic, serve as valuable
assessment tools in education. Analytic rubrics enable detailed evaluation and
targeted feedback on specific aspects of student work, while holistic rubrics provide a
comprehensive view of overall performance. Both approaches contribute to fair and
consistent evaluation, guiding students towards improvement and promoting a more
transparent and meaningful assessment process.

B. Provide Information About the Topic

Scoring rubrics are structured frameworks that define the expectations and criteria for
assessing student work. They allow educators to evaluate and provide feedback on
various aspects of a student's performance, such as content knowledge, critical
thinking, organization, and presentation skills. Rubrics can be created for different
types of assignments, including essays, projects, presentations, and performances.

Analytic rubrics break down the evaluation criteria into specific components or
dimensions, providing separate ratings for each criterion. This approach offers a
detailed assessment of a student's strengths and weaknesses in different areas. On
the other hand, holistic rubrics evaluate the overall quality of the work as a whole,
considering multiple criteria simultaneously. This approach provides a comprehensive
view of a student's performance, highlighting the integration and coherence of their
work.

C. Explanation with Examples

To better understand the concept, let's consider an example in an English class. In

assessing an essay, an analytic rubric may include criteria such as thesis statement,
supporting evidence, organization, grammar, and clarity. Each criterion would be
assessed independently, allowing the educator to provide specific feedback for
improvement. Conversely, a holistic rubric for the same essay would focus on overall
impression, evaluating the essay as a unified piece based on criteria such as
coherence, originality, and depth of analysis.

Analytic rubrics provide a detailed breakdown of a student's performance, allowing

targeted feedback on specific areas for improvement. Holistic rubrics, on the other
hand, consider the overall quality and integration of the work, providing a broader
perspective on the student's performance.
IV. Conclusion

In conclusion, scoring rubrics, whether analytic or holistic, offer valuable assessment

tools in education. Analytic rubrics enable detailed evaluation and targeted feedback,
helping students understand their strengths and areas for growth. Holistic rubrics
provide a comprehensive assessment of overall performance, focusing on the
integration and coherence of student work. Both approaches contribute to fair and
consistent evaluation, guiding students towards improvement.

To further enhance the understanding and effectiveness of scoring rubrics, future

research can explore the impact of rubric design on student engagement and
motivation. Additionally, investigating the alignment between rubric criteria and
learning objectives can offer insights into optimizing the use of scoring rubrics as a
means of promoting student learning and growth.