Chapter 4

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

Table 1.1 Age of the respondents

AGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
17 12 30%
18 18 45%
19 5 13%
20 5 13%
TOTAL 40 101%
This table showed that among 40 respondents, there are 12(30%) respondents at the age of 17.
There are 18(45%) respondents at the age of 18. There are 5(13%) respondents at the age of 19.
There are 5(13%) respondents at the age of 20

Table 1.2 Grade Level

GRADES FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

12 40 100%
TOTAL 40 100%
This table showed that among 40 respondents, there are 40(100%) respondents in Grade 12
HUMSS

Table 1.2 Gender of the respondents

GENDER FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE
MALE 13 33%
FEMALE 27 68%
TOTAL 40 100%
Table 2. Is face-to-face classes important to the students? And importance of face-to-face
classes to the students

DATA YES NO
Choices Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
Did you understand 38 95% 2 5%
the lesson better in
Face-to-face classes?
Did you perform 36 90% 4 10%
better in Face-to-Face
classes?

This table showed that among 40 respondents there are 38(97%) understand the lesson better in
face to face classes and 2(5%) didn’t understand the lesson better in face to face and 36(90%)
perform better in face to face classes while 4(10%) didn’t perform better in face to face classes.
Face-to-face classes are vital for improved lesson knowledge and performance; in our survey,
considerably more students replied yes, indicating that they had greater understanding and
performance in face-to-face classes.

Table 3. How does face-to-face classes affects the academic performance of the Grade 12
HUMSS students.

DATA YES NO
Choices Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
Did you get higher 30 75% 10 25%
grades in face-to-face,
than in modular?
Did you perform 36 90% 4 10%
better in Face-to-Face
classes?
Does face-to-face 40 100% 0 0%
learning help you to
get so focused on
activities?
Is your academic 32 80% 8 20%
performance better
than last school year
(modular distance
 learning)?
Are any difficulties 23% 58% 17 43%
you have encountered
in coping up to the
class?

This table showed that among 40 respondents, there are 30(75%) respondents got higher grades
in face to face rather than in module and 10(25%) respondents didn’t get higher grades in face to
face than in modular, 36(90%) respondents perform better in face to face and 4(10%)
respondents didn’t perform better in face to face, 40(100%) respondents get focused on activities
in face to face learning,23(58%) respondents have any difficulties in coping up the class and
17(43%) respondents don’t have difficulties in coping up the class

Table 5. Is face-to-face interaction with teachers more effective than online sessions and
lectures?

DATA YES NO
Choices Frequency Percentage Frequency Percentage
Did you participate 39 98% 1 3%
and assist better in a
face-to-face learning
environment?
Do you have a better 34 85% 6 15%
comprehension of the
teachings now?
Do you still 23 58% 17 43%
experienced having
lack of information in
the classroom
Did you have 20 50% 21 53%
struggles in coping up
to face-to-face classes

This table showed that among 40 respondents, there are 39(98%) respondents participate and
assist better in face to face classes and 1(3%) respondents didn’t participate and assist better in
face to face, 34(85%) respondents have a better comprehension of the teaching now and 6(15%)
didn’t have a better comprehension of the teaching now, 23(58%) still experienced having lack
of information in the classroom and 17(43%) don’t have experienced having lack of information
in the classroom and 20(50%) respondents have struggles in coping up in face to face and
21(53%) respondents don’t have struggles in coping up in face to face. There are fewer answers
of no, so among our 40 respondents, students had greater comprehension of the teaching,
participation, and assistance from teachers, though some students still have a lack of information
inside the classroom and still have struggles in coping up in face to face.

TABLE 6

CHOICES FREQUENCY PERCETAGE

In face-to-face classes, I got higher 29 73%
grades.
Face-to-face classes help us access 38 88%
more information for the lesson.
Face-to-face classes had less distraction 32 80%
and required more
concentration that made us understand
the lesson more
In face-to-face classes, I improved my 31 78%
social skills.
In face-to-face there is a high level of 31 78%
student achievement.
Face-to-face classes gives better 32 80%
motivation to my study.
My queries are no longer difficult 32 80%
because they can be answered in class.

This table showed that among 40 respondents, 29 (73%) got higher grades in face-to-face
classes, 38 (88%) accessed more information for the lesson in face-to-face classes, 32 (80%) had
less distraction and more concentration to understand the lesson in face-to-face classes, 31 (78%)
improved their social skills in face-to-face classes, 31 (78%) had a high level of student
achievement, and 32 (80%) had better motivation in face-to-face classes and no longer had
queries because it can answered during face to face classes