Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S0167844217301088 Main
1 s2.0 S0167844217301088 Main
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t
Article history: Fractal geometry has been widely used in literature to characterize the mechanical behaviour of quasi-
Received 3 March 2017 brittle materials. In this work, innovative cementitious composites with carbon-based pyrolyzed
Revised 21 March 2017 micro-aggregates were tested until complete fracture and their fracture behaviour was studied in the
Accepted 21 March 2017
light of fractal geometry. Images of the crack paths across the tested specimens were acquired by
Available online 22 March 2017
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and their fractal dimension was calculated via the box counting
method. Results show that the pyrolyzed micro-aggregates, characterized by high strength and stiffness
Keywords:
due to their significant carbon content, are able to alter the crack path by increasing its tortuosity, thus
Cementitious composites
Crack path
inducing toughening mechanisms in the cementitious composites. This favourable behaviour is explained
Fractal dimension by means of fractal geometry: it is found that, the greater the fractal dimension of the crack path, the
Box counting higher the fracture energy.
Fracture energy Ó 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Fracture toughness
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2017.03.016
0167-8442/Ó 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
134 L. Restuccia et al. / Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 90 (2017) 133–141
Table 1
Weights of the materials used for each mixture.
Mixture ID Cement (g) Water (g) w/c (–) SP1 (g) Pyrolyzed hazelnut shells (g) Pyrolyzed hazelnut shells (%)a
PLAIN CEM 214 74.9 0.35 3.21 – –
PY-HS_0.5% 214 74.9 0.35 3.21 1.07 0.5
PY-HS_0.8% 214 74.9 0.35 3.21 1.71 0.8
PY-HS_1% 214 74.9 0.35 3.21 2.14 1.0
a
Percentage with respect to the cement weight.
L. Restuccia et al. / Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 90 (2017) 133–141 135
Table 2
Chemical composition of pyrolyzed hazelnut shells by XRF.
Components C Si Mg K Ca P Zn S Cr Cu Fe
Weight% 97.9 0.11 – 1.01 0.44 0.05 – 0.02 0.02 0.19 0.25
Fig. 2. Example of crack path detection in a binary image and the corresponding data matrix.
Fig. 3. Example of application of the box counting method on a binary matrix, three subsequent iterations: (a) k = 2, Nk = 14; (b) k = 4, Nk = 7 and (c) k = 8, Nk = 4.
136 L. Restuccia et al. / Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 90 (2017) 133–141
Table 3
Determination of fracture energy GF in accordance with standard JCI-S-001-2003 [31], specimens after 7 curing days.
Specimen ID JCI-S-001-2003
Mixture # W0 (Nmm) 0.75 W0 (Nmm) CMODc (mm) W1 (Nmm) GF (N/mm) GF mean value
PLAIN CEM 1 1.38 1.03 0.03 1.26 0.008 0.016
PLAIN CEM 2 1.44 1.08 0.04 2.03 0.011
PLAIN CEM 3 2.55 1.91 0.06 3.15 0.018
PLAIN CEM 4 3.96 2.97 0.09 4.69 0.027
PY-HS_0.5% 1 4.45 3.34 0.10 5.15 0.030 0.030
PY-HS_0.5% 2 4.14 3.11 0.10 5.16 0.029
PY-HS_0.5% 3 4.34 3.26 0.10 5.03 0.029
PY-HS_0.5% 4 4.14 3.11 0.11 5.26 0.029
PY-HS_0.8% 1 5.00 3.75 0.10 5.17 0.031 0.032
PY-HS_0.8% 2 5.03 3.78 0.11 5.24 0.032
PY-HS_0.8% 3 4.97 3.72 0.11 5.34 0.032
PY-HS_0.8% 4 4.97 3.73 0.10 4.88 0.030
PY-HS_1% 1 3.05 2.29 0.06 2.76 0.018 0.022
PY-HS_1% 2 3.04 2.28 0.07 3.65 0.021
PY-HS_1% 3 3.84 2.88 0.08 3.86 0.024
PY-HS_1% 4 3.65 2.74 0.08 3.74 0.023
L. Restuccia et al. / Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 90 (2017) 133–141 137
work done by the deadweight of specimen and loading, evaluated in which l is the loading span, L is the total length of the specimen,
as m1 is the mass of the notched specimen, m2 is the mass of the load-
ing arrangement part not attached to testing machine but placed on
l
W 1 ¼ 0:75 m1 þ 2m2 g CMOCc ð3Þ the specimen, g is the acceleration due to gravity and CMODc is the
L
crack mouth opening displacement at rupture.
Table 4
Determination of fracture energy GF in accordance with standard JCI-S-001-2003 [31], specimens after 28 curing days.
SPECIMEN ID JCI-S-001-2003
Mixture # W0 (Nmm) 0.75 W0 (Nmm) CMODc (mm) W1 (Nmm) GF (N/mm) GF mean value
PLAIN CEM 5 2.83 2.12 0.05 2.48 0.016 0.018
PLAIN CEM 6 3.39 2.54 0.06 3.05 0.020
PLAIN CEM 7 2.72 2.04 0.08 3.98 0.022
PLAIN CEM 8 1.23 0.92 0.06 3.05 0.014
PY-HS_0.5% 5 4.69 3.52 0.09 4.27 0.027 0.031
PY-HS_0.5% 6 4.07 3.05 0.08 4.08 0.025
PY-HS_0.5% 7 9.04 6.78 0.11 5.31 0.043
PY-HS_0.5% 8 5.35 4.01 0.08 4.13 0.029
PY-HS_0.8% 5 5.46 4.09 0.05 2.66 0.024 0.033
PY-HS_0.8% 6 5.91 4.43 0.15 7.45 0.042
PY-HS_0.8% 7 5.94 4.46 0.10 5.14 0.034
PY-HS_0.8% 8 6.16 4.62 0.07 3.71 0.029
PY-HS_1% 5 3.54 2.66 0.11 5.62 0.029 0.029
PY-HS_1% 6 3.95 2.96 0.11 5.39 0.029
PY-HS_1% 7 3.92 2.94 0.10 5.11 0.028
PY-HS_1% 8 3.76 2.82 0.11 5.29 0.028
Fig. 6. Mean values of fracture energy GF evaluated from TPB tests, 7 days cured specimens.
Fig. 7. Mean values of fracture energy GF evaluated from TPB tests, 28 days cured specimens.
138 L. Restuccia et al. / Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 90 (2017) 133–141
Results from the TPB tests reported in Tables 3 and 4 show an 3.2. Toughening micromechanisms and fractal geometry of the crack
increase of GF, with respect to the plain cement paste, for all the paths
percentages of pyrolyzed micro-aggregates added to the cementi-
tious composite, both after 7 and 28 curing days. In Figs. 6 and 7, The increase in fracture toughness and fracture energy due to
bar plots show the mean values of GF, calculated as average of four the pyrolyzed micro-aggregates can be explained by examining
specimens according to JCI-S-001-2003. It can be noticed that the the fractal characteristics of crack paths and fracture surfaces
0.8% addition improves the most the fracture toughness of the [10,17].
cementitious composites, with an increase, compared to plain Figs. 8 and 9 depict the crack paths and fracture surfaces across
cement paste, of 69% and 75% in 7 and 28 curing days, respectively. the specimens of plain cement paste (PLAIN CEM – #1) and of
Since the difference between the results after 7 and 28 curing days cementitious composite with 0.8% addition of pyrolyzed hazelnut
is not significant, the pyrolyzed micro-aggregates are proved to be shells (PY-HS_0.8% – #2), respectively. It is apparent that the crack
immediately able to confer a better mechanical behaviour to the in plain cement paste follows a linear path, as typical in brittle frac-
cementitious composites. ture, while the crack in cementitious composite progresses with a
Fig. 8. Plain cement paste, specimen ID: PLAIN CEM – #1. (a) Crack path and (b) fracture surface [24].
Fig. 9. Cementitious composite with 0.8% addition of pyrolyzed hazelnut shells, specimen ID: PY-HS_0.8% – #2. (a) Crack path and (b) fracture surface [24].
Fig. 10. SEM image of the crack path across the cementitious composite with 0.8% addition of pyrolyzed hazelnut shells, specimen ID: PY-HS_0.8% – #2.
L. Restuccia et al. / Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 90 (2017) 133–141 139
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 12. Image processing and box counting method for plain cement paste (specimen ID: PLAIN CEM – #1). (a) SEM image, (b) binary image, (c) edge detection of the crack
path and (d) box counting results and linear least-squares regression.
140 L. Restuccia et al. / Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 90 (2017) 133–141
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
Fig. 13. Image processing and box counting method for the cementitious composite with the 0.8% addition of pyrolyzed hazelnut shells (specimen ID: PY-HS_0.8% – #2). (a)
SEM image, (b) binary image, (c) edge detection of the crack path and (d) box counting results and linear least-squares regression.
the fractal dimension is a measure of the complexity of an object sion of the crack path showed an increment consistent with the
across different scales, the morphology and irregularity of a crack fracture energy, indicating an increment in tortuosity and, there-
path determine its fractal dimension: the crack path following a fore, an increment of the fracture surface. The presence of the
more linear pattern, in the plain cement paste, has indeed a fractal micro-aggregates, characterized by high strength and stiffness
dimension closer to 1, or the dimension of a straight line, while the due to their significant carbon content, forced the crack path to
more irregular and tortuous crack path, in the cementitious com- deviate its trajectory and surround them. Even if the quantity of
posite with pyrolyzed micro-aggregates, shows a higher fractal these micro-aggregates was very small, the specific surface area
dimension. The fractal dimension of the crack path is therefore was impressive, due to their micro-dimension, and the increase
related to the fracture toughness of the material: with increasing of fracture energy was significant.
fractal dimension, the crack consumes more energy to propagate
along a more complicated pattern, thus resulting in boosting up
the fracture toughness. References
[1] B.B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman, San Francisco,
4. Conclusions 1982.
[2] K. Falconer, Fractal Geometry: Mathematical Foundations and Applications,
Wiley, Chichester, 1990.
In the present work, a fractal analysis of the crack paths in inno-
[3] T. Ai, R. Zhang, H.W. Zhou, J.L. Pei, Box-counting methods to directly estimate
vative composites with pyrolyzed hazelnut shells as micro- the fractal dimension of a rock surface, Appl. Surf. Sci. 314 (2014) 610–621.
aggregates has been presented. The principal goal of this approach [4] H. Khanbareh, X. Wu, S. van der Zwaag, Analysis of the fractal dimension of
was to give a theoretical justification to the significant increment grain boundaries of AA7050 aluminum alloys and its relationship to fracture
toughness, J. Mater. Sci. 47 (2012) 6246–6253.
of fracture energy experimentally measured in the specimens [5] G.P. Cherepanov, A.S. Balankin, V.S. Ivanova, Fractal fracture mechanics – a
added with the carbonaceous micro-aggregates. The fractal dimen- review, Eng. Fract. Mech. 51 (1995) 997–1033.
L. Restuccia et al. / Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics 90 (2017) 133–141 141
[6] G. Zheng, J. Zhao, L. Li, X. Cheng, M. Wan, A fractal analysis of the crack [22] R.A. Khushnood, L. Restuccia, G.A. Ferro, S. Ahmad, J.M. Tulliani, P. Jagdale,
extension paths in a Si3N4 ceramic tool composite, Int. J. Refract. Metals Hard Modified fracture properties of cement composites with nano/micro
Mater. 51 (2015) 160–168. carbonized bagasse fibers, F&IS 34 (2015) 534–542.
[7] E. Charkaluk, M. Bigerelle, A. Iost, Fractals and fracture, Eng. Fract. Mech. 61 [23] L. Restuccia, G.A. Ferro, Nanoparticles from food waste: a ‘‘green” future for
(1998) 119–139. traditional building materials, in: 9th International Conference on Fracture
[8] S.P. Shah, C. Ouyang, D. Lange, Fracture behavior of cement based materials, Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures (FraMCoS-9), Berkeley,
MRS Bull. 18 (1993) 55–59. California, USA, 2016, Paper N. 276, 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.21012/FC9.276.
[9] D.N. Winslow, The fractal nature of the surface of cement paste, Cem. Concr. [24] L. Restuccia, G.A. Ferro, Promising low cost carbon-based materials to improve
Res. 15 (1985) 817–824. strength and toughness in cement composites, Constr. Build. Mater. 126
[10] D.N. Winslow, J.M. Bukowsky, J.F. Young, The fractal arrangement of hydrated (2016) 1034–1043.
cement pastes, Cem. Concr. Res. 25 (1995) 147–156. [25] J. Liu, Q. Li, S. Xu, Influence of nanoparticles on fluidity and mechanical
[11] D. Lange, H. Jennings, S.P. Shah, Relationship between fracture surface properties of cement mortar, Constr. Build. Mater. 101 (2015) 892–901.
roughness and fracture behavior of cement paste and mortar, J. Am. Ceram. [26] S. Montenegro Camacho, S. Bensaid, B. Ruggeri, L. Restuccia, G.A. Ferro, G.
Soc. 76 (1993) 589–597. Mancini, D. Fino, Valorisation of by-products/waste of agro-food industry by
[12] V.E. Saouma, C.C. Barton, Fractals, fractures and size effects in concrete, J. Eng. the pyrolysis process, J. Adv. Catal. Sci. Technol. 3 (2016) 1–11.
Mech. 120 (1994) 835–854. [27] D. Wei, R. Dave, R. Pfeffer, Mixing and characterization of nanosized powders:
[13] G.A. Ferro, Effetti di scala sulla resistenza a trazione dei materiali Ph.D. Thesis, an assessment of different techniques, J. Nanopart. Res. 4 (2002) 21–41.
Politecnico di Torino, Torino, 1994. [28] L. Restuccia, Re-think, Re-use: Agro-food and C&D Waste for High-
[14] A. Carpinteri, G.A. Ferro, Size effects on tensile fracture properties: a unified performance Sustainable Cementitious Composites (Ph.D. Thesis), Politecnico
explanation based on disorder and fractality of concrete microstructure, di Torino, Torino, 2016.
Mater. Struct. 27 (1994) 563–571. [29] S. Ahmad, R.A. Khushnood, P. Jagdale, J.M. Tulliani, G.A. Ferro, High
[15] A. Carpinteri, B.M. Chiaia, G.A. Ferro, Scale dependence of tensile strength of performance self-consolidating cementitious composites by using micro
concrete specimens: a multifractal approach, Mag. Concr. Res. 50 (1998) 237– carbonized bamboo particles, Mater. Des. 76 (2015) 223–229.
246. [30] S. Ahmad, G.A. Ferro, R.A. Khushnood, L. Restuccia, J.M. Tulliani, P. Jagdale,
[16] G.A. Ferro, On dissipated energy density in compression for concrete, Eng. Crack path and fracture surface modifications in cement composite, F&IS 34
Fract. Mech. 73 (2006) 1510–1530. (2015) 524–533.
[17] Mohsen A. Issa, Mahmoud A. Issa, S. Islam, A. Chudnovsky, Fractal dimension – [31] Japan Concrete Institute, Method of Test for Fracture Energy of Concrete by
a measure of fracture roughness and toughness of concrete, Eng. Fract. Mech. Use of Notched Beam (JCI-S-001-2003), Tokyo, Japan, 2003.
70 (2003) 125–137. [32] RILEM TC 50-FMC, Determination of the fracture energy of mortar and
[18] B. Chiaia, J.G.M. Van Mier, A. Vervuit, Crack growth mechanisms in four concrete by means of three-point bend test on notched beams, Mater. Struct.
different concretes: microscopic observations and fractal analysis, Cem. Concr. 18 (1985) 285–290.
Res. 28 (1998) 103–114. [33] RILEM TC 89-FMT, Determination of fracture parameters of plain concrete
[19] G.A. Ferro, J.M. Tulliani, P. Jagdale, L. Restuccia, New concepts for next using three-point bend tests, Mater. Struct. 23 (1990) 457–460.
generation of high performance concretes, Proc. Mater. Sci. 3 (2014) 1760– [34] V.C. Li, M. Maalej, Toughening in cement based composites. Part I: cement,
1766. mortar, and concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos. 18 (1996) 223–237.
[20] G.A. Ferro, S. Ahmad, R.A. Khushnood, L. Restuccia, J.M. Tulliani, Improvements [35] Q. Qin, Introduction to the composite and its toughening mechanism, in: Q.
in self-consolidating cementitious composites by using micro carbonized Qin, J. Ye (Eds.), Toughening Mechanisms in Composite Materials, Woodhead
aggregates, F&IS 30 (2014) 75–83. Publishing, 2015, pp. 1–32.
[21] G. Ferro, J.M. Tulliani, A. Lopez, P. Jagdale, New cementitious composite
building material with enhanced toughness, Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 76
(2015) 67–74.