Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CE19B073 - Steel 1
CE19B073 - Steel 1
Prachi
CE19B073
Group: K2
Apparatus used:
1. The beam - ISMB 200
- Length =200 cm,
- Flange width = 100 mm,
- Flange Thickness = 10.8 mm,
- Web Thickness = 5.7 mm
- Depth = 200 mm.
- Izz = 2.235 x 10-5 m4
- Zzz = 2.235 x 10-4 m3
Background:
1. Assumptions in the theory of beam bending and its implications for this
experiment
- The beam is subject to pure bending, the shear force is zero, and that no
torsional or axial loads are present -- But in reality bending will induce axial
forces in the beam.
- The material is isotropic and homogeneous – Material imperfections have not
been taken into consideration in deriving the theoretical values.
- The material obeys Hooke's law (it is linearly elastic and will not deform
plastically) – To ensure this the beam should be loaded so that the stresses are
well below the yield point.
- The beam will fail by bending rather than by crushing, wrinkling or sideways
buckling – ISMB 200 satisfies this criterion. Load applied is well below the elastic
limit to satisfy this condition
- Plane sections of the beam remain plane before and during bending –a
consequence of our assumption – pure bending scenario. Here we assume that
no shear stresses are present in the cross section which is not true for the same
reasons refuting assumption #1. Consequently, some shear deformation is
expected which will cause deviations.
- The majority of the deviations from the theoretical values occur because of our
idealized assumptions which are not truly practical in reality.
2. Brief derivation of the flexure formula
- In order to compute the value of bending stresses developed in a loaded
beam, let us consider the two cross-sections of a beam HE and GF,
originally parallel as shown in fig 1(a).when the beam is to bend it is
assumed that these sections remain parallel i.e. H'E' and G'F' , the final
position of the sections, are still straight lines, they then subtend some
angle .
- Consider now fiber AB in the material, at a distance y from the N.A, when the
beam bends this will stretch to A'B'
- Since CD and C'D' are on the neutral axis, it is assumed that the Stress on the
neutral axis is zero. Therefore, there won't be any strain on the neutral axis.
- Consider any arbitrary cross-section of a beam, as shown above now the
strain on a fiber at a distance ‘y' from the N.A, is given by the expression.
- This equation is known as the Bending Theory Equation. The above
proof has involved the assumption of pure bending without any shear
force being present. Therefore this is termed as the pure bending
equation. This equation gives distribution of stresses which are normal to
cross-section i.e. in x-direction.
Ref: https://www.ques10.com/p/33257/derive-the-flexural-formula-bending-equation/
- Since the slope is continuous across the length of the beam, this is the slope at x
= L/3. Hence
- The shape on the second half of the beam span is a mirror image of the shape
on the first half of the span owing to symmetry and so we have not considered it
separately. It can be described by the same equations by shifting the origin to the
right side end of the beam and analyzing the beam from right to left.
5. Theory of Strain Rosette
- Strain Rosette: Arrangements of gauge lines at a point in a cluster are
called strain rosettes. The three strain measurements taken from a rosette
suffice to determine the state of plane strain at a point.
Equations
- Since a single gauge can only measure the strain in only a single direction, two
gauges are needed to determine strain in the εx and εy. However, there is no
gauge that is capable of measuring shear strain. But any rotated normal strain is
a function of the coordinate strains, εx, εy and γxy, which are unknown in this
case. Thus, if three different gauges are all rotated, that will give three equations,
with three unknowns, εx, εy and γxy. These equations are,
Applying this equation to each of the three strain gauges results in the following
system of equations
- To increase the accuracy of a strain rosette, large angles are used. A common
rosette of three gauges is where the gauges are separated by 45o , or θa = 0o ,
orθb = 45o , or θc = 90o . The three equations can then be simplify to
Solving for εx, εy and γxy gives,
Ref: https://ecourses.ou.edu/cgi-bin/ebook.cgi?doc=&topic=me&chap_sec=08.3&page=theory
Experimental Data:
Raw data (taken at intervals of 250 kg load till 2500kgs)
Depth of
LOAD Moment Neutral axis Curvature SG_9 SG_10
kg (N-m) (mm) (ø) µm/m µm/m
0 0 100 0 0 0
247.0208 807.758016 100 -0.108333339 -9.625000502 8.966667134
498.8386 1631.202222 100 0.6750000352 -20.65833441 16.69166754
755.5834 2470.757718 100 1.941666768 -32.92500172 23.55833456
1003.891 3282.72357 100 3.091666828 -45.10833569 29.67500155
1249.599 4086.18873 100 4.516666902 -57.35833632 35.58333519
1506.292 4925.57484 100 6.366666999 -70.11667032 42.2750022
1751.828 5728.47756 100 7.800000407 -82.06667095 48.41666919
1998.25 6534.2775 100 9.383333823 -93.52500488 54.78333619
2246.849 7347.19623 100 10.72500056 -105.1583388 61.00833652
2500.964 8178.15228 100 12.38333398 -116.7666728 67.65833686
2522.01 8246.9727 100 12.34166731 -117.9083395 68.01667021
2499.656 8173.87512 100 12.25833397 -116.8666728 67.47500352
2252.693 7366.30611 100 10.89166723 -105.2833388 61.33333653
2001.214 6543.96978 100 9.350000488 -93.60000488 54.76666952
1748.214 5716.65978 100 8.108333756 -81.61667092 48.5666692
1509.094 4934.73738 100 7.133333705 -69.65000363 42.88333557
1288.354 4212.91758 100 6.308333662 -58.13333637 38.31666867
980.0417 3204.736359 100 5.066666931 -41.94166885 31.46666831
748.8386 2448.702222 100 4.275000223 -30.11666824 26.09166803
462.7344 1513.141488 100 3.600000188 -16.17500084 18.74166764
50.93229 166.5485883 100 2.833333481 0.57500003 4.616666907
Graphs:
1. Plot of depth vs. strain for various loads:
2. Plot of load vs. deflection (3 curves):
Flexural rigidity=EI:
Theoretically, flexural rigidity= E*I = 200000*21200000 = 4.24*1012 Nmm2
1. From moment vs curvature graph
𝒅2𝒚/𝒅𝒙2 = 𝑴/ 𝑬𝑰
Experimentally, from the moment curvature graph, the slope value = 30.8°
Experimental EI = tan-1(30.83)= 4.04*1012 Nmm2
Shear rigidity:
From Load vs shear strain graph,
Shear modulus of rigidity = 9.81 / 𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 ∗ 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑐/𝑠
= 9.81/ 0.0258 * 10−6 * 30.8 * 10−4 = 77.9 𝐺𝑃𝑎
Theoretical shear modulus of rigidity = 𝐸 / 2(1+𝑣) = 76 GPa