Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Comparative Analysis of Two Control Schemes For
Comparative Analysis of Two Control Schemes For
Abstract—Non-linear loads have an inherent property of drawing active filter is high. Therefore, an integration of an active filter
reactive power along with harmonic current from AC supply which and a passive filter is preferred in designing a hybrid filter [5].
causes various significant problems in the system. Thus, it is very
crucial to mitigate these issues. One of the important and
commonly used methods is using filters. In this paper, designing of
a shunt connected active filter particularly for a three-phase
balanced load with two different control strategies is presented. The
results of both the control techniques used for designing an active
filter are compared. Afterwards, designing procedure of a passive
filter is also discussed. The combined performance of shunt
connected active filter along with passive filter is analyzed in detail.
The model is developed in MATLAB/ Simulink and all the results
obtained are formally presented for validating the performance of
both filters governing IEEE Std. 519-2014. Fig. 1. General arrangement of a shunt connected active and passive filter
B. DC Bus Capacitor
= 1.25 (3.0348 + 28.608)
The equation governing CDC is given as: = 39.55 A
֜ ͲǤͷܥ ሾሺܸ ሻଶ െ ሺܸଵ ሻଶ ሿ ൌ ͵ܸ ሺܽܫሻݐ (2) where Isp is peak value of active filter current and Icr is
ܫൌ ʹͲǤʹ͵ʹܣሺʹͶΨof Idc) permissible value of ripple current.
֜ ͲǤͷܥ ሾሺͷͲሻ2 – (690)2] Therefore, the IGBTs of 1200V and 75A is chosen for
= 3ൈ240ൈ ͳǤʹ ൈ ʹͲǤʹ͵ʹ ൈ ͳͲ ൈ ͳͲ-3 designing the voltage source converter.
֜ ܥ = 3372 ≈ 5000 μF
E. Rating of active filter
Where, VDC = reference DC bus voltage,
VDC1 = the minimum DC bus voltage level, The formula to find out the rating of active filter is :
a = overloading factor, S = 3VfIf (6)
Vph = phase voltage, = 3 ൈ 239.60 ൈ ʹͲǤʹ͵ʹ ൌ ͻǤ ≈ 10KVA
I = harmonic current, F. Control Schemes for an Active Filter
t = time by which the bus voltage is to be recovered.
For controlling an active filter, the major task is to derive a
C. AC Inductor reference current and thereafter generating switching or gating
The value of the limiting inductance relies mainly on the pulse for voltage source converter by using a proper current
current ripple Icrpp, which is a component of voltage source controller. This can be achieved in a number of ways. But two
converter current and the AC inductance is specified as: frequently used techniques which are simulated for verifying
ܮ ൌ ሺඥ͵ሻܸ݉ Ȁሺͳʹ݂ܽ௦ ܫ ሻ (3) the operation of active filter are IRP theory and SRF theory.
General arrangement of blocks for controlling the active filter
ൌ ሺඥ͵ሻ ൈ ͲǤͻ ൈ ͷͲȀሺͳʹ ൈ ͳǤʹ ൈ ͳͲ ൈ ͳͲ3ൈ3.0348) by Instantaneous Reactive Power (IRP) theory is given in Fig.
ൌ ʹǤͷ ≈ 3 mH 3 and by Synchronous Reference Frame (SRF) theory is
Where m is modulation index, fs is switching frequency and shown in Fig. 4.
VDC is reference DC bus voltage and 15% (approximately)
current ripple (Icrpp) is taken into consideration for designing 1) Instantaneous Reactive Power Theory
ac inductor. Instantaneous reactive power (IRP) theory can also be called
D. Calculation of IGBT parameters as p–q theory. The control algorithm of the APF using IRP
theory is revealed in Fig. 3. In this method of controlling
It is important to define the voltage (Vsw) and current ratings
shunt active filter, first of all, voltage and load currents are
(Isw) of the IGBTs under dynamic conditions.
sensed and by applying Clark’s transformation, these
Voltage rating of IGBT is calculated as:
parameters are converted to two phase parameters in α–β.
Vsw = VDC + Vd (4)
Now, instantaneous active power along with reactive power is
= 750 + 75 =825V
Where, Vd is 10% overshoot in DC bus voltage. evaluated. After that, obtained reference current is
transformed back to abc frame from α–β frame using reverse
The current rating of IGBT is obtained as:
Isw = 1.25(Icr + Isp) (5) Clark's transformation. In this way, the reference current is
obtained by this method.
2
Where, fs = supply frequency
The value of filter inductance is evaluated by:
LF = 1/(2 πfs)2( h0 )2CF (9)
Where, ho is order of tuned harmonic component
The Q-factor is given as:
Q = Xn/R = ሺξܮȀܥሻȀܴ (10)
Where, Xn is the characteristic reactance.
Now, the designed passive filter will divert the 5th harmonic
(19%) and active filter’s rating will now get reduced.
Therefore, the rating of hybrid active filter (using equation 7
is calculated to be 2.1KVA ≈ 3KVA
V. SIMULATION AND RESULTS
A. Simulation Model
Fig. 3. Control of Active Filter by IRP Theory A three phase three wires system is considered for
understanding the designing of an active filter with two
2) Synchronous Reference Frame (SRF)Theory different control strategies. Every parameter of the system
In this scheme, sensed three phase currents are converted to a remains unchanged except the control block. The control
synchronously rotating d-q frame by applying park’s block is first simulated using IRP theory and then SRF theory.
transformation. Along with this, a PLL is used for generating A passive filter is also coupled in shunt to the active filter. A
sine and cosine signals by sensing three-phase voltage signals. three phase circuit breaker is used to provide us the flexibility
Afterwards, sensed currents converted to d-q frame are made to switch on/off any of the filters according to our need. The
to pass through low pass filter and filtered current is converted load that is considered for simulation is non-linear and
back to abc frame by applying reverse Park’s and Clark’s balanced in nature. The necessary parameters for the
transformation consecutively. In this way, the reference simulation of hybrid filter are specified briefly in TABLE 1.
current is obtained. Now, this reference current is fed to a
current controller for generating desired switching pulse for TABLE 1. DESIGN PARAMETERS FOR THE SIMULATION MODEL
VSC.
Active filter parameters
Source Voltage (r.m.s) 415 Volts
System Frequency (f) 50 Hertz
Source inductance (Ls) 0.1 mH
Source resistance (Rs) 0.02 Ω
DC link Voltage 750 Volts
Dc link capacitance (C1=C2) 5000 μF
Coupling Inductance 3 mH
Load Resistance (R) 6.5 Ω
Load Inductance (L) 15 mH
Passive filter parameters
Filter Capacitance (CF ) 50 μF, 450 Volt
Fig. 4. Control of Active Filter by SRF Theory
Filter Inductance (LF) 8 mH
IV. DESIGN OF PASSIVE FILTER
Among popular passive filter configurations, single tuned is
most often used as shunt passive filter. This filter is easier, B. Simulation Results
economical and simple in designing and construction. It is All the necessary results are compiled and discussed in this
generally designed to divert the dominant harmonic section. Simulation results are obtained by switching on/off
component from the system. Therefore, the passive filter, here the circuit breaker to connect and disconnect the active and
is suggested be tuned to 5th harmonic component. passive filter whenever required. First result is recorded
The relation of capacitive reactance with reactive power is without any compensation i.e. neither active filter nor the
given as [7]: passive one is working. The Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)
Xc = Vrc / Qc (7) analysis of source current of each result is also done to
calculate the actual THD present in the waveform. Second
Where, Vrc = nominal voltage of capacitor result is observed when only active filter (with both control
Qc = reactive power supplied by capacitor schemes) is working and the third and last result is considered
The value of filter capacitance is evaluated by: when both passive and active filters are working. The results
CF = 1/2 πfsXc (8)
3
in each case and their FFT analysis are obtained by applying When no compensation is done, the source current is distorted
both the control strategies. from its original sinusoidal shape and is similar to load current
as shown in Fig. 5. The THD in this case is coming out to be
24% (Fig. 6). But when active filter is connected with the help
of a three-phase circuit breaker, then the waveform of source
current is improved.
Fig. 8. FFT Analysis of source current with active filter (with IRP theory)
Fig. 7. Waveform with active filter (with IRP Theory) Fig. 10. FFT analysis of source current with active filter (with SRF theory)
4
Fig. 14. FFT analysis of source current with passive filter and active filter
with SRF theory
CONCLUSION
The design of active filter with two different control schemes
along with the designing of a shunt connected passive filter is
is successfully carried out. MATLAB/ Simulink environment
Fig. 13. Waveform with passive filter and active filter with SRF theory
is used to carry out the simulation. All the results obtained are
formally presented for validating the performance of both
filters. Designed and simulated filters are satisfactorily
5
compensating the current harmonics and restricting them to
affect the supply system. All the values of THDs are within
prescribed limit according to IEEE 519 standard. It can also
be concluded that operation of active filter with SRF control
theory is providing better result than with IRP control theory
in mitigating harmonics. The computational complexity is also
lesser in SRF control strategy when compared to that of IRPT.
Also, the active filter is providing better compensation as
compared to the passive filter. The active filter along with the
shunt passive filter is capable of further reducing the THD
from source current and hence enhancing its performance. The
rating and hence size and cost of the active filter gets reduced
by employing a passive filter in shunt as it is designed to
divert the dominant harmonic from the system (5th Harmonic
in this case).
REFERENCES