Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Case 18 - 2009
Case 18 - 2009
Case 18 - 2009
From the Department of Medicine, Eden- Dr. Anne Griffin (Medicine and Pediatrics): A 24-year-old woman with the acquired im-
dale Hospital, Pietermaritzburg, and the munodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and pulmonary tuberculosis was admitted to a
Department of Medicine, Nelson R. Man-
dela School of Medicine, University of hospital in South Africa that is affiliated with this hospital, because of progressive
KwaZulu–Natal, Durban — both in South cough, dyspnea, and wasting.
Africa (D.W.); the Division of Infectious A diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis was made 7 months earlier, when she
Diseases (R.M.H.) and the Department of
Radiology (S.D.), Massachusetts General presented at another facility with a productive cough, and a sputum specimen was
Hospital, Boston; and the Departments positive for acid-fast bacilli on sputum-smear microscopy. No chest radiograph was
of Medicine (R.M.H.) and Radiology obtained. She had no known history of active tuberculosis. The patient was enrolled
(S.D.), Harvard Medical School, Boston.
in a local Directly Observed Treatment (DOTS) program, and antimycobacterial
N Engl J Med 2009;360:2456-64. therapy (isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide for 2 months, followed
Copyright © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society. by isoniazid and rifampin for 4 months) was administered according to the South
African National Tuberculosis Control Programme guidelines. The next month,
a test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection was positive; the CD4+
T-lymphocyte count was 102 cells per cubic millimeter.
After 6 months of therapy, the productive cough persisted and stained specimens
of sputum remained positive for acid-fast bacilli. Isoniazid and rifampin were con-
tinued. Approximately 6 weeks before admission, the patient’s cough worsened and
dyspnea developed and worsened, with fevers, night sweats, and weight loss. She
became progressively debilitated and was admitted to the hospital.
She reported having been hospitalized elsewhere for 4 months during the pre-
vious year; no further information was available. She had no known allergies. She
had not received antiretroviral medications or prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii.
Her only medications were rifampin and isoniazid. She was single, with no children.
She lived in a poor community in the province of KwaZulu–Natal, South Africa, and
was unemployed. She did not smoke, drink alcohol, or use recreational drugs, and
she had never worked in a health care facility or been incarcerated. She was a mem-
ber of the Zulu ethnic group. No other family members were known to have tuber-
culosis.
dents in internal medicine from Massachusetts favors an infectious disease. The presence of cavi-
General Hospital participate in clinical and edu- ties and loss of volume suggests a subacute to
cational services as part of a Global Health elective. chronic process, such as a mycobacterial or fun-
The hospital serves about 1 million people from gal infection. In an immunocompromised patient,
communities that have prevalence rates of HIV such as this one, opportunistic infections such as
infection and tuberculosis that are among the high- chronic P. jirovecii pneumonia can have an appear-
est in the world. This patient, who was infected ance similar to that seen in this patient. It is dif-
with both HIV and tuberculosis, was referred to ficult to rule out acute infection superimposed on
our hospital because of evidence of progressive tu- the background of chronic lung disease, since
berculosis, despite appropriate treatment. there are no earlier radiographs for comparison.
May we review the radiology studies? Dr. Wilson: I am aware of the diagnosis in this
Dr. Subba Digumarthy: There are multiple cavities case, which illustrates many of the diagnostic and
and air-space opacities in the left lung involving therapeutic challenges encountered in resource-
the upper lobe (Fig. 1), the lingula, and the lower limited settings in southern Africa. This young
lobe. There is loss of volume in the left lung, with woman with HIV infection was in a DOTS pro-
a slight shift of the mediastinum to the left. The gram that should have ensured adherence to first-
left heart border and the mediastinum are par- line therapy for tuberculosis, but she had sputum
tially obscured by the opacities in the left lung. smears that were persistently positive for acid-fast
There is also focal consolidation in the right up- bacilli; there is a paucity of other laboratory infor-
per lobe adjacent to the minor fissure. There is mation, such as culture results and drug-sensitiv-
pleural thickening or a small pleural effusion on ity testing. Common causes of sputum smears that
the left side. are persistently positive for acid-fast bacilli in HIV-
Multifocal asymmetric involvement of the lungs infected adults are shown in Table 2, and causes
of nonresponse to antituberculosis therapy are
shown in Table 3.
aminase levels are commonly seen in patients Table 2. Causes of Sputum Smears That Are Persistently
taking antituberculosis therapy. Causes of mod- Positive for Acid-Fast Bacilli in HIV-Infected Adults.
erately elevated lactate dehydrogenase levels in- Mycobacterium tuberculosis
clude tuberculosis, lymphoma, hemolysis, and P. Erratic adherence to antituberculosis therapy
jirovecii pneumonia. Abnormal renal function could Poor drug absorption
be caused by HIV-related nephropathy,3 acute tu- Limited drug penetration into pulmonary cavities
bular necrosis due to sepsis, or rifampin, which and fibrous tissue
has been associated with renal tubular, interstitial, Nonviable organisms shed into respiratory secretions
and glomerular disease. Initial evaluation should Drug-resistant strains
include urinary dipstick testing, microscopy for Bacteria other than M. tuberculosis
casts, and renal ultrasound scan, and if renal func- Nontuberculous mycobacteria (colonization or
tion continued to deteriorate, a kidney biopsy may invasive infection)
be needed. Nocardia*
Rhodococcus*
Causes of persistently positive sputum smears
* This species is partially acid-fast.
This patient’s sputum smears were positive for
acid-fast bacilli, and causes other than persistent
tuberculosis need to be considered (Table 2). Col-
Table 3. Causes of Nonresponse to Antituberculosis
onization and invasion of bronchiectatic lung tis-
Therapy in HIV-Infected Adults.
sue by nontuberculous mycobacteria is possible;
diagnosis requires identification of the species in Incorrect original tuberculosis diagnosis
a positive culture.4 Nocardia species are partially Nonadherence to antituberculosis therapy
acid-fast and cause cavitating lung disease; how- Resistance to mycobacterial drugs
ever, the absence of skin involvement, the lack of Post-tuberculosis lung disease (bronchiectasis)
focal neurologic signs, and the absence of a clin- Superimposed infection or tumor
ical response to high-dose trimethoprim–sulfame- Progression of HIV disease
Immune reconstitution syndrome (after starting antiret-
thoxazole make this diagnosis unlikely. roviral therapy)
Deterioration due to other conditions (e.g., heart failure,
Causes of worsening respiratory disease renal disease, or diabetes)
HIV infection evolves over a period of months to
years, with gradual weight loss, fatigue, chronic
diarrhea, oral pain, and skin rash. Superimposed nolones should not be used for the treatment of
localized or systemic infections may cause clini- bacterial infections of the respiratory tract in set-
cal deterioration over a period of days to several tings with a high incidence of tuberculosis, since
weeks, as seen in this patient. Her 6-week respira- activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis can mask
tory deterioration suggests a new pulmonary infec- culture-positive disease and promote the develop-
tion. P. jirovecii is an important cause of subacute ment of resistance. On admission, the patient was
pneumonia in southern Africa, and an induced appropriately treated for a bacterial infection of the
sputum specimen for direct fluorescent antibody lower respiratory tract and P. jirovecii pneumonia.
testing or polymerase-chain-reaction assay for This patient was isolated only after spending
P. jirovecii would be helpful to evaluate this pos- a week in an open ward. It is essential to isolate
sibility. Other possible pathogens include Legion- all patients with positive sputum smears at the
ella pneumophila, Chlamydia pneumoniae, and Mycoplas- time of admission,6 but this may be difficult to
ma pneumoniae; this patient was taking rifampin, achieve in a resource-limited setting. Negative-
which has activity against legionella and chlamyd- pressure rooms are not available, and physically
ia but does not have an effect on mycoplasma. separating an acutely ill patient from the rest of
A tetracycline or macrolide such as azithromycin the ward in a side cubicle (if one is available) may
could have been added to cover this atypical patho- restrict access to nursing care without greatly re-
gen, although there are potential interactions be- ducing the risk of infection. Cough hygiene and
tween the macrolides and rifampin.5 Fluoroqui- the use of surgical masks by patients with smear-
are often limited. This case is of particular rele- tibility testing are not possible for all patients, this
vance to clinicians in South Africa, where exten- patient’s lack of clinical response (persistent cough)
sively drug-resistant tuberculosis has been con- and the presence of smear-positive disease after
firmed in all nine provinces. Genotyping studies 2 months or more of therapy should have prompt-
have shown that many patients with extensively ed such cultures and drug-susceptibility testing.
drug-resistant tuberculosis in this patient’s prov- In the context of a DOTS program, persistent
ince of KwaZulu–Natal have been infected with the smear-positive disease after more than 2 months
highly transmissible F15/LAM4/KZN strain, which of therapy increases, by a factor of 12, the likeli-
developed resistance to as many as seven drugs hood of multidrug resistance13 and is a well-estab-
over the span of a decade since its original fin- lished indication for culture and testing for drug
gerprinting, in 1994.9 susceptibility according to South African guide-
lines.14 Even with a confirmed positive smear af-
Causes of infection with extensively drug- ter 6 months of therapy, she did not undergo cul-
resistant tuberculosis ture and testing for drug susceptibility until her
This patient could have primary infection with a final hospitalization. In addition, after a culture
strain of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis,10 was sent, the diagnosis of extensively drug-resistant
a mixed infection, or reinfection with a resistant tuberculosis was not reported until 3 months lat-
strain while on first-line treatment.11,12 Her his- er. Thus, multiple opportunities for earlier diag-
tory of a previous prolonged hospitalization rais- nosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis were missed.
es the possibility of nosocomial transmission, a The use of rapid diagnostic tests for tubercu-
well-described mode of acquisition of drug-resis- losis at the time of the patient’s original diagno-
tant tuberculosis in HIV-positive patients.10 Fi- sis would have had benefits for both her and the
nally, she might have been exposed during that community, because of decreased risk of trans-
hospitalization to fluoroquinolones, injectable anti- mission. Rapid diagnostic methods under evalu-
biotics, or both for treatment of bacterial infec- ation in resource-limited settings include the mi-
tions such as invasive pneumococcal disease or croscopic-observation drug-susceptibility (MODS)
nontyphoidal salmonellosis, which are not un- assay and line-probe assays. These have a high
common in HIV-positive patients. Such exposures degree of concordance with drug-susceptibility
may contribute to the evolution of resistance to testing in the detection of resistance to isoniazid
these agents in a patient with undiagnosed or in- and rifampin, especially in smear-positive disease,
adequately treated tuberculosis. and a reduced time to diagnosis as compared with
There are three aspects of this patient’s treat- conventional methods (7 days for MODS and 1
ment that should be explored further. These in- to 2 days for the line-probe assay, as compared
clude timely diagnosis of drug-resistant tubercu- with 22 to 68 days for conventional liquid and
losis; chemotherapeutic management of extensively solid mediums).15,16 Current versions of rapid di-
drug-resistant tuberculosis, including adjunctive agnostic tests do not detect resistance to fluoro-
interventions; and management of HIV/AIDS in quinolones and injectable drugs. Therefore, the
this coinfected patient. confirmation of extensively drug-resistant tuber-
culosis still requires access to drug-susceptibility
Diagnosis of drug-resistant tuberculosis testing for second-line tuberculosis drugs. A two-
First, the delay in diagnosis of drug-resistant tu- step strategy, which could have been used for this
berculosis was an obstacle to proper medical care patient, would involve the use of rapid diagnostic
for this patient. Unfortunately, it is the most com- tests to screen for multidrug-resistant tuberculo-
mon roadblock to accessing appropriate second- sis, followed by expedited referral of the isolate,
line antimycobacterial therapy for patients coin- once drug resistance was detected, for expanded
fected with HIV and drug-resistant tuberculosis second-line drug susceptibility testing.
in resource-limited settings. As is standard in these
settings, this patient’s diagnosis of tuberculosis Management of drug-resistant tuberculosis
was based on smear microscopy and clinical cri- in a resource-limited setting
teria, without sputum cultures and drug-suscep- In addition to evaluating and treating the patient
tibility testing. Although cultures and drug-suscep- for other concomitant diagnoses, should we con-
sider empiric therapy for multidrug-resistant tu- fects on bone marrow, and the drug has not been
berculosis? In most resource-limited settings, evaluated in patients coinfected with HIV. In this
documentation of multidrug resistance is required patient, with HIV and a compromised bone mar-
before the initiation of treatment for multidrug- row, linezolid would not have been a favorable
resistant tuberculosis, since unregulated use of choice. High-dose isoniazid has been shown to
second-line antimycobacterial agents can lead to increase negative sputum cultures in patients with
the development of extensively drug-resistant tu- multidrug-resistant tuberculosis,22 but it has not
berculosis. The issue is even more complex for this been formally evaluated in patients with exten-
patient, who actually had extensively drug-resis- sively drug-resistant tuberculosis or in patients
tant tuberculosis, since most empirical regimens who are coinfected with HIV.23
for the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuber- If an adequate antimycobacterial regimen is
culosis in resource-limited settings provide only used concomitantly, corticosteroids can be ben-
partial coverage for extensively drug-resistant tu- eficial in patients with tuberculosis who have re-
berculosis. Empirical therapy for extensively drug- spiratory distress24 and might have been con-
resistant tuberculosis could have been considered, sidered in this patient. I am not aware of any
given the presence of extensively drug-resistant tu- controlled trials that have involved patients with
berculosis in her community, but such empirical drug-resistant tuberculosis, and the weaker regi-
treatment may not be feasible for most commu- mens used in the treatment of patients with ex-
nities in South Africa. Unfortunately, until diag- tensively drug-resistant tuberculosis who are in
nostic tests improve and treatment capacity in- an immunosuppressed state could result in ad-
creases, many patients such as this one will die verse outcomes in patients coinfected with HIV.
of tuberculosis. If this patient’s condition had improved after sev-
Constructing a regimen for treating extensive eral months of treatment, and if she had relatively
ly drug-resistant tuberculosis in this patient would localized disease and adequate pulmonary reserve,
have been based on the strategies for multidrug- resection of affected lung tissue could have been
resistant tuberculosis,17,18 including an induction considered. Resection has been associated with
phase with the use of at least four (preferably five) improved outcomes in several cohorts with mul-
active drugs (excluding amithiozone [formerly tidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tu-
called thiacetazone], which is contraindicated in berculosis (including those in resource-limited
patients coinfected with HIV), use of an injectable settings).25-27 In view of the extensive lung disease
drug for a minimum of 6 months (preferably at present on admission, it seems unlikely that resec-
least 6 months after conversion to a negative cul- tion would have been an option for this patient.
ture, and in many cases, well beyond 6 months),
continuation of therapy for a minimum of 18 Antiretroviral therapy
months after culture conversion, and supervised A third important component of this patient’s
therapy. Some programs have included newer qui- care is the use of antiretroviral therapy for HIV.
nolones such as moxifloxacin.19,20 Although these Antiretroviral therapy has been associated with im-
treatment strategies are derived from retrospec- proved survival in patients coinfected with multi-
tive experience and not from randomized, con- drug-resistant tuberculosis and HIV.28 Initiation
trolled trials, a regimen of capreomycin, moxi- of antiretroviral therapy was indicated, given this
floxacin, cycloserine, and para-aminosalicylic acid patient’s advanced immunosuppression, if she had
as the core agents would have been an appropri- no adverse effects associated with the antimyco-
ate starting point for this patient. Other agents bacterial regimen. To my knowledge, no random-
such as clofazimine and amoxicillin–clavulanate, ized, controlled trials of timing of antiretroviral
with some in vitro activity yet with uncertain ef- therapy in patients with multidrug-resistant tuber-
ficacy, would probably have been included. Lin- culosis have been undertaken. However, in view
ezolid, not available in resource-limited settings of the significantly higher rates of death among
because of its cost, has been used in small num- patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis who
bers of patients with multidrug-resistant or ex- are HIV-positive as compared with those who are
tensively drug-resistant tuberculosis.21 There are HIV-negative, I would strongly consider early ini-
reports of peripheral neuropathy and adverse ef- tiation of antiretroviral therapy in such coinfected
patients, regardless of CD4+ T-cell count. The tings, would have been helpful for this patient,
choice of regimen is important, since antiretrovi- once she was clinically stabilized.20,29
ral drugs and antimycobacterial drugs have many In summary, a delay in diagnosis that caused
overlapping adverse effects, including nephrotox- a delay in therapy for extensively drug-resistant
icity (injectable drugs and tenofovir), peripheral tuberculosis, coupled with advanced immunosup-
neuropathy (injectable drugs and nucleosides), and pression and several poor prognostic factors (re-
neuropsychiatric effects (efavirenz and cycloser- spiratory insufficiency, coinfection, fibrocavitary
ine). Thus, a major component of the patient’s disease), led to this young patient’s death. The
treatment plan would have included careful mon- challenges of caring for patients such as this one
itoring for drug-related adverse events while she in resource-limited settings remain formidable.
was taking medications for concomitant tubercu-
losis and HIV infection. A nat omic a l Di agnosis
Monitoring for a treatment response of both
tuberculosis and HIV infection, as well as for the Extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculo-
development of new intercurrent illnesses or im- sis infection in a patient with HIV/AIDS.
mune-reconstitution inflammatory syndromes,
would be essential. Supervising the treatment of Presented at the 2nd Annual Workshop in Advanced Clinical
Care—AIDS, Durban, South Africa, October 2, 2008, organized
both tuberculosis and HIV infection, ensuring un- by Drs. Henry Sunpath, Mahomed-Yunus S. Moosa, Steven Reid,
interrupted supplies of drugs, and providing nu- Francois Venter, and Rajesh Gandhi and supported by the Har-
tritional and psychosocial support would also have vard University Center for AIDS Research, the Department of
Health of KwaZulu–Natal, McCord Hospital (Durban), the Uni-
been key to improving the clinical outcome for versity of KwaZulu–Natal, the South African HIV Clinicians Soci-
this patient. Community-based programs, which ety, and the Harvard Medical School Division of AIDS.
have been successfully implemented in the treat- Dr. Wilson reports receiving support from the Secure the Fu-
ture Foundation, which receives support from Bristol-Myers Squibb.
ment of multidrug-resistant and extensively drug- No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was
resistant tuberculosis even in resource-limited set- reported.
References
1. Boelaert JR, Vandecasteele SJ, Appel- adults with a premortem diagnosis of tu- Pretoria, South Africa: Department of
berg R, Gordeuk VR. The effect of the berculosis: an autopsy study. AIDS 2007; Health, 2000.
host’s iron status on tuberculosis. J Infect 21:2043-50. 15. Barnard M, Albert H, Coetzee G,
Dis 2007;195:1745-53. 9. Pillay M, Sturm AW. Evolution of the O’Brien R, Bosman ME. Rapid molecular
2. Moir S, Fauci AS. Pathogenic mecha- extensively drug-resistant F15/LAM4/KZN screening for multidrug-resistant tuber-
nisms of B-lymphocyte dysfunction in HIV strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in culosis in a high-volume public health
disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2008;122: KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Clin Infect laboratory in South Africa. Am J Respir
12-21. Dis 2007;45:1409-14. Crit Care Med 2008;177:787-92.
3. Gerntholtz TE, Goetsch SJ, Katz I. 10. Gandhi NR, Moll A, Sturm AW, et al. 16. Moore DAJ, Evans CAW, Gilman RH,
HIV-related nephropathy: a South African Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis as et al. Microscopic-observation drug-sus-
perspective. Kidney Int 2006;69:1885-91. a cause of death in patients co-infected ceptibility assay for the diagnosis of TB.
4. Churchyard GJ, Grant AD. HIV infec- with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area N Engl J Med 2006;355:1539-50.
tion, tuberculosis and non-tuberculous of South Africa. Lancet 2006;368:1575-80. 17. Guidelines for the programmatic man-
mycobacteria. S Afr Med J 2000;90:472-6. 11. Braden CR, Morlock GP, Woodley CL, agement of drug-resistant tuberculosis.
5. Grau S, Antonio JM, Ribes E, Salvadó et al. Simultaneous infection with multi- Geneva: World Health Organization, 2006.
M, Garcés JM, Garau J. Impact of rifampi- ple strains of Mycobacterium tuberculo- (Publication no. WHO/HTM/TB/2006.361.)
cin addition to clarithromycin in Legion- sis. Clin Infect Dis 2001;33(6):e42-e47. 18. Mukherjee JS, Rich ML, Socci AR, et al.
ella pneumophila pneumonia. Int J Anti- 12. Warren RM, Victor TC, Streicher EM, Programmes and principles in treatment
microb Agents 2006;28:249-52. et al. Patients with active tuberculosis of- of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Lan-
6. Guidelines for the prevention of tuber- ten have different strains in the same spu- cet 2004;363:474-81.
culosis in health care facilities in resource- tum specimen. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 19. Keshavjee S, Gelmanova IY, Farmer PE,
limited settings. Geneva: World Health 2004;169:610-4. et al. Treatment of extensively drug-resis-
Organization, 1999. (Publication no. WHO/ 13. Chavez Pachas AM, Blank R, Smith tant tuberculosis in Tomsk, Russia: a ret-
CDS/TB99.269.) Fawzi MC, Bayona J, Becerra MC, Mitnick rospective cohort study. Lancet 2008;372:
7. Hot A, Schmulewitz L, Viard JP, CD. Identifying early treatment failure on 1403-9.
Lortholary O. Fever of unknown origin in category I therapy for pulmonary tubercu- 20. Mitnick CD, Shin SS, Seung KJ, et al.
HIV/AIDS patients. Infect Dis Clin North losis in Lima Ciudad, Peru. Int J Tuberc Comprehensive treatment of extensively
Am 2007;21:1013-32. Lung Dis 2004;8:52-8. drug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med
8. Martinson NA, Karstaedt A, Venter 14. The South African Tuberculosis Con- 2008;359:563-74.
WD, et al. Causes of death in hospitalized trol Programme. practical guidelines 2000. 21. Condos R, Hadgiangelis N, Leibert E,
Jacquette G, Harkin T, Rom WN. Case review of the adjunctive use of systemic tant tuberculosis: report of 121 cases re-
series report of a linezolid-containing corticosteroids for pulmonary tuberculo- ceiving community-based treatment in
regimen for extensively drug-resistant tu- sis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2003;7:208-13. Lima, Peru. Thorax 2007;62:416-21.
berculosis. Chest 2008;134:187-92. 25. Jeon CY, Hwang SH, Min JH, et al. Ex- 28. Waisman JL, Palmero DJ, Alberti FA,
22. Katiyar SK, Bihari S, Prakash S, Mam tensively drug-resistant tuberculosis in Güemes Gurtubay JL, Francos JL, Negroni
tani M, Kulkarni H. A randomised con- South Korea: risk factors and treatment out- R. Improved prognosis in HIV/AIDS re-
trolled trial of high-dose isoniazid adjuvant comes among patients at a tertiary referral lated multi-drug resistant tuberculosis
therapy for multidrug-resistant tuberculo- hospital. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46:42-9. patients treated with highly active antiret-
sis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2008;12:139-45. 26. Kwon YS, Kim YH, Suh GY, et al. roviral therapy. Medicina (B Aires)
23. Frieden TR, Sherman LF, Maw KL, et Treatment outcomes for HIV-uninfected 2001;61:810-4. (In Spanish.)
al. A multi-institutional outbreak of high- patients with multidrug-resistant and ex- 29. Mitnick C, Bayona J, Palacios E, et al.
ly drug-resistant tuberculosis: epidemiol- tensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Clin Community-based therapy for multidrug-
ogy and clinical outcomes. JAMA 1996; Infect Dis 2008;47:496-502. resistant tuberculosis in Lima, Peru. N Engl
276:1229-35. 27. Somocurcio JG, Sotomayor A, Shin S, J Med 2003;348:119-28.
24. Smego RA, Ahmed N. A systematic et al. Surgery for patients with drug-resis- Copyright © 2009 Massachusetts Medical Society.
Lantern Slides Updated: Complete PowerPoint Slide Sets from the Clinicopathological Conferences
Any reader of the Journal who uses the Case Records of the Massachusetts General Hospital as a teaching exercise or reference
material is now eligible to receive a complete set of PowerPoint slides, including digital images, with identifying legends,
shown at the live Clinicopathological Conference (CPC) that is the basis of the Case Record. This slide set contains all of the
images from the CPC, not only those published in the Journal. Radiographic, neurologic, and cardiac studies, gross specimens,
and photomicrographs, as well as unpublished text slides, tables, and diagrams, are included. Every year 40 sets are produced,
averaging 50-60 slides per set. Each set is supplied on a compact disc and is mailed to coincide with the publication of the
Case Record.
The cost of an annual subscription is $600, or individual sets may be purchased for $50 each. Application forms for the current
subscription year, which began in January, may be obtained from the Lantern Slides Service, Department of Pathology,
Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 (telephone 617-726-2974) or e-mail Pathphotoslides@partners.org.