Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reseaech Paper
Reseaech Paper
Companies are also starting to adapt their product development processes to the
new environment. For years, firms have made their ways into the global market by
researching generic competitors to patented drugs and following up with litigation to
challenge the patent. This approach remains untouched by the new patent regime and
looks to increase in the future. However, those that can afford it have set their sights on
an even higher goal: new molecule discovery. Although the initial investment is huge,
companies are lured by the promise of hefty profit margins and the recognition as a
legitimate competitor in the global industry. Local firms have slowly been investing more
money into their R&D programs or have formed alliances to tap into these opportunities.
When it comes to formulating a new product development strategy, there are four
potential avenues of innovation: (1) core market growth, which consists of making
improvements to products and services that already exist in order to help customers get a
job done better, (2) adjacent or related market growth, which is improving existing
products and services to help customers get related or ancillary jobs done (for example,
by adding a tongue cleaner to a tooth brush), (3) new market creation, which involves
creating a new product or service for customers who are trying to get a job done but
cannot because no solutions or only ad hoc solutions exist, and (4) disruption, which is
defined as the creation of a technology that enables a new set of customers to perform a
job that only specialists could previously perform. Crest White stripes, for example, made
it possible for people to whiten their teeth on their own, eliminating the specialist – the
dentist.
While core market growth is nearly always an important part of the new product
development strategy, most companies hesitate to pursue the other three avenues of
growth – even though they may offer higher returns. A success in the area of new market
creation, for example, is said to deliver ten times more profit that a success in that core
market.
The Product Development stage begins when the company finds and develops a
new-product idea. This involves translating trends in the macro environment, taking
diverse pieces of information, and incorporating them into a product concept.
During the product development stage, sales are zero and profits are negative (i.e.
anticipated future profits are being invested in product development).
In the Market Introduction stage, sales are low as a new idea is first introduced
to a market. Customers aren't looking for the product, and may not be aware of its
benefits or advantages over current offerings. In fact, they may not even know about it.
Informative promotion is needed to tell potential customers about the new product
concept.
Even though a firm promotes its new product, it takes time for customers to learn
that the product is available. Money is invested in developing the market in anticipation
of future profits.
In the Market Growth stage, industry sales grow quickly -- but industry profits
rise and then start falling. The innovator begins to make big profits as more and more
customers buy. But competitors see the opportunity and enter the market. Some just
copy the most successful product, or try to improve it to compete better. Others try to
refine their offerings to do a better job of appealing to some target markets. The new
entries result in much product variety.
This is the stage where industry profits are largest, but it is also when industry
profits begin to decline as increased competition creates downward pressure on prices.
Market Maturity occurs when industry sales level off. Competition gets tougher
as aggressive competitors have entered the race for profits. Industry profits continue to go
down during maturity because promotion costs rise and competitors continue to cut prices
to attract more business.
The findings of the paper will from organizational perspective in new product
development are enlisted below:
Increased competition and shortened window of opportunity.
Low level of customer knowledge (Doctors, Retailers, Wholesalers).
Poor customer acquisition, development and retention strategies.
Varying customer perception.
The number and the quality of medical representatives
Very high territory development costs.
High training and re-training costs of sales personnel.
Very high attrition rate of the sales personnel.
Busy doctors giving less time for sales calls.
Poor territory knowledge in terms of business value at medical representative
level.
Unclear value of prescription from each doctor in the list of each sales person.
Unknown value of revenue from each retailer in the territory
Virtually no mechanism of sales forecasting from field sales level, leading to huge
deviations.
Absence of analysis on the amount of time invested on profitable and not-so
profitable
customers and lack of time-share planning towards developing customer base for
future markets
Manual and cumbersome administrative systems and processes designed which
don't facilitate optimal efficiency levels in sales teams
References:
http://www.pharmafocusasia.com/strategy/pharmaceutical_marketing_asia.htm
http://www.innovations-report.de/html/berichte/wirtschaft_finanzen/bericht-103324.html
http://www.marketresearch.com/product/display.asp?productid
http://www.salesandmarketingnetwork.com/reports.php?ID=2259
http://www.ngpharma.eu.com/currentissue/article.asp?art=271729&issue=224