Rubric for Evaluating BUSINESS RESEARCH OF BSBA 3rd YR STUDENTS

(This page should be filled out by the Students/advisor/Adviser prior to distribution to Committee and Chair)

Group #5 Date of Defense: May 22, 2023

Advisor: Prof.Christoper D.L. Correa
Proposed Research Title: The Impact of Social Media Content Marketing Influencers in the Brand Awareness of the Customers of
Kenny Rogers Roasters Restaurant Branch in SM Tungko, City of San Jose Del Monte, Bulacan.

Committee Members and Department

Department Chairperson: Dr. Edwin Leoncio Saavedra

Committee Member: Dr. Rochelle Salazar
Committee Member: Prof. Jesus Jefren Buñag
⮚ At the conclusion of the defense, each committee member should fill out the response sheet. For each attribute which a
committee member feels are somewhat or very deficient, a short explanation should be provided. Since completed forms are
to be treated as confidential, they are to be turned in to the Committee Chair (advisor), not the student.
⮚ This document should be completed, even if the committee feels that the thesis is unacceptable.
⮚ A hard copy of the final thesis must accompany these evaluation forms. All materials must be sent to the Advisor/Adviser.
⮚ The Advisor/Adviser will summarize the results, averaging the Three responses into one final synopsis.
The following are the duties of the panelist

a. Help the students to improve their manuscript especially by giving comments and/or suggestions in which case the changes,
corrections and annotation should be written in the manuscript.
b. Read the manuscript before the schedule date of defense.
c. Issue oral defense grades immediately after the panel deliberation of the defense.
d. Accomplish the routing slip every time the paper comes in and out of the students’ responsibility.
Student’s Name:Alvarez, John Paolo F., Gara, Jay Veeriel L., Jamero, Charleston P.
Evaluator’s Name: Dr. Edwin Leoncio Saavedra
Position: Department Chairperson

MANUSCRIPT

Contribution to the field of Substance and content Forms of writing Total GRAND
specialization/discipline (Logical style (Scholarly TOTAL
Organization/Depth of Language)
Discussion) (100%)
(40%)

(20%)
GROUP GRADE (10%)
(10%)

RESEARCH STUDY

PRESENTATION ARGUMENTATION

INDIVIDUAL GRADES Style of Presentation Oral Articulation Mastery of the Accuracy and Total
topic (Ability to relevance of
answer the works cited
questions) (60%)

(20%)
(10%)
(Student’s Name) (10%) (20%)

1. Alvarez, John Paolo

F.

2. Gara, Jay Veeriel L.

 3. Jamero, Charleston
P.

Comments:

Student’s Name: Alvarez, John Paolo F., Gara, Jay Veeriel L., Jamero, Charleston P.
Evaluator’s Name: Dr. Rochelle Salazar
Position: Committee Member

MANUSCRIPT

Contribution to the field of Substance and content Forms of writing Total GRAND
specialization/discipline (Logical style (Scholarly TOTAL
Organization/Depth of Language)
Discussion) (100%)
(40%)

(20%)
GROUP GRADE (10%)
(10%)

RESEARCH STUDY

PRESENTATION ARGUMENTATION
INDIVIDUAL GRADES Style of Presentation Oral Articulation Mastery of the Accuracy and Total
topic (Ability to relevance of
answer the works cited
questions) (60%)

(20%)
(10%)
(Student’s Name) (10%) (20%)

1. Alvarez, John Paolo

F.

2. Gara, Jay Veeriel L.

3. Jamero, Charleston
P.

Comments:
Student’s Name: Alvarez, John Paolo F., Gara, Jay Veeriel L., Jamero, Charleston P.
Evaluator’s Name: Prof. Jesus Jefren Buñag
Position: Committee Member

MANUSCRIPT
 Contribution to the field of Substance and content Forms of writing Total GRAND
specialization/discipline (Logical style (Scholarly TOTAL
Organization/Depth of Language)
Discussion) (100%)
(40%)

(20%)
(10%)
GROUP GRADE (10%)

RESEARCH STUDY

PRESENTATION ARGUMENTATION

INDIVIDUAL GRADES Style of Presentation Oral Articulation Mastery of the Accuracy and Total
topic (Ability to relevance of
answer the works cited
questions) (60%)

(20%)
(10%)
(Student’s Name) (10%) (20%)

1. Alvarez, John Paolo

F.

2. Gara, Jay Veeriel L.

3. Jamero, Charleston
P.

Comments: