Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Controllable Synthesis of A Smart Multifunctional Nanoscale
Controllable Synthesis of A Smart Multifunctional Nanoscale
www.acsami.org
dehydrating agent was added to the above mixture, which was sub- recorded at 265 nm. The cumulative release profiles were expressed
sequently stirred for 16 h in the dark. At the end of the reaction, the by cumulative release percentages of 5-FU from Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-
obtained Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU nanocomposite was iso- 5-FAM/5-FU as a function of time, in which the cumulative release
lated from the solution through centrifugation, followed by washing percentages of 5-FU from Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU were
with water and drying under vacuum at 25 °C. Through use of a calculated as follows: cumulative 5-FU release = amount of released
similar method to calculate loading efficiency of 5-FU on Fe-MIL- 5-FU/amount of total 5-FU × 100%.
53-NH2, the loading efficiency of 5-FU on Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-
5-FAM/5-FU nanocomposite was calculated to be 23%, and the
loading amounts of FA and 5-FAM on Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/ 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
5-FU nanocomposite were 2.6 and 1.5%, respectively. Additionally, 3.1. Fabrication and Characterization of Fe-MIL-53-
the standard concentration curves of FA and 5-FAM are shown in NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU. Different reactant concentrations were
Figures S3 and S4.
applied to control the size of Fe-MIL-53-NH2, and the results
The aforementioned synthetic procedure was subsequently used to
synthesize Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM and Fe-MIL-53-NH2-5-FAM/ are shown in Figure 2. Figures 2A−D show the SEM images of
5-FU. Details of the procedure are provided in the Supporting
Information.
2.5. Cytotoxicity Study. MGC-803 and HASMC cells were used
to evaluate the in vitro cytotoxicities and antitumor efficiencies of
Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM, Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU, and
5-FU via the MTT method. In short, MGC-803 and HASMC cells
were seeded onto 96-well plates with a culture density of 104 cells per
well. After MGC-803 and HASMC cells were incubated for 24 h, the
initial culture medium was removed and replaced by the dispersions
of Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM, Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU,
and 5-FU in various concentrations (0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, and
200 μg/mL). After being incubated for another 24 h, 20 μL of MTT
solution was added to each well in which the previous culture medium
has been removed and incubated for another 4 h. At last, all media
were removed from each well before 100 μL of DMSO was added, and
the cell viability was obtained by monitoring the absorbance value of
each sample at 570 nm using a microplate reader. The cell viability was
expressed as a percentage of the absorbance value of the sample well
compared to that of the control cell. All experiments were executed in
triplicate, and the results were averaged.
2.6. Cellular Uptake Study. The in vitro targeting ability of the
FA to FR was evaluated by luminescence imaging in MGC-803 and
HASMC cells. The cells were attached onto a 6-well plate for 24 h.
Afterward, the MGC-803 cells were treated with Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA- Figure 2. SEM images of nanocrystalline Fe-MIL-53-NH2 with dif-
5-FAM/5-FU and Fe-MIL-53-NH2-5-FAM/5-FU for 4 h, and ferent reactant concentrations (A−D).
HASMC cells were incubated with Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/
5-FU for 4 h (concentration was 0.1 μg/mL). Before being observed
using a laser confocal microscope (OLYMPUS, IX81) under an excita-
tion wavelength of 473 nm, the MGC-803 and HASMC cells were
washed several times with phosphate buffered saline (PBS).
2.7. In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging. All animal
experiments were conducted according to the guidelines approved
by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Peking Uni-
versity. To carry out the in vivo imaging study, athymic nude mice
bearing glioblastoma were injected with Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/
5-FU aqueous solution (5 mg/kg). At 1 h after intratumoral injection,
magnetic resonance imaging was taken by a Siemens Prisma 3.0 T MR
scanner (Erlangen, Germany) with a gradient strength up to 80 mT/m.
2.8. In Vivo Biodistribution in Different Organs. To investigate
the biodistribution of Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU in different
organs, athymic nude mice were administered the solutions via
intraperitoneal injection (10 mg/kg) and were sacrificed at the 24 h
time point postinjection. The major organs were collected, and the
fluorescence signal intensity was recorded on an IVIS imaging system Figure 3. XRD patterns of simulated Fe-MIL-53-NH2 (A) and Fe-MIL-
(Iumina II) at an excitation wavelength of 495 nm. After auto- 53-NH2 nanocrystallines prepared with different reactant concentrations
fluorescence was deducted, the biodistribution of different organs was (B−E).
concluded as the ratio of average fluorescence intensity of the indi-
vidual organ to the average fluorescence intensity of all measured the nanocrystalline Fe-MIL-53-NH2 prepared by employing
organs. decreasing amounts of FeCl3·6H2O from 0.4 to 0.1 mmol and
2.9. In Vitro Drug Release Study. The sustained 5-FU release
BDC-NH2 from 0.4 to 0.1 mmol. Interestingly, as the reactant
assays were carried out by soaking the samples in PBS (pH 7.4 and 5).
At 37 °C, a dialysis containing 0.05 g of Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/ concentrations decrease, the sizes of the nanoparticles change
5-FU was put into a 10 mL PBS solution in a 50 mL centrifuge tube. from 120 nm to 1 μm. Thus, tuning the amount of the reactant
For real-time monitoring of the release behavior of 5-FU, 2 mL of is a facile and robust way to control the particle size. To check
solution was withdrawn from the centrifuge tube at appropriate time the crystallinity, the materials were further investigated by
intervals, and the UV−vis absorption values of the solutions were XRD, which is depicted in Figure 3. The XRD reflections of all
3457 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b14795
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 3455−3462
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Research Article
Figure 4. (a) FTIR spectra of nanocrystalline Fe-MIL-53-NH2 (A), FA (B), 5-FAM (C), and nanocrystalline Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM (D); and
(b) FTIR spectra of 5-FU (A), Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU nanocomposites (B), and Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM nanocomposites (C).
Figure 7. Fluorescence imaging of live MGC-803 cells cultured with Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU (A) and Fe-MIL-53-NH2-5-FAM/5-FU
(B) and HASMC cells cultured with Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU (C) for 4 h. Left, middle, and right panels are dark-field images, bright-field
images, and overlays, respectively. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU can be calculated by the band with a maximum at 530 nm (excited at 480 nm), DDS
slope of a plot of the relaxation rate 1/T2 versus Fe concentra- Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU generates a broad band with
tion. As we know, dipolar interaction between the magnetic a maximum at 560 nm (excited at 495 nm), as shown in Figure 6,
moments of Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU and the pro- which belongs to green emission and fulfills the requirements of
tons in the water can cut down T2. Thus, 1/T2 increases linearly fluorescence imaging.
within the tested range of Fe concentration, as revealed by To gain more insight into the targeting ability of DDS
Figure 5, and DDS Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU exhibits Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU, we carried out fluorescence
high relaxivity values (r2 = 18.8 mM−1 s−1) for potential clinical imaging tests using FA-positive MGC-803 cells and FA-negative
use as contrast agents for T2-weighted MRI. The T2-weighted HASMC cells, and the results are shown in Figure 7. When
MRI images of DDS Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU are MGC-803 cells are incubated with Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/
shown in the inset of Figure 5, and the iron concentrations in 5-FU, bright green fluorescence is observed in the cell. How-
images 2 to 7 are 0.115, 0.2308, 0.4617, 0.9235, 1.847, and ever, no obvious fluorescence contrast is obtained in MGC-803
3.694 mM, respectively. It is evident that the signal intensity cells incubated with Fe-MIL-53-NH2-5-FAM/5-FU or HASMC
decreases (darkening) with the increase in the iron cells incubated with Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU. This
concentration, suggesting that Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/ observation shows that only the FA-conjugated Fe-MIL-53-
5-FU is a better candidate for T2-weighted MRI. Furthermore, NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU nanocomposite shows a high affinity to
the fluorescence testing of DDS Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/ the cancer cells but has little interaction with normal cells,
5-FU was also performed. Clearly, compared to the fluo- confirming the targeted fluorescence imaging ability of DDS
rescence spectrum of 5-FAM, the excitation and emission Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU. We also investigated the
spectra of Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU are similar, magnetic resonance imaging capability of Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-
suggesting that the luminescent property of Fe-MIL-53-NH2- 5-FAM/5-FU in vivo (Figure 8). Clearly, at 1 h postinjection,
FA-5-FAM/5-FU is mostly derived from the 5-FAM. It is noted the tumor became darker, and the T2-weighted MR image
that the slight discrepancies in the position of excitation and exhibits intense contrast enhancement. In brief, Fe-MIL-53-
emission wavelengths are due to the combination of 5-FAM NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU displays good imaging capability similar
and Fe-MIL-53-NH2. While 5-FAM exhibits a broad emission to that of the fluorescence and magnetic resonance imaging
3459 DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b14795
ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 3455−3462
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Research Article
Figure 10. (a) Viabilities of HASMC cells cultured with Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM (A), DDS Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU (B), and 5-FU
(C) evaluated by MTT. (b) Viabilities of MGC-803 cells cultured with Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM (A), DDS Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/5-FU
(B), and 5-FU (C) evaluated by MTT.
■ ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
All authors received funding from the Natural Science
Foundation of China (Grant 21361016) and the Inner
Mongolia Autonomous Region Fund for Natural Science
(Grant 2013ZD09).
■ REFERENCES
(1) Della Rocca, J.; Liu, D.; Lin, W. Nanoscale Metal−Organic
Frameworks for Biomedical Imaging and Drug Delivery. Acc. Chem.
Res. 2011, 44, 957−968.
(2) Yoon, M.; Srirambalaji, R.; Kim, K. Homochiral Metal−Organic
Frameworks for Asymmetric Heterogeneous Catalysis. Chem. Rev.
2012, 112, 1196−1231.
(3) Keskin, S.; Kizilel, S. Biomedical Applications of Metal Organic
Figure 11. Drug release profile for DDS Fe-MIL-53-NH2-FA-5-FAM/ Frameworks. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 1799−1812.
5-FU in PBS buffer solution at pH 7.4 (A) and 5 (B). (4) Zhang, T.; Lin, W. Metal−organic Frameworks for Artificial
Photosynthesis and Photocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 5982−
as a contrast agent for MRI. Additionally, such DDS is also 5993.
found to generate better toxicity to cancer cells (MGC-803 (5) James, S. L. Metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2003, 32,
cells) due to the targeted 5-FU release, and release studies show 276−288.
(6) McKinlay, A. C.; Morris, R. E.; Horcajada, P.; Férey, G.; Gref, R.;
that the 5-FU release behavior can last for more than 20 h. In
Couvreur, P.; Serre, C. BioMOFs: Metal−Organic Frameworks for
conclusion, this paper provides a brief and efficacious method Biological and Medical Applications. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49,
to explore MOFs as a new targeted drug delivery system which 6260−6266.
generates significantly enhanced antitumor efficacy. These results (7) Wang, C.; Liu, D.; Lin, W. Metal−Organic Frameworks as A
provide a proof of concept for a new mode of drug delivery, and Tunable Platform for Designing Functional Molecular Materials. J. Am.
we fully expect to see this drug delivery system make its presence Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 13222−13234.
known in the area of biological applications. (8) Horcajada, P.; Gref, R.; Baati, T.; Allan, P. K.; Maurin, G.;
■
*
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
S Supporting Information
Couvreur, P.; Férey, G.; Morris, R. E.; Serre, C. Metal−Organic
Frameworks in Biomedicine. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 1232−1268.
(9) Horcajada, P.; Chalati, T.; Serre, C.; Gillet, B.; Sebrie, C.; Baati,
T.; Eubank, J. F.; Heurtaux, D.; Clayette, P.; Kreuz, C. Porous Metal−
Supporting Information for this article is available on the The
organic-framework Nanoscale Carriers as A Potential Platform for
Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Drug Delivery and Imaging. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 172−178.
Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b14795. (10) Wang, H. N.; Yang, G. S.; Wang, X. L.; Su, Z. M. pH-induced
Chemical structure, fluorescence imaging, TGA curves, Different Crystalline Behaviors in Extended Metal−organic Frame-
XRD patterns, N2 adsorption−desorption isotherms, and works based on the Same Reactants. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 6294−
absorbance of 5-FU in PBS buffer solution (PDF) 6297.
■
(11) Cooper, L.; Hidalgo, T.; Gorman, M.; Lozano-Fernández, T.;
Simón-Vázquez, R.; Olivier, C.; Guillou, N.; Serre, C.; Martineau, C.;
AUTHOR INFORMATION Taulelle, F. A Biocompatible Porous Mg-gallate Metal−organic
Corresponding Authors Framework as An Antioxidant Carrier. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51,
*E-mail: cezlliu@imu.edu.cn. 5848−5851.
*E-mail: bigaole@imu.edu.cn. (12) Liu, K. G.; Zhu, Z.; Wang, X. Y.; Gonçalves, D.; Zhang, B.;
ORCID Hierlemann, A.; Hunziker, P. Microfluidics-based Single-step Prepara-
tion of Injection-ready Polymeric Nanosystems for Medical Imaging
Zhiliang Liu: 0000-0003-3917-6014 and Drug Delivery. Nanoscale 2015, 7, 16983−16993.
Notes (13) Wong, P. T.; Chen, D. X.; Tang, S. Z.; Yanik, S.; Payne, M.;
The authors declare no competing financial interest. Mukherjee, J.; Coulter, A.; Tang, K.; Tao, K.; Sun, K.; Baker, J. R., Jr;
Choi, S. K. Modular Integration of Upconverting Nanocrystal- superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4,
Dendrimer Composites for Folate Receptor-Specific NIR Imaging 3969−3981.
and Light-Triggered Drug Release. Small 2015, 11, 6078−6090. (33) Liu, Y.; Kang, N.; Lv, J.; Zhou, Z. J.; Zhao, Q. L.; Ma, L. C.;
(14) Chen, W. H.; Luo, G. F.; Lei, Q.; Cao, F. T.; Fan, J. X.; Qiu, W. Chen, Z.; Ren, L.; Nie, L. M. Deep Photoacoustic/Luminescence/
X.; Jia, H. Z.; Hong, S.; Fang, F.; Zeng, X.; Zhuo, R. X.; Zhang, X. Z. Magnetic Resonance Multimodal Imaging in Living Subjects Using
Rational Design of Multifunctional Magnetic Mesoporous Silica High-Efficiency Upconversion Nanocomposites. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28,
Nanoparticle for Tumor-targeted Magnetic Resonance Imaging and 6411−6419.
Precise Therapy. Biomaterials 2016, 76, 87−101.
(15) Song, W. Y.; Di, W. H.; Qin, W. P. Synthesis of mesoporous-
silica-coated Gd2O3: Eu@silica particles as cell imaging and drug
delivery agents. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 7443−7449.
(16) Shen, B. B.; Ma, Y.; Yu, S. Y.; Ji, C. H. Smart Multifunctional
Magnetic Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery System for Cancer
Thermo-Chemotherapy and Intracellular Imaging. ACS Appl. Mater.
Interfaces 2016, 8, 24502−24508.
(17) Della Rocca, J.; Liu, D. M.; Lin, W. B. Nanoscale Metal−
Organic Frameworks for Biomedical Imaging and Drug Delivery. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 957−968.
(18) Carné, A.; Carbonell, C.; Imaz, I.; Maspoch, D. Nanoscale
Metal−organic Materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 291−305.
(19) Lin, W. B.; Rieter, W. J.; Taylor, K. M. L. Modular Synthesis of
Functional Nanoscale Coordination Polymers. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 650−658.
(20) Spokoyny, A. M.; Kim, D.; Sumrein, A.; Mirkin, C. A. Infinite
Coordination Polymer Nano- and Microparticle Structures. Chem. Soc.
Rev. 2009, 38, 1218−1227.
(21) Serre, C.; Mellot-Draznieks, C.; Surblé, S.; Audebrand, N.;
Filinchuk, Y.; Férey, G. Role of Solvent-Host Interactions That Lead
to Very Large Swelling of Hybrid Frameworks. Science 2007, 315,
1828−1831.
(22) Zhang, P. C.; Lock, L. L.; Cheetham, A. G.; Cui, H. G.
Enhanced Cellular Entry and Efficacy of Tat Conjugates by Rational
Design of the Auxiliary Segment. Mol. Pharmaceutics 2014, 11, 964−
973.
(23) Prabaharan, M.; Grailer, J. J.; Pilla, S.; Steeber, D. A.; Gong, S.
Q. Folate-conjugated Amphiphilic Hyperbranched Block Copolymers
based on Boltorn®H40, Poly(l-lactide) and Poly(ethylene glycol) for
Tumor-targeted Drug Delivery. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 3009−3019.
(24) Sudimack, J.; Lee, R. J. Targeted Drug Delivery via the Folate
Receptor. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2000, 41, 147−162.
(25) Mansoori, G. A.; Brandenburg, K. S.; Shakeri-Zadeh, A. A
Comparative Study of Two Folate-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles for
Cancer Nanotechnology Applications. Cancers 2010, 2, 1911−1928.
(26) Stella, B.; Arpicco, S.; Peracchia, M. T.; Desmaële, D.; Hoebeke,
J.; Renoir, M.; D’Angelo, J.; Cattel, L.; Couvreur, P. Design of Folic
Acid-Conjugated Nanoparticles for Drug Targeting. J. Pharm. Sci.
2000, 89, 1452−1464.
(27) Carlsson, M.; Gustavsson, M.; Hu, G. Z.; Murén, E.; Ronne, H.
A Ham1p-Dependent Mechanism and Modulation of the Pyrimidine
Biosynthetic Pathway Can Both Confer Resistance to 5-Fluorouracil in
Yeast. PLoS One 2013, 8, e52094.
(28) Mojardín, L.; Botet, J.; Quintales, L.; Moreno, S.; Salas, M. New
Insights into the RNA-Based Mechanism of Action of the Anticancer
Drug 5′-Fluorouracil in Eukaryotic Cells. PLoS One 2013, 8, e78172.
(29) Li, Y. T.; Tang, J. L.; He, L. C.; Liu, Y.; Liu, Y. L.; Chen, C. Y.;
Tang, Z. Y. Core−Shell Upconversion Nanoparticle@Metal−Organic
Framework Nanoprobes for Luminescent/Magnetic Dual-Mode
Targeted Imaging. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 4075−4080.
(30) Wu, Q.; Cheng, Q. Q.; Yuan, S. M.; Qian, J. C.; Zhong, K.;
Qian, Y. F.; Liu, Z. Y. A Cell-penetrating Protein Designed for Bimodal
Fluorescence and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Chem. Sci. 2015, 6,
6607−6613.
(31) Sun, Y. Q.; Wang, D. D.; Zhao, T. X.; Jiang, Y. N.; Zhao, Y. Q.;
Wang, C. X.; Sun, H. C.; Yang, B.; Lin, Q. Fluorescence-Magnetism
Functional EuS Nanocrystals with Controllable Morphologies for Dual
Bioimaging. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 33539−33545.
(32) Lam, T.; Avti, P. K.; Pouliot, P.; Tardif, J. C.; Rhéaume, E.;
Lesage, F.; Kakkar, A. Magnetic resonance imaging/fluorescence dual
modality protocol using designed phosphonate ligands coupled to