Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Neuropsychology Methods
Neuropsychology Methods
Structure
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Objectives
1.2 Techniques for Measuring Brain Structure and Functions
1.2.1 Examining Tissue
1.2.2 Lesions and Ablation
1.2.3 Electrical Stimulation
1.2.4 Neurochemical Manipulations
1.2.5 Electrical Recording
1.2.6 In-Vivo Imaging
1.3 Neuropsychological Assessment
1.4 Dissociation and Double Dissociations
1.5 In Vivo Imaging in Psychiatry
1.6 Let Us Sum Up
1.7 Unit End Questions
1.8 Suggested Readings
1.0 INTRODUCTION
In this unit, you will be introduced to some of the methods that researchers use
to explore the relationships between brain structure and function.
Neuropsychology is a bridging discipline that draws on material from neurology,
experimental psychology and even psychiatry; and the area is served by a diverse
collection of investigative measures ranging from neuroanatomical procedures
at one end of the spectrum to assessments from experimental psychology at the
other.
A particularly exciting development over the last 30 years has been the
introduction of invivo imaging techniques. The rapid spread in availability of
scanning and imaging hardware (particularly during ’the decade of the brain’ in
1990s) has provided neuroscientists with research opportunities that were, until
recently, unthinkable. In vivo imaging has provided independent confirmation
of the suspected role(s) of particular brain regions in psychological processing
(for example, the role of the anterior cingulate in attention). In other instances,
in-vivo techniques have revealed the true complexity of processes that other
procedures had tended to oversimplify.
The application of imaging techniques to language to find out the different areas
involved in different processing of language is an example of the same.
Informative though the various procedures can be, it is also important to realise
that most neuropsychological techniques (including in vivo scanning) have their
limitations. So, although the demise of older procedures has frequently been
predicted as imminent, many still have important role to play. In fact, the
combination of imaging with traditional techniques can turn out to be a particularly
fruitful and informative collaboration. In simple terms using a combination of
5
Brain Behaviour methods is the best way to follow when studying a phenomenon in
Inter-relationship
neuropsychology.
The unit starts with a brief review of classical techniques that are, for the most
part, neuroanatomical in origin. Next, the use of electrical stimulation and
electrical recording of the brain is discussed and elaborated. Then some of the
in-vivo techniques are identified that allows researchers to visualise the structure
and/or function of the ‘living’ brain. Neuropsychological procedures are
elaborated towards the end, some of which can be used in conjunction with in-
vivo imaging to provide better insight and understanding of the functioning of
the brain. It is tried to keep the information simple and brief, but at the same
time pertinent information is not omitted. The unit concludes with an illustration
of an exciting application of in-vivo imaging in psychiatry.
1.1 OBJECTIVES
After completing this unit, you will be able to:
• Define and describe neuropsychological assessment;
• Describe the techniques for measuring brain structures and functions;
• Describe the tests and subtests underlying neuropsychological assessment
battery;
• Differentiate between dissociation and double dissociation; and
• Elucidate the in vivo imaging in psychiatry.
Obstructions such as tumors can interrupt normal brain activity, leading to deficits
of normal reasoning, motor control, or consciousness. Many of the signs of neural
damage are easily recognisable by an outside observer, but since the actual cause
of these problems are internal, the symptoms can be vague. The real deficits can
affect the brain’s anatomy, or the way signals are processed. A physician can
only determine the real cause by examining the brain internally to find
irregularities, either in structure or in functioning. Since the brain is extremely
fragile and difficult to access without risking further damage, imaging techniques
are used frequently as a noninvasive method of visualising the brain’s structure
and activity.
Today’s technology provides many useful tools for studying the brain, and this
website will try to briefly describe the most important ones. Some have their
most important applications in medical diagnosis, and some are used more for
research. The latter are often too expensive or limited for cost-efficient medical
use, but can prove valuable and necessary in the future through development
and further advances.
6
There are two main groups of procedures. Structural analysis is used to analyse Neuropsychology Methods
the anatomy of the brain, in order to find structural deviations. These could be
tumors, hemorrhages, blood clots and lesions, or even deficits present at birth.
Functional analysis tries to measure and locate brain activity. This is useful for
investigating the functioning of special structures, and to diagnose epileptic
seizures or diseases affecting brain activity. Functional imaging is also used to
aid surgical treatment of brain lesions when it becomes necessary to determine
the locality of essential functional cortex to help guide the best surgical approach.
Many times a structural and functional method will be used in conjunction to
better assess how the activity and region are related.
Brain tissue looks solid to the naked eye (it has a consistency of stiff jelly), so
‘finger-grain’ investigations had to await two technological developments. The
first was the gradual refinement over many years of the light microscope, and
second was the discovery of tissue staining techniques that had the effect of
‘highlighting’ particular component structures of tissue. The combinations of
these developments enable researchers to identify small groups of neurons, or
even individual neurons, using a microscope. Thanks to technological
improvements in lens manufacture, microscopy has developed considerably since
its first reported use to examine biological tissues (of a cow) by Van Leeuwenhoek
in1674. Light microscope can now reliably magnify by a factor of several hundred,
but electron microscope can magnify by a factor of several thousands. They can
produce images of images of individual synapses (junctions between neurons),
or even of receptor sites for neurotransmitters on the surface of neurons.
New staining techniques have also been developed since the pioneering work of
Golgi in the late 19th century, although his silver-staining method (which makes
7
Brain Behaviour stained material appear dark) is still used to produce images of neurons. Other,
Inter-relationship
staining techniques, such as horseradish peroxidise (HRP), have been developed
to enable the tracing of connections between neurons. This stain gets absorbed
by distal (remote) regions of neuron, but is carried back to the cell body (by
retrograde transport within the neuron) to reveal the pathway that the neuron’s
axon takes. A combination of silver and HRP techniques can be used to establish
functional connectivity between the brain regions, such as the innervations of
the striatum by the substantia nigra.
For obvious reasons these procedures are not used experimentally on humans,
but sometimes brain tissue is ablated for medical reasons such as the excision of
tumour. Occasionally, surgical lesioning is also undertaken. Taylor’s (1969) study
of the effects of lesions to the left and right sides of the cortex in two patients is
an example of the former. The surgical procedure of lesioning the corpus callosum
as a treatment for epilepsy is an example of the latter. Sometimes, accidents
cause lesions (or ablations). The case of Phineas Gage is one celebrated case in
point. The case of NA, who developed amnesia following an accident with a
fencing foil, is less well known but equally interesting.
8
Neuropsychology Methods
Self Assessment Questions
1) Discuss the techniques for measuring brain structures and functions.
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
2) What is meant by lesions and ablations? Discuss their role in measuring
brain structure.
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
3) Discuss Taylor’s study of the effects of lesions to the left and right sides
of the cortex.
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
In order to record ERPs a series of stimuli such as tones or light flashes are
presented to the participant, and the raw EEG for a precise one or two second
period following each stimulus is recorded and fed into a computer where it is
summed and averaged. This will be a response (or ‘event-related potential’) in
the brain to each separate stimulus but this will be small (millionths of a volt) in
comparison with the background EEG (thousandths of a volt). By summing all
EEGs together and averaging them, the more-or-less random EEG averages to
zero, to leave an ERP that has a characteristic waveform when shown on the
computer screen. Various abnormalities in this waveform have been linked to
predisposition to alcoholism and schizophrenia. The ERP technique has also
been useful as a tool to explore the mechanism of attention.
10
Neuropsychology Methods
Self Assessment Questions
1) What is the contribution/discovery of Penfield?
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
2) How will you correlate the behavioural effects of pharmacological agents
with dysfunction in anatomical areas ?
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
3) Discuss the ERP.
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
Source: www.mirium-english.org
12
Other in vivo imaging procedures that you may read about include regional Neuropsychology Methods
cerebral flow (rCBF) and single photon emission computerised tomography
(SPECT). Both are variants of PET technology.
SPECT differs from PET in certain technical respects, the upshot of which is
that the clarity of the scans is less precise because they take longer to generate.
The MRI scanner can be ‘tuned’ to detect the very subtle disturbances to the
magnetic field induced by the different proportions of oxygenated and
deoxygenated blood in active and inactive regions. The so-called BOLD (blood
oxygenated level dependent) signal can be further improved by the use of more
powerful magnets in the scanner, and the spatial resolution (which generates the
structural scans) is barely compromised.
Although fMRI has only been available for a few years, it has been adopted
enthusiastically by researchers because, like MRI, fMRI scanning does not expose
participants to radiation. Among many of its applications, it has recently been
used to identify functional changes in frontal brain regions as participants
undertake tests of working memory.
13
Brain Behaviour
Inter-relationship 3) What is MRI? Describe
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
4) What is the function of PET scan?
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
5) Differentiate between SPECT and PET.
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
Usually, a series of tests (called a test battery) will be given. One widely used
battery is Halstead Reitan, which includes measures of verbal and nonverbal
intelligence, language, tactile and manipulative skills, auditory sensitivity, and
so on (Reitan & Wolfson, 1993). Some of the tests are very straightforward: The
tapping test, which assesses motor function, requires nothing more than for the
respondent to tap as quickly as possible with each of his\her fingers for a fixed
time period on a touch sensitive pad. The Corsi block-tapping test measures
14 spatial memory using a series of strategically placed wooden blocks on a tray. A
third test measures memory span for sets of digits. The Luria Nebraska test battery Neuropsychology Methods
(Luria, 1966) is even more exhaustive procedure taking about two to three hours
to administer, including over 250 test items.
Source: portal.wpspublish.com
The lengthy administration of test battery may be unsuitable for some individuals
(such as demented or psychiatric patients) who simply do not have the requisite
attention span. In such instances a customised battery may be more appropriate.
Such assessments typically still include some overall index of intelligence: the
comprehensively norm-referenced WAIS-R (the revised Wechsler Adult
Intelligence Scale; Wechsler, 1981) is commonly used. In addition, specific
measures may be adopted to test particular hypotheses about an individual.
For example, if the person has received brain damage to the frontal lobes, tests
might be selected that are known to be especially sensitive to frontal damage.
The Wisconsin card sort test, the trails test (in which respondents have to join
numbered doted on a page according to particular rules) and verbal fluency
(generating words starting with particular letter on belonging to a specific
category) are cases in point.
Poor performance on one particular test may signal possible localised damage or
dysfunction, while poor across the board performance may indicate generalised
damage. For example, inability to recognise objects by touch (astereognosis)
may be a sign of damage to the parietal lobes.
A poor verbal test score (compared with normal non-verbal test score) may
indicate generalised left hemisphere damage.
The WAIS-R is particularly useful in this respect because the eleven components
tests segregate into six verbal and five performance sub tests, from which it is
possible to derive separate verbal and non verbal estimates of IQ.
15
Brain Behaviour The National Adult Reading Test (NART; Nelson, 1982) allows the researcher
Inter-relationship
to obtain an estimate of an individual’s IQ prior to damage or disease onset. This
may be useful if a neuropsychologist is making an initial assessment of a person
who has been brain damaged or ill for some time. The NART comprises 50
words that sound different to their spelling (such as yacht, ache and thought).
The respondent reads through the list until they begin to make pronunciation
errors. Such words were almost certainly learned before the onset of illness or
brain damage, and because this test has been referenced against the WAIS, the
cut off point can be used to estimate IQ prior to illness, disease or accident.
Self Assessment Questions
1) Discuss in detail the neuropsychological assessment.
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
2) Describe the tests and subtests.
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
3) What is the implication of applying these tests.
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
16
Table 1.1: Groups and tasks % correct Neuropsychology Methods
Hypothetical results from this study are shown in the above table. At first glance
they seem to support the hypothesis because the right frontal subjects appear to
be selectively impaired on the MemD condition. Many neuropsychological
investigations employ this sort of design, and use the evidence of dissociation
between groups in the MemD but not the MemW as support for the hypothesis.
There is, however design problem with single dissociation studies stemming
from the assumption that the two conditions are equally ‘sensitive’ to differences
between the two groups of participants (which may or may not be the case). For
example, it could be that right frontal subjects have poor attention, which happens
to affect the memD task more than the MemW task.
A much ‘stronger’ design is one with the potential to show a double dissociation.
For example, if we also thought that left frontal damage impaired MemW but
not MemD, we could recruit two groups of patients that is (i) one group with left
and (ii) the other with right frontal damage, plus (iii) a control group. Then test
all participants on both measures. Hypothetical results from this design are shown
in the table. They indicate that one group of patients is good at one test but not
the other, and the reverse pattern is true for the second group of patients. In other
words, we have evidence of a double dissociation, which suggests to
neuropsychologists that the two tasks involve non overlapping component
operations that may be anatomically separable too.
A recent update of Woodruff’s study has been reported by Shergill et al. (2000).
The researchers recorded fMRI activity in six regularly hallucinating
schizophrenic patients. Approximately every 60 seconds respondents had to
indicate whether (or not) they had ‘experienced’ an auditory hallucination during
the last time epoch.
19