This document discusses the origins and principles of the rule of law. It traces the concept back to Aristotle and A.V. Dicey. While some have criticized the rule of law as vague, it is referenced in important international agreements. The core principles discussed are that all persons and authorities should be bound by and entitled to publicly made laws that are administered in courts. Other principles include accessibility of laws, limits on discretionary power, equality before the law, protection of human rights, access to fair courts, and accountability even at the international level.
This document discusses the origins and principles of the rule of law. It traces the concept back to Aristotle and A.V. Dicey. While some have criticized the rule of law as vague, it is referenced in important international agreements. The core principles discussed are that all persons and authorities should be bound by and entitled to publicly made laws that are administered in courts. Other principles include accessibility of laws, limits on discretionary power, equality before the law, protection of human rights, access to fair courts, and accountability even at the international level.
This document discusses the origins and principles of the rule of law. It traces the concept back to Aristotle and A.V. Dicey. While some have criticized the rule of law as vague, it is referenced in important international agreements. The core principles discussed are that all persons and authorities should be bound by and entitled to publicly made laws that are administered in courts. Other principles include accessibility of laws, limits on discretionary power, equality before the law, protection of human rights, access to fair courts, and accountability even at the international level.
IRB108 2022/2023 SPRING SEMESTER THE ORIGINS ❖ ARISTOTLE: ‘IT IS BETTER FOR THE LAW TO RULE THAN ONE OF THE CITIZENS, … SO EVEN THE GUARDIANS OF THE LAWS ARE OBEYING THE LAWS’. ❖ DICEY: ❖ 1. ‘NO MAN IS PUNISHABLE OR CAN LAWFULLY BE MADE TO SUFFER IN BODY OR GOODS EXCEPT FOR A DISTINCT BREACH OF LAW ESTABLISHED IN THE ORDINARY LEGAL MANNER BEFORE THE ORDINARY COURTS OF THE LAND’ - NO MAN IS ABOVE THE LAW ❖ 2. ‘EVERY PERSON, WHATEVER BE HIS RANK OR CONDITION, IS SUBJECT TO THE ORDINARY LAW OF THE REALM AND AMENABLE TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE ORDINARY TRIBUNALS’ - ALL ARE SUBJECT TO THE SAME LAW ADMINISTERED IN THE SAME COURTS ❖ 3. ‘GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF THE CONSTITUTION … ARE WITH US THE RESULT OF JUDICIAL DECISIONS DETERMINING THE RIGHTS OF PRIVATE PERSONS IN PARTICULAR CASES’ - PRINCIPLES GUIDE THE LAW APPLICATION CRITICS, SCEPTICS ❖ ‘A SHORTHAND DESCRIPTION OF THE POSITIVE ASPECTS OF ANY GIVEN POLITICAL SYSTEM’ (JOSEPH RAZ) ❖ ‘MEANS LITTLE MORE THAN HOORAY FOR OUR SIDE’ (JEREMY WALDRON) ❖ ‘AN EXCEEDINGLY ELUSIVE NOTION’ AND ANALOGOUS TO THE NOTION OF THE GOOD IN THE SENSE THAT ‘EVERYONE IS FOR IT, BUT HAVE CONTRASTING CONVICTIONS ABOUT WHAT IT IS’ (BRIAN TAMANAHA) ❖ ‘JUST ANOTHER ONE OF THOSE SELF-CONGRATULATORY RHETORICAL DEVICES THAT GRACE THE PUBLIC UTTERANCES OF ANGLO- AMERICAN POLITICIANS’ (JUDITH SHKLAR) BUT… ❖ REFERENCES TO THE RULE OF LAW ARE NOW EMBEDDED IN INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS OF HIGH STANDING ❖ ‘ESSENTIAL, IF MAN IS NOT TO BE COMPELLED TO HAVE RECOURSE, AS A
LAST RESULT, TO REBELLION AGAINST TYRANNY AND OPPRESSION, THAT
HUMAN RIGHTS SHOULD BE PROTECTED BY THE RULE OF LAW’ (UNDHR) ❖ ‘A COMMON HERITAGE OF POLITICAL TRADITIONS, IDEALS, FREEDOM
AND THE RULE OF LAW’ (ECHR)
❖ ‘THE UNION IS FOUNDED ON THE VALUES OF RESPECT FOR HUMAN
DIGNITY, FREEDOM, DEMOCRACY, EQUALITY, THE RULE OF LAW AND
RESPECT FOR HUMAN RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS BELONGING TO MINORITIES.’ (TEU) ❖ JUDGES REFER TO THE ROL WHEN GIVING THEIR JUDGMENTS IN MANY COUNTRIES (RECHTSSTAAT, ÉTAT DE DROIT) THE CORE ALL PERSONS AND AUTHORITIES SHOULD BE BOUND BY AND ENTITLED TO THE BENEFIT OF LAWS PUBLICLY MADE, TAKING EFFECT (GENERALLY) IN THE FUTURE AND PUBLICLY ADMINISTERED IN THE COURTS
JOHN LOCKE ‘WHEREVER LAW ENDS, TYRANNY BEGINS.’
NOT UNQUALIFIED ADMIRATION OF THE LAW
BUT WE’D RATHER LIVE IN A COUNTRY THAT COMPLIES OR AT
LEAST SEEKS TO COMPLY WITH THE PRINCIPLE ACCESSIBILITY ❖ WE CANNOT BE DISCOURAGED TO BEHAVE CRIMINALLY IF WE DO NOT KNOW WHAT IT IS WE SHOULD NOT DO
❖ IT IS IMPORTANT TO KNOW WHAT OUR RIGHTS OR
OBLIGATIONS ARE TO PERFORM A DUTY
❖ TO HAVE A SUCCESSFUL TRADE, INVESTMENT AND BUSINESS,
WE NEED TO HAVE ACCESSIBLE LEGAL RULES ON COMMERCIAL RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS
❖ SO: PEOPLE SHOULD BE ABLE TO FIND OUT WHAT THE LAW IS
LAW, NOT DISCRETION
❖ DISCRETIONARY DECISION-MAKING OPENS THE DOOR TO ARBITRARINESS (E.G., AUTHORISING THE PM TO AMEND OR DISAPPLY AN ACT OF PARLIAMENT) ❖ EXAMPLE: PARLIAMENT ENACTS A SCHEME FOR THE MAKING OF GRANTS TO PERSONS WHO HAVE A DISABILITY, STIPULATING THAT DECISIONS ON ELIGIBILITY SHALL BE MADE BY LOCAL OFFICERS AND SHALL NOT BE CHALLENGEABLE IN THE COURTS EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW ❖ THE LAW SHOULD APPLY EQUALLY TO ALL ❖ THE DIFFERENTIATION MUST BE JUSTIFIED ❖ THE LAW CAN TREAT PEOPLE DIFFERENTLY IF THEIR POSITIONS OR SITUATIONS ARE GENUINELY DIFFERENT THE EXERCISE OF POWER ❖ IN GOOD FAITH, FAIRLY, FOR THE PURPOSE FOR WHICH THE POWERS WERE CONFERRED, WITHOUT EXCEEDING ITS LIMITS AND NOT UNREASONABLY ❖ COURTS ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAW: JUDICIAL REVIEW ❖ PARTICULAR DECISIONS SHOULD ALSO FOLLOW THE LAW HUMAN RIGHTS ❖ THIN ROL: ‘A NON- DEFINITION OF THE DEMOCRATIC LEGAL SYSTEM, BASED ON THE DENIAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS, ON EXTENSIVE POVERTY, ON RACIAL SEGREGATION, SEXUAL INEQUALITIES, AND RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION MAY, IN PRINCIPLE, CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE RULE OF LAW BETTER THAN ANY OF THE LEGAL SYSTEMS OF THE MORE ENLIGHTENED WESTERN DEMOCRACIES. IT WILL BE AN IMMEASURABLY WORSE LEGAL SYSTEM, BUT IT WILL EXCEL IN ONE RESPECT- IN ITS CONFORMITY TO THE RULE OF LAW.’ (JOSEPH RAZ) ❖ THICK DEFINITION OF THE ROL: THE LAW MUST AFFORD ADEQUATE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS (TOM BINGHAM) ACCESS TO COURT AND FAIR TRIAL ❖ PEOPLE SHOULD BE ABLE TO GO TO COURT ❖ TWO ENDURING OBSTACLES: EXPENSE AND DELAY ❖ FAIR TRIAL BOTH IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL PROCEDURES ❖ FAIRNESS TO BOTH SIDES ❖ CHANGING CONCEPT ❖ JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE INTERNATIONAL RULE OF LAW ‘IT REFERS TO A PRINCIPLE OF GOVERNANCE IN WHICH ALL PERSONS, INSTITUTIONS AND ENTITIES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, INCLUDING THE STATE ITSELF, ARE ACCOUNTABLE TO LAWS THAT ARE PUBLICLY PROMULGATED, EQUALLY ENFORCED AND INDEPENDENTLY ADJUDICATED, AND WHICH ARE CONSISTENT WITH INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS NORMS AND STANDARDS.’ (REPORT OF THE SECRETARY-GENERAL OF THE UN TO THE SECURITY COUNCIL IN 2014)