PROJECT CONCEPT PAPER

Country Name : Philippines

Authorized by : Daehyun Kim
Prepared by : Benjielyn Mendoza

Building Resilient communities through climate change adaptation and

Project Name :
in the Municipality of San Clemente, Tarlac, Philippines Proje

No. Project Name

Building Resilient communities through climate change adaptation and mitigation

1
in the Municipality of San Clemente, Tarlac, Philippines Project
T PAPER

ines
n Kim
Mendoza

mate change adaptation and mitigation

te, Tarlac, Philippines Project

Duration Budget Remarks

1 years (2020-2021) $1,704,545.00

 PROJECT CONCEPT PAPER
*Please fill in the blank following the guide and example.
<Project Info.(사업 기본정보)>
Project Name (사업명) Eliminating Hunger Periods for the Pugad and Tibaguin Islands through Community Urban/Vertical Gardening Project in Bulacan, Philippines

Date Submitted (제출일) 9-Mar-20 Sector Income Generation 다분야(Multi-sector)

Prepared by (작성자) Desserie Cunnan Contact info. sjlee@goodneighbors.org

Authorized by (최종승인자) Mr. Daehyun Kim/ Country Director Contact info. (연락 가능 이메일) daehyunkim@goodneihgbors.ph

1. Assessment
1) Importance of CCAM(Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation) in the Philippines
- The Philippines is 5th of the most affected countries based on the long-term climate risk index [Data Source: Global Climate Risk Index, 2016&2019]
- The frequent occurrences of natural disasters is one of the major factors that hinder the Philippines’ national development. According to the 2018 World Risk Report, the Philippines is ranked 3rd in terms of exposure to disaster risks. Average of 20 typhoons and
floods occur and generate tremendous material damage and injuries.
- The Philippines has republic act regarding the CCAM(Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation) [Data Source: The Philippines law, Republic Act 9729]
- The Philippines ranks on the 6th most prone and vulnerable to climate change. [Data Source: Department of Agriculture-Bureau of Agricultural Research: Climate Risk Study]

2) Importance of Agriculture in the Philippines

- Agriculture sector takes up 12% of GDP (2015) and employs 32% of the workforce (2014);
- The lack of infrastructure and policy and institutional barriers has left the sector underdeveloped and unable to meet the food requirements of the growing population;
- Recognizing the importance of food security, the Department of Agriculture stated that “available and affordable food” is its mission in 2016.
[Data Source: Department of Agriculture-Systems-wide Climate Change Office: Climate Resilience Analysis, 2017]

3) Relation between CCAM(Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation) and Agriculture in the Philippines
- Philippine government offices have initiated to conduct assessment and researches. Based on the initial results, climate change has a big relevance on putting high pressure on the agricultural sector in the country. In fact, when a disaster strikes, the agriculture
sector receives the highest number in terms of damages and losses resulting to loss of income and starvation, especially of the vulnerable sector. [Data Source: The National Climate Change Action Plan 2011-2028]
Summary of literature - Chronic poverty in the rural Philippines is burdened by external challenges, ranging from frequent natural disasters including floods and typhoons.
review - The Philippines is extremely vulnerable to climate change and natural disasters. Typhoons, floods, droughts, and earthquakes frequently occur all over the country, putting life and property at risk and severely hampering agricultural production, water resources
(문헌조사 결과 요약) management, health services delivery, and infrastructure development. [Data Source: Korea's CSP, 2017]

4) Relation between agricultural technology and farmers' income/productivity in the Philippines

In order to improve the living conditions of resource-poor farmers and fisherfolk; as well as to increase productivity and increase their income, complementary supporting economic activities beyond their farms needs to be strengthened. Agriculture modernization is
the way to make this happen.
Thus, the enactment of the Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Act (AFMA) 1997 which aims to transform the Philippine agriculture and fishery sectors to scientific and technology-based and competitive industry; while at the same time ensuring equal access to
resource-poor farmers in terms of services, assets and resources; guarantee food security; encourage farmer and fisherfolk groups to bond together for more bargaining power; strengthen people’s organizations, cooperatives and non-government organizations by
enhancing their participation in decision-making; pursue an aggressive market-driven approach to make the products more competitive in the market; stimulate further processing of agricultural products and make it more marketable; and implement policies that will
invite more investors to establish business in the country. [Data Source: The Agriculture and Fisheries Modernization Act of 1997]

The agriculture sector is one of the key contributor sector in the country wherein it contributes to 12% of the country's gross domestic products and provided employment to over 32% of the country's population. With the apparent increase on the temperature, humidity
and increasing number of typhoons and rainfalls, as well as the growing population, the agriculture is being compromised. The Philippines, in general, is one of the countries which is highly vulnerable to climate change impacts, a large proportion of damages from
disasters, which are generally climate-related, are experienced by the agricultural sector each year. From 1990 to 2006, damages to agricultural production were caused by typhoons (70%), droughts (18%), and floods (5%). In 2016, El Niño situation have brought pest
infestation especially on Central Luzon. [Data Source: Department of Agriculture- Climate Risk Analysis]

The Department of Agriculture - Systems-wide Climate Change Office have conducted a comprehensive research that would measure the vulnerability of the provinces in terms of Climate-risk. 10 provinces were under the studies namely: Ilocos Sur, Isabela, Tarlac,
Quezon, Camarines Sur, Iloilo, Negros Occidental, Bukidnon, North Cotabato and Davao del Sur. Among all, Tarlac Province is one of the most pressed in terms of vulnerability. Furthermore, San Clemente Municipality, above the all the presentation of the department
of Agriculture is considered one of the most vulnerable, in terms of poor support on infrastructure, the monetary resources and the natural susceptibility on climate and natural hazards. [Data Source: Department of Agriculture-Systems-wide Climate Change Office:
Climate Resilience Analysis, 2017]

One of the provinces in Central Luzon is Tarlac Province, which is generally, agriculture is the economic activity, specially rice production. Tarlac Province has 17 municipalities and 1 city. One of those Municipalities is the San Clemente Municipality which belongs to
the 5th class Municipality (poorest municipality) having a total of Internal Revenue Allocation (IRA) of PHP 50,000,000.00 ($ 961,538) in one full term (3 years). Municipality of San Clemente is a landlock municipality which has a total land area of 49.73 square
kilometers composed of 12,657 populations. [Data Source: https://www.philatlas.com/luzon/r03/tarlac/san-clemente.html]
Target region/target
Tarlac Province is relatively showing a decrease of rice production since 2017, approximately 1.39% in an average. This is due to some noted threats such as: Increasing costs of agricultural inputs & declining real farm incomes, Global competitiveness under increasing
group need assessment
liberalized trade environment and Global warming and climate change. One of the key challenges is on how to sustain food security to the growing population and how to make the Filipino farmer productive, profitable, competitive and climate resilient. [Data Source:
result
Philippine Statistics Office: Rice and Corn Outlook in 2019 and Food and Agriculture Organization: Status of Rice in the Philippines]
(사업 대상지역/대상그룹
수요조사 결과) In terms of irrigation, Tarlac Province is also limited which made the agricultural activity unstable. In fact, this province is ranked 10th among provinces who does not have enough or sustained irrigation system, and the lowest among region 3 provinces. In a total
112,921 hectares irrigable land, only 49,428 hectares is currently irrigated. Meanwhile, Muncipality of San Clemente has an irrigation system that is supporting 2 Barangays only (out of 12 Barangays). This circumstance made the Municipality of San Clemente more
burdened on how to increase productivity. [Data Source: National Irrigation Administration: Status of Irrigation System]
1.1
Feasibility Municipality of San Clemente is generally plain area, however, due to some of the hilly and slope areas, this makes them susceptible to soil erosion which has a great effect to the production of crops, one of the Barangay of San Clemente which is Barangay Dueg is
study noted to have a high susceptibility to landslide. Municipality of San Clemente, although landlock area, is still susceptible to flooding due to the presence of riverbanks/channel. Furthermore, Municipality of San Clemente is low-lying area and serves as a catchbasin
(사전조사) whenever San Roque Dam (Pangasinan), one of the largest dam in the Philippines, is releasing water. [Data Source: Mines and Geosciences Bureau: Tarlac Executive Summary]

In 2009, when Typhoon Parma "Pepeng" hit the country, San Clemente is one of the hardly hit community. The situation on this disaster situation is further aggravated by the release of water in San Roque Dam prompting to high cost of damages. In agriculture sector
alone, at the national level (country-wide), it has a total of PHP 20,000,000,000.00 ($ 384 Million) worth of damages in both on the agricultural products and irrigation system. [Data Source: National Disaster Coordinating Council Update Final Report re TS Ondoy and
Pepeng]
In 2015, Typhoon Koppu hit the country which affected again mostly the central luzon, wherein, Tarlac Province prompted to the declaration of State of Calamity due to high cost of damages. It recorded 2 casualties (1 death case, 1 missing). Tarlac acquires the
highest in terms of damage to school infrastructure, noted 340 totally damaged classrooms and 464 partially damaged. This resulted to PHP 3 Billion ($ 57 Million) worth of damage to agriculture (national-wide). [Data Source: National Disaster Risk Reduction and
Management Council Update Final Report re Typhoon Koppu]
 For this project, the identified possible risks analysis and possible solutions are as follows:

1) Weather condition.
- The implementation of the activities will be hampered due to changing weather condition that will subsequently lead to some delays in the execution. Possible solution for this risk is that all the construction activities will be done during dry season. Another possible
solution is the regular monitoring of weather with PAGASA for proper adjustment in the execution.
2) Political dynamics and bureaucracy.
- This includes the changing political leaders (municipal and barangay level) that might have different set of priority agenda/platform which may be not in line with the project. Another is the gap among different political parties present in the communities. The
possible solutions are to conduct series of consultations among different stakeholders in the communities and formalized agreeement through a MOA or MOU, whichever may be legally possible.
3) Paradigm shift in the commmunity.
Risk analysis - The challenge on this is the time that will be entailed to possibly change the way of thinking and practices among the community people in line with new strategies and technologies in farming. The target solution for this is the intensified community organization and
(사업 위험요인 분석) conscientization (action - reflection - action) in the community.
4) Scheduling of capacity building and other activities.
- The possible risk on this is the non-attendance of the target participants due to other farm-related and domestic activities. The possible solution for this is the consultation among the community members and as much as possible, the schedule of the activities will
not contradict their farm activities.

1) RWAN(Rice Watch Action Network)

The Philippines, thru the local government unit of Gerona, Tarlac and in partnership with Climate Change Commission (National Government) and a private network called Rice Watch Action Network (RWAN) have implemented the so called "Promoting Resiliency and a
Climate-informed Gerona" that have started since 2017. The pressing issue and problem on this local community is the food security of the locals in cases of emergencies and disasters, especially that the agricultural activity in the country is highly vulnerable to
disasters and it is very rampant that more Filipinos, especially those living in poverty, are scarce of food after a disaster due to lack of income. The objective of this project is to enhance the knowledge of the community people on weather and climate so that they
could improve the anticipation capabilities of the community people on interpreting weather information and lead them on a good decision-making process. This project also involves field schools as a learning platform for farmers that thought them on becoming more
sustainable thru a climate-resilient farming. As of this year, the local government of Gerona, Tarlac is becoming independent in terms of the continuity of the project and that it was also institutionalized under their own development investment plans. The partnership
between the national government, the local governement and technical experts have made their project implementation more valuable as they worked to make the project a success. Each offices' expertise has been drawn into one and made the project more
comprehensive and diverse.
[Data source: GNIP Collaborative discussion with Rice Watch Action Network; Climate Change Commission-Peoples Survival Fund]

2) MASIPAG
MASIPAG has been has been working with the resource poor farmers for more than 30 years and at the forefront of development struggles in the Philippines pursuing, among other things, a holistic approach to development, community empowerment, and people’s
Same projects or relevant control over agricultural biodiversity as a contribution in the over-all effort of improving the quality of life of small farmers and resiliency to climate change.
projects As of 2016, MASIPAG has 512 member peoples’ organizations, 41 NGO partners; 20 church-based development organizations 15 scientist-partners and around 30,000 farmers reached in 63 provinces. It maintains 188 trial farms/community seed banks (maintaining a
(타 기관 사업과의 중복 minimum of 50 traditional rice varieties), 2 national back-up farms/community seed-banks and 8 regional community seed-banks. They also boast of 70 farmer rice breeders, 12 farmer corn-breeders and about 100 volunteer farmer-trainers.
또는 협력 가능성) It already has a collection of more than 2,000 rice varieties comprising of 600 traditional rice varieties, 1,299 MASIPAG rice and about 506 farmer-bred rice. In response to agro climatic conditions brought about by climate change, they have documented some of the
varieties with particular adaptation: 12 flood tolerant varieties, 18 drought tolerant varieties, 20 saline(saltwater) tolerant varieties and 24 pests or diseases resistant varieties.(Source: Magsasaka at Siyentipiko Para sa Pag-unlad ng Agrikultura, Inc.)
Their study entitled " Food Security and Farmer Empowerment : A study of the impacts of farmer-led sustainable agriculture in the Philippines" revealed that farmers using sustainable agriculture are much more food secure than those using conventional farming
techniques. This is the case in all the three island regions of the Philippines.

1) Philippine Development Plan (PDP)

On Chapter 20 (Ensuring Ecological Integrity, Clean and Healthy Environment) of the Philippine Development Plan 2017 – 2022, the environment and natural resources (ENR) sector plays a critical role to the resource dependent communities and for the country’s
development at large. It was further stated that for climate change, one of the challenges identified is that efforts on disaster risk reduction (DRR) and climate change adaptation (CCA) remain inadequate. Measures that help prevent and mitigate the impact of
disasters and prepare for these events have come in various forms, including:

(a) mainstreaming CCA and DRR into policies, plans, programs and budget;
(b) risk and vulnerability analysis and assessments, including the development of multi-hazard maps;
(c) strengthening institutional and financial mechanisms;
(d) improving early warning systems; and
(e) continuing information, education and communication (IEC) campaigns.
Relationship to Project
Further, it was also mentioned that there is a lack of sustainable financing and limited access to available funding facilities. Funding for ENR management including CC and disaster risk reduction and management (DRRM) initiatives largely depends on public finance.
country's development
Especially in local government units, funding for ENR, CC, and DRRM competes with other development priorities. This has limited the initiatives for environmental management, CCA and DRRM.
policy
(국가 개발목표와의 In the same PDP, one of identified strategies is to strengthen the implementation of CCA and DRR across sectors, particularly at the local level. Because preparatory activities for building adaptive capacity and resilience are limited, the following are some of the
연계성) specific strategies that will be pursued:

• Strengthen existing inter-agency bodies that serve as venues for improving policy making and implementation of CC and DRRM
• Develop, maintain, and ensure the accessibility of climate and geospatial information and services.
• Promote climate and disaster-resilient structures and designs following established measures and standards.
• Maximize access to CC and DRRM financing and risk transfer mechanisms
1.2
Reflection of 2) Republic Act 9729 (Climate Change Act)
development • Established the creation and formulation of the National Climate Change Action Plan (NCCAP) which shall serve as the national framework of the country in terms of the implementation of CCAM projects and the Local Climate Change Action Plan (LCCAP) wherein
strategy Local Government Unit (LGU) shall also create their strategic plans on the implementation of CCAM projects which is in line with the NCCAP.
(개발정책 및
전략 반영) 3) National Climate Change Action Plan (NCCAP)
• Ultimate goal:
 Build adaptive capacity of women and men in their communities, increase the resilience of vulnerable sectors and natural ecosystem to climate change and optimize mitigation opportunities toward gender-responsive and rights-based sustainable developments.
• National Framework Strategies:
 Envisions a climate risk-resilient Philippines with healthy, safe, prosperous and self-reliant communities, and thriving and productive ecosystem;
 Build the adaptive capacity of communities and increase the resilience of natural ecosystems to climate change, and optimize mitigation opportunities towards sustainable development;
 Climate change knowledge is science-based, and shall draw from scientific contributions and best practices from communities taking into considerations local circumstances;
 The principle of complementation shall be observed to ensure that climate change initiatives by one sector do not restrict the adaptation of other sectors;
 Recognizes the principle of subsidiarity and the role of local governments as front-liners in addressing climate change;
 Recognizes the value of forming multi-stakeholder participation and partnerships in climate change initiatives, including partnerships with civil society, the private sector and local governments, and especially with indigenous peoples and other marginalized groups
most vulnerable to climate change impacts
 strategy
(개발정책 및
전략 반영)

1) The government of the Republic of Korea maps out the Country Partnership Strategy for the Republic of the Philippines' inclusive and sustainable development. The priority cooperation areas are composed of ●Rural development, ●Health and Sanitation,
●Transportation, ●Disaster prevention and preparedness.

2) Country Partnership Strategy

● (Expansion of agricultural infrastructure and technology) The construction of Community Seed and Food Banks will ensure food security after disasters and availability of seeds and livestock for planting and dispersal after disasters. This is also a mechanism for agro-
Consideration for Country biodiversity conservation or safe keeping of native or local breeds of crops and livestock adapted to local climate. The establishment of Farmers Field School (FFS) also provides a venue for farmers to learn new technologies and about sustainable and organic
Partnership Strategy: If agriculture which they will practice in their own farms.
applicable ● (Irrigation and water resource management) The establishment of water management system will ensure stable supply of agricultural water to farm areas even during drought season. This will also manage the flow of water during rainy season so as not to flood farm
(CPS 중점 분야 고려: and residential areas.
CPS 국가인 경우만 해당) ● (Increasing farmers' understanding and preparedness on CCAM) Series of training on CCAM will be conducted in Farmers Field School to increase farmers' understanding on CCAM. Also community awareness on CCAM will be improved through the conduct of CCAM for
and awareness campaigns in schools and community gatherings.
● (Climate proof telecommunication infrastructures) The establishment of automated weather system will provide timely delivery of weather information on agriculture to communities. This will help farmers to plan possible actions that will protect and save their
crops and livestock.
● (Promoting LGU's capacity building in disaster response system to vulnerable agricultural sector) The institutionalization of Local CCAM through organizing and capacitating a local council or structure of CCAM, policy advocacy through creation of ordnance to support
the council/structure and CCAM related initiatives, establishment of the Climate Information System, and Strengthening Local Climate Change Action Plan (LCCAP) will promote and strengthen the local government’s capacity on CCAM.

1) Department of Agriculture (DA).

- DA, specifically Bureau of Agricultural Research, shared significant data and other literature in line with the project conceptualization. DA is also expected to provide technical support relative to establishment of seed banks and during the implementation proper.
Further, GNIP plans to formalize the partnership with them through MOA.
2) Department of Science and Technology (DOST).
- DOST, through PAGASA (Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration) in coordination with KOICA, they can help in this project in terms of analyzing the weather condition and provide related weather information and advisories.
This, in turn can be utilized by the communities in line with their farm-related activities.
3) Climate Change Commission (CCC).
- CCC shared literature in line with the project conceptualization. CCC is also expected to provide technical support relative to implementation proper in line with LCCAP (Local Climate Change Action Plan) formation and strengthening. Further, GNIP plans to formalize
Relationship to the local the partnership with them through MOA.
government 4) Provincial, Municipal, and Barangay Local Government Units.
(현지 정부와의 협력상 - GNIP plans to coordinate and consult with the provincial and municipal local government in line with the entire project management cycle. GNIP had started conducting meetings with the local government units and some other stakeholders present in the community.
황/계획) To be specific, GNIP targets to work with the different offices like Municipal Agriculture Office (MAO), Municipal Environment and Natural Resources Office (MENRO), Municipal Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Office (MDRRMO), Municipal Planning and
Development Office (MPDO), to name a few. Further, GNIP plans to formalize the partnership with them through MOA. GNIP, in return will be assisting the local government in developing their LCCAP. The Local Climate Change Action Plan or LCCAP is a document
1.3 crafted and designed by the local government unit (LGU) regarding climate change adaptation plans in their locality. [Data Source: Local Climate Change Adaptation for Development]
Networking
(네트워킹
현황)

1) Farmer organizations.
- They will serve as our partners in the project especially in the implementation of the project in a sense that they will be sharing their existing farming practices and technologies and how can we possible assist them. GNIP had started conducting meetings.
2) Farmer Cooperatives.
Relationship to the local - The existing cooperative/s in the communities will be extending their possible services that can help in implementing the identified activities. GNIP had started conducting meetings.
community 3) Other NGOs.
(현지 지역사회와의 - Rice Watch Action Network (RWAN) and Magsasaka Siyentipiko para s Pag-unlad ng Agrikultura (MASIPAG). They will provide technical support in line with the implementation since they have significant years of experience in CCAM-related projects.
협력상황/계획)

1-4. Problem analysis

(문제분석)
 1-5. Objective analysis
(목표분석)

2. Project Summary

2-1. Project Name

Eliminating Hunger Periods for the Pugad and Tibaguin Islands through Community Urban/Vertical Gardening Project in Bulacan, Philippines
(사업명)

2-2. Objective
Resilient communities through climate change adaptation and mitigation
(목표)

1. Strengthened governance on Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation (CCAM)

% of farmers access /receive information from CIS
2-3. Outcome
(성과) 2. Improved sustainable agriculture practices in the community
% of increased varieties in Municipality seed bank

1.1. Established Climate Information System (CIS)

# of Agricultural information delivery through CIS

2.1. Improved knowledge and skills of Farmers on sustainable agriculture

2-4. Output # of farmers completed Farmers Field School (FFS) on sustainable agriculture (Male/Female)
(산출물)
2.2. Participatory plant breeding on rice developed and community seed banks established
# of community Seed bank developed

1.1.1. Coordination with Partnership (PAGASA/MASIPAC/LGU)

1.1.2. Capacity building and development of protocols for CIS
1.1.3. Regular dissemination/delivery of Climate information to community
1.1.4. Operation and Management of Climate Infrmation System (CIS)
2-5. Activity
(활동) 2.1.1. Organizing and Conduct of Farmers Fields School (FFS)
2.2.1. Organizing and Capacity building on community seed banking at the barangay level
2.2.2. Establishment of Municipal seed bank

Total (전체) 10635

2-6. Beneficiaries
Direct (직접 수혜자) 72 Remark (비고) Farmers participaing in project
(수혜자 수)
Indirect (간접 수혜자) 10,563 Remark (비고) Population based on the Municipal profile of San Clemente

2-7. Project duration

1 years (2020-2021) Target region Central Luzon Region (Region-Ⅲ)
(사업기간)

2-8. Total budget (전체 사업예산) Total budget (전체 사업예산) Exchange rate (환율)
$ 3,159,600.00 164,299,200 52
(USD) (Local currency) (1$=52)

(1 year) Budget Executive Plan (USD)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Activity COA Detail Total Remarks
(FEB) (MAR) (APR) (MAY) (JUNE) (JULY) (AUG) (SEP) (OCT) (NOV) (DEC) (JAN)

Coordination with
Transportation, Fuel
1.1.1 Partnership 12,000 12,000 ₱24,000.00
(PAGASA/MASIPAC/LGU) php2,000*12months=php24,000
 Capacity Building 1 staff(CIS
Officer) - 3months
approximately php100,000 * 1
Capacity building and person
1.1.2 development of protocols 106,000 6,000 6,000 ₱118,000.00
for CIS CIS Training(Barangay)
snack, transportation
5persons*php300*12barangays=
php18,000

Regular
dissemination/delivery of Municipality Monitor:
1.1.3
Climate information to
100,000 ₱100,000.00
php 100,000*1pc
community

Operation and Salary (1 staff) php31,000*14

1.1.4 Management of Climate months 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 31,000 93,000 31,000 ₱434,000.00
Infrmation System (CIS) =php 434,000

FFS Curriculum Localization

Materials: 15*php200=php3,000
Meals&Snack:
16,500 ₱16,500.00
15*php200*3meals=php9,000
Transportation:
15*php300=4,500

Standard FFS Facilitator's

Organizing and Conduct of Allowance
Farmers Fields School 2batches/
2.1.1 (FFS) 16weeks*3facilitators*2croping 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 ₱120,000.00
(1crop: Trial Farm, 2 crop: php 10,000*
cross breeding) 2batches*3facilitators*2croping
=php120,000

Meals
php150*36pax*16days*2 43,200 43,200 43,200 43,200 43,200 43,200 43,200 43,200 ₱345,600.00
batches*2croping=php345,600

2-9. Direct Project Cost

(직접사업비)
Training Materials
php 43,250*2batches 86,500 ₱86,500.00
=php86,500

Orientation and Inception

Meeting at the Community
Level
Meals: 20,000 ₱20,000.00
php300*50persons=15,000
Materials:
php100*50persons=5,000
Organizing and Capacity
building on community
2.2.1
seed banking at the
barangay level
Policy Formulation on Buffer
Seeds Stocks, Seed
Distribution, etc. (12
Barangays) 12,000 ₱12,000.00
Meals: 700*12barangay=8,400
Materials:
300*12barangays=3,600

Renovation for Municipal

40,000 30,000 30,000 ₱100,000.00
SeedBank Space
 Procurement of Equipments
and Materials
(Cabinetry, Computer Set,
Moisture Tester, Net Bags,
Vials, Signage) 160,000 ₱160,000.00
= php 60,000
Establishment of Municipal
2.2.2 Procurement of initial seeds
seed bank
= php 100,000

CSB Management Training

Meals:
php300*50persons=15,000
Materials: 23,000 ₱23,000.00
php100*50persons=5,000
Allowance of Speakers:
3,000/day=3,000

Monitoring&Evaluation Midterm & Final evaluation 100,000 100,000 ₱200,000.00

1 Project Manager, 39,000

Staff (3) Salary 1 Project Officer (included) 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 210,000 70,000 ₱980,000.00
1 Finance staff, 31,000

Total(USD) 335,500 277,500 195,200 372,200 159,200 159,200 101,000 201,000 159,200 159,200 361,200 259,200 ₱ 2,739,600.00
2-10. Indirect Project Cost
Office Supplies 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 $ 420,000
(간접사업비)
Others
(*) it is possible to allocate indirect
cost separately for less than 6% of Reserve money $ -
direct cost.
(직접사업비의 6% 이하까지 편성 가능) Total(USD) 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 $ 420,000.00

Direct&Indirect Cost Total(USD) 370,500 312,500 230,200 407,200 194,200 194,200 136,000 236,000 194,200 194,200 396,200 294,200 $ 3,159,600.00
3. Project team organization (local)
*Describe current system and future plan.
Guide
*Write or use organization chart
GNIP is composed of dedicated personnel on the conceptualization of the project. The field and head office in charge of both DRRM and Income Generation sector worked together to gather necessary data that will put value and framework on the proposed project. The DME Unit helped on the construction
of the objective and outcomes of the project, as well as the logical arrangements of activity and the hands-on participation and brainstorming of the higher management.

To give a bigger picture of the organizational chart and how the project will be handled, below is the hierarchy:
1. The whole project will be supervised by the Country Director who will serve as the final approval of all budget disbursement and project implementation requests;
2. To further give input and technical suggestions and advices, the Assistant Operations Department Manager will do the supervision as well, assisting the Country Director
3. Two Head Office-in-charge (DRRM and Income Generation Sector) will give main guidance on the project-based employee to handle the project;
4. Project-based Staff-in-charge will primarily spearhead the project implementation both at the head office and CDP level;
5. Project-based Staff will assist on the whole duration of the project implementation;
6. Project-based finance staff will handle all administrative and financial concerns of the whole project duration.

4. Additional Comments

*Write any comments including discussion topics and requests

Guide
*If you have any consortium plan with other NGO or organization, please describe it. (In case of partnership with enterprise, it will be considered when applying IBS(Inclusive Business Solution) projects.
 [Evaluation Criteria] 2020 KOICA Civil Society Cooperation Project Concept Paper

Evaluation Criteria Contents of examination Percentage

o Properness of pre-investigation and demand survey

- Did you conduct enough research about potential project area? and are project plans based on the pre-investigation
Fullness and validity of pre- through documentary, on-site survey valid?
investigation - Is demand survey done for potential beneficiaries? and does it include the contents about necessity of the project? 20%
for the project - Do components of the project and performance management reflect analysis result from demand survey?
- Is that analyzed if there is any limitation (government policy, regulation, and so on) in regard to reflecting results
from demand survey?

o Connection between goals of the project and development policy of the country
Coincidence with the policy - Relation with mid and long-term development policy of the country 15%
of state
o Correspondence with Country Partnership Strategy(CPS) for Korea government

o Validity of the compilation of a budget for meaty contents and achieving the goal
- Is the budget plan reasonable related to the project's intent
Validity of
o Details and validity about the budget plan
the compilation of a budget 10%
- Details and validity of budget calculation
- Do you have evidence materials of budget calculation (If you spend more than $10,000, you should attach
documentary evidence)

o Clarity of project's goal

- Do goal reflect not activities but results?
- Are there logical relations among way of assessing, frequency of measurement, outputs, achievement of the goals?
Possibility of realization and o Properness of the contents and method of the project 25%
clarity of goals and indicators - Is the relation clear between activity and output?
- Is detailed explanation about the activity clear?
- Is schedule of the project clear and practical?

Consideration and reflection o Consideration about cross cutting issue

- Do contents of the project reflect cross cutting issue such as human rights of vulnerable social group, climate change 5%
of cross cutting issue response, protecting environmental resources, gender equality?

o Have you ever done similar projects before?

Capability to perform the - Does the state have know-how and experience of similar projects
project o Competency of managers and staffs 15%
- Do the local staffs have proper experience and skills to conduct the project?

o Will and capability of the project's partners

Will of participation of the
- Are there will of participation of the project's partners and evidence (MOU, prior consultation) to show role 5%
project's partners allocation?

o Connection with existing projects of KOICA

- Are proposed projects made related to existing projects of KOICA in the state?
Etc o Cost-effectiveness of the project Extra Points
- Can you use existing infrastructures, networks ?