MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: Name of Rater:

Position: Position:
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: Date of Review:
Rating Period:

Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review

Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 7% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Knowledge knowledge (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and
Pedagogy
of content observer agreement form/s
within and done through onsite / face-to-face
across / in-person classroom
curriculum observation.
teaching areas. 1. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
(PPST 1.1.2). developed highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across Efficiency
subject areas
2. Instructional materials
highlighting mastery of
content and its integration in
other subject areas
3. Performance tasks/test
material(s) highlighting
integration of content
knowledge within and across
subject areas
4. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Used a range Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education of teaching 7% (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services
strategies that observer agreement form/s
enhance done through onsite / face-to-face
learner / in-person classroom
achievement in observation.
literacy and 1. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
numeracy used in teaching highlighting
different teaching strategies
skills. that develop critical and
(PPST 1.4.2) creative thinking and/or
other HOTS
Efficiency
2. Instructional materials
highlighting different
teaching strategies that
develop critical and creative
thinking and/or other HOTS
3. Performance tasks/test
material(s) used in
demonstration teaching
4. Results of assessment used
in teaching
Others (Please specify and
provide annotations
Basic 3. Applied a range Classroom Observation Quality
Education of teaching Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
Services strategies to
develop critical 7% inter- observer agreement Efficiency
and creative form/s done through onsite /
thinking, as well face-to- face / in-person
as other higher- classroom observation.
order thinking
skills.
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 7% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Environment classroom (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and Diversity
of Learners structure to observer agreement form/s
engage learners, done through onsite / face-to- face
individually or in / in-person classroom
groups, in observation.
Efficiency
meaningful 1. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
exploration, highlighting various
classroom management
discovery and strategies that engage
hands-on learners in activities/tasks in
activities within different physical learning
a range of environments
physical 2. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
learning
environments.
(PPST 2.3.2).
Basic 5. Managed Classroom Observation Quality
Education learner behavior Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
Services constructively by 7%
applying positive inter- observer agreement
and non-violent form/s done through onsite /
discipline to face-to- face / in-person
ensure learning- classroom observation.
focused 1. Providing motivation
environments. 2. Praising the learners/Giving Efficiency
positive feedback
3. Setting house
rules/guidelines
4. Ensuring learners’ active
participation
5. Allowing learners to express
their ideas/opinions
6. Giving equal opportunities
to learners
7. Encouraging learners to ask
questions
Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
8. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Basic 6. Used Classroom Observation Quality
Education differentiated, 7% Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
Services developmentally
appropriate inter- observer agreement
learning form/s done through onsite /
experiences to face-to- face / in-person
address learners’ classroom observation.
gender, needs, 1. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
strengths, developed highlighting
interests and differentiation in content,
experiences. product, process, learning Efficiency
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
2. Instructional materials
developed highlighting
differentiation in content,
product, process, learning
environment or others
according to learners’
gender, needs, strengths,
interests and experiences
3. Others (Please specify and Timeliness
provide annotations)
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 7% Classroom Observation Quality
Education and Planning managed and Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
Services implemented
developmentally inter- observer agreement
sequenced form/s done through onsite /
teaching and face-to- face / in-person
learning classroom observation.
processes to 1. /modified DLLs highlighting
meet curriculum developmentally sequenced
requirements and
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
varied teaching instruction that meet Efficiency
contexts. curriculum goals and varied
teaching contexts
2. Instructional materials used
to implement
developmentally sequenced
teaching and learning
process to meet curriculum
requirements and varied
teaching contexts
3. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)

8. Participated in
7%\ 1. Proof/s of attendance in LAC Quality
collegial sessions / FGDs / meetings /
discussions that
use teacher and
other collegial discussions
learner feedback 2. Minutes of LAC sessions
to enrich teaching / FGDs / meetings / other
practice. collegial discussions on use of Efficiency
teacher and learner feedback to
enrich teaching practice
3. Reflection notes of teachers
on their demonstration of
teaching practices following
participation from LAC
sessions / FGDs / meetings /
other collegial discussions that
use teacher and learner
feedback to enrich teaching
practice, with proof/s of
attendance
4. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
highlights the objective
Basic 9. Selected, Classroom Observation Quality
Education developed, Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
Services organized and
used appropriate inter- observer agreement
teaching and form/s done through onsite /
learning face-to- face / in-person
resources, classroom observation.
including ICT, to 7%
Examples:
address learning  Activity sheets/task Efficiency
goals. sheets/work sheets
 PowerPoint presentations
 Video clips
 Module
 SIMs-Strategic
Intervention Materials
 Others
1. Lesson plans/modified DLLs
with appropriate instructional
materials appended
2. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 7% Quality
Education Assessment selected,
Services and organized and
Reporting used diagnostic,
formative and
summative
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
assessment Classroom Observation Efficiency
strategies Tool (COT) rating sheet/s or
consistent with
curriculum inter- observer agreement
requirements. form/s done through onsite /
face-to- face / in-person
classroom observation.
1. Prepared lesson
plans/modified DLLs
highlighting appropriate use
of formative assessment
strategies
2. Developed diagnostic tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
3. Developed summative tests:
(a) with TOS reviewed by
superior; (b) with sample
accomplished
questionnaire/answer
sheets
4. Developed performance
tasks: (a) with rubrics
reviewed by superior; (b)
with sample accomplished
rubrics
5. Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Basic 11. Monitored and Any one (1) of the following: Quality
Education evaluated learner 1. Individual Learning Monitoring
Services progress and Plan (ILMP)
achievement 7%
2. Peer assessment data
using learner 3. Sample of learners’ output with
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
attainment data. reflection / self- assessment Efficiency
4. Progress charts/anecdotal records
5. Class/e-class record/grading
sheets
6. Lesson plans showing index of
mastery
7. Frequency of errors with
identified least/most mastered Timeliness
skills
8. Any equivalent ALS
form/document that highlights the
objective (e.g., Individual
Learning Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
9. Others (Please specify and provide
annotations)
Basic 12. Any one (1) of the following: Quality
Education Communicated ● A sample of corrected test paper
Services promptly and of a learner in a learning area
clearly the 7% with parent’s or guardian’s
learners’ needs, signature and date of receipt
progress and
achievement to ● Minutes of meetings with key
key stakeholders, stakeholders
including 1. (e.g., PTA, SGC, SPT, Efficiency
parents/guardians 2. CPC) with proof of
. 3. attendance

Timeliness
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks

13. Applied a 7% A reflection/journal entry that

personal highlights the application of a
philosophy of learner- centered teaching
teaching that is philosophy in the lesson plan or
learner-centered. community work
(PPST 7.1.2)
14. Set 7% 1. Certification from the ICT
professional Coordinator / School Head
development / Focal Person in charge of
goals based on e- SAT
the Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form (MRF)
Standards for Updated IPCRF-DP from Phase II
Teachers.
(PPST 7.5.2)
Basic 5. Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality
Education various related 1. committee involvement;
Services works/activities 2. involvement as
that contribute to module/learning material
the teaching- writer/validator;
learning process. 3. involvement as a resource
 Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review
Weight
MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Means of Verification Performance Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Results
per KRA
Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks
person/speaker/learning Efficiency
facilitator in in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based instruction;
4. book or journal authorship/ co-
authorship/contributorship;
5. advisorship/coordinatorship/
chairpersonship;
6. participation in demonstration
teaching;
7. participation as research
presenter in a
forum/conference;
8. mentoring of pre-service/in-
service teachers;
9. conducted research within
the rating period;
10. others (please specify) with
annotation on how it
contributed to the teaching-
learning process.

Rater Ratee Approving Authority