Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Education Policy & Inequality
Education Policy & Inequality
Education Policy & Inequality
Raising educational standards – UK 1965 – Got rid of the 11+ exam and made it so all students Comprehensives are large schools so
education needs to compete in a global Comprehensivisation would get ‘Parity of Esteem’ & ‘Equality’ within lack individual attention.
education market and is ranked against Act education
other countries – e.g. PISA
Schools Admissions Forbids discrimination in admitting pupil on grounds Covert selection still takes place by
Creating equality of educational opportunity
- ensuring that all students get the best Code of socio-economic backgrounds or ability. both schools and parents. Postcode
educational opportunities. lottery
Policies that improve Pupil Premium – additional funding for those students Kerr and West – too many other
What are the 4 aspects of educational inequality in from a poor socio-economic background. factors outside of school that impact
equality identified by Gillborn and circumstances Compensatory education achievement.
Youdell
Selection and Admissions Policies
Explain
3 types of selection Arguments against selection Over Subscription Policies
Every child should have the same
Equality of
• Faith
Equality of
chances of achievement in teaching can take place. Faith schools require a letter from spiritual
subscribed schools fill up quickly so
education regardless of socio- leader to gain insight to the potential
many parents don’t get their 1st
economic background. students family and commitment to both
choice.
the faith and the school ethos.
Education Policies (Marketisation)
Marketisation means the Three features of marketisation Policies which promote Marketisation and Raising standards
process of where by services
like education are pushed Independence – allowing schools Marketisation Policies Raising Standards Policies
towards operating like a to run themselves how they see fit.
business based on supply and League Tables Ofsted
Conservative
1979 – 1997
demand. Students are Local Management Schools National Curriculum
Funding Formula National Testing
Govt
considered consumers rather Competition – Making schools
than pupils. Open Enrolment
compete with each other for
students.
Privatisation in Education
Choice – Giving customers Business sponsored Academies Maximum class sizes for 5 -7 yr old
Labour Govt
means changing the internal
1997 – 2010
processes of a school to be (parents and students) more Specialist schools Building Schools for the future program
more like a business, for choice in where they go to school. Education Action zones
Business sponsored Academies
example treating Parents and
students as consumers, target Three elements of quality
setting, performance related control New Style Academies Pupil Premium
Coalition Govt
2010 - 2015
pay and league tables. Free Schools English Baccalaureate
Ofsted Inspections Reform of the National Curriculum
Reform of the Exams system
Privatisation of Education Tougher performance targets for schools
means opening up aspects of
education to Private Publication of performance Tables
businesses such as staff such as examination results.
training, school finances, Evaluation of Marketisation policies and raising standards
school Management
Parents do not have equal freedom to choose the schools which their child attends due
Parentocracy
(academy chains) and Exams National curriculum – baseline for to covert selection process, postcode lotteries in catchment areas, Middle class parents
Myth of
what is taught. have much more freedom in choice due to their cultural capital, higher education and
income.
Parentocracy means when a
child’s Educational Evaluation of Privatisation of Educational Teachers tend to allocate more resources to the students who are on the C/D boarder
achievement has more to line in order to achieve the 5 A* - C needed for the league tables thus ignoring those who
Education
Triage
do with parental wealth and are unlikely to achieve this.
wishes than student ability.
Parents are able to have more Positives Negatives
choice over where to send More efficient Takes money Due to the funding formula, schools need to retain and attract students in order to receive
their children. from the
Dumbing
funding. Schools will therefore lead to the dumbing down of teaching and standards in
Down
More choice for education order to retain students who might leave if they are pushed too hard or if the courses are
parents system. too difficult.
companies to schs stranded. the process by changing the standards and goal posts.
control
quality
support failing
schools Less equality
Globalisation and Education