PHILIPPINE NATIONAL POLICE

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW (IPCR)

2nd Semester 2016
Semester

I,NUP WILSON L DOCTORA, ADA-5 ,of the TSS-OMD of CIDG commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with the indicated
measures for the period July 1, 2016 to December 30, 2016.

Ratee:
Date: Approved by: Date:
Wilson L. Doctora January 3, 2017______________ PCI JESUS S HULIGANGA___ January 3, 2017________
Print Name and Signature Rater/Immediate Supervisor

Success Indicators TARGETS ACCOMPLISHMENT RATINGS

OUTPUT/ACTIVITY
(Measures) Q T E Q T E Q T E Average
Core Functions:
Daily monitoring to
One error
100% (200) computers and keep the CIDG Two errors for the Monitored daily
1. Responsible in the monitoring of the % of keeping the CIDG network 120%(240 of committed
gadgets connected to CIDG network period of six (6) the network 4.49 4.49 4.49 4.49
CIDG network infrastructure infrastructure checked 200) for the period of
network infrastructure infrastructure months connection
six (6) months
running properly
2. Configuration and maintenance of No error
% of configuration and Daily maintaining Daily maintaining
Cpanel to keep the CIDG Website 100% (1000) CIDG email committed for the 130% (1,300 No error
maintenance on CIDG email CIDG email CIDG email 4.49 4.49 5 4.66
alive and daily operation on CIDG accounts maintained
accounts
period of six (6) of 1000) accounts
committed
accounts
email accounts months
3. Responsible in the implementation of regular database Two error for the
100% (5) regular weekly Back-up every no error
back-up recovery when disaster % of database backup backups in weekly period of six (6) 100%(5 of 6) 4.49 4.49 5 4.66
database backups
basis
friday committed
comes. months
Installed on new One error
4. Maintain the CIDG Network 80 users of anti-virus Two error for the
50 users of anti-virus for CIDG 100% (80 of purchased PC or committed
infrastructure secured from % of anti-virus installed are installed for period of six (6) 4.49 4.49 4.49 4.49
computers 50) newly reformat for the period of
internal/external threats. CIDG computers months
pc six (6) months
4. Monitoring the CCTV operation
5.
Total 4.58
Sub-total (70%)
Total x 70%
3.2
Support Functions:
1. Purchase of IT equipment such as Immediately buy No error
50 units of IT Two error for the
computer, access point, router, 50 units of IT equipment are 100% (50 of necessary IT committed 3.49 3.49 5 3.99
No. of IT equipment purchased equipment are period of six (6)
switch, UTP cables, IO ports, plastic purchased 50) equipment within
purchased months
moulding, etc. the day
Total 3.99
Sub-total (30%) Total x 30% 1.2

Final Average Rating (70% +30%= 100% 4.4

Adjectival Rating VS
 Comments and Recommendations for Development Purposes
I, NUP Wilson L. Doctora__, ADA-5 of the Technical Support Section-Operation Management Division of
CIDG commit to deliver and agree to be rated on the attainment of the following targets in accordance with Discussed with: Assessed by:
the indicated measures for the period January to June 2016.
NUP WILSON L. DOCTORA PCI BENJIE M CALAPIZ July 18, 2016
Ratee Rater Date
NUP Wilson L Doctora
Ratee
Approved by:
Performance Management Team Advice:

PCI BENJIE M CALAPIZ __July 18, 2016__

Ratee. Immediate Supervisor Date

Legend:
Q – Quality
T: Timeliness
E – Efficiency

Notes/Legend:
1. Core functions should indicated outputs/activity prescribed in the individual plantilla positions.
2. Success indicators/Measures –quantifiable means of achieving one’s activity.
3. Actual accomplishments relate to the set targets in every activity; may be defined numerically or qualitatively
4. Rating should indicate the overall rating (using the scale below) of the immediate supervisor taking into consideration;
Quality (Q) – whether the individual is doing the right things based on his mandated tasks/expectations/requirements of the client
Efficiency (E) – whether the individual is doing the things/mandated tasks/expectations right
Timeliness (T) – whether the deliverable was done on time based on the requirements of the law and/or clients/stakeholders.
QUANTITY OF WORK % EFFICIENCY TIMELINESS OF WORK
4.50-5.00 –ALWAYS performs each work exceptionally accurate, no
4.50-5.00 Exceed Output by 30% 4.50-5.00 – Always ahead of schedule
wastage, work is met & complete in all detail, no errors committed
3.50-4.49 –ALMOST always performs each work accurately, wastage is
3.50-4.49 Exceed Output by 15 to 29% 3.50-4.49 –Almost always ahead of schedule
minimum, work is neat and complete in all details, with minimum errors
2.50-3.49 - Performs each work in the correct manner with occasional 2.50-3.49 -Meet the schedule occasionally (2
2.50-3.49 Met target by up to 100 to 114% wastage in some aspects, work is neat but frequently commit errors days delay)
1.50-2.49 –Performs each work in the correct manner and wastage occur in 1.50-2.49– Meet the schedule often late (3 to 5
1.50-2.49 Met target 51-99% all aspects, work is untidy and repeatedly commit errors days delay)
1.00-1.49 – Never meets the schedule always
1.00-1.49 Met target 50% and below 1.00-1.49 – Performs each work in an untidy and erroneous manner,.
late.