Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fuentes e R & Jaksic F M
Fuentes e R & Jaksic F M
12:179-190, 1979
E D U A R D O R. F U E N T E S , F A B I A N M . J A K S I C
in Chilean Liolaemus species has been strong tend to exhibit strong altitudinal partitioning.
enough to produce a mosaic of alternative c o m Of the 36 Liolaemus species known in C h i l e ,
munities in central C h i l e ( 3 ) . O n the other hand, 20 are predominantly found above 1000 meters
endemism in m a m m a l s , ants, and bees also tends above sea level ( m a s l ) , and only 3 of them are
to be high ( 1 , 2, 4 ) . known to live above and below this altitude.
The question w e will attempt to answer is However, at different latitudes altitudinal
w h y C h i l e seems to be comparable to an isolated segregation varies. Between aproximately 18°
but complex archipelago with copious speciation and 27° latitude south by the A t a c a m a desert,
for lizards, and m o r e like an island for other there are 8 Liolaemus species above 1000 masl
groups. and only 1 below it. Further south, as the valley
Possible explanations for differences in the gets m o r e mesic, the proportion of species found
number of species between C h i l e and C a l i f o r n i a below 1000 masl increases monotonically.
could be related to the amount of time the dif Between 27° and 37° latitude, the ratio of species
ferent groups have had to speciate in C h i l e , o r above 1000 masl to species below is about 1.6;
to different resource availabilities in the two between 37° and 42° latitude, the ratio is 1.0,
regions. H o w e v e r , recent studies ( 2 , 5, 6 ) have and further south it is 0.0. T h i s trend reflects
shown resource supply for several groups o f the l o w productivity in the northern valley, the
organisms is quite comparable in Chile and m o r e mesic climate in the central part, and the
California. O n the other hand, paleontological low average height o f the Andes south of 42°
evidence is weak or inexistent, and therefore latitude (see 7 ) .
does not aid to explain the patterns. It is T h u s , there is strong altitudinal partitioning
conceivable though that both of these factors only in the central part of the country, roughly
could be shown to be important. around Santiago. F i g . 1 shows altitudinal species
In this contribution w e have taken an alterna sequences on the mesic Coastal Ranges (El
tive route which w e hope will at least offer a Roble, L a Campana) and on the drier A n d e s
partial explanation for the relative species slopes ( L a g u n i l l a s ) . T h e figure starts only at
diversity phenomenon. W e will attempt to show about 1000 masl and does not contain the species
that ecological differences between lizards and b e l o w the level (see 8 ) . Still, it can be seen that
other groups, manifest themselves in different there is species turnover on the three mountains,
speciation patterns. Because available ecological although it is not strictly parallel in all o f them.
information about most taxa is scarce, w e w i l l It is important to emphasize at this point
restrict ourselves mostly to the comparison o f that in other transects covering a w i d e r altitudinal
lizards with rodents. T h e r e is no doubt that range, some species would probably be added,
these are " p a r t i c u l a r " groups, but as will be seen and perhaps other be dropped, depending on
later in this paper, their speciation modes could slope and exposure. T h e important aspects in
offer clues for future w o r k on other taxa. Fig. 1 are the existence of species turnover and
relation to their proposed pattern of speciation. The biological reasons for the altitudinal
We will then c o m p a r e these attributes with the species replacement are currently being investigat
available ecological information on rodents and ed, but there are already some e m e r g i n g patterns.
their postulated speciation mode. S o m e species in F i g . 1, like L. nigroviridis and
L. leopardinus are typically high-mountain
ALTITUDINAL PARTITIONING lizards, whereas other species like L. tenuis,
L. schroederi and L. nitidus are low altitude
C h i l e is basically a mountainous country. The species further south or north ( 8 , and personal
high A n d e s border its east side, and on the west observations). Species w o u l d thus be " t r a c k i n g "
coast it is limited by the Coastal R a n g e s , with in altitude and latitude conditions w h e r e they
only a n a r r o w central valley in between. T h i s can survive and reproduce. H o w e v e r , what are
physiography is strongly reflected in the distri the restrictions which limit the use o f the w h o l e
bution of the organisms. T h u s , Chilean lizards altitudinal gradient by the species?
LIZARDS A N D RODENTS 181
Fuentes and Jaksic (in preparation) show lemniscatus ( F i g . 1). L. lemniscatus is a grass-
that density of grasses can impose a strong species which uses ground preferentially ( 5 , 11).
selective pressure on lizards, such that grass At El R o b l e , as grass density decreases with
and open ground analogue species can be altitude, L. lemniscatus drops out of the c o m
distinguished. O p t i m a l morphologies for survival munity, being replaced by the j u v e n i l e s o f L.
in each habitat are different, and thus presence nigrouiridis (see 5 ) . In this case L. leopardinus
or absence of grass acts as a sieve separating is absent from the Coastal R a n g e s .
true alternative communities (9, 10) in each O t h e r species seem to be strongly associated
environment. with the presence or absence of a v e r y particular
We found this mechanism to explain some environmental feature. Thus, L. monticola is
latitudinal as well as altitudinal habitat partition a rock dweller strongly associated with the
ing. T h u s , L. nigrouiridis is preferentially a rock presence of boulders and rocks ( 8 , 11, 12). T h e s e
dweller, but can frequently be found on the features tend to be more frequent high in the
ground if grass density is l o w . A t L a g u n i l l a s mountains, close to tops and ridges, and concomi
(east of Santiago) w e found that L. leopardinus tantly L. monticola drops out of the community
replaces L. nigrouiridis as grass density increases. at l o w altitudes. Similarly, L. tenuis is a tree
Both species are preferentially rock dwellers, dweller ( 5 , 8 ) and its presence is strongly as
but have the option of hunting on the ground, sociated with the distribution of trees.
and L. leopardinus is more of a grass-species than Besides these particular elements, some
L. nigrouiridis. general metabolic difficulties seem to add more
The same grass-non grass phenomenon could constraints on high altitude species and to en
be involved in setting an altitudinal limit on L. hance zonation. Shortening of the growing
L leopardinus
L_ schroederi
L_ tenuis
L. monticola
L nitidus
L. lemniscatus
Lgravenhorsti
L. fuscus
C maculatus
season with altitude imposes strong restrictions 1. Species which live on mountains and do not
on some species. Fuentes and D i Castri ( 1 3 ) form subspecies. H o w e v e r , this is strictly not
noted that high altitude Liolaemus species are an exception but sustaining evidence, since
forced to be o m n i v o r o u s , incorporating vegetable these species are known from only one locality
tissues into their diet. They interpreted this and therefore give strong evidence for genetic
plant consumption as compensation for l o w and isolation on mountaintops. Species in this
unpredictable insect densities in those e n v i r o n category are L. signifer, L. ornatus, L. moc-
ments. Furthermore, Fuentes ( 5 ) found that quardi, L. pantherinus, L. fitzgeraldi, L.
large Callopistes maculatus eats vegetation at lorenzmulleri, L. buergeri, L. knegi, L.
its limit of altitudinal distribution, but not paulinae, L. constanzae, and L. darwxni
further d o w n . A g a i n , it w a s suggested that as (see 8 ) .
favorable season shortens with altitude, lizards 2. M o u n t a i n species at high latitudes do not
have to be less insectivorous and have to c o m form subspecies. H o w e v e r , at high latitudes
pensate the l o w consumption of insects by eating mountains are very l o w , and distinction bet
plant material. T h e p r o b l e m is that only large ween mountain and valley becomes arbitrary
lizards can use vegetation efficiently, and not (see 7 ) . A g a i n , this is expected from the h y
all plants are edible (13, 14). Besides the pothesis and does not contradict it. Species
physiological difficulties for most lizards of in this category are L. magellanicus, L. kingi,
eating l o w caloric plant material ( 1 5 , 1 6 ) , high L. lineomaculatus, L. d'orbignyi, and L.
altitude Liolaemus also tend to be viviparous fitzingeri (see 8 ) .
(8, 17). T h i s indicates that shorter favorable
T h u s , the pattern of divergence on mountains
seasons at higher altitudes could impose alti
but homogeneity at l o w altitudes, confirms the
tudinal restrictions to egg development of some
suggestion based on ecological data regarding
Liolaemus species. O n the other side, l o w alti
isolation of lizard populations living at high
tudinal limits are likely to be associated with
altitudes. A s w e saw before, habitat selection
particular habitat features ( i . e . rocks and trees),
(most likely in relation with interspecific c o m
and diffuse competition ( 9 ) in these m o r e stable
petition) can set barriers to movement of lizards
environments.
on an altitudinal gradient. It is likely then that
In sum, in central C h i l e there is altitudinal
these barriers have a l l o w e d for intraspecific dif
species turnover of lizards and this pattern seems
ferentiation in mountain species (see Fig. 2 ) .
to be associated with alternative morphologies
and behavior of the species. In general, species Interestingly, the degree of differentiation
with optimal fitness at one point in the altitudi between mountain populations has been c o m
nal gradient are not equally adapted to other parable t o , or greater than differences observed
habitats, suggesting the presence of ecological between mainland and island populations. T h e r e
barriers to lizard movement between mountains. are no island species absent from the mainland,
and the existing island forms are o n l y subspecies
of mainland species ( 8 ) .
In sum, adaptations of lizards to their habitats would have favored resource partitioning and
seems to be fine enough to entail reproductive hence n e w forms capable o f coexistence.
isolation between populations on nearby moun By the above mechanism, races and perhaps
tains. species formation would follow interglacial
isolation on separate mountains. During
A T W O W A Y SPECIATION MODEL glaciations, populations formerly on different
ranges w o u l d intermingle and further diverge,
Based on research in the European Alps, Hell- or if differences achieved are not strong enough,
mich ( 1 2 ) suggested the Andean races o f Liolae- they w o u l d m e r g e into one species. A t any rate,
mus would develop on different mountains this is a speciation model which in repeated
during interglacial periods and eventually come glaciation events could generate great diversity.
into contact with each other during glacial In central C h i l e there have occurred three to
periods. T h a t is, as snow level approaches l o w e r four glaciations (21) and there are separate
altitudes, high altitude lizard species and sub ranges along the A n d e s , as well as in the Coastal
species w o u l d shift their distributions closer to R a n g e s ( 7 ) , thus a l l o w i n g for multiple species
the valley, with many of them c o m i n g in contact formation within even a small latitudinal range.
with each other. If reproductive difference achiev The essential factors in this speciation mode is
ed during the isolation in the interglacial period that species partition the habitat altitudinally
were pronounced enough, natural selection and that during interglacial periods, movements
184 F U E N T E S and JAKSIC
between mountains are restricted and comparable On the other side, the same design operating
to movements between mainland and islands by valley speciation would at most double the
on the continental shelf. In the remaining part number of species per cycle. T h e point is that
of this contribution we shall refer to this speciation rate depends directly on number o f
speciation mode as " m o u n t a i n speciation". isolates and amount of intermingling. C l e a r l y ,
A second mode of speciation, not exclusive speciation rate of groups using both speciation
of the former, is also likely to have operated in modes would be considerably higher than
C h i l e . D u r i n g glaciations, pockets of non snowed speciation rate of groups using only one mode.
habitats or at least with short g r o w i n g seasons, For all the reasons given above, lizards seem
have been inferred to occur in the southern to fall into the mountain speciation mode. T h e
A n d e s ( 2 1 ) . T h e s e pockets being more or less evidence given on their altitudinal stratification
isolated from each other, can lead to reproductive and on the isolation between mountains, with
isolation between populations. During inter- presence of subspecies and even species on some
glacial periods, the formerly isolated populations mountains during the present interglacial, point
w o u l d intermingle and further differentiate, or in this direction. H o w e v e r , in addition lizards
m e r g e into fewer forms. F o r analogous reasons could have also used the valley speciation mode.
as before, w e will refer to this speciation mode Unfortunately, since w e are living on interglacial
as " v a l l e y speciation". In valley speciation, the period at present and therefore during an inter
essential features are restricted movements mingling phase for valley speciation, it is not
between valleys or pockets during glacial possible to clearly determine its importance.
periods, and m i x i n g during interglacial periods. Possible examples of valley speciation in
Fig. 3 shows the t w o speciation modes in a lizards could be the geographical subspecies
diagram. Note that for three mountains and patterns of L. platei and L. nigromaculatus.
t w o valleys, as shown in F i g . 3, each cycle o f L. platei platei is roughly distributed between
mountain speciation would at most triple the 26° and 32° latitude south, whereas its only
number of species (species 1 and 2 in Fig. 3 ) . known subspecies L. platei curicensis is restrict-
MOUNTAIN / 1
SPECIATION,
VALLEY
SPECIATION
DIFFERENTIATION OF POPULATIONS
P oaqoodi
A. botiviaww
A sublimit
E typu»
L- viicqcio
Ch. tahomqe
A. «don
Ch. brevicouda
N. ebriwus
C. lepidus
Rodents are endotherms and do not have the of geographical distribution measured in degrees
capability to hybernate, at least in C h i l e ( 1 , 2 4 ) , (r = .82, P < . 0 0 0 1 ) . T h a t is, species distributed
so they are more likely to periodically shift over long latitudinal stretches tend to have m o r e
their altitudinal range and diet. In contrast, subspecies than m o r e restricted ones. This is
lizards are temporal opportunists, have relatively evidence (certainly not conclusive) for valley
l o w e r energetic requirements, and restrict their isolation during glacial periods, and secondary
activity to the season of m a x i m u m productivity, contacts during interglacials.
not shifting in altitude. In the sense described In conclusion, our evidence points towards
by L e v i n s ( 3 3 ) , lizards w o u l d be coarsely grained a t w o - m o d e speciation for lizards, but a valley
and use one environmental type preferentially, speciation m o d e for rodents. In agreement w i t h
whereas rodents w o u l d be more finely grained this is the fact that C h i l e has m o r e lizards than
tending to use more environmental types, related California, whereas the opposite is true for
to the p r o p o r t i o n o f their occurrence. Rodents, rodents. T h e former w o u l d speciate faster than
being less specialized than lizards, w o u l d have the latter, and w o u l d thus have been able to
exhibited more between-year i n t e r m i n g l i n g and compensate for the more diverse centers of
greater transition probabilities between moun origin of t h e ' C a l i f o r n i a fauna. R o d e n t s , on the
tains, and hence less subspeciation than moun other hand, depending on more stringent
tain lizards. speciation conditions, w o u l d have speciated at
In sum, rode do not comply with the a slower rate and w o u l d therefore not have been
requirements for mountain speciation because able to compensate for the diversity of centers
of their high mobility during interglacials. On of origin in the Californian rodent fauna.
the other hand, rodents seem to have speciated T h e by n o w well k n o w n radiation of altiplano
in the valley mode. Number of subspecies of rodents ( 2 3 , 26, 3 4 ) w o u l d thus be linked to the
rodents is significantly correlated with breadth existence of numerous v a l l e y s and surrounding
LIZARDS A N D RODENTS 187
mountains, which w o u l d h a v e provided during south and southwest (Sonoran and Mexican
glacial times the reproductive isolation needed deserts), the Chilean immigration has been
for speciation. T h e geographical and ecological relatively low. For several faunistical groups,
proximity of these valleys during the inter- speciation in the country has been copious.
glacials, their isolation from each other by the A m o n g these, lizards (Liolaemus) seem to be
high mountains, and the vaster areas associated an excelent e x a m p l e o f adaptive radiation. T h e i r
with the altiplano, would have provided the speciation has been explained as a result of the
conditions for greater speciation of rodents in greater speciation rate as compared to other
the northern region than in the more extended groups, particularly rodents. T h e basic difference
southern A n d e s . between these t w o types of vertebrates seems to
Other groups besides rodents and lizards are reside in their different mobilities, ultimately
more difficult to explain, and w e do not have related to their endothermy or ectothermy. A s
the required information to examine tlieir a consequence of this difference, lizards w o u l d
speciation patterns. H o w e v e r , it is possible that speciate during and between glaciations, whereas
both birds and frogs also have valley speciation rodents would do so only during glacial periods.
patterns. Birds have high mobilities and are It is possible the speciation of birds and frogs
not expected to show the large phenotypic dif- could be explained by the same scheme.
ferences between mountains as lizards d o . C o d y
( 3 5 , 3 6 ) has shown Chilean birds tend to segre-
gate more by regions than by habitat types. RESUMEN
Speciation in these animals would probably
operate not only between valleys, but between C h i l e es un país relativamente rico en lagartijas,
distant and isolated ones. Vuilleumier (37) pero pobre en roedores, en comparación con
postulated that the Nothofagus bird fauna as- lugares que exhiben características similares de
sociated with forest speciated phyletically, which clima y recursos. En este trabajo se intenta res-
strongly suggests that long distances are requir- ponder por qué nuestro país ha sido análogo a
ed for genetic isolation in these animals. un archipiélago para las lagartijas (alta diferen-
Birds would thus be expected to exhibit ciación específica e intraespecífica), pero más
relatively lower endemism than lizards or rodents. bien como una isla para los roedores (menor
faunas remains to be explained, but it is probably Se muestra que las lagartijas exhiben una
a compound phenomenon with local speciation fuerte segregación altitudinal, que es particular-
and relatively more immigration from distant mente patente en la zona central de C h i l e (véase
localities. F i g . 1). L a razón para este r e e m p l a z o altitudi-
Frogs might have speciated locally ( 3 8 ) and nal de especies estaría relacionado con la selec-
could exhibit valley and perhaps some mountain ción de ciertas características del habitat por
speciation. F r o g s seem to c o m p l y with the l o w parte de las lagartijas, que les proporcionarían
mobility requirement, but to our k n o w l e d g e it condiciones óptimas para su sobrevivencia y re-
is not k n o w n h o w much altitudinal stratification producción. En el texto se analizan numerosos
they exhibit. It is suggestive though that total casos en que esta situación es evidente.
species counts for C a l i f o r n i a and C h i l e frogs Intimamente ligados a la selección del habitat
are about the same (see 39, 4 0 ) . M o r e research se encontrarían las morfologías y el comporta-
on this point is necessary. miento de las lagartijas, por lo que fenotipos
óptimos en un cierto lugar no lo serían en o t r o ,
CONCLUSIONS en donde podrían ser reemplazados por fenotipos
(especies) diferentes. L a estrecha relación que
It has been assumed — and there are good existiría entre fenotipo y ambiente seleccionado,
reasons for it — that C h i l e and C a l i f o r n i a offer determinaría la partición altitudinal del gradien-
resources for comparable faunas ( 4 1 , 4 2 ) . H o w - te de habitats en las montañas, restringiendo
ever, whereas C a l i f o r n i a has received immigration el flujo de individuos desde ciertas porciones del
of species from centers in the north ( G r e a t B a s i n ) , gradiente (en las cuales constituyen el fenotipo
188 F U E N T E S and JAKSIC
óptimo) a estratos similares en montañas cer- citan posibles ejemplos de especiación "de
canas. v a l l e " . L a suma de estos dos m o d o s de especia-
Este r a z o n a m i e n t o basado en datos ecológi- ción, actuando durante sucesivos ciclos glacia-
cos, se ajusta al hecho que las lagartijas que están les, explicaría entonces la gran diversidad de
q u e aquellas que viven en el valle. El m a y o r dores chilenos, que son bastante menos diversos
aislamiento de las cumbres habría entonces per- q u e las lagartijas. Se discute que, aun cuando
que se observa en las montañas. En este sentido, montañas (véase Fig. 4), también presentan
conjunto de islas en las cuales se puede producir a esta proposición, se muestra que los roedores
ción del flujo de individuos entre aislados conti- subespecies que los de valle. Esto, junto a otras
9. MacArthur, R.H., "Geographical Ecology", N e w York, Cody, M L . , Diamond, J . M . , Eds. Cambridge, Mass.,
Harper and Row, 1972. BelknaD Press, 1975, p. 315.
10. Cody, M.L., "Competition and the Structure of Bird 28. M'Closkey, R.T., Ecology 57:728, 1976.
Communities". Princeton, Princeton University Press, 29. Rosenzweig, M.L., WinakurJ., Ecology 55:558, 1969.
1974. 30. Heller, H.C., Ecology 52:312, 1971.
11. Fuentes, E.R., Ph. D . Thesis, Berkeley, University of 31. Meserve, PL, J. Mammal. 57:300, 1976.
California, 1974. 32. Miller, S.D., Rottmann, J., Informe Interno, CONAF
12. Hellmich, W., A b . Bay. Ak. Wiss. 24:1, 1934. (mimeog.), 1976.
13. Fuentes, E.R., Di Castri, F., An. Mus. Hist. Nat. Val 33. Levins, R., "Evolution in Changing Environments".
paraiso 8:66, 1975. Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1968.
M . Hershkovitz, P., Fieldiana: Zool. 46:\, 1962.
14. Pough, F.G., Ecology 54:837, 1973.
35. Cody, M.L., Ecology 57:455, 1970.
15. Szarski, H, Evolution 76:529, 1962.
36. Cody, M.L., In "Mediterranean Type Ecosystems". Di
16. Ostrom, H.J., Evolution 77:368, 1963.
Castri, F., Mooney, H . A . , Eds. N e w York, Springer-
17. Hurtubia, J., Di Castri, F., In "Mediterranean Type
Verlag, 1973, p. 307.
Ecosystems". Di Castri, F., Mooney, H . A . , Eds. N e w
37. Vuilleumier, F. Nature 275:247, 1967.
York, Springer-Verlag, 1973, p. 349.
38. Vuilleumier, F., Nature 2 79:87, 1968.
18. Hellmich, W.C., Evolution 5:359, 1951. 39. Cei, J.M., "Batracios de Chile". Santiago, Ediciones
19. Williams, EE., Quart. Rev. Biol. 44:345, 1969. Universidad de Chile, 1962.
20. Rand, A.S., Breviora 319:1, 1969. 40. Stebbms, R.C., " A Field Guide to Western Reptiles and
21. Simpson, B., Science 173:771, 1971. Amphibians". Cambridge, Mass., Riverside Press, 1966.
22. Muller, L., Hellmich, W., Zool. Anz..9:225, 1938. 41. Di Castri, F., Mooney, H.A., Eds. "Mediterranean Type
23. Pearson, O.P., Univ. California Publ. Zool. 56:391, 1958. Ecosystems". N e w York, Springer-Verlag, 1973.
24. Greer, J.K., Publ. M u s . Mich. State Univ., Biol. Ser. 42. Thrower, N.J. W., Bradbury, D.E., Eds. "Chile-Califor
3:51, 1965. nia Mediterranean Scrub Atlas". Stroudsburg, Pennsyl
25. Miller, S.D., Rottmann, J., "Guía para el Reconocimien vania, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, 1977.
to de Mamíferos Chilenos". Santiago, Editorial Gabriela 43. Pinto, A., Hermosilla, W., Di Castri, F., Astudillo, V.,
Mistral, 1976. Inv. Zool. Chilenas (III Congreso Latinoamericano Zoo
26. Spotorno, A.E., An. Mus. Hist. Nat. Valparaíso 9:141, logía), 1965, p. 32.
1976. 44. Jerez, V., Ortiz, J.C., An. M u s . Hist. Nat. Valparaiso
27. Brown, J.H., In "Ecology and Evolution of Communities". <S:58, 1975.