Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Su GLLQ
Su GLLQ
Su GLLQ
liquicolor
1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 2
2 Imprecision .................................................................................................................................................................... 2
3 Linearity and Detection Limit ...................................................................................................................................... 2
Linearity Tested with Standards .......................................................................................................................................................... 2
Detection Limit ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 3
4 Tracebility ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4
5 Recovery of Control Sera .............................................................................................................................................. 4
6 Comparison of Methods ............................................................................................................................................... 5
7 Interferences ................................................................................................................................................................. 5
8 Stability.......................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Recovery in Control Sera ......................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Linearity......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7
2 Imprecision
The imprecision (within-run and day-to-day) of the GLUCOSE liquicolor method was calculated from six
determinations on six consecutive days. Three pooled control sera were employed as sample material.
High Pool Analytical Data Regressed Data Deviation from Regression Line
Content (%) mg/dl mg/dl mg/dl (%)
0 0.05 -0.13 0.18 -138.89
10 51.35 52.01 -0.66 -1.27
20 104.65 104.15 0.50 0.48
30 156.40 156.30 0.10 0.07
40 208.50 208.44 0.06 0.03
50 260.40 260.58 -0.18 -0.07
60 310.30 312.72 -2.42 -0.77
70 361.70 364.86 -3.16 -0.87
80 412.15 417.00 -4.85 -1.16
90 441.90 469.14 -27.24 -5.81
100 484.20 521.29 -37.09 -7.11
M E A S U R E D A N A L Y T E C O N C E N T R A T IO N ( m g /d l)
Er r o r B a r s = ± 2 S D
500
400
300
200
100
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
HIG H P O O L C O NT ENT ( % )
Conclusion: The GLUCOSE liquicolor test is linear up to a glucose concentration of at least 400 mg/dl or
22.2 mmol/l.
Detection Limit
A 20-fold determination of a ‘0’ sample (phys. saline) on a HumaStar 100 analyser revealed an absolute mean of
2.32mg/dl and a SD of 0.42mg/dl. From the three-fold standard deviation the detection limit can therefore be
calculated on the base of mean +3 SD to 3.58mg/dl.
As can be seen, the recovery of the reference preparation is excellent when calibrated with the respective kit
standards.
HUMATROL N # 018 122 103-140 114.8 -5.89 118.2 -3.13 114.7 -6.00 117.2 -3.93
HUMATROL P # 016 254 215-292 232.4 -8.49 241.6 -4.88 237.4 -6.54 236.6 -6.86
SERODOS # 6868 115.6 98.3-133 119.0 2.91 122.2 5.67 118.7 2.72 119.7 3.55
SERO.Plus # 6795 248.7 211.4-286 255.7 2.82 263.7 6.02 257.0 3.32 260.0 4.54
Precinorm # 154916 98 83.3-112.7 103.5 5.61 106.1 8.24 104.0 6.12 104.9 7.02
Precipath # 199459 235 199-271 248.0 5.54 253.5 7.86 249.8 6.28 251.2 6.89
Summary 1073.3 1073.5 1105.2 1081.5 1089.5
Conclusion: No significant differences could be observed between fresh and stressed reagents, confirming the
stability of the reagents. Controls were all recoverd well within the specified ranges.
N= 55
r= 0.997
Y= 1.000 * X + 2.788
Xmean = 100,89
Ymean = 103,44
Conclusion: Both methods showed a good agreement and no significant deviation could be observed with any
specific sample.
7 Interferences
Interference by uric acid, glutathion, anticoagulants, bilirubin and creatinine have been studied by adding known
amounts of the potentially interfering substance to a known sample.
Recoveries have been analyzed according to the method of Glick et al. (Clin.Cem. 1986, 32 470-5).
Uric Acid Analyt. Dev. Ascorb. Analyt. Dev. Glutathion Analyt. Dev. Citrate Analyt. Dev.
mg/dl Result % mg/dl Result % mg/dl Result % mg/ml Result %
mg/dl mg/dl mg/dl mg/dl
0 129.5 100.0 0 115.2 100.0 0 99.0 100.0 0 102.6 100.0
1.4 128.8 99.5 2 111.6 96.9 5 95.3 96.3 2.5 102.7 100.1
2.8 129.3 99.8 4 108.2 94.0 10 93.4 94.3 5.0 100.5 98.0
4.2 129.0 99.6 6 107.4 93.2 15 90.8 91.7 7.5 102.4 99.8
5.6 129.4 99.9 8 104.8 91.0 20 89.0 89.9 10.0 101.1 98.5
7.0 128.9 99.5 10 104.8 91.0 25 86.0 86.9 12.5 102.3 99.7
8.4 130.2 100.5 12 102.5 89.0 30 84.7 85.5 15.0 101.9 99.4
9.8 131.6 101.6 14 99.1 86.1 35 83.0 83.8 17.5 101.6 99.1
11.2 130.2 100.5 16 96.4 83.7 40 81.4 82.2 20.0 103.2 100.6
12.6 131.5 101.5 18 94.1 81.7 45 79.8 80.6 22.5 102.8 100.2
14.0 132.4 102.2 20 92.8 80.6 50 79.9 80.7 25.0 103.8 101.2
Glick 1 2 2 1
Glick 1 2 3 1
Conclusion: This test is not influenced by uric acid, ascorbic acid, glutathion, anticoagulants and creatinine in
physiological concentrations. A Glick value of 3 for bilirubin indicates an interfering effect. Samples with highly
pathological bilirubin concentrations (> 12 mg/dl) should therefore be avoided.
8 Stability
Recovery in Control Sera
Commercially available control sera have been employed. The control sera have been reconstituted/prepared
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Five-fold determinations of each control serum have been performed
with the GLUCOSE liquicolor test method. The means of the fivefold determinations have been calculated and
compared with the target values.
HUMATROL N # 018 114 97-131 109.8 1.04 113.0 1.01 111.5 1.02 111.1 1.02
HUMATROL N # 019 123 105-141.5 113.5 1.08 115.7 1.06 114.9 1.07 114.2 1.08
HUMATROL P # 016 234 199-269 214.7 1.09 218.3 1.07 218.0 1.07 215.6 1.08
HUMATROL P # 017 250.7 213.1- 232.6 1.08 238.1 1.05 235.0 1.07 233.9 1.07
288.3
SERODOS # 6868 115.6 98.3-133 111.0 1.04 113.3 1.02 110.8 1.04 110.6 1.04
SERO.Plus # 6795 248.7 211.4-286 243.5 1.02 246.0 1.01 242.0 1.03 242.6 1.03
SERO.Plus # 6796 274 233-315 241.6 1.13 243.4 1.12 241.6 1.13 239.2 1.14
Precinorm #159296 102 87-117 101.1 1.01 102.5 1.00 101.0 1.01 101.3 1.01
Precipath #165215 242 206-278 239.3 1.01 244.4 0.99 241.0 1.00 211.2 1.17
Summary 1704 1607.1 1634.7 1615.8 1579.7
Conclusion: The above results clearly demonstrate the stability of the test for more than 24 months after
production. In addition to the real-time stability studies, temperature stress tests are routinely performed on each
production batch as part of the end control of the product.
Conclusion: The results obtained with reagents stored for even 27 months under real-time conditions. From the
above results the stability claim of 24 months from the date of manufacture has been confirmed.