Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Order 5310822 I
Order 5310822 I
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
Instructor
Due Date
2
Fallacies are considered bad arguments since they give a biased argument that is
critically unsatisfactory and does not give a complete point of view; instead, they are
credibility and makes it less convincing. The fallacies on the website are bad arguments since
flawed argumentative strategy because it targets the individual making the argument instead
of addressing the evidence and logic behind a statement (Dunning, 2012). This approach
provides no actual counter to the argument and relies on emotional appeals to discredit the
speaker.
argument strategy as it diverts attention away from the main point being discussed. The
original argument lacks solid evidence to support its conclusion, causing the opponent to
switch to a different topic (Ferrer, 2019). This type of fallacy is considered bad because it can
prevent a meaningful discussion from taking place and can be used to mislead others by
single authority figure or institution instead of basing the argument’s strength on logic and
sound reasoning (Dunning, 2012). This reasoning error is viewed as bad because it can result
authority.
Conclusion
Ad Hominem, Red Herring, and Argument from Authority are some fallacies
considered bad arguments. They distract from the actual argument, mislead the discussion,
3
and can lead to accepting false or misleading information. To avoid these types of fallacies, it
is vital to critically evaluate arguments based on their merits rather than buying them based
Reference
YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1N3TROA8MYY
Ferrer, D. (2019). 15 Logical Fallacies You Should Know Before Getting Into a Debate.