Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lab Report 3 Differences Test (Duo-Trio Test)
Lab Report 3 Differences Test (Duo-Trio Test)
Lab Report 3 Differences Test (Duo-Trio Test)
Apparently, the purpose of this experiment was to see if there was a discernible
difference in a specific attribute of the food sample. This experiment was also divided
into parts, which were preference/acceptance tests, discriminatory tests, and descriptive
tests, which are the three basic categories of sensory tests. Preference/acceptance
tests are affective tests that are based on a measure of preference or a measure from
which relative preference can be established. A panelist's response is influenced by his
personal feelings about the product.
Different testing is used to compare foods to see if they differ in any way. Only a
few of these characteristics are odor, taste, and texture. In the sensory lab, three types
of difference tests are used: the triangle test, the duo-trio test, and the paired
comparison test.
A Duo-Trio Test is an overall difference test that determines whether or not two
samples differ in their sensory properties. This method is especially advantageous: To
determine whether product variations are due to changes in ingredients, processing,
packaging, or storage.
PROCEDURES
Duo-Trio Test
Evaluation Form:
On your tray you have a marked control sample (R) and two coded samples. One
sample is identical with (R) and the other is different. Which of the coded samples is
identical with R?
168
In the duo-trio test, both samples 370 and R were seaweed. 100% of panelists
were able to determine that these two samples were the same while 0% of panelists
thought sample 168 was equal to the standard. Figure above illustrates the reasoning of
panelists as to why the off sample differed from the standard. 100% of panelists
attributed the difference as the odd sample having spicy taste.
DISCUSSION
Foods are greatly influenced by their sensory qualities, such as flavor, aroma, texture,
and appearance. In order to control human hunger and nutritional intake, meal selection
and consumption are extremely important. The main elements influencing how
consumers perceive the quality of food and drink are color, scent, and taste. However,
the flavor (the whole combination of oral and nasal stimulation) may have the greatest
influence on acceptability and willingness to consume it again. Color and appearance
are the initial quality features appealing us. The juice industry must regulate the
organoleptic properties of their goods due to the significance of not only consumer
acceptance but also of other particular elements.
Salty and briny seaweed is possible. Its texture can be anything from crunchy and
crispy to rubbery. It naturally contains a lot of glutamic acid, which gives monosodium
glutamate (MSG) its umami flavor and is a flavoring ingredient. Seaweed sheets that
have been roasted or fried are typically sold as thin square or rectangular chips and
have a flavor similar to that of regular seaweed. However, flavored seaweed snacks
come in a variety of flavors, from wasabi to teriyaki. As tasty as any thinly sliced food,
dried seaweed is rich, salty, savory, and much more. Your favorite salad, grilled fish, or
noodle soup taste excellent when topped with dried and crushed seaweed flakes. The
umami flavor of seaweed is particularly noticeable in the saline saltiness of seaweed,
which you can sense from the first mouthful. Depending on the method of preparation
and the kind of seaweed used, the flavor might range from a straightforward marine salt
taste to others.
According to the duo-trio test results, 100% of panelists were able to distinguish
between sample R and dried seaweed snack sample 168, whereas 0% were unable to
determine which of the two samples was the same as sample R. The amount of spice
was the most significant difference between the two dry seaweed snack samples,
followed by texture and color, according to the panelists who examined the changes
they discovered. In the study by Beinner et al., it was considered that the variations
between the samples of iron-fortified rice and regular rice included variations in texture,
color, and one sample's distinct taste. Overall, people liked the iron-fortified rice.
CONCLUSION