Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Experiment 1,2and3
Experiment 1,2and3
1
Theory : In the study of physical objects is very
important to be able to systematically measure the
quantities of length , mass and time . Every
measurement that you make is a comparison . The
characteristic you wish to quantify must be measured
in comparison to a standard . The standard for length
is the meter . Historically , the meter was intended to
be a convenient fraction , ( 1 / 10,000,000 ) of the
distance between the North Pole and the equator
traveling along a line through Paris . There are
different ways to measure length . The method chosen
to make a linear measurement depends upon the
accuracy desired and distance involved . It is important
to recognize that any measurement you make is
subject to error. The best value of the measured
quantity is given by the average of the values obtained
or the standard unit for mass is the kilogram. Mass is
the property of material bodies that makes them hard
to accelerate . Weight is the force of gravity with
which earth attracts body . Mass and weight are not
the same and should not be confused. The mass of an
object is constant and its weight varies according on
the location of the object. The density of the material
of which each is made is defined as the material's mass
, per unit volume
D = M/V
2
where M is the mass in grams , V is the volume in cubic
centimeters and D is the density with units grams per
. cubic centimeter
For the metal cylinders and the wire the volume is
given by
V=π
Lr 2
V=( π D L)/4
2
:Procedure
6
We Used the vernier caliper to measure the length )1
. and diameter of aluminum , brass and iron cylinders
We Obtain the reading when the jaws of the )2
vernier caliper are closed and in contact with each
other . This is the zero reading of the vernier caliper
. and be either positive or negative
We had each lab partner take readings , we make )3
sure to open and close the jaws before each reading .
. Record the zero reading to 0.01 cm in Data Table # 4
We Measure the length and diameter of each )4
cylinder with the vernier caliper . Each lab partner
should take a length and diameter reading for each
cylinder . Record the reading to 0.01 cm in Data Table
..#2
We Record both readings to nearest 0.01 inch in )5
. Data Table #2
7
Next obtain the reading of the thimble and add this
value to the reading you obtained from the barrel .
Thimble
We obtain the reading when the surfaces of the )1
anvil and the spindle are in contact . This is the zero
reading of the micrometer caliper , it can be either
. positive or negative
. We record the zero reading to 0.0001 cm)2
. We Measured the diameter of the copper wire )3
We Placed the wire between the anvil and the )4
spindle , grip the ratchet and twist until the wire is
. lightly gripped
we had taken measurements at different points )5
. along the length of the copper wire
We Recorded the reading to 0.0001 cm in Data )6
Table #5
The length of the wire = the right end – the left end =34-17=17
Average length = (17+17+17+17)/4 = 17
9
Part (2): table#2 measuring length of wire by
English ruler
Length Deviation ( Deviation )2
10
Part (4):table#4 length and diameter metal
cylinder
Length Cm5 5 5 5 5
aluminium
Length Iron 5 5 5 5 5
Length 5 5 5 5 5
Diameter 12.665 12.665 12.665 12.665 12.665
aluminium
(D ) L ¿/ 4 Volume
2
= (π
V = (π×(1.267×1.267)×5) /4
cm
3
6.3 =
12
Density= mass/volume
c m3/D = 17.9 /6.3= 2.84 g
Sources of errors
There are some personal error when we measured )1
the length by meter ruler and The vernier caliper and
the demeter by micrometer also there is a personal
.error in the siginficant figures in the calculations
There is a systematic error where the apparatus we )2
used are old so maybe will be some errors in the
.measurements
there is a random error in the data due to repeat )3
.the measurements for many times in each parts
:Conclusion
In this experiment we measured the length, the
diameter,mass volume and density by important
instruments are the meter ruler , vernier caliper , and
micrometer - triple - beam balance for mass, we
13
determined the volume from Diameter and length also
determined the density by volume we found and mass
We found that there was a precentege of error
about 1.57% in finding the length of wire and this
Precentege of error was due to some sources
error we mentioned above in sources of errors,we
noticed that there was a Precentege of error in
finding density for iron cylinder was about
5%,cuppy wire was about 1.06% and aluminium
cylinder was 4.68% ,due to the errors we
. mentioned above
14
Experiment (2)
15
THEORY
The distance , x , traveled in time t by an object moving
in a straight line with constant acceleration a is given
: by
) x = v.t+ (1/2) a t 2
………. 1
The " lubrication " provided by the air flowing to the air
track and under the glider provides nearly frictionless
motion , so to a very good approximation we may
neglect the effects of friction . Thus the object is
accelerated only by gravity and hence its acceleration
satisfies
16
to very accurately measure the time taken to travel the
. distance x
The method works as follows : when the glider passes
the first gate , it interrupts a light beam and starts the
timer ; when the glider passes the second gate , it again
interrupts a light beam but now stops the timer . The
timer then displays the time taken to travel the distance
.x between the gates
: PROCEDURE
17
We Checkd that the timer is set to read timing II in .3
ms " ( that is millisecond ) and properly reset to zero . "
we Started the air blower for the air track while holding
the glider gently at the top of the air track . we Released
the glider , observed the timer start when the glider
passes the first light fork , then we stoped as it passes
the second light fork . we repeated the measurement
several times ,we entered our results in table.1 ; and
. then average the resulting times
18
Data and Calculations :
Part (1) : Data table#1
At x = 1.5 m )2
Average time = (1.53+1.59+1.59)/3 = 4.71/3
s 1.57 =
19
At x = 1.30 m)3
Average time = (1.44+1.41+1.35)/3 = 4.2/3
s 1.4 =
At x = 1.00 m )4
Average time= (1.32+1.28+1.25)/3 = 3.85/3
=1.28 s
At x = 0.50 m )5
Average time= (0.97+0.94+0.97)/3 =2.88/3
=0.96 s
h= 11.4 cm
d = 15.8 cm
Sin(theta) = h/d =11.4/15.8 =0.7
F = ma
mg sin(theta) = ma
a = gsin(theta)
t 2X = x. + v. +(1/2) a
x.=0 ,v.=0
X = 0+0+ (1/2) at^2
21
a = 2 (x/(t ))
2
a = 2 slope
2Slope = gsin(theta)=g.(h/d)
h/d = 11.4/15.8 = 0.7
Slope= 5.03
0.7× )g calculated (= 5.03×2
2
s /g calculated = 14.37 m
The Percentage of error = (|g calculated – g accepted|)/g
accepted)×100% =( |14.37-9.8|/9.8)×100%
% 46.6 =
Sources of errorse
The type and number of errors depend on the setup of the
,experiment and the measuring devices that you are using
:Personal error)1
There is a personal error in the measuring the displacement
.when we used a meter rule
There is a personal error in observing the siginficant figures in
.calculations
Systematic error)2
There is a systematic error from the air resistance that is
effected on the car , so the accepted acceleration is 9.8
22
m/s2 , and the air resistance results the difference in
accepted acceleration, and the calculated acceleration
(14.37 m/s2)
There is a systematic error from the fraction force between
.the surface and the car that causes the different acceleration
Random error )3
There is a random error when we repeat the
experiment at many different times so there will be
.some errors in the data and calculations
: Conclusion
In this experiment we measured the acceleration due
to gravity and compare between the calculated value
we found ( 14.37 ) and the accepted value (9.8m/ s . ) 2
23
Experiment (3)
: OBJECTIVES
To study the rectilinear motion of a body under constant )1
. force
To measure the acceleration of a cart produced by a given )2
force ( weight ) and to compare it with that calculated from
. Newton's second law of motion
To determine the mathematical relationship between )3
.mass and acceleration when the force is kept constant
APPARATUS
• AC - Power supply
Ticker timer Threads •
Cart •
Ticker tape•
Weights•
24
Metric ruler •
Pulley•
: THEORY
In accordance with Newton's first law of motion , when the
resultant of all the forces acting on a body is zero , if the body
is at rest , it will remain at rest , and if it is in motion , it will
continue to move with constant speed in a straight line .
Newton's second law of motion describes what happens if
the resultant of all the forces is different from zero . When a
force or a net of forces Fact is acted on a body of mass m ;
the latter moves with acceleration as long as the force acts .
If the magnitude of the force Fnet is kept constant , the
velocity is found to increase at constant rate . If the force is
altered , the rate of change of velocity alters in the same
proportion . The relation which holds the net force Fer , the
: mass m , and the acceleration ā is
F = ma( 1 )
25
: PROCEDURE
We placed a dynamic cart ( trolley ) on a .1
smooth horizontal table with a thread attached to
it and passing over a smooth pulley as shown in
. Figure below
27
The graph below (Average velocity Vs Time)
2
s /The slope = 425 cm
2
s /Slope = the acceleration =a (measured) = 425 cm
M1= 215 g
M2 = 306 g
28
M1g – T = M1a. ………..y axis
T = M2a ………. X axis
Sum the two equations
M1g = M1a + M2a
M1g = (M1+M2)a
a (accepted) = M1g/(M1+M2)
)215+306(/)9.8×215( =
2
s /m 4.04 =
2
s /cm 404=
:Sources of errors
Personal error
There were some personal errors when we used the meter ruler to
measured the total distance and in observed the significance figures
in data and calculations
29
Random errors
There was a random error in data of distance due to
repeating the measureing in many intervals time
Systematic errors
There were a systematic errors due to the old of the
apparatus we used, the air resistance is effected on
measurements at vertical axis and the fraction force is
effected on the measurements at horizontal surface
:Conclusion
In this experiment we measured the acceleration of a cart
produced by a given force ( weight ) and compared it with
that calculated from Newton's second law of motion .and we
determined the mathematical relationship between mass
and acceleration when the force is kept constant,the
Precentege of error was small about % 4.9
and this percentage due to some errors we mentioned
. in the part of errors sources
30