Name of the Proponent: ERICSON M. MAREGMEN School/Office: PEDRO L.

QUINES ES Score: 86
Title of the Research Paper UTILIZATION OF KEEPING INDIVIDUAL LEARNER AS NATURAL AND DILIGENT E-READER (KIND-E-R) AS TOOL IN
IMPROVING THE READING PERFORMANCE OF THE KINDERGARTEN LEARNERS WITH DISTANCE EDUCATION
Rubrics in the Evaluation of Proposals
(as per DepEd Order No. 4, s. 2016)

GUIDE FOR APPRAISING SCHOOL ACTION RESEARCH PROPOSALS

Main Criteria Increasing Levels of Quality and their Descriptions Score
Sub-Criteria Low High
Rationale of the Context not described The action research proposal The educational The nature, extent and salience 14
Action Research (15) (no points) presents a general description relevance and of the identified problem or
(30 points) of the problem or issue as its timeliness of the issue are comprehensively
focus of inquiry. problem or issue were discussed. Different aspects of
(8 points) shown. The need to the action research setting are
conduct action elaborated showing in depth
research as a way to and critical analysis of the
address or improve the situation.
situation is explained. (15 points)
(12 points)

Proposed not presented The action research proposal The proposal outlines The rationale, extent and 13
Intervention, (no points) mentions an intervention, when and where the limitation of the intervention,
Innovation, innovation or strategy to be intervention, innovation or strategy are
Strategy tried out to address the innovation or strategy explained in detail. Its
(15) problem or issue. will be undertaken, plausibility as a way to address
(8 points) and who will be the problem or issue is given
involved. Activities to support.
be undertaken are (15 points)
stated.
(12 points)

Action Research Questions
(30 points)
not stated The action research proposal
(no points) has a stated aim, objective, or
general research questions.
(15 points)
The research question The research question(s) 25
(s) specifies the action logically proceeds from the
research variable(s) or context of the inquiry. It
the focus of inquiry. clearly relates to the identified
Key elements of the problem or issue, and conveys
 research questions are the desired change or
reflected in the title of improvement.
the research output. (30 points)
(25 points)

Action Research Participants Not stated The action research proposal Details are provided about the target participants (ex. 8
Methods and/or other (no points) states the target participants number, characteristics, sampling procedure, if any
(30 points) resources of and/or other sources of data and/or other sources of data and information. Clear
data and and information (ex. learners, rationale for their inclusion in the study is given.
Information teachers, documents, realia, (10 points)
(10) learners’ products, others)
(5 points)

Data not described The action research proposal Details of the data The proposal explains why the 8
Gathering (no points) presents a general description gathering methods are selected data gathering
Methods of the method(s) to be provided; the specific method(s) is suited to the
(10) employed for gathering data kinds of data, how and nature and purpose of the
(5 points) when they will be action research. The data
collected (ex. pretest gathering method(s) is aligned
and post test scores). with the research questions.
Research instruments, Research instruments, if any,
if any, are described are appropriate for obtaining
(ex. test, scale, survey the desired kind of
questionnaire, data/information
checklist, interview (10 points)
guide, others)
(8 points)

Data not stated The action research proposal Details of the methods The selected method of data 8
Analysis (no points) presents a general description of data analysis are analysis is shown to be
Plan of how the gathered given. Techniques (ex. appropriate to the nature of the
(10) data/information will be quantitative/statistical, data/information to be gathered
analyzed. qualitative, or both and for addressing the research
(5 points) methods) as well as question(s).
tools (ex. software) to (10 points)
be employed are
specified.
(8 points)

Action Research Not included (no points) The action research A detailed work plan is 5
 Work Plan and proposal includes a list provided covering start to
Timelines of major activities and completion of the action
(5 points) their timelines. research. Timelines are
(3 points) realistic and show concretely
how the action research
unfolded over the allowed
period. The overall plan
reflects the proponent’s
capacity to concretize ideas
into clear and sequential steps
to be undertaken.
(5 points)

Cost Estimates Not included (no points) The action research A detailed breakdown of items 5
(5 points) proposal includes a list with their corresponding costs
of major items and is furnished. The items and
their estimated costs. costs reasonably reflect the
The total costs is funding needs of the action
shown research and adhere to the
(3 points) BERF guidelines. The overall
plan reflects the proponent’s
capacity to project specific
expenses that she or he be
accountable for.
(5 points)

TOTAL SCORE 86

Remarks:

Source: Enclosure No. 10 to Regional Memorandum No. 48 s. 2016