Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A2 AD Strategy
A2 AD Strategy
➢ Anti Access & Area Denial are modern terms referring to warfighting strategies focused on
preventing an oonent from operating military forces near, into, or within a contested region
➢ Anti Access& Area denial are an ancient concept whose technics of strategy that have been used
throughout military history, representinghistorical component of grand strategy
➢ Denying access to an ennemy is a natural objective for any defender, and should be considered an
integral component of any military campaign.
➢ Specifically, A2/AD is meant to denote a strategic approach intended to defend against an opponent
that is judged to be superior in strength or skill in overall combat operations
New Age Air Warfare
Introduction
A2/AD Objective
➢ Anti Access & Area Denial objective is t prevent the attacker from bringing its operationallysuperior
force into the contested region or to prevent the attacker from operating freely within the region
and maximizing its combat power.
➢ For the defender the desired result
➢ Denying access to an ennemy is a natural objective for any defender, and should be considered an
integral component of any military campaign.
➢ Specifically, A2/AD is meant to denote a strategic approach intended to defend against an opponent
that is judged to be superior in strength or skill in overall combat operations.
➢ The desired result of Anti Access & Area Denial isn’t jut a stalemate, but also an attrition of the
attacker’s forces such that the attacker loses over time any ability to make any decisisve strike at
the center of gravity of the opponent.
➢ For example Anti Access operations as a component of grand strategy naturally include
international diplomatic, political and economic activities.
New Age Air Warfare
A2/AD Context & Definition
A2/AD Five Fundamentals
➢ Anti-Accees is defined by those actions and capabilities, usually long-range, designed to prevent an
opposing force from entering an operational area.
➢ Area Denial is defined as those actions and capabilities, usualy of shorter range, designed not to
keep an opposing for out, but to lit its freedom of action through attrition within the area.
➢ OERATIONAL ACCESS is defined as the ability to project military force nto an operational area with
sufficient freedom of action to accomplish the mission.
➢ SEA CONTROL is what great navies sought in war: The ability to prevail in te area of conflict and
utilize the sea-space and airspace, for its own purpose.
➢ Conversely, Sea Denialwas what lesser navies could hopeto achieve: deny the opponent the free
use of that sea space for its purposes.
New Age Air Warfare
Developing Modern Concept of Anti-Access
Anti Access network
➢ Modern Weapon systems must operate as network (Digital Transformation of the Forces)
➢ All this requires a network along which information flows from sensor to shooter
➢ ANTI-ACCESS strategy is designed to prevent the entry of power projection forces into a contested
region and to eliminate any such force that might be already there in a war of attrition
➢ AREA-DENIAL consists of tactics and systems (BUK for example) to be utilized in denying the
freedom of action of forces operating within the region.
➢ ANTI-ACCESS and AREA-DENIAL appear to be very different situations
➢ Guerilla Warfare as an example is primarily about area denial.
➢ ANTI-ACCESS and AREA DENIAL, segment the use and type of equipment from strategic (theater
wide) to tactical operation (localized action of a Medium or Short Air defense System).
New Age Air Warfare
Asymetrical Tactics & Cognitives Anti Access
➢ Asymetrical warfare means the utilization of weapons or tactics that are different than those used
by a well equipped conventional forces with a wide portfolio of assets
➢ Some of the asymetrical aspect constitutes ‘those actions that an adversary can exercise that you
either cannot or will not’
➢ PLA have stressed asymetrical approaches in which ‘the inferior can defeat the superior’
➢ Just as certain types of sensors and weapons systems are necessary in building a modern anti
access network, certain sensors and systems are needed to overcome them (Nagorno Karabakh war
in 2020)
➢ The weapons and systems analytical methodology is most effective when anti access systems are
evaluated as network, rather than individually.
➢ Doing so can make the threat of an effective anti-access strategy concrete.
➢ Anti access warfare is as much about numbers and attrition of systems as technological
sophistication (swarm attack platform and munitions / multistrike)
New Age Air Warfare
A2/AD & Counter Strategy In Asia
New Age Air Warfare
A2/AD & Counter Strategy In Asia
New Age Air Warfare
A2/AD & Counter Strategy In Asia
New Age Air Warfare
A2/AD & Counter Strategy In Asia
New Age Air Warfare
A2/AD & Counter Strategy In Asia
• Multi-Domain Sensor Battlefield deployment
•
• Having developed an accurate Digital Targeting Battlefield Geographical information system, the 2nd Tier of the
Azerbaijani strategy consisted in the massive deployment over and around the battlefield, of unmanned sensors assets
that in a systemic way, provide volume targeting seamlessly, embracing the ‘sensors to shooters’ concept of operation
to an unprecedented scale.
• Known Main Azerbazijan Drones Types and functionalities
➢ Elbit System Hemers-900 SIGINT (Stand-off Air Defense / EW jammer Targeting)
➢ Israel Aircraft Industries Heron TP SAR/GMTI Radar (stand-off Battlefield targeting)
➢ Baykar TB-2 (Strike UCAV)
➢ Israel Aircraft Industries HAROP (EO/IR Loitering Munitions UCAV)
➢ Israel Aircraft Industries Mini HARPY (RF Passive Emitter Detection – Anti Radar UCAV)
➢ Elbit Skystrike (EO/IR Loitering Munitions UCAV)
New Age Air Warfare
A2/AD & Counter Strategy In Asia
• This multi-domain Intelligence COP provided by the profusion of unmanned battlefield sensors to
the Digital Battlefield Playground, greatly enhances the effectiveness of mission planning, targeting
and execution capability of combat unit at contact with their enemies. Those functionalities allow the
establishment of an ‘on the move dynamic target cueing list’ that enables fluid strike tasking
assignments against mobile Armenian armor units maneuvering in support or their static pre-
established multi-defensive line environment. The Armenian Artsakh defensive layered lines, were
meant to hold the ground and or fix any invading force, through well positioned ATGM and Artillery
fire, while mobile armored tactical units in the rear intervene to crush any force left, through
enveloping counter attacks. The whole under the protective umbrella of long range Surface to Air
Missile like the S-300PS.
New Age Air Warfare
A2/AD & Counter Strategy In Asia
SU-27 Upgd
Concept Of Operations
Forward Ground
Control Station Land
Reconnaissance E-TAC / Strike
Group Targeting Tablet
Anti Access Network
3D Radar associated with Buk MLB Air defense System
Anti Access Network
SU-30 BVR Engagement
Anti Access network
SU-27/30 SDB type Weapons Stand Off Range