Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Response Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Mariana Camila Medina Doria
    4 views2 pages
    This document outlines a grading rubric for student responses. It evaluates responses based on 5 criteria: incorporating evidence from the original source, critical engagement with the text, support for positions, language and rhetorical features, and meeting assignment guidelines. Each criterion is worth a certain number of points, with descriptors provided for performance levels like superior, strong, meets expectations, needs improvement, and unacceptable. The rubric will be used to systematically assess and assign points to student responses based on how well they address each of the outlined criteria.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    Response Rubric(1)

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document outlines a grading rubric for student responses. It evaluates responses based on 5 criteria: incorporating evidence from the original source, critical engagement with the text, support for positions, language and rhetorical features, and meeting assignment guidelines. Each criterion is worth a certain number of points, with descriptors provided for performance levels like superior, strong, meets expectations, needs improvement, and unacceptable. The rubric will be used to systematically assess and assign points to student responses based on how well they address each of the outlined criteria.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    4 views2 pages

    Response Rubric

    Uploaded by

    Mariana Camila Medina Doria
    This document outlines a grading rubric for student responses. It evaluates responses based on 5 criteria: incorporating evidence from the original source, critical engagement with the text, support for positions, language and rhetorical features, and meeting assignment guidelines. Each criterion is worth a certain number of points, with descriptors provided for performance levels like superior, strong, meets expectations, needs improvement, and unacceptable. The rubric will be used to systematically assess and assign points to student responses based on how well they address each of the outlined criteria.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Grading Rubric, Response

    Possible Criteria Assigned


    Points Points

    5 pts Incorporating Evidence (Objective 2A)


    Meets Expectations = Response includes an appropriate and accurate
    summary of the original source.
    ● Superior (5 pts)
    ● Strong (4 pts)
    ● Meets Expectations (2 – 3 pts)
    ● Needs Improvement (1 pt)
    ● Unacceptable (0 pts)

    5 pts Critical Engagement (Objectives 2A, 2B)


    Meets Expectations = Response identifies interesting points from reading to
    discuss and possibly agree or disagree with, demonstrating evidence of
    critical engagement with the text.
    ● Superior (5 pts)
    ● Strong (4 pts)
    ● Meets Expectations (2 – 3 pts)
    ● Needs Improvement (1 pt)
    ● Unacceptable (0 pts)

    4 pts Support for positions (Objective 2B)


    Meets Expectations = Claims are supported with sufficient explanation
    and/or examples.
    ● Superior (4 pts)
    ● Strong (3.5 pts)
    ● Meets Expectations (2 – 3 pts)
    ● Needs Improvement (1 pt)
    ● Unacceptable (0 pts)

    4 pts Language and Rhetorical Features (Objectives 1B, 3A)


    Meets Expectations = Response appropriately uses or adapts conventional
    features of summaries and critiques, such as reporting verbs, verb tense,
    evaluative language, APA citation to the source, and proper use of
    quotations.
    ● Superior (4 pts)
    ● Strong (3.5 pts)
    ● Meets Expectations (2 – 3 pts)
    ● Needs Improvement (1 pt)
    ● Unacceptable (0 pts)

    © University of Arizona Writing Program


    2 pts Assignment Guidelines and Expectations (Objectives 4B, 4C)
    Meets Expectations = The paper meets the Response assignment guidelines,
    including all drafts submitted and final reflection.
    ● Exceeds Expectations (2 pts)
    ● Meets Expectations (1 pts)
    ● Unacceptable (0 pts)

    © University of Arizona Writing Program

    You might also like