y 30 mean 24

SD 10.28
n 25

Null Ho mean = 27

Alternate ho 2-sided

T statistic

z 2.92

P value 0.0075

less than 0.01,so reject null hypothesis, sufficient evidence

does not contain value =24 in confidence interval, reject null hypothesis at alpha = 0.01

y 30.28 mean 24
SD 11.31 df 24
n 25

Null Ho Mean = 19

Alternate Ho one-sided

T statistic 2.78
P value 0.0052

less than 0.05, reject null ho, sufficient evidence

N 25

A) 100
B) 10000

SD 28.68
ME 6
t n-1 2

a) n 91

SD 28.68
ME 1.2
t n-1 2

b) n 2285
 Neighborhood 1 Neighborhood 2
n_1 35 n_2 30
yBar_1 55.7 yBar_2 44.7
s_1 7.27 s_2 7.93

a) Mean age difference 11

b) SD of mean differnce

1.90

c) t-statistic

U1-U2 = 0 is assumed

y1-y2 11
SE(y1-y2) 1.90

t= 5.79

Similar Ques Q6
Website 1 Webiste 2
n_1 65 n_2 80
yBar_1 6.2 yBar_2 6.1
s_1 5.1 s_2 5.3

a) Mean age difference 0.1

b) SD of mean differnce 0.87

c) t 0.12

Q7
 Neighborhood 1 Neighborhoodt
n_1 35 n_2 30 5.96
yBar_1 52.4 yBar_2 41.2
s_1 7.89 s_2 7.24

a) given : df 62.7
t 5.96

p value 0.000

b) p-value using rule : df=min(n1-1,n2-1)

df 29
t 5.96

p-value 0.000

c) if p-value is less than given alpha value then reject and is sufficient and if greater then visa-versa

Question 8
Website 1 Website 2
n 80 90
mean 6.3 6.2
s 5.5 5.4

t 0.119

a) given: df 164.9
t 0.119

P value 0.453

b) p-value using rule : df=min(n1-1,n2-1)

df 79
t 0.119
 0.453

c) greater than alpha, fail to reject, not sufffucinet evidence

Ya 49 Sda 5 Na 20
Yb 52 SDb 4 Nb 20

Mean difference 3

Standard error

SE 1.4317821063

T-STATISTIC 2.0952908873

df 36.253121453

Significance l 95% 0.05

Critical value 2.0281

Confidence interval 5.90

0.10
C) Past Recent A)
19 13
12 16
8 15
13 28
12 10
15 14 B) The​ 10% Condition is likely satsified as there are
15 17
10 The Randomization Condition is likely satisfied. T
20
19 The Nearly Normal Condition is likely satisfied. W
Mean 13.428571429 16.2
SD 3.408672413 5.3291650378 The Independent Groups Assumption is likely sat
N 7 10

DF 14.94

SE 2.121288275

T -1.31

P VALUE 0.2112841598

League 1 League 2
11.3 10.7
10.8 9.9
10.2 9.7
10.1 9.5
9.9 9.5
9.9 9.4
9.7 9.3
 9.6 9.2
9.6 8.9
8.8 8.8
8.7 8.8
8.5 8.6
8.5
8.2
Mean 9.7583333333 9.2142857143
SD 0.825126253 0.6490906572
N 12 14

SE 0.2946698197

DF 20.810031452

CV 2.0859634473

y1-y2 0.544047619

CI -0.07
1.16
We are ​95% confident that the amount by which the runs scored in League 1 games exceed the runs sc

T 1.85
P value 0.040

Rap Mozart No Music

N 31 21 19
Mean 10.52 11.14 11.83
SD 4.14 3.17 4.95

Yn-Yr 1.31

SE 1.35738557
T 0.97

DF 33.093098481

P 0.1707595469

CV 2.4447941998

CI -2.01
4.63

With 98​% ​confidence, the mean number of objects remembered by those students who listen to no m

A) Independence assumption

Nearly normal condition

Independent group assumption

B)

C) Town 1 Town 2
410000 489000
429900 526000
500000 669000
569000 759900
695000 798000
700000 857000
745500 997000
815900 1095000
 840000 1255000
928500 1312000
1285000 1399000
1375000 1419000
1399000 1445000
1416500 1475000
1485000 1525000
1530000 1585500
1565000 1623500
1650000 1655000
1691000 1685000
1750000 1860000
1855000 1990000
1997000 1999400
2200000 2059900
2360000 2135000
2435000 2255000
2660000 2398000
2745000 2437000
2830000 2597000
2960000 2749000
2965000 3000000

Mean 1559576.6667 1601673.3333

SD 805285.49646 670128.88309
N 30 30

Y1-Y2 -42096.666667

SE 191272.70678

T -0.22 0.22

DF 56.146590065

P 0.827

D) Fail to reject . There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean prices of home

The mean prices of homes in these two towns are not significantly different.
A) Independent group assumption

Independence assumption

Nearly normal condition

B)

C) Northeast Southwest
5.5 4.3
5.8 9.4
5.9 5.9
5.4 6.7
4.6 0.3
6.9 8.3
5.4 9.3
7.3 4.4
7.4 1.2
-3.2 8.2

Mean 5.1 5.8

SD 3.0546867452 3.2259365565
N 10 10

Yn-Ys -0.7

SE 1.4049120178

T -0.50 0.5

DF 17.946708983

P 0.623
Fail to reject Ho .​Thus, although the mean home foreclosure rates in the Northeast is​ lo
t alpha = 0.01
greater then visa-versa
ely satsified as there are 17 samples and tropical storms have existed for more than 170 years.

dition is likely satisfied. The data were collected at random which should combat underlying trends.

dition is likely satisfied. While there is an outlier in the first​ group, both data sets are reasonably symmetric.

s Assumption is likely satisfied. There is no reason to think that an observation in one group would affect an
e 1 games exceed the runs scored in League 2 games will fall in the interval.
e students who listen to no music at all is greater than the mean number remembered by those who study to Rap music by an a
the mean prices of homes in these two towns are different.

ntly different.
ates in the Northeast is​ lower, the difference in home foreclosure rates in the Southwest is not significant. A
 than 170 years.

at underlying trends.

are reasonably symmetric.

n one group would affect an observation in the other group.

se who study to Rap music by an amount in the interval.
uthwest is not significant. A larger sample may produce a different result.
 17.28
11.46 A)
45.03
10.03 Ha one-sided
48.72
10.44 B) Mean 29.65
33.41 SD 14.34
39.73 Y 22
48.27 N 25
41.24
24.56 S.E 2.868
9.01
31.87 T-stat 2.67
9.35
42.41 C) Df 24
41.46
44.29 P value 0.0067
19.37
47.23
24.68 D) P value is less than 0.05, reject hypothesis, suffiecient evidence
28.72
36.29
43.02
9.14
24.18

N 16
Mean 11.1
SD 6 Confidence
 80%
Intervals 8.47 13.73 85%
90%
A) ME 2.63 95%
99%
B) 99.50%
99.90%

Tn-1 since sample size is not know , Use the corresponding value from z * the normal model​
For 95% confidence interval, z* is 1.960

Tn-1 1.645
ME 1

n 9.87

A) Ho u = 13.8 One tail test

Ha u < 13.8

Mean 13.8
Y 6.9
SD 7
N 40

S.E 1.10679718105893

I T Stat -6.23 6.23

One sided, df = n-1

df 39
II P value 1.000E+00 0

P value is less than alpha, reject the null hypothesis, sufficient evidence

III The Independence Assumption has been satisfied because the​ 10% Condition and the
The Normal Population Assumption has not been satisfied because the Nearly Normal

B) probability 0.05 % confidence

critical value 2.02

upper 9.14
lower 4.66

Neighborhood 1 Neighborhood 2
n_1 35 n_2 40
yBar_1 56.4 yBar_2 47.6
s_1 7.88 s_2 7.76

A) df 71.4
Confidence 95% 5%

SE 1.81095712657305

y1-y2 8.8

critical value 1.99394336784563

 upper value 12.41
lower value 5.19

B) The sample sizes are larger.

C) Is 0 within the confidence interval found in part​ a?

no

D)

Website 1 Website 2
n 75 80
mean 7.1 6.2
s 3.2 3.3

A) SE 0.522166959250902

DF 152.821300042097

Y1-Y2 0.9

% confidence 95% 5%

CV 1.97569392781527

Upper 1.93
Lower -0.13

B) The sample sizes are larger.

C) Is 0 within the confidence interval found in part​ a?

yes
D)

Neighborhood 1 Neighborhood 2
n_1 30 n_2 35
yBar_1 56.2 yBar_2 43.3
s_1 7.99 s_2 7.82

A) (Given in the question to a

y1-y2 12.9

S pooled 7.8987084537977

SE 1.96525139321888

T statistic 6.56
 df 63

P value 1.1424195818043E-08 0.000

P value is less than alpha, reject the null hypothesis, sufficient evidence

B) % Confidence 95% 5%

CV 1.99834054252074

Upper 16.83
Lower 8.97

No. Since the standard deviations are fairly​ close, the two methods will result in essent

Website 1 Website 2
n 75 90
ybar 6.1 5.2
s 5.2 4.3

A)

y1-y2 0.9
 S pooled 4.72986205845631

SE 0.739500651359145

T statistic 1.217

df 163

P value 0.1127

B) Confidence 95% 5%

CV 1.97462462096636
Upper 2.36
lower -0.56

C) The confidence intervals are close because the standard deviation for the two websites
store With_Progra Without_Program Mean difference (d) (d-dbar)^2
1 137 142 -5 56.25
2 233 222 11 72.25
3 118 107 11 72.25
4 48 50 -2 20.25
 5 335 335 0 6.25
6 144 140 4 2.25
7 134 127 7 20.25
8 33 32 1 2.25
9 180 180 0 6.25
10 146 148 -2 20.25

N 10 AVG Mean diff (dbar) 2.5 278.5

A) ​Yes, the data are paired because measurements of customers were taken at each stor

B) Mean difference 2.5

C) SD Differnece 5.56

D) SE 1.76

E) T stat 1.421

F) DF 9

G) It is​ one-sided, because the supermarket chain wants to

H) P value 0.0945

I)

store With ProgramWithout Program Mean Difference (d) (d-dbar)^2

1 138 139 -1 6.76
2 231 234 -3 21.16
 3 111 111 0 2.56
4 44 38 6 19.36
5 336 328 8 40.96
6 133 134 -1 6.76
7 139 138 1 0.36
8 36 33 3 1.96
9 176 179 -3 21.16
10 147 141 6 19.36

n 10 d bar 1.6 140.4

SD Difference 3.9496835316263

SE 1.24899959967968

df 9

confidence le 90% 10%

cv 1.83311293265624

A) upper -0.69
lower 3.89

SD 20 mean diff 20.4

N 33

SE 3.48

DF 32

Confidence 90% 10%

cv 1.69388875
upper 26.30
lower 14.50

Summary of the speeds​ (in kilometres per​ hour)

Variable Count Mean StdDev
Site2 1114 7.648 3.944
Site4 1114 7.725 3.983
​Site2-Site4 1114 −0.077 2.737
s, suffiecient evidence

Z
1.282
1.44
1.645
1.96
2.576
2.807
3.291
% Condition and the Randomization Condition are both true for these data.
e the Nearly Normal Condition is not true or verifiable for these data with the given information. It must be as
iven in the question to apply pooled-t test)
s will result in essentially the same confidence intervals and hypothesis tests.
for the two websites are fairly close.
 e taken at each store twice—once during the program and once without the program.

market chain wants to know if traffic increased.

ormation. It must be assumed that the data in the sample come from a population that follows a Normal mod
on that follows a Normal model.