Congenital Anomalies of the Aortic Arch: A Comprehensive review.

Mr.Sandeep Kumar Pandey, Research Scholar, Malwanchal University, Indore.

Prof. Dr. Vimal Modi, Research Supervisor, Malwanchal University, Indore.

Introduction

Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch refer to structural abnormalities that occur during
fetal development, resulting in variations in the normal anatomy of the aorta and its
branching vessels. These anomalies can range from minor anatomical variations to severe
malformations, and they may have significant clinical implications. Understanding these
anomalies is crucial for clinicians, as early identification and appropriate management can
lead to improved patient outcomes. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of
congenital anomalies of the aortic arch, including their classification, etiology, clinical
presentation, diagnostic modalities, and treatment options.

I. Classification of Congenital Anomalies of the Aortic Arch

Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch can be broadly classified into three main types:

1. Coarctation of the Aorta: Coarctation refers to a narrowing of the aortic lumen,

usually occurring just distal to the origin of the left subclavian artery. It is one of the
most common anomalies, accounting for approximately 5-8% of all congenital heart
defects. Coarctation can present as isolated or associated with other cardiac
abnormalities.
2. Interrupted Aortic Arch: Interrupted aortic arch is a rare anomaly characterized by a
complete discontinuity between the ascending and descending aorta. It is usually
classified into three types based on the location of the interruption. This condition is
often associated with other intracardiac defects and requires surgical intervention
shortly after birth.
3. Double Aortic Arch: In this anomaly, the aorta persists as two parallel vessels that
encircle the trachea and esophagus, forming a vascular ring. Double aortic arch can
cause compression of the trachea and esophagus, leading to respiratory and feeding
difficulties, especially in infants.

208
©2023,IRJEdT Volume:05Issue:06 |June-2023
II. Etiology and Pathogenesis

The etiology of congenital anomalies of the aortic arch is multifactorial, involving genetic
and environmental factors. While some anomalies have a clear genetic basis, others may
result from disruptions in embryological development. Several genetic syndromes, such as
DiGeorge syndrome and Turner syndrome, are associated with a higher incidence of aortic
arch anomalies.

During embryogenesis, the aortic arches develop from the branchial arches, which form the
framework for the pharyngeal apparatus. Abnormal development or regression of these
arches can lead to various anomalies. Disturbances in the neural crest cell migration, which
play a vital role in the development of the cardiovascular system, can also contribute to aortic
arch abnormalities.

III. Clinical Presentation and Diagnosis

The clinical presentation of congenital anomalies of the aortic arch can vary depending on the
type and severity of the anomaly. Coarctation of the aorta often presents with hypertension in
the upper extremities and reduced or absent pulses in the lower extremities. Other symptoms
may include weak femoral pulses, differential blood pressure between the upper and lower
extremities, and heart murmurs.

Interrupted aortic arch is typically diagnosed in the neonatal period due to severe
cardiovascular compromise. Affected infants may present with signs of congestive heart
failure, such as tachypnea, poor feeding, and cyanosis. The absence of femoral pulses is a
characteristic finding.

Double aortic arch can manifest with respiratory distress, stridor, recurrent respiratory tract
infections, and difficulty swallowing. Symptoms are often worse during feeding or in certain
positions.

The diagnosis of these anomalies relies on a combination of clinical evaluation and various
diagnostic modalities. Physical examination findings, including blood pressure measurements
in all extremities, can provide initial clues. Echocardiography is a valuable tool for
confirming the diagnosis and assessing the anatomy and hemodynamics. Additional imaging

209
©2023,IRJEdT Volume:05Issue:06 |June-2023
studies, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT), may be
necessary to further delineate the anatomy and identify associated abnormalities.

IV. Management and Treatment Options

The management of congenital anomalies of the aortic arch depends on the specific anomaly
and its associated complications. In some cases, surgical intervention is required shortly after
birth to address life-threatening conditions, such as interrupted aortic arch or severe
coarctation of the aorta. Surgical repair aims to restore normal blood flow and relieve any
associated compression of adjacent structures.

For milder cases of coarctation, balloon angioplasty and stent placement may be considered
as less invasive alternatives to surgery. Ongoing monitoring is essential for detecting
potential complications, such as recurrent coarctation or aneurysm formation.

In double aortic arch, surgical division of the abnormal vessel is usually indicated to relieve
tracheoesophageal compression and alleviate symptoms. The specific surgical approach may
vary depending on the anatomy and severity of the condition.

Conclusion

Congenital anomalies of the aortic arch encompass a wide spectrum of structural variations
that can have significant clinical implications. Early recognition and appropriate management
are crucial for improving outcomes in affected individuals. Through advancements in
diagnostic modalities and surgical techniques, clinicians can effectively identify and treat
these anomalies. Further research into the underlying etiology and genetic factors associated
with aortic arch abnormalities will continue to enhance our understanding of these conditions,
leading to improved management strategies and outcomes for affected patients.

Reference

1. Lim HK, Ha HI, Hwang HJ, et al. Feasibility of high-pitch dual-source low-dose chest CT:
Reduction of radiation and cardiac artifacts. Diagn Interv Imaging 2016;97:443-9.
10.1016/j.diii.2016.01.007 .
2. McLaren CA, Elliott MJ, Roebuck DJ. Vascular compression of the airway in children.
Paediatr Respir Rev 2008;9:85-94. 10.1016/j.prrv.2007.12..]

210
©2023,IRJEdT Volume:05Issue:06 |June-2023
3. Fogel MA, Pawlowski TW, Harris MA, et al. Comparison and Usefulness of Cardiac
Magnetic Resonance Versus Computed Tomography in Infants Six Months of Age or
Younger With Aortic Arch Anomalies Without Deep Sedation or Anesthesia. Am J Cardiol
2011;108:120-5. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.03.008 .
4. Leonardi B, Secinaro A, Cutrera R, et al. Imaging modalities in children with vascular ring
and pulmonary artery sling. Pediatr Pulmonol 2015;50:781-8. 10.1002/ppul.23075

5. Zucker EJ, Cheng JY, Haldipur A, et al. Free-breathing pediatric chest MRI: Performance
of self-navigated golden-angle ordered conical ultrashort echo time acquisition. J Magn
Reson Imaging 2018;47:200-9. 10.1002/jmri.25776 .
6. Cheng JY, Hanneman K, Zhang T, et al. Comprehensive motion-compensated highly
accelerated 4D flow MRI with ferumoxytol enhancement for pediatric congenital heart
disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;43:1355-68. 10.1002/jmri.25106 .
7. Hahn AD, Higano NS, Walkup LL, et al. Pulmonary MRI of neonates in the intensive care
unit using 3D ultrashort echo time and a small footprint MRI system. J Magn Reson Imaging
2017;45:463-71. 10.1002/jmri.25394 .
8. Krishnamurthy R, Bahouth SM, Muthupillai R. 4D Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography
with the Keyhole Technique in Children: Technique and Clinical Applications.
Radiographics 2016;36:523-37 10.1148/rg.2016150106 .
9. Olchowy C, Cebulski K, Łasecki M, et al. The presence of the gadolinium-based contrast
agent depositions in the brain and symptoms of gadolinium neurotoxicity - A systematic
review. Mohapatra S, editor. PLoS One 2017;12:e0171704. [.
10. Gulani V, Calamante F, Shellock FG, et al. Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary
of evidence and recommendations. Lancet Neurol 2017;16:564-70. 10.1016/S1474-
4422(17)30158-8
11. Bultman EM, Klaers J, Johnson KM, et al. Non-contrast enhanced 3D SSFP MRA of the
renal allograft vasculature: a comparison between radial linear combination and Cartesian
inflow-weighted acquisitions. Magn Reson Imaging 2014;32:190-5.
10.1016/j.mri.2013.10.004
12. Tandon A, Hashemi S, Parks WJ, et al. Improved high-resolution pediatric vascular
cardiovascular magnetic resonance with gadofosveset-enhanced 3D respiratory navigated,
inversion recovery prepared gradient echo readout imaging compared to 3D balanced steady-
state free precession readout imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2016;18:74.
10.1186/s12968-016-0296-4

211
©2023,IRJEdT Volume:05Issue:06 |June-2023
 212
©2023,IRJEdT Volume:05Issue:06 |June-2023