1/13/23, 3:33 PM Debt: a longer view - Newspaper - DAWN.

COM

TODAY'S PAPER | JANUARY 13, 2023

Debt: a longer view

Anjum Altaf | Published January 13, 2023 | Updated about 8 hours ago

The writer is the author of What We Get Wrong About Education in Pakistan (Folio Books 2022) and Pakistan ka matlab kya (Aks Publications 202

0:00 / 6:51 1x 1.2x 1.5x

“INSANITY is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results,” is a saying intended to
suggest that such behaviour is stupid. Is that interpretation correct in the context of our debt crisis?

Pakistan is in an IMF programme for the umpteenth time. Neither the remedy nor the outcomes have ever varied. Instead, the
situation has progressively deteriorated to the point where the country is staring into the abyss. How does one explain this
endless repetition in the framework of stupidity?

It would be hard to argue that highly qualified IMF staffers are stupid. Those on our side are remarkably adept at advancing
their own interests; their cleverness is the envy of many. So, what gives? Could it be there is a method to the madness and only
the public is stupid enough to swallow the same story repeatedly, missing the forest for the trees?

Debt has an old history and we would gain by reading David Graeber’s 2011 classic Debt: The First 5,000 Years whose major
argument connects the enforcement of debt with state-sponsored violence. For our purposes, we need only go back 100 years to

https://www.dawn.com/news/1731420/debt-a-longer-view 1/14
1/13/23, 3:33 PM Debt: a longer view - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

recall when India was a colony, ruled to enrich Britain not the Indian masses.

Former colonies have been kept economically captive,

serving the same purpose in the global economy as they
did before decolonisation.

Who would argue that after decolonisation the former colonists had a change of heart and became devoted to the welfare of their
erstwhile subjects? The evidence is quite the contrary — neocolonialism emerged as the continuation of colonialism by other
means.

Consider the evidence. First, the placing of ruthless strongmen like Somoza and Stroessner (‘our bastards’ according to one US
president) wherever the interests of powerful states were at stake, reducing many nominally sovereign countries to ‘banana’
republics. Second, the removal, often by assassination, of leaders who threatened to prioritise national over foreign interests, eg
Mossadegh, Allende, Lumumba. Third, by resorting to regime change when all else failed, eg Noriega and Saddam Hussein.

These extreme examples leave little doubt that the objective in every case was to ensure that former colonies — now politically
liberated — remained economically captive, continuing to serve the same purpose in the global economy as they did before
decolonisation. It was to make these countries safe for capital that needed profitable outlets and to serve as outposts of the
imperial system on the side of the ‘free’ world.

The desideratum, of course, was to do without such extreme measures which revealed the ugly face of neocolonialism that critics
could decry. Inconspicuous arrangements were much to be preferred. These required three elements: pliant national rulers who
would play along; a policeman who would make sure they did; and an instrument that would tie the two together.

All three were available. There was no shortage of pliant rulers of the type Mao colourfully called ‘the running dogs of
imperialism’; the policeman was the IMF whose rules were drafted by the big powers who also exercised a veto over its actions;
and the instrument was debt. It was no surprise that an analyst as astute as Samuel Huntington considered Ayub Khan just the
kind of leader newly liberated colonies needed rather than someone like Suhrawardy who might have proved less amenable to
signing on to the dictates of neoimperialism. Ayub obliged promptly by strengthening ties with the US and opening the debt
pipeline that briefly offered the captivating mirage of Pakistan turning into a model of development.

Lest all this seem far-fetched recall some aspects of our past and present. During colonial rule, even princely states not directly
under British rule had an Office of the Resident with the authority to depose rulers acting against the empire’s interests, a
practice we continued with political agents in Fata. And we long had the institution of indentured farm labour, tying down
generations through the manipulation of debt which continues today in the brick kiln industry where lenders and contractors
flourish at the expense of workers.

The analogy should be clear: we can recognise the managers, the contractors, and the workers in the global system. We have
seen, repeatedly, the crushing of trade unions, austerity for the majority, and the carrot-dangling of debt forgiveness and
cancellation that keeps the system alive by securing new debt to pay the old, the variation across countries being a function of
the relative competence and honesty of their leaders.

Is there a way out? Think of the examples from history. Instead of forgiveness, cancellation or renegotiation, the USSR
repudiated all debts in 1917; China did the same in 1949 and Cuba in 1961. While the US was able to suffocate Cuba with
sanctions (after attempts to assassinate Castro and an invasion), the other two built up robust economies, against stiff

https://www.dawn.com/news/1731420/debt-a-longer-view 2/14
1/13/23, 3:33 PM Debt: a longer view - Newspaper - DAWN.COM

opposition and at huge cost, once freed of the yoke of debt. Attempts to find pliant rulers, the White Bolsheviks in Russia and
Chiang Kai-shek in China, failed. The USSR became powerful enough to force a long Cold War; China lifted millions out of
poverty and is now so powerful that a new cold war is in the offing.

This history suggests no relief for Pakistan. Whether the country defaults or not is missing the point. The majority is fated for
grinding austerity while exporters gain concessions and pliant rulers receive fresh leases to perpetuate the status quo. Just as
bonded labour continues to exist despite its gross ugliness, so would dependent capitalism till its chains are broken.

The New International Economic Order and the Non-Aligned Movement promised one such possibility for economic liberation
but was snuffed out. Perhaps it wasn’t a surprise that the BCCI, which was emblematic of South-South collaboration, was
decimated so ruthlessly while many other global banks engaging in similar practices got off with lighter penalties.

This may not necessarily be the right explanation for our predicament but we do need to think of alternatives. Those who keep
telling us we have to go to the IMF else we won’t survive are not doing us any favours. At the very least, their second ‘we’ does
not include the vast majority of poor Pakistanis.

The writer is the author of What We Get Wrong About Education in Pakistan (Folio Books 2022) and Pakistan ka matlab kya
(Aks Publications 2022).

Published in Dawn, January 13th, 2023

Read more
Dubious distinctions

Resistance arts

Strong foundations

https://www.dawn.com/news/1731420/debt-a-longer-view 3/14