Professional Documents
Culture Documents
J. A. Langer Engaging With Literature-1
J. A. Langer Engaging With Literature-1
Langer
Elizabeth Close
Improving
literary
understanding
THROUGH CLASSROOM CONVERSATION
Research reports
and newsletter
articles about this
and other Center
work are available
at this site.
http://cela.albany.edu
PAGE 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ....................................... 5
classroom .................................. 13
Instructional scaffolding
for thinking and discussing .......... 14
PAGE 3
W
E
hy is it important to
R
through reading,
thinking, and
T
discussing literature
A
alternative ways to From 1987 to 1995, Judith Langer and a team of field research-
R
gain knowledge and ers took a close look at what happens in classrooms that help
E
solve problems.
students engage in deep understandings of literature. They
Through sharing of
T
worked with teachers of grades 1-12 and the first year of col-
understandings,
I
lege to learn more about how readers think when they read
they learn not only
and discuss literature and how teachers can help students use
L
important content,
but also cognitive, discussion to think more deeply. Students were also partners
critical, and social
Y
for success in
and their classroom discussions.
academic courses,
W
work, and life. As a result of the study, Langer was able to describe the
Living through a processes involved in literary understanding as well as the
literary experience
instructional environments, activities, and interactions that
involves exploring
support it. The results of this research are shared in a set of
meanings, interpre-
research reports by Langer, the field researchers, and the teach-
tations and
perspectives while ers (see page 22 for a partial list), as well as in Langer’s book,
maintaining an Envisioning Literature. In addition, Maryland Public Televi-
openness to future
sion, with a grant from Annenberg/CPB, has prepared a se-
possibilities.
ries of professional development programs based on this work.
PAGE 4
Improving
literary
understanding
through
classroom
I N T R O D U C T I O N
the Center.
PAGE 5
B U I L D I N G E N V I S I O N M E N T S
E nvisionments
are understandings There is no best map for coming to understand any literary piece, whether
fiction or nonfiction. However, people orient their minds differently when they
— the wealth of read for literary understanding as compared to when they read for information.
ideas that people They build envisionments in both orientations, but the strategies they use to
build them and the kinds of understandings they develop are different. They
have in their minds read for and expect different kinds of information, and thus, engage in some-
at any point in time. what different reading experiences.
Envisionments
Reading for literary Reading for information:
include related understanding: Opening Maintaining a point of
ideas and images, horizons of possibilities reference
When readers seek to make sense of a When readers are primarily concerned
questions, hunches,
literary work, they engage in an ex- with gaining information, they work to
anticipations, ploration; they are open to many pos- develop a sense of the topic by main-
arguments, sibilities for meaning. At any given taining a point of reference. Their
point a reader is developing ideas, or envisionments are shaped by their
disagreements, envisionments, of events, characters, questions and explorations that bring
and confusions that and meaning while anticipating what them closer to the information they
might be ahead. Readers recognize that seek and that help them to better un-
fill the mind during
some future experience — a develop- derstand the topic. As people read, they
every reading, ment in the work, an interaction with use the content to narrow the possibili-
writing, speaking, or friends or fellow students — might ties of meaning and sharpen their
change their thinking. Thus their read- understandings of the information.
thinking experience. ing is guided by inquisitiveness. Using information gained along the
Literary envisionments — thoughts way (combined with what they already
about what is being read or discussed know) to refine their understanding,
for the moment and thoughts about the they seek to get the author’s point or
whole (e.g., theme, meaning, eventu- understand more and more about the
alities) — constantly inform each other topic. Here, unlike literary thinking,
because a reader’s sense of what the their questioning is guided by their
piece is “about” is always open to sense of the whole (e.g., the topic or the
change. We call this exploring the hori- point of the argument and the ideas,
zons of possibilities. For example, as issues, and arguments related to it).
readers explore relationships between Although readers may revise their cur-
characters, they understand not only rent understandings, rarely do they
the characters and their actions, but change their sense of the whole or what
they also develop ideas about how the the entire piece is about. New questions
piece might end. As their understand- and ideas about the topic may develop,
ings of the characters change, so, too, but the point of reference remains the
do possibilities for the ending, and focus around which they build their
vice versa. When readers share their envisionments.
thinking with others, they consider
more possibilities for meaning.
Readers can move in and out of literary and information orientations depending upon their pur-
poses for reading. Both are essential for effective reading, thinking, and problem solving. This
booklet will focus on exploring the horizons of possibilities for literary understanding.
PAGE 6
Enriching literary understanding
O ur research
identified four
PAGE 7
T eachers who ask questions based on the four stances help
students to think from a variety of perspectives. They also pro-
vide students with models to use in posing their own questions.
move to •
•
What do you wonder about?
stances •
reading?
PAGE 8
ments, they can also step back from the text inactivity in developing better relations,
A ll of these
stances are
world to consider what they understand and ways to become more involved in so-
from the reading and how that influences cial and political issues. Their literary available to
what they already know. After reading Roll envisionments thus enrich their under- readers as their
of Thunder, Hear My Cry, the story of a standings of the real world. envisionments
young African-American girl living in Stepping back and rethinking does not grow. Understand-
Mississippi in the 1930s, students might occur as frequently as the other stances, but ing comes through
think about how serious the consequences it can have powerful impact. It is one of the stances taken
of segregation are and how little they re- the reasons we read literature — to help — becoming
ally understand its effects. They may think us think about and sort out our own lives acquainted with
of their own neighborhoods, their own past and places in the world.
the text, using
meaning to build
■Stepping back and objectifying the experience
As she builds her envisionment of the able to make judgments about the relative
meaning, gaining
insights, and
school environment, the student often strengths and weaknesses of the two school taking a critical
steps back to consider her experience from experiences. view.
a distance. Initially she may have been an- So too, readers can become objective
gry or frightened by the idea of attending a about their reading experiences and use
new school, but now and then she is able these to reflect on the text and the reading
to take a more analytical look. She may experience itself. They distance themselves
think about the additional opportunities from their envisionments as they make
this experience has provided (e.g., more judgments, focus on the structure of the
sports options, more electives) and may be text, or comment on meaning.
A W O R D A B O U T S C A F F O L D I N G
PAGE 9
G
S O M E S T R AT E G I E S T H AT
SUPPORT ENVISIONMENT BUILDING
N
small group).
• Provide support (scaffolding) for students to employ the four stances
(teacher-designed guides to focus their small group discussions).
R
• Ask students to write before sharing their thinking aloud to help Writing
develop and focus their envisionments (e.g., quick-writes). activities
• Ask students to write during the experience to explore, rethink, and
expand their envisionments (e.g., journals, written conversations).
• Ask students to write after a discussion to reflect on ideas and
to reconsider possibilities for changed or new understandings (e.g.,
response journals, pieces written from a character’s point of view).
• Encourage students to use talk as a way to try out ideas and sharpen
thoughts for writing.
PAGE 10
In envisionment-building class-
at the core.
■
Use class meetings as time to develop
understandings
Students and teachers know that their ideas about a par-
ticular piece may change as they engage in a discussion.
Supporting Class time is an opportunity to share thinking, re-
work understandings, raise questions, and use the stances
PAGE 11
1 Involve all
students in
all aspects of
class discussion.
Some
strategies 2 Help students focus on ideas by
providing guiding questions that
will deepen the discussion (avoid
questions with yes, no, or one-word
that support answers).
• What might you do in a similar situation?
struggling •
Why do you think the character did it his way?
What is the character feeling? How might
this affect his actions?
readers •
•
How does the setting help you understand
the character’s feelings?
If you were telling this story, how might
you end it? Why?
• How might this story be different if it
happened in another time period?
3
Provide direct instructional scaffolding with guided
activities that help students develop envisionments.
■
• Design activities to support students’ • Describe a similar experience
ideas and questions. you’ve had. What feelings did you
• Paired readings where students share with this main character?
read together, stopping to What feelings were different? Why?
share thoughts and questions. ■
• Encourage students to listen to and
• Note taking while reading to respond to the ideas of others.
capture ideas (e.g., writing on • Does anyone agree or disagree with
copies of the text, or using Damien’s idea? Why?
sticky notes). • What other ideas do you have
• Journal writing to record about why the character behaved
thoughts and possible insights. this way?
• Quick-writes at crucial points in ■
• Provide opportunities for students to
the narrative or at the end to engage in related activities in multiple
help students focus. formats that make the thinking of their
■• Provide alternative ways to access peers visible and develop their under-
material (e.g., books on tape). standings of the work (e.g. role play,
■• Ask questions that help students make think-aloud, dramatic presentations,
connections with the full text, with their fish bowls, art representations).
own experiences and other readings. ■
• Provide individual copies of guiding
• Can you tell about another book questions (e.g. bookmarks,
where the character was like sticky note reminders).
this one?
PAGE 12
I N C L U D I N G S T R U G G L I N G R E A D E R S
I N A N E N V I S I O N M E N T - B U I L D I NG C L A S S R O O M
Often students who struggle with reading find ments as collections of ideas rather than cohe-
themselves distanced from classroom activi- sive and ever-changing wholes.
ties. What kind of support do these readers Yet, when less proficient readers engage
need? Throughout the study, researchers ob- in thought-provoking literary discussions,
served that all readers engaged in the en- they perform more like proficient readers
visionment-building process, but there were because the thinking of their peers is visible
differences in the quality of envisionments. to them and they have models for building
Struggling readers are less aware of their pur- understanding. Through participation in
poses for reading (literary or discursive). Their envisionment-building discussions, they gain
envisionments are often thinly developed and reading strategies, e.g., models for ways to
easily shatter when they are puzzled or when think about reading purposes, literary content,
they lack or don’t use background informa- possibilities for meaning. They learn what
tion or prior experience. Struggling readers are counts in the discussion and use that knowl-
more likely to lose their envisionments and to edge to develop their envisionments. They see
have more difficulty returning to them. Be- their classmates working together to explore
cause they lack an understanding of the kinds the horizons of possibilities, sometimes puz-
of knowledge they are after, they rarely look zling together over meaning, and they learn
for connections to what they have read and not only that puzzling and questioning are
understood earlier, and they have difficulty normal but also that their experiences, per-
hypothesizing about where the piece might spectives, and knowledge add important un-
go. They tend to treat their growing envision- derstandings to the discussion.
PAGE 13
S tudents need
support before,
par ticipate in a
literary discussion.
Teachers can do
students develop
Instructionaltheir envisionments.
Beginning on page
scaffolding
16, we offer
samples to illustrate
activities that
and discussing
PAGE 14
Helping students Learners often need support when facing new or difficult tasks. When ap-
move in and propriate support (or scaffolding) is not provided, they may go off task,
lose interest, or give up completely. Teachers can use the four reading stances
through various to help students explore horizons of possibilities and thus develop their
reading stances literary understanding. For example, if students are spending much of the
time in one stance, the teacher can help them extend their thinking by ask-
ing a question or modeling thinking in another stance. Effective instruc-
tional scaffolding also allows students to develop skills for supporting,
challenging, and shaping thinking.
Teachers need to be careful listeners and observers so they can deter-
mine when and what kind of support students require at any given time.
As students internalize the process, scaffolding can be decreased and fi-
nally eliminated. Two kinds of instructional scaffolding are particularly
helpful as students learn to think more deeply about literature: scaffolding
ways to discuss and ways to think.
Scaffolding Scaffolding
ways to ways to
discuss think
■ Tapping understanding ■ Focusing ideas
Ask questions that invite students to Help students focus and narrow in on
express ideas, e.g., “What were you concerns, e.g., “You’re saying that it
thinking as you finished reading?” wasn’t what the children did then?”
“What questions would you like to “What was the character’s purpose for
bring to the discussion?” “What part doing that?”
of the story was most powerful? Why?”
■ Shaping arguments
■ Seeking clarification Help students shape their ideas into
Ask for clarification or restatement, e.g., tighter presentations, e.g., “I wonder
“Can you say more about that idea?” whether your idea is limited to just one
“I’m not sure that I understood. Are character or whether the idea works for
you saying …?” “Can you say that in other characters as well?”
another way?”
■ Linking concerns
■ Inviting participation Help students use other ideas from the
Show students how to enter a conver- discussion, from the text, or other read-
sation, e.g., “What questions do you ings to develop their own interpreta-
have?” “Does anyone want to respond tion, e.g. “Listen to Henri. He says that
to Willie’s comment?” there are two ideas in the poem. See if
you agree or disagree.”
■ Orchestrating discussion
Show students how to converse, agree, ■ Upping the ante
disagree, connect and extend ideas, e.g., Provide new and less obvious ways to
“Sam, you’ve had your hand up for think about their ideas and concerns,
awhile. What would you like to add?” e.g., “How is the view of the charac-
“Devon, do you want to go back to ters in this play different from our mod-
something Maria said earlier?” “Talk ern view?” “Who agrees that it’s a good
to one another, not just to me.” idea to forget and start over? Why?”
PAGE 15
S U P P O R T I N G D I S C U S S I O N S T H A T
DEVELOP AND EXTEND STUDENT THINKING
Excerpt Excerpt
Middle school students are preparing to read The teacher is preparing to read The Mud Pony
Girl Who Owned a City (O.T. Nelson). At the (Caron Lee Cohen) to a first-grade class. She
beginning of this novel all adults in the world opens the windows to bring in fresh air as the
are dead and only children under the age of students gather on a rug that defines their story
thirteen remain. All public services are gone, and discussion area. She then lowers the lights
and the children are forced to rely on their to set the mood for the reading. Taking a seat
limited skills to survive. with the children, she holds the book up and
As preparation for reading, the teacher asks introduces it.
students to imagine a world with no adults Teacher: This story is called The Mud Pony
and to individually list the advantages and and it’s by Caron Lee Cohen and
disadvantages of this situation. The students the illustrations are by Shonto
bring their chairs into a circle. Desks are Begay. Shonto,that’s an interesting
moved out of the way and unrelated books name. The Mud Pony.
and papers remain outside of the circle. The Students: Mud Pony.
teacher and students sit so they can see Teacher: This is a story that has been told by
and respond directly to one another. a group of Native People called the
Candy: I couldn’t find any strong points Pawnee.
and it made me realize how much Students: Pawnee.
I like my parents. Teacher: And they’ve been telling the story
Teacher: Okay, what did you see as a for a long, long time. And the author
problem? decided to write the story in words
Candy: Well, first you’d think like great, no that we could understand.
school, but then you think, geez, Juan: Did it say adapted or the other one
we’d all be pretty dumb. in the front?
Barbara: But you wouldn’t have to listen to Teacher: It doesn’t say adapted and that’s a
anyone. very good question.
Candy: But there’d also be no one to give So this author doesn’t do what Terry
you advice. Would you listen to a Colin does. This author said retold.
six-year-old? I’m very glad you brought that up,
Lily: Candy is true. The strong points Juan, because this author said that
are all really weak points. Who she retold the story which means
would make food? Who would care she is telling it very close
for you? to the real, real original story. Now
Al: The strong point that I have is not Terry Colin adapted her stories and
having to answer to anyone, not that means that she didn’t quite
having to tell them like a D on your make them exactly like they’ve
report card or coming home late. been told.
PAGE 16
N
O
Inviting initial
understandings
I
Tapping what students are thinking
S
at the end of a reading but before
S
center of the discussion. These initial
xamples of things to
say at the end of a reading understandings are always subject
(short story, selection,
U
to change and are often incomplete, but
chapter) to invite students’
initial understandings: they provide ways to begin an exploration.
■ Jot down what you were
C
thinking as you finished
the piece.
■ List the
S
questions
we need to
talk about.
I
■ Write about
what
D
bothered
(concerned,
interested,
delighted)
you at the
end of the
story or tell your partner
about the part that stands
out for you.
■ Draw a picture of what
you see.
■ Circle words or phrases
that seem important or
puzzling.
PAGE 17
Supporting the development of interpretations
Teachers can help students develop and changes across time. They support students
extend their envisionments by questioning as they consider multiple perspectives from
and building on their current understand- within the reading and from their own ex-
ings. To do this they encourage students to periences. In this way students learn to use
think about possible explanations for ac- differing views from the discussion as ways
tions, events, or emotions and to reflect on to explore, refine, and challenge their own
ideas and the ideas of others.
Excerpt
A high school teacher helps students develop ties. One is that everybody goes
and extend their envisionments of The Great to the Gatsby mansion.
Gatsby (F. Scott Fitzgerald). Note how the orchestrating, shaping
teacher keys in on their concerns and encour- Christie: But he got invited by invitation.
ages students to build on others’ thoughts to Teacher: Aha. That’s your question. Okay,
The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald
PAGE 18
N
Inviting students Stocktaking
O
to take a critical It is important for students to un-
stance derstand that envisionments can
develop beyond class meeting
To help students step back from
I
times. By concluding a discussion
their envisionments, take a more
without shutting off thinking, the
objective look, and analyze their
teacher helps students to continue
understandings, the text, and their
S
to consider ideas and issues.
experiences, teachers ask students
Teachers can close sessions by
to examine related issues and al-
summarizing key ideas, noting
ternative perspectives and to ex-
S
changes in ideas, and pointing to
plore textual features and literary
concerns not yet adequately ex-
concepts.
pressed. This leaves room for fur-
ther exploration of possibilities
U
A s students respond to
these sample questions,
and envisionment building.
C
ask them to explain and Girl Who Owned a City
provide support for their Teacher:
thinking. I have to do something. I have to
stop you. Tomorrow we still have a
S
■ How does the way this question about realism. Kent
piece is written (language, brought it back again. We have a
“All Summer in a Day”
literary devices, style, etc.) question about changing. We still
Teacher:
I
affect your understanding? haven’t finished that. And if there’s
We haven’t talked about William
anything anyone else wants to say
and we really haven’t talked about
■ If a psychologist (reporter, about the ending of the story.
Margot at all. And so that is one of
D
We’ve talked about the ending,
lawyer, historian, etc.) were the things I’d like you to think about
we’ve talked about change, and
to look at this character, as you do your quick-write tonight.
we’ve only touched on Jimmy’s
what might she say? I’d like you to think about the
issue of realism.
writer’s style, but I would also like
■ How do the roles of the you to think about what a science
The Mud Pony fiction story should do for you. Can
characters in this story Teacher: you, as Nick said, ignore the setting
connect with current news Aha. Well, I think your question is or is there a problem for you? Then
events? something worth thinking about. I I’d like you to think about why the
think we will all give that some author selected this setting. You
■ If these characters were to thought, and I thank you for your don’t have to answer all of these
face this same conflict question. Maybe later we can talk questions, but I’d like you to think
today, how might the story about that question: Why was this and write about at least one of
be different? boy the only one at the beginning of them tonight.
the story who didn’t seem to have a
■ What does the author say pony and who got teased?
about the culture in this
story? What is your view?
PAGE 19
More about T hroughout this booklet we have mentioned
literary
excerpts that illustrate them. The strategies are
written conversations, response journals, dis-
cussion guides, think-aloud or paired/shared
Strategy Strategy
Written conversations take place between Response journals can take many different forms
pairs of students. Sharing a sheet of paper, they depending upon student needs and teacher goals. Es-
communicate their ideas and ask one another sentially students use them to respond to their read-
questions by writing their thoughts. They are able ing. Teachers might suggest questions students can
to converse on topics of concern to them while consider as they write or ask students to record and
capturing their thoughts for further consideration. respond to their own questions. Students may use a
double entry format so that they can return to earlier
Excerpt responses and reflect and comment upon them or ex-
Middle school students’ written conversation about change journals and respond to classmates’ entries.
Girl Who Owned a City (O.T. Nelson).
PAGE 21
Literature Cited
Bradbury, R. (1992). “All Summer in a Day.” In J.N. Beatty and W.L. McBride
(Eds.), Literature and Language (pp. 123-129). Evanston, IL: McDougal,
Littell. (Original work published 1954)
Cohen, C.L. (1988). The Mud Pony. New York: Scholastic.
Fitzgerald, F.S. (1990). The Great Gatsby. New York: MacMillan.
Hunt, E. T. (1992). “Taught Me Purple.” In J.N. Beatty and W.L. McBride
(Eds.), Literature and Language (p. 321). Evanston, IL: McDougal, Littell.
(Original work published 1964)
Nelson, O.T. (1975). The Girl Who Owned a City. New York: Dell.
Paulsen, G. (1991). Canyons. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell.
Taylor, M.D. (1991). Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry. New York: Penguin USA.
Acknowledgements
This publication would never have been possible
without the efforts of Janet Angelis, our expert editor.
Professional Colleagues
Dale Allender Urbana, IL
Jim Burke San Francisco, CA
Sharon Chaney Nashville, TN
Arlene Clausell Morgantown, WV
Jeffrey N. Golub Tampa, FL
Judith Irvin Tallahassee, FL
Teri S. Lesesne Huntsville, TX
Akiko Morimoto Vista, CA
Kathy Rowlands Pittsburgh, PA
Sallie Snyder Gold Beach, OR
David Wendelin Golden, CO
Jeffrey D. Wilhelm Orono, ME
CELA Staff
Peter Johnston
Jacqueline Marino
Eija Rougle
Additional information is
website; from
Langer’s Envisioning
http://cela.albany.edu/
publication/envisionment.htm
CELA is the only national center funded by
the U.S. Department of Education to
conduct research dedicated to improving
the teaching and learning of English
language and literacy, grades K-12.
Phone: 518.442.5026
Fax: 518.442.5933
Email: cela@albany.edu
http://cela.albany.edu
The Center on English Learning & Achievement (CELA) is supported by the Office of
Educational Research and Improvement (OERI), U.S. Department of Education (award
number R305A960005). The research on which this booklet is drawn was con-
ducted under OERI grants G008720278 and R117G10015. The contents of this
document do not necessarily represent the positions of OERI, the department, or September 2001
any agency of the U.S. Government.