1 Process Effectiveness 2

Assessment Report

3
Organization: 4
Site: 4
OIN:

5
6
Audit Report
PEAR Number: 02 US.1049835 7
Issue Date: 9/27/2011
Number:
8
Process Name:
Planning
Process details, including associated process interfaces:
9

Planning process as described in the Quality Manual process map. Inputs include job
entry, quote worksheet, customer specifications, and ITAR requirements. Outputs
Process Description
include: Job traveler (BOM & product configuration) and risk analysis. Process interfaces
include: Quoting, Quality, Production, Purchasing and Shipping.
Process Aim Manage planning of product realization process process.
10
Applicable 9100/9110/9120 clause(s):
4.1, 4.2, 7.1
11
Organization’s method for determining process effectiveness:
Is KPI
Job travelers are monitored for accuracy (internal product nonconformities due to planning relevant?
Comment errors) as to the effectiveness of the planning process.
YES NO
KPI #1 Accuracy of job travelers 

12
Auditor observations and comments supporting process effectiveness determination:
2010-2011 Target
Actual for audited
for audited Comments
period
period
2010 at 99.87 & Even that goals are met for 2011 so far, appropriate actions are being taken with cross
KPI #1 95% per year
2011YTD at 0 checking of job travelers

13
Statement of Effectiveness Level:
The process is:
1. Not implemented; planned results are not achieved.
2. Implemented; planned results are not achieved and appropriate actions not taken.
3. Implemented; planned results are not achieved, but appropriate actions being taken.
4. Implemented; planned results are achieved.

14
15
Auditee Representative
Auditor Name(s):
Acknowledgement Name:
14
Signature(s): 15
Signature(s):
91XX – PEAR-KPI – rev 11-07