Safety Verifications: - Geometry of The Hangers

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

5

For the main longitudinal beam it was The arch height and the hangers were
used the same tube section of the arch, a CHS designed simultaneously due to the fulfilment
(Circular Hollow Section) with D = 1250 mm of the 5.0 m minimum required gabarit over the
and t = 25 mm, for aesthetic reasons mainly, sidewalks kerb. Since there was a maximum
and two secondary longitudinal box-girders height (1/4 of the span) defined by the study of
beams were set on both cantilever tips, to stiff other Bowstring cases, 30 m high was the
the grid steel structure and better redistribute chosen solution. From that, several designs
the hangers forces through the deck. were made for the hanger’s geometry, leading
to an inclined Net solution of Figure 4.4.

Figure 4.4 – Geometry of the hangers

4.3. MATERIALS AND ACTIONS


Figure 4.2 – Transversal girders cross-section
The materials adopted were the
The transversal beams were base on
concrete C35/45 for the deck slab; steel
important works like the Puente de la
reinforcement bars A500; steel grade
Exposición in Valencia or Pont de [3]
S420 NH/NHL for all deck girders and grade
l’Observatoire in Liège (Figure 4.3), from the [3]
S460 NH/NHL for the arch; and steel S355
famous architect Santiago Calatrava, leading
or S460 for the hangers.
to a maximum and minimum cross-section
For every step of the design, the actions
presented on Figure 4.2.
(dead loads, hangers installed forces, live
loads and fatigue) were considered. With all
the permanent actions in play, it is able to
[4] [5]
verify the ULS and fatigue , as well as the
ULS and stability of the arch.

5. SAFETY VERIFICATIONS

Figure 4.3 – Pont de l’Observatoire in Belgium To determine the required area of


reinforcement in the concrete deck slab, the
The chosen cross-section for the arch,
shell bending moments were obtained by with
the same as the main longitudinal beam, was a
a 3D finite beam/shell elements analysis
CHS (D = 2500 mm and t = 80 mm) since it’s
model. The longitudinal slab cracking was
going to be heavily compressed and subjected
relevant to the slab behaviour, and a fictitious
to high bending moments in every direction.

You might also like