DR. B.R.

AMBEDKAR NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY,

SONEPAT

CONSTITUTION- II
PROJECT

THE ROLE OF THE GOVERNOR IN INDIAN

CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNANCE

SUBMITTED TO: SUBMITTED BY:

Mr. NAVNEET SACHIN SHUKLA- 2001090
ASSISTANT PROFESSOR OF LAW TANAYA- 2001116
YUVRAJ NATH- 2001125

1
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Presentation inspiration and motivation have always played a major role in the success of any
venture. We pay my deep sense of gratitude to Mr Navneet, Assistant professor of law in Dr
BR Ambedkar National Law University, Sonipat for encouraging me to the highest peak and
to provide me the opportunity to prepare this project. I came to know about various new things
just because of you. We are immensely obliged to my friends for their elevating, encouraging
guidance and kind supervision in the completion of my project. Last, but not the least, my
parents are also an important inspiration for me. So, with due regards, we express my gratitude
to them. We are making this project not only for marks but also to increase my knowledge.

THANKS AGAIN TO ALL WHO HELPED US.

Regards
SACHIN SHUKLA- 2001090
TANAYA- 2001116
YUVRAJ NATH- 2001125

1
TABLE OF CONTENT
1. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ……………………………………………………………1
2. TABLE OF CONTENT…………………………………………………………….…2
3. INTRODUCTION …………………………………………………………………….3
4. HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE …………………………………………………..…3
5. POWERS AND DUTIES OF GOVERNOR……………………………………….…4
A. EXECUTIVE POWERS ………………………………………………………….4
B. FINANCIAL POWERS …………………………………………………………..5
C. JUDICIAL POWERS …………………………………………………………….5
6. IMPORTANCE OF GOVERNOR ……………………………………………….…..6
7. THE PUPPET OF THE CENTER ………………………………………………..….7
7.1. APPOINTMENT AND REMOVAL OF GOVERNORS ……………7
7.2. DISCRETIONARY POWERS OF GOVERNORS ………………….8
7.3. EXAMPLES OF MISUSE ……………………………………………9
A. PPOINTMENT AND REMOVAL OF CM ……………………10
B. RESERVE BILLS FOR THE PRESIDENT'S CONSIDERATION.
C. PRESIDENTS RULE ……………………………………………11
8. POSSIBLE SOLUTION SUGGESTED BY DIFFERENT COMMISSIONS……...11
9. THE JUDICIAL INTERVENTION ………………………………………………..12
10. CONCLUSION ……………………………………………………………..……13,14
11. REFERENCES…………………………………………………..…………….….15,16

2
INTRODUCTION
The Governor plays a pivotal role in the complex framework of Indian polity, serving as a
constitutional authority that connects the central government and the states. Appointed as the
head of the state executive according to Article 153 of the Indian Constitution, the Governor
holds immense significance in ensuring effective governance and maintaining the delicate
balance within the federal structure.
Acting as a vital link between the central and state governments, the Governor fosters
cooperation and coordination in matters of administration, legislation, and policy
implementation. With executive and legislative powers, they are responsible for appointing the
Chief Minister and Council of Ministers, summoning and proroguing the state legislature,
granting assent to bills, and overseeing the smooth functioning of the state machinery.
Additionally, the Governor assumes the role of a custodian of the Constitution, safeguarding
its principles and provisions.
In times of constitutional breakdown, such as political instability or governance failures, the
Governor recommends the imposition of President's Rule as a measure of last resort. The
appointment of the Governor upholds the principles of federalism, ensures the autonomy of
states, and upholds democratic values. Serving as a vital conduit between the central and state
governments, the Governor facilitates harmonious relations, enabling the effective
implementation of policies and programs for the welfare of the citizens.

HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANCE
The post of the Governor in India holds significant historical importance in the country's
political landscape. The roots of this position can be traced back to ancient times, dating as far
back as 272 BCE during the Mauryan Empire when governors were appointed to administer
the provinces.1
The prominence of the Governor's role emerged during the era of British colonial rule in India.
The British Raj established presidencies as centres of government, each headed by a governor
and council. Until 1834, these presidencies had the authority to enact regulations for their
territories. Consequently, any newly acquired territory, whether through conquest or treaty, fell
under the existing regulations of the corresponding presidency.
With India coming under direct administration by the British Crown in 1858, provincial
Governors became representatives of the Crown. They operated under the supervision of the
Governor-General and were responsible for safeguarding the Crown's interests while ensuring
effective governance in the provinces.2

1
The Hindu. (n.d.). Federalism: The office of the Governor in India. Retrieved from
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/federalism-the-office-of-the-governor-in-india/article65882166.ece
2
Ibid

3
During the Indian nationalist movement, demands for reforms and improved governance
intensified. The Government of India Act in 1935 marked a significant milestone by granting
provincial autonomy. As per the Act, the Governor was required to act based on the advice of
the Ministers of the provincial legislature. However, the Governor still retained specific
responsibilities and discretionary powers, setting them apart from a purely symbolic role.3

Upon India's independence in 1947, the Provisional Constitution was adopted, and the post of
Governor was retained. However, certain phrases granting individual discretion were omitted,
aligning with the principles of democratic governance. The role and powers of the Governor
were extensively debated in the Constituent Assembly, with an emphasis on maintaining a
balance between the centre and the states.

POWERS AND DUTIES OF GOVERNOR

The powers of the Governor in India, as enshrined in the Indian Constitution, encompass a
wide range of responsibilities and authority. These powers are designed to ensure effective
governance, maintain constitutional balance, and uphold democratic principles. The following
sections outline the key powers and duties vested in the office of the Governor.4
A. Executive Powers:

1. In the realm of executive powers, the Governor of a state in India wields significant
authority. One of the key aspects of their executive role is that all actions undertaken
by the state government are carried out in the name of the Governor, as stipulated by
Article 166 of the Indian Constitution. This provision establishes the Governor as the
constitutional head and representative of the state.

2. Another crucial executive power bestowed upon the Governor is the authority to
appoint the Chief Minister and other ministers. According to Article 164, it is the
Governor's prerogative to select the Chief Minister, who then forms the Council of
Ministers to assist in the governance of the state. This appointment is pivotal in
determining the leadership and composition of the state government.

3. Furthermore, the Governor holds the power to appoint the Advocate General of the
state, as stated in Article 165 of the Constitution. The Advocate General serves as the
chief legal advisor to the state government and plays a crucial role in offering legal
counsel and representing the state's interests in legal matters.

3
ibid
4
Drishti IAS. (n.d.). Roles and Powers of Governor. Retrieved from https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-
updates/daily-news-analysis/roles-and-powers-of-governor

4
 4. During times of constitutional emergencies, the Governor assumes a prominent role
as the agent of the President. Article 356 empowers the President to recommend the
imposition of emergency in a state to the Governor. Upon receiving such a
recommendation, the Governor gains extensive powers to deal with the emergency
situation effectively. This includes taking necessary measures to ensure the smooth
functioning of the state government and maintain law and order.

B. Financial Powers:
The Governor of a state in India possesses significant financial powers that contribute to the
effective management and allocation of financial resources. These powers are enshrined in
various articles of the Indian Constitution.

1. One of the key financial powers of the Governor is the scrutiny and approval of the
state budget. According to Article 202, the Governor is responsible for examining and
sanctioning the budget proposed by the state government. This ensures fiscal discipline
and accountability in the utilization of funds for the overall development and welfare
of the state.

2. As per Article 207, the introduction of a money bill in the state legislature requires the
prior recommendation of the Governor. This provision ensures that financial matters
are carefully reviewed and approved by the Governor, maintaining transparency and
accountability in financial decision-making.

3. Governor plays a crucial role in recommending grants that cannot be provided without
their approval. Article 203 empowers the Governor to recommend grants, thereby
ensuring that financial assistance is allocated judiciously and in accordance with the
needs and priorities of the state.

4. The Governor is entrusted with the responsibility of constituting the State Finance
Commission every five years, as specified in Article 243-I. This helps in promoting
financial decentralization and equitable distribution of funds for local development.

C. JUDICIAL POWERS
The Governor exercises significant judicial powers in the Indian constitutional framework.
1. Article 217 establishes that judges of the High Court are appointed by the President in
consultation with the Governor. This collaborative process ensures the appointment of
qualified and competent judges to uphold justice and maintain the integrity of the
judiciary.

5
 2. Furthermore, Article 233 empowers the Governor to appoint and promote district
judges in consultation with the High Court. This ensures that individuals with the
requisite expertise and merit are appointed to key positions within the judicial
hierarchy, contributing to the efficient and effective administration of justice at the
district level.

3. In matters pertaining to the judicial services, the Governor, in consultation with the
High Court and the State Public Service Commission, appoints individuals as per
Article 234. This process ensures a fair and transparent selection of candidates who
possess the necessary qualifications and aptitude for judicial roles, reinforcing the
principles of justice, impartiality, and independence.

4. The Governor in India possesses the power of granting pardons, reprieves, respites, or
remissions of punishment to individuals convicted under state laws, as provided by
Article 161 of the Indian Constitution. This power allows the Governor to review
cases, considering factors such as the nature of the offense, circumstances, and the
conduct of the convicted person, with the aim of ensuring justice and proportionality
in sentencing. It serves as a safeguard against miscarriages of justice, providing an
avenue for mercy and rehabilitation within the criminal justice system.

IMPORTANCE OF GOVERNOR

The role of the Governor as a liaison between the central government and the state
government holds immense significance in promoting cooperation, coordination, and the
overall benefit of the polity. Acting as the authorized representative of the President and the
Union government at the state level, the Governor assumes the responsibility of bridging the
communication gap and fostering collaboration between these two entities.
Primarily, the Governor plays a pivotal role in establishing effective coordination mechanisms
by facilitating dialogue and consultation. Through regular engagements with the Chief
Minister, Council of Ministers, and state officials, the Governor remains well-informed about
the state's affairs and concerns. This valuable information is then communicated to the central
government, enabling a comprehensive understanding of the state's needs and priorities5.
Furthermore, the Governor serves as a conduit for the implementation of central government
policies and programs within the state. Their active involvement ensures the smooth
dissemination and execution of crucial schemes, initiatives, and legislations at the grassroots
level. This not only promotes uniformity in governance but also aids in addressing regional
disparities and promoting equitable development. 6

5
Singh, M. P. (2007). Indian Federalism: Core Dimensions and Contemporary Debates. Oxford University
Press.
6
Sharma, S. K. (2010). Indian Government and Politics. Atlantic Publishers and Distributors.

6
In addition to coordination, the Governor's role in maintaining constitutional balance,
upholding federalism, and managing crises is of utmost significance. Through their executive
powers, involvement in the legislative process, and discretionary authority, the Governor acts
as a constitutional check, ensuring effective governance, safeguarding federal principles, and
addressing crises. This pivotal role guarantees the harmony between the centre and the state,
upholds the democratic functioning of the state, and ensures stability, continuity, and effective
intervention during times of crisis.

THE PUPPET OF THE CENTER

The existing evidence provides substantial support to the notion that Governors, who are
appointed by the President based on the advice of the central government, are frequently
perceived as being subservient to the centre. This circumstance poses significant challenges to
the principles of federalism and diminishes the independence and self-governance of the states.
The appointment and tenure of Governors emerge as prominent factors contributing to this
perception, highlighting the need for comprehensive examination and potential reforms in this
area.7

APPOINTMENT AND REMOVAL OF GOVERNORS

The appointment and removal of Governors in India are governed by constitutional provisions
outlined in Articles 155, 156(1), and 157. As per Article 155, the President of India appoints
the Governor through a formal warrant under their hand and seal. According to Article 156(1),
the Governor serves at the pleasure of the President, signifying that their tenure is subject to
the President's discretion, which is ultimately controlled by the central government. It is
noteworthy that the Constitution does not specify any specific criteria or qualifications for the
appointment of a Governor, except for the requirement of a certain age. Consequently,
individuals affiliated with any political party can potentially assume the position of Governor.

Article 155: The Governor of a State shall be appointed by the President by warrant under his
hand and seal.
Article 156(1): The Governor shall hold office during the pleasure of the President.
Article 157: No person shall be eligible for appointment as Governor unless he is a citizen of
India and has completed the age of thirty-five years.

7
ORF (Observer Research Foundation). (2020, July 7). The recurring controversy of the Governor's role in state
politics. Retrieved from https://www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/recurring-controversy-governor-role-state-
politics-67433/

7
Legal experts have analyzed the appointment process and the implications it has on the
functioning of Governors. For instance, Dr. A.G. Noorani, a constitutional expert, asserts that
Governors are often appointed on political considerations and loyalty to the ruling party at the
center, which can compromise their impartiality and independence (Noorani, 2012). He further
argues that this practice has led to instances where Governors have acted as agents of the central
government, rather than being guardians of federalism and protectors of state interests
(Noorani, 2012).8

DISCRETIONARY POWERS OF GOVERNORS

The Constitution of India grants discretionary powers to the Governor, allowing them to
exercise independent judgment in certain situations. While these powers are intended to ensure
the smooth functioning of the state government and protect constitutional principles, they can
also be susceptible to misuse, particularly when influenced by the central government.
These discretionary powers of Governors and their role within the constitutional framework
have been a subject of scrutiny. Dr. Subhash Kashyap, a renowned constitutional scholar,
emphasizes that Governors should exercise their powers objectively and impartially, acting as
a check on the executive and legislative branches (Kashyap, 2010). However, he points out that
the appointment process and the potential for removal at the President's pleasure can influence
their decisions and make them susceptible to political pressures (Kashyap, 2010).9
The Governor of India holds significant discretionary powers, such as
1. the ability to reserve bills for the President's consideration,
2. recommend President's Rule,
3. appoint the Chief Minister,
4. dismiss the Council of Ministers,
5. provide discretionary grants,
6. dissolve the Legislative Assembly,
7. exercise pardoning powers, commute sentences,
8. make appointments to various official positions.
However, these discretionary powers have been subject to allegations of misuse and have
become topics of concern in numerous instances. A comprehensive examination of these cases
reveals a pattern of potential misuse of these powers, raising questions about the impartiality
and integrity of gubernatorial actions

8
Noorani, A. G. (2012). Governors' Role in States. Frontline, 29(13). Retrieved from
[https://frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/article30177526.ece]
9
Kashyap, S. C. (2010). The Role of Governors. The Hindu. Retrieved from
https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/The-role-of-Governors/article16682815.ece

8
 EXAMPLES OF MISUSE
A. Appointment and removal of CM

1. JHARKHAND ASSEMBLY 2005: In 2005, the dissolution of the Jharkhand State

Assembly by the Governor, Syed Sibtey Razi, sparked controversy. The Governor's
decision came under scrutiny as it was seen as favoring the ruling party at the center.
The dissolution was challenged in the Jharkhand High Court, which subsequently
declared it unconstitutional and ordered the restoration of the Assembly (PTI, 2006).
This case highlighted concerns regarding the impartiality and political bias of
Governors in their exercise of discretionary powers.10

2. JHARKHAND ASSEMBLY 2020 In 2020, the non-removal of Hemant Soren as the

Chief Minister of Jharkhand by Governor Draupadi Murmu despite him losing majority
support in the Legislative Assembly highlighted concerns about the potential misuse of
the power of appointment by the Governor. 11

3. Manipur Government Formation (2017): The Governor of Manipur, Najma

Heptulla, invited a political party to form the government in the state, despite another
party having emerged as the single largest party in the Legislative Assembly. This
action was seen as a disregard for democratic norms and a misuse of discretionary
power12

These actions raised questions about the adherence to constitutional principles, particularly
Article 164(1) of the Indian Constitution, which grants the Governor the authority to appoint
and remove the Chief Minister.

10
Press Trust of India (PTI). (2006). Jharkhand assembly dissolution unconstitutional: HC. The Times of India.
Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Jharkhand-assembly-dissolution-unconstitutional-
HC/articleshow/1410781.cms
11
ANI. (2020, July 8). Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren loses majority; Congress, JMM, RJD MLAs resign. The
Economic Times. Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/jharkhand-
election-results-live-news-updates-bjp-jmm-congress-jvm/liveblog/72931339.cms
12
Zee News. (2017, March 15). Manipur Governor Najma Heptulla invites BJP to form government, Congress
cries foul. Zee News. Retrieved from https://zeenews.india.com/india/manipur-governor-najma-heptulla-invites-
bjp-to-form-government-congress-cries-foul-1985425.html

9
 Article 164(1): The Chief Minister shall be appointed by the Governor and the other Ministers
shall be appointed by the Governor on the advice of the Chief Minister, and the Ministers shall
hold office during the pleasure of the Governor.
B. RESERVE BILLS FOR THE PRESIDENT'S CONSIDERATION
The Governor possesses the power to retain a bill and prevent its submission to the President
for ascent. This authority enables the Governor to retain the bill, thereby obstructing its
progression into law and preventing its enactment. The Governor exercises this discretion,
often influenced by the desires of their superiors at the central government. Numerous instances
exemplify the Governor's utilization of this power in alignment with the preferences of the
central authority. Some of them are as follows: -

1. Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act (1970): The Governor of Uttar Pradesh, disregarding
the state government's objections, reserved the Uttar Pradesh Control of Goondas Act for
the President's consideration. This act aimed to address organized crime and maintain
public order. The Governor's decision to reserve the bill was criticized for bypassing the
elected government's authority and undermining the principles of federalism.

2. Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act (2013): The Governor of Maharashtra, despite the
state government's opposition, reserved the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act for the
President's consideration. The act aimed to reform cooperative societies and improve their
governance. The Governor's action was viewed as an interference in the state's legislative
affairs, raising concerns about the misuse of the Governor's office for political purposes.

3. Manipur People's Protection Bill (2018): The Governor of Manipur, against the wishes of
the state government, reserved the Manipur People's Protection Bill for the President's
consideration. This bill sought to regulate entry and exit of non-Manipur residents in the
state. The Governor's decision was met with protests and allegations of undermining the
democratic process and disregarding the elected government's authority.

4. Andhra Pradesh Decentralization and Inclusive Development of All Regions Bill (2020):
The Governor of Andhra Pradesh, disregarding the state government's objections, reserved
the Andhra Pradesh Decentralization and Inclusive Development of All Regions Bill for
the President's consideration. This bill aimed to decentralize governance and ensure
balanced development across all regions of the state. The Governor's decision sparked a
political controversy and led to accusations of misusing the office to advance political
interests.

10
C. PRESIDENT’s RULE
Article 356 of the Indian Constitution bestows upon the governor the authority to recommend
the imposition of President's Rule, whereby the President assumes control of a state's
governance in the event of a breakdown in the functioning of the state machinery.
This provision is intended to be used sparingly and as a last resort to address exceptional
circumstances that pose a threat to the constitutional order. However, there have been instances
where this power has been misused, giving rise to concerns regarding the Governor's
impartiality and proper exercise of authority.

An instance illustrating such misuse occurred in Bihar in 2005, where Governor Buta Singh
recommended President's Rule without sufficient justification, resulting in the dissolution of
the state assembly. In the case of Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India13, the Supreme Court
deemed this action as a misuse of power and a violation of constitutional norms. 14
Similarly, in Uttarakhand in 2016, the Governor, along with the central government,
recommended President's Rule citing a constitutional breakdown, despite the state assembly
being in session. The Uttarakhand High Court, in the case of Harish Chandra Singh Rawat v.
Union of India15, opposed the imposition of President's Rule and reinstated the elected
government. These cases serve as examples that underscore the potential for the Governor's
power to recommend President's Rule to be misused, influenced by political considerations and
partisan interests. 16

POSSIBLE SOLUTION SUGGESTED BY DIFFERENT COMMISSIONS

The preservation of constitutional governance and the integrity of democratic institutions
heavily relies on ensuring the impartiality and independence of the office of the Governor. To
tackle the challenges surrounding this issue and create an environment of fairness, several
potential solutions have been put forth. The following are among the proposed measures to
address these concerns:

1. The Administrative Reforms Commission (1969) recommended that Governors of a State

should be non-partisan individuals with extensive experience in public life and administration
(Administrative Reforms Commission, 1969).

13
Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India (2006) 2 SCC 1
14
Indian Express. (n.d.). Simply Put: Governor’s role in review. Retrieved from
https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/simply-put-governors-role-in-review-6526427/
15
Harish Chandra Singh Rawat v. Union of India (2016) 16 SCC 748(1)
16
The Hindu. (2016, March 27). President's rule imposed in Uttarakhand. Retrieved from
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/President%E2%80%99s-rule-imposed-in-
Uttarakhand/article60578526.ece

11
2. The Sarkaria Commission (1988) made several recommendations regarding the appointment
and removal of Governors. It suggested that Governors should be appointed after consulting
the Chief Minister of the State, and they should be eminent individuals from outside the State
without intense political links or recent political involvement. The Commission also
emphasized that the use of Article 356 (imposition of President's Rule) should be sparingly and
as a last resort (Sarkaria Commission, 1988).

3. The National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution (NCRWC) proposed that
a committee comprising the Prime Minister, Home Minister, Speaker of the Lok Sabha, and
the Chief Minister of the State concerned should be responsible for appointing Governors
(National Commission to Review the Working of the Constitution, NCRWC).

4. The Second Administrative Reforms Commission (ARC) recommended that guidelines should
be developed by the Inter-State Council for Governors to follow when exercising their
discretionary powers (Second Administrative Reforms Commission, ARC).

5. The Punchhi Commission (2010) put forward various recommendations, including giving
Governors a fixed term of 5 years and removing them through an impeachment process by the
State Legislature. It also reiterated the Sarkaria Commission's suggestion of appointing
Governors who are not active in politics. Additionally, the commission recommended doing
away with the convention of making Governors the chancellors of universities. It also proposed
amending Articles 355 and 356 to allow the Union Government to bring specific troubled areas
under its rule for a limited period (Punchhi Commission, 2010).

THE JUDICIAL INTERVENTION

One significant legal case that examined the constitutional validity of the recommendations
made by expert bodies like the Sarkaria Commission and the Punchhi Commission regarding
the appointment and removal of governors is B.P. Singhal v. Union of India (2010). 17This case
provided an opportunity to assess the recommendations in question.
The Supreme Court, in its judgment, recognized the persuasive value of recommendations
made by expert bodies like the Sarkaria Commission and the Punchhi Commission. These
recommendations were seen as valuable reference points for the government in ensuring the
appointment of suitable candidates as governors. The court emphasized the importance of
transparency, objectivity, and adherence to constitutional principles during the process of
governor appointments.

17
B.P. Singhal v. Union of India (2010) 6 SCC 331

12
It is worth noting that while the recommendations of expert bodies carry persuasive value, they
are not legally binding. The ultimate responsibility for making appointments lies with the
President and the Council of Ministers. The court reiterated that the appointment of governors
should be carried out in a manner that upholds the federal structure, maintains the integrity of
the Constitution, and promotes the welfare of the states.
In addition to the B.P. Singhal case, there have been other instances where legal experts have
scrutinized the recommendations regarding the appointment of governors. While not
specifically cases in a judicial sense, these instances include scholarly publications and expert
opinions. These contributions offer valuable insights into the subject matter and contribute to
the ongoing discourse on improving the impartiality of governor appointments.
The Supreme Court ruling in the case of Shamsher Singh vs. State of Punjab (1974) 18highlights
the constitutional framework within which the Governor operates. The Court emphasized that
while the executive power of the state is vested in the Governor, it must be exercised in
accordance with the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers headed by the Chief Minister.
This signifies that the Governor's actions should align with the provisions of the Constitution,
ensuring the democratic functioning of the state.
In the case of SR Bommai vs. Union of India (1994)19, the Supreme Court examined the use of
Article 356, which pertains to the dismissal of a State Government by the Governor. The Court
emphasized the importance of objective assessment in determining whether a State
Government has the majority. It held that the floor of the House should be the decisive factor,
rather than the subjective assessment of the Governor. This ruling reinforces the principle of
parliamentary democracy, where the legitimacy of a government is determined by the elected
representatives in the legislative assembly.
These judicial pronouncements highlight the role of the Governor within the constitutional
framework. The Governor's actions are bound by the principles of constitutionalism and
democratic governance, as enshrined in the Constitution. The rulings emphasize the need for
the Governor to act in accordance with the provisions of the Constitution and ensure a fair and
objective approach in exercising their powers. This judicial guidance provides clarity on the
limits and scope of the Governor's authority, safeguarding the principles of democracy and rule
of law.
CONCLUSION
The role of the Governor in Indian constitutional governance holds immense significance and
serves as a cornerstone of our democratic system. While instances of misuse and controversies
surrounding this position have raised concerns, it is essential to recognize the inherent value
and potential of this office. The Governor, as an impartial custodian of the Constitution, plays
a crucial role in maintaining the delicate balance between the center and the states, upholding
the principles of federalism, and safeguarding the interests of the people.

18
Shamsher Singh vs. State of Punjab 1974 AIR 2192. 1975 SCR (1) 814.
19
SR Bommai vs. Union of India ([1994] 2 SCR 644 : AIR 1994 SC 1918 : (1994)3 SCC1)

13
It is important to approach these issues of challenges faced by the office of the Governor with
a commitment to reform and improvement. By implementing necessary measures, we can
mitigate the potential for misuse and enhance the independence, impartiality, and
accountability of Governors. Key areas of focus should include transparent and objective
appointment processes, limiting discretionary powers to prevent undue influence, and
establishing robust mechanisms for oversight and accountability.
Furthermore, addressing the appointment process itself warrants careful consideration.
Exploring the possibility of establishing a bipartisan committee or involving multiple
stakeholders in the appointment of Governors can help ensure a more inclusive and merit-based
selection process. This would contribute to greater confidence in the impartiality and integrity
of the office. It is imperative to recognize that the role of the Governor extends beyond partisan
politics. It is a responsibility that demands a steadfast commitment to upholding the
Constitution and serving as a bridge between the centre and the states. By nurturing an
environment that values the principles of federalism, transparency, and accountability, we can
pave the way for the Governors to effectively discharge their duties and contribute to the
smooth functioning of our democratic governance.
While acknowledging the past instances of misuse and controversy, we must remain optimistic
about the future of the office of the Governor. Through comprehensive reforms, institutional
strengthening, and a collective commitment to democratic ideals, we can build a more
impartial, effective, and resilient system of governance. The office of the Governor holds
immense potential to play a pivotal role in upholding the democratic fabric of our nation,
ensuring the well-being of the states, and promoting harmonious federal cooperation.

14
REFERENCES
A. CASE LAWS

1. B.P. Singhal v. Union of India (2010) 6 SCC 331

2. Shamsher Singh vs. State of Punjab 1974 AIR 2192. 1975 SCR (1) 814.

3. SR Bommai vs. Union of India ([1994] 2 SCR 644 : AIR 1994 SC 1918 : (1994)3
SCC1)

4. Rameshwar Prasad v. Union of India (2006) 2 SCC 1

5. Harish Chandra Singh Rawat v. Union of India (2016) 16 SCC 748(1)

B. BOOKS AND ARTICLES

1. The Hindu. (n.d.). Federalism: The office of the Governor in India. Retrieved from
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/federalism-the-office-of-the-governor-in-
india/article65882166.ece

2. Drishti IAS. (n.d.). Roles and Powers of Governor. Retrieved from

https://www.drishtiias.com/daily-updates/daily-news-analysis/roles-and-powers-of-governor

3. Singh, M. P. (2007). Indian Federalism: Core Dimensions and Contemporary Debates.

Oxford University Press.

4. Sharma, S. K. (2010). Indian Government and Politics. Atlantic Publishers and Distributors.

5. ORF (Observer Research Foundation). (2020, July 7). The recurring controversy of the
Governor's role in state politics. Retrieved from https://www.orfonline.org/expert-
speak/recurring-controversy-governor-role-state-politics-67433/

6. Noorani, A. G. (2012). Governors' Role in States. Frontline, 29(13). Retrieved from

[https://frontline.thehindu.com/the-nation/article30177526.ece]

7. Kashyap, S. C. (2010). The Role of Governors. The Hindu. Retrieved from

https://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/The-role-of-Governors/article16682815.ece

8. Press Trust of India (PTI). (2006). Jharkhand assembly dissolution unconstitutional: HC. The
Times of India. Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Jharkhand-
assembly-dissolution-unconstitutional-HC/articleshow/1410781.cms

9. ANI. (2020, July 8). Jharkhand CM Hemant Soren loses majority; Congress, JMM, RJD
MLAs resign. The Economic Times. Retrieved from
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/jharkhand-election-results-
live-news-updates-bjp-jmm-congress-jvm/liveblog/72931339.cms

15
10. Zee News. (2017, March 15). Manipur Governor Najma Heptulla invites BJP to form
government, Congress cries foul. Zee News. Retrieved from
https://zeenews.india.com/india/manipur-governor-najma-heptulla-invites-bjp-to-form-
government-congress-cries-foul-1985425.html

11. Indian Express. (n.d.). Simply Put: Governor’s role in review. Retrieved from
https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/simply-put-governors-role-in-review-6526427/

12. The Hindu. (2016, March 27). President's rule imposed in Uttarakhand. Retrieved from
https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/President%E2%80%99s-rule-imposed-
in-Uttarakhand/article60578526.ece

16