Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LabProject PDF
LabProject PDF
LabProject PDF
Prejudice impacts entire people and communities. The ramifications of discrimination are
significant on an institutional and individual level. Race, gender, sexuality, religion and the
intersectionality of these identities influence how we are perceived and, often, how we are
treated. Understanding the experiences of others and the way that other’s identities are perceived
combats discriminatory thought. In this study, researchers examine the effects of employees’ race
and gender on perceptions of unfairness in the workplace. Black and White men and women are
asked to indicate their perceptions on a likert scale. The objective of this study is to answer the
research question: Is there an effect of sex, gender, and the interaction of sex and gender, on
perceived unfairness in this sample? The conductor of the study determined a null hypothesis
stating that there is no effect of sex, race, or the interaction of sex and race on employee’s
perceptions of unfairness. The alternative hypothesis is that there is an effect of sex, race, or the
For the purpose of this research study, the data consists of responses on perceptions of
unfairness from Black and white men and women. An industrial/organizational psychologist
collected this data by administering a survey to five Black men, five Black women, five white
men, and five white women, which totals up to 20 participants in this study that have experience
in the workplace. There are two independent variables within this study, sex and race, and both
of these concepts are categorical variables. The independent variables also have two levels each.
For sex, the two levels are male or female and for race, the two levels are Black or white. The
dependent variable, perceptions of unfairness, is a continuous variable and participants can report
their perceptions of unfairness within the workplace through a Likert scale. The Likert scale
The results of this study represent variation between the participants’ responses on
3
fairness in the workplace based on their sex or race. The mean perception of unfairness from
Black women in this study (M=9.8, SD= 1.483240) is higher than the mean perception of
unfairness from the white women in this study (M=7.2, SD= 0.836660). However, the mean
perception of unfairness from the white men in this study (M=1.6, SD= 1.140175) is lower than
the mean perception of unfairness from the Black men in this study (M=7.2, SD=1.923538), as
shown in Table 1. The researchers conducted a Two-way independent samples ANOVA to assess
if sex, gender, or the interaction of sex and gender has an effect on perceptions of unfairness in
the workplace. In order to run the Two-way independent samples ANOVA, the assumptions of
within groups must be met. The assumption of independence of observations is met due to the
fact that the participants in this study are independent and not related to each other. The
0.5617. From the output value, the p-value is not less than the significance level of 0.05, which
means that there is no evidence to suggest that the variance across groups is statistically
significantly different. The assumption of normality of residuals is met after a Shapiro-Wilk test
(W=0.98, p= 0.883), found no indication that normality was violated. After conducting a
Two-way independent samples ANOVA, the results revealed a statistically significant interaction
effect between sex and race on perceptions of unfairness in the workplace, F(2,16)=5.696, p<.05,
as shown in Figure 2. The results also reveal that there is a statistically significant main effect of
sex on perceptions of unfairness, F(1,16)= 42.557, p<.05, and a statistically significant main
effect of race on perceptions of unfairness, F(1,16)=42.557, p<.05. A Tukey HSD test is used to
determine that the only pairwise comparison that did not have a statistically significant difference
at the .05 level of significance is Black males and white females, as depicted in Figure 1.
4
The null hypothesis is rejected at the .05 level of significance, suggesting that the data
provides convincing evidence that the effect of sex, race, and the interaction of sex and race has
an impact on perceptions of unfairness in the workplace. These results reveal that the Black
women in this sample feel they are treated most unfairly in the workplace while the white men in
this sample feel that they are treated fairly in the workplace on average. In addition, Black men
and white women in this sample reported that, on average, they feel the same amount of
unfairness in the workplace. Although results show there is an effect of sex and race on
employee’s perceptions of unfairness, there are limitations within this research. Limitations,
such as type of workplace, hierarchy within the workplace, and the way unfairness is
operationalized, may skew the data. In the future, it is important to note the type of workplace,
Figure 1
Note: The above graph depicts the mean perceptions of unfairness from different groups. The
median mean difference for Black women is 10, Black males is 7.2 as is white females, and
Figure 2
Note: The above graph depicts the interaction effects of sex and race. Sex and race have an effect
on perception of unfairness in the workplace. Women from both races felt that they experienced
Table 1
Sex Race M SD
Note: The above table depicts the descriptive statistics of the interaction effects of sex and race
on perceptions of unfairness in the workplace. On average, Black women in this sample reported
higher answers on the Likert scale and white men in this sample reported lower answers on the
Likert scale. Black men and white women reported about the same level of unfairness in the