Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Uploaded June 9 2023 by Anita Senkowski - 6.7.23 Ingersoll Ingersoll Order

    Uploaded by

    anitasenkowski
    66 views2 pages
    The bankruptcy court denied Defendant Steven Ingersoll's motion for summary judgment in an adversary proceeding. The court had previously issued a scheduling order setting a deadline of May 26, 2023 for all dispositive motions not addressed in another pending motion. Ingersoll filed his summary judgment motion on June 1, 2023, after the deadline. As a result, the court denied the motion solely because it was not timely filed by the deadline in the scheduling order. The court's prior order converting Ingersoll's motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment remains pending under the deadlines in that order.

    Original Description:

    Steven Ingersoll Smart Schools Bankruptcy Adversary Filing

    Original Title

    Uploaded June 9 2023 by Anita Senkowski_6.7.23 Ingersoll Ingersoll Order

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The bankruptcy court denied Defendant Steven Ingersoll's motion for summary judgment in an adversary proceeding. The court had previously issued a scheduling order setting a deadline of May 26, 2023 for all dispositive motions not addressed in another pending motion. Ingersoll filed his summary judgment motion on June 1, 2023, after the deadline. As a result, the court denied the motion solely because it was not timely filed by the deadline in the scheduling order. The court's prior order converting Ingersoll's motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment remains pending under the deadlines in that order.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Flag for inappropriate content
    66 views2 pages

    Uploaded June 9 2023 by Anita Senkowski - 6.7.23 Ingersoll Ingersoll Order

    Uploaded by

    anitasenkowski
    The bankruptcy court denied Defendant Steven Ingersoll's motion for summary judgment in an adversary proceeding. The court had previously issued a scheduling order setting a deadline of May 26, 2023 for all dispositive motions not addressed in another pending motion. Ingersoll filed his summary judgment motion on June 1, 2023, after the deadline. As a result, the court denied the motion solely because it was not timely filed by the deadline in the scheduling order. The court's prior order converting Ingersoll's motion to dismiss to a motion for summary judgment remains pending under the deadlines in that order.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    Case:20-80059-jwb Doc #:237 Filed: 06/07/2023 Page 1 of 2

    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT


    WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
    ____________________

    In re:
    Case No. BT 19-00613
    FULL SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT, LLC, Chapter 7

    Debtor.
    ____________________________________________/

    INDEPENDENT BANK, derivatively for and on behalf of


    KELLY M. HAGAN, CHAPTER 7 TRUSTEE for the
    Bankruptcy Estate of Full Spectrum Management, LLC,
    Adversary Proceeding
    Plaintiff, No. 20-80059

    -vs-

    MARK D. NOSS,
    MARK D. NOSS, O.D., LLC,
    SMART SCHOOLS MANAGEMENT, INC.,
    MDN DEVELOPMENT, LLC,
    SMART SCHOOLS MANAGEMENT OF BAY CITY, LLC,
    STEVEN INGERSOLL, and
    SMART SCHOOLS, INC.,

    Defendants.
    _____________________________________________/

    ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT INGERSOLL'S


    MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

    PRESENT: HONORABLE JAMES W. BOYD


    United States Bankruptcy Judge

    On March 28, 2023, this court entered a Scheduling Order regarding Plaintiff
    Independent Bank's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (AP Dkt. No. 212.) Among
    other things, the Scheduling Order required all dispositive motions "on an issue or count
    not addressed in the Bank's pending motion for partial summary judgment" to be filed by
    no later than May 26, 2023.

    On June 1, 2023, pro se Defendant Steven Ingersoll filed a Motion for Summary
    Judgment. (AP Dkt. No. 235.) The court has reviewed the motion and has determined
    that it was filed after the deadline established in the prior Scheduling Order and must be
    denied on that basis.
    Case:20-80059-jwb Doc #:237 Filed: 06/07/2023 Page 2 of 2

    NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Ingersoll's Motion


    for Summary Judgment (AP Dkt. No. 235) be, and hereby is, DENIED.

    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Ingersoll's prior Motion to Dismiss (AP


    Dkt. No. 220), which the court converted to a motion for summary judgment by order
    entered on May 22, 2023, remains pending. All deadlines established in the court's prior
    Scheduling Order Regarding Defendant Ingersoll's Motion to Dismiss (AP Dkt. No. 233)
    remain in effect.

    IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve a copy of this order pursuant
    to FED. R. BANKR. P. 9022 and LBR 5005-4 upon:

    Sandra S. Hamilton, Esq. Gerald B. Zelenock, Jr., Esq.

    Wallace H. Tuttle, Esq. Steven Ingersoll


    1514 Center Ave.
    Bay City, MI 48708

    END OF ORDER

    IT  IS SO ORDERED.

    Dated June 7, 2023

    You might also like