Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Shahin 2020 Phys. Scr. 95 045226
Shahin 2020 Phys. Scr. 95 045226
Abstract
In this paper, the dynamical properties of charge carriers in the two-dimensional atomic layer of
graphene lattice with torus-shape geometry is studied in the presence of a gauge field. The
curved space considerations involves Dirac equation along with a magnetic field for relativistic
quasiparticles in graphene. By using the Heun’s differential equation, we are able to analytically
find discrete Landau levels of graphene in torus-like curved space. The magnetization of energy
states is investigated.
Keywords: geometry of torus, Dirac equation in curved space, Heun’s equation, Landau levels
(Some figures may appear in colour only in the online journal)
The line element for surface is determined by relation In the curved space Glms is the usual affine connection
ds 2 = -c 2 dt 2 + r 2 du2 + (R + r cos u )2 dv 2 . Embedding (1 (Chiristoffel symbol) related to the metric tensor by
+2)-dimensional torus into higher dimensional (1+3)-
1
dimensional space can generate effective gravity or effective Glms = gnl (gsn , m + gmn , s - gms, n ).
curvature to the reduced space-time. Fermions living on the 2
reduced space-time actually experience space-time curvature. The spin connection for fermion (spin 12 ) can be written as:
One can define line element for (1+3)-D Minkowski space- 1
Gm (x ) = w ab
m [ga , gb] , (7 )
time coordinate in the form dx′μ={cdt, dx, dy, dz}, and 8
dxm = {c dt , du , dv} as a (1+2)D torus. The transformation where w mab are the spin connection coefficients
matrix is given by: n bl
w ab
m = en (¶m + G ml ) e .
a
(8 )
¶x ¢m
gmn = To obtain vierbeins, we use the following relation:
¶x n
⎛1 0 0 0 ⎞ gmn = emi enj hij ,
= ⎜ 0 r sin u - r sin u cos v 0 ⎟.
where ηij=diag.(−1, 1, 1) in (1+2)-dimensions and i, j ò {0,
⎜ ⎟
⎝0 0 - (R + r cos u) sin v (R + r cos u) cos v ⎠ (2)
1, 2}. Consequently, vierbeins becomes
The behavior of fermions in curved space is more compli- ⎛1 0 0 ⎞
cated than that of scalar or vector fields, because their Lorentz emi (u , v) = ⎜ 0 r 0 ⎟. (9 )
⎜ ⎟
transformation do not generalize easily to arbitrary coordinate ⎝ 0 0 (R + r cos u)⎠
systems. Instead of the metric g μν (described in arbitrary
One can consider fermion in Minkowski space subject to the
coordinate), a set of locally inertial coordinates x aX and the
vierbein fields fixes the transformation between the local and torus embedding constant.
the general coordinates:
¶x aX (x ) 3. Graphene in magnetized torus geometry
ema (X ) = . (3 )
¶x m
The curved space Dirac gamma matrices, γ μ(x) then satisfy We consider a gapped graphene lattice with torus geometry
the Clifford algebra: (as sketched in figure 1) subjected in a magnetic field. The
strong magnetic field can strongly affect the fermion
{gm , gn} = 2gmn . dynamics, similar to a gravity in resulting curved space.
μ Therefore, we use Dirac equation in the curved space in the
The γ are related to the constant flat space matrices γ a by:
presence of vector potential
g m (x ) = eam g a, (4 )
(ig iPi - D) y = 0, (10)
and the spin connection Gm (x ) is defined via the vierbein
where the canonical momentum Pi of fermion in the presence
1
ga gb ela (x ) gls (x ) m esb (x ) ,
Gm (x ) = (5 ) of an electromagnetic potential is:
4
⎛ e ⎞
where the covariant derivative ∇μ acting on the esb (x ) can be Pi = eim ⎜ - m + i Am ⎟ ,
⎝ c ⎠
defined as
and ψ represents the Dirac spinor field, Δ is the rest mass of
m esb (x ) = ¶m esb - Glms elb (x ). (6 ) the particle, c is the speed of light in the curved space -time, e
2
Phys. Scr. 95 (2020) 045226 M Shahin et al
is electric charge and Aμ is electromagnetic four-potential. Now, we are in a position to define the pseudo-vector
Also, γ i are the Dirac matrices given by: potential as following:
0 sa , icr sin u 1
( )
g0 = 1 0 , ga =
0 -1 -s a 0 ( ) (11) Au¢ =
2e (R + r cos u)
, Av =
2
B (u) R. (18)
3
Phys. Scr. 95 (2020) 045226 M Shahin et al
spin-up and spin-down fermions, respectively. By substituting the equation (25) is reduced to the following form:
the wave function f(u, v) in equation (21), we obtain the
d2f ⎛a b c ⎞
following relation for spinor components: +⎜ + + ⎟
dx 2 ⎝x x-1 x - x2 ⎠
⎡ 1 ¶2 2 sin u ¶ df ab (x - x1¢ )
D 2 f (u , v ) = ⎢ - 2 2 - ´ + f = 0. (27)
⎣ r ¶u r (R + r cos u) ¶u dx x (x - 1)(x - x2)
cos u 3 sin2 u
- - With the following condition, the above equation is found to
2r (R + r cos u) 4 (R + r cos u)2 be Heun’s differential equation [29] with the parameterization
1 ⎛ e ⎞⎟2
⎜m - Av ab = F , a + b + 1 = a + b + c,
(R + r cos u)2 ⎝ c ⎠
es 3 ⎤ where
- Fuv - K 2⎥ f (u , v) = 0.
cr (R + r cos u) ⎦
(23) (a + b + c - 1 ) + (a + b + c - 1 )2 - 4 F
b= ,
2
To solve this equation, one can use x = R + r cos u and F
a= .
dx = -r sin u du , then equation (23) is transformed in to the b
following differential equation for spinor components: (28)
4r (r (m - ) + ) eAv 2 3R 2
where 2 2
c 4
A
A Dx2 + C - A n2 (2R + (8R 2 - 4r 2) 2 )
1
a =- , b=D-
x2
+ , + . (29)
x1x2
Dx2 + C -
x2 - x1
A
x1x2
( (
4r 2 r 2 m -
eAv 2
c) +
3R 2
4 )
x2
c= , The parameters n and m denote integer numbers. The other
x2 - x1
energy spectrum can be obtained from the equation (26) and
-H H 2 4G
A A2 - 4B - has the following form:
x1,2 = ¢ =
, x1,2
2 F2 F
.
2 2 1 3
Em2 = D2 + -
By applying the conditions 4r 2 4
eAv 2
-H
-
H 2
-
4G
+
(
4r 2 m - c ) + 3R 2
x1¢ = r2
2 F2 F
= 0,
2 1
x1 =
A- A2 - 4B
= 1, (26) +
( (
4r 2 m -
eAv 2
c ) + 3R 2 + 4 ).
2
(30)
2 2r 2
4
Phys. Scr. 95 (2020) 045226 M Shahin et al
We choose one of the energy spectra, because the energy are given by:
spectrum (29) is close to the Landau level energy spectrum. In
equation (29), En+, m and En-, m are energy spectra for spin-up lf 0
¶A
Av = ,
and spin-down fermions, respectively. The term c ( er ¶uv ) 2p (R + r cos u)
shows the interaction between magnetic field and spin of
fermion, where±denotes interaction between spin-up and and the differential of the Av with respect to u reads:
down fermions with magnetic field. Also, the term
eA 2 e 2A 2 ¶Av lf0 r sin u
( ) 2 2
e
r 2 m - c v = r 2m2 + cc v - 2r 2m c Av shows other inter-
¶u
=
2p (R + r cos u)2
.
actions, for example r m represents orbit–orbit interaction,
me
and -2r 2 c Av shows interaction between orbit and magnetic
field. We must apply the constraint (26) into equation (29). If we consider Av and its derivative at the point u = p2 , one
This constraint tells us that the relation between R and r is can then obtain
R2+2R−1=r2. Hence, we obtain equation (29), when we lr 2B0 ¶Av lr 3B0
put x1=1 and x2=a. This is one of the cases that we apply Av = , = .
2R ¶u 2R 2
on equation (25) to obtain Heun’s differential equation for
Dirac spinor. There is another case when we put x1=1 and Further, we consider the special case when m=l, conse-
x2=a where a, is the regular singular point of the Heun’s quently, the energy spectrum becomes:
differential equation. In this case the energy spectrum E En, m2 = D2eff
becomes:
En, m2 = D2 +
1
-
3 +
(
(2R + (8R 2 - 4r 2) 2 ) n2 + 2n R +
1
( emr 3B
2Rc )) ,
2 ⎛ 1
⎞
4r
(
2n R +
4
er ¶Av
) (2 R - (8 R - 4 r ) ) 2 2 1
2
⎝ (
4 r 2 ⎜r 2 m -
emr 2B
2Rc ) 2 3
+ 4 R2⎟
⎠
(32)
c ¶u
+
where D2eff = D2 + 41r 2 - 34 . The magnetization is a deriva-
4r (r (m - ) + )
2 2 eAv 2 3R 2
c 4 tive of the energy over the magnetic field. At zero temper-
¶E
n2 (2R - (8R 2 - 4r 2) 2 ) ature, this quantity becomes Mn, m = - ¶Bn, m , where Mn, m is
1
+ . (31)
the magnetic moment of the (n, m) state for spin up and down
( (
4r 2 r 2 m -
eAv 2
c ) +
3R 2
4 ) particles. After an easy calculation the magnetization
becomes:
⎡ ⎤
n, m =
1
⎢ (2R + (8R 2 - 4r 2) 12 ) er 3nm
⎢ cR
+
( )
(2R + (8R 2 - 4r 2) 2 ) n2 + 2n R +
1
( ( emr 3B
2Rc ) )( )(m -
emR 4
cr
mer 2B
2cR ) ⎥
⎥
2En, m ⎢ 2 ⎛ 2 1
⎞ ⎛ 1
⎞2 ⎥. (33)
⎢ 4r ⎜r m - 2Rc
⎣ ⎝ (
emr 2B 2 3
+ 4 R2⎟)⎠
emr 2B
4r 2 ⎜r 2 m - 2Rc
⎝ ( ) 2 3
+ 4 R2⎟
⎠
⎥
⎥⎦
Also, we remember that +En, m are the energy spectra for It is evident that the magnetic field is uniform with respect to
particles and -En, m are the energy spectra for anti-particles or the time.
holes. Finally, to have magnetic susceptibility quantity, one can
obtain it from the derivative of magnetization respect to the
magnetic field. At zero temperature, this quantity is achieved
3.2. Magnetization and magnetic susceptibility by c
n, m = ¶n, m ¶B , where n, m is given by equation (33)
for spin-up and spin-down fermions, respectively. After an
To calculate magnetization for energy spectrum (31), we easy calculation, we find the following relation for magnetic
consider the magnetic flux through the solenoid of torus with susceptibility:
radius r. Let us consider a closed curve C on torus and let l be
its winding number, therefore, it is evident that:
- n, m emg1
⎛ nr 4g + g g R 5 ⎞
c = ⎜ 2 3 4
⎟
∮ A · dl = lf0, n, m
En, m2 8cr 2g2 ⎝ rRg2 ⎠
g1 e 2m 2 ⎛ nr 5 g R3 g4 g3 R 3r ⎞
where l is integer number and f0 is equal to πr2B0 (B0 denotes + 2 2⎜ 3
⎜ng R 3 + - 4 + ⎟⎟,
8En, mc g 2 ⎝ 4 g3 R 2
2r 2g2 ⎠
a constant magnetic field). The vector potential components (34)
5
Phys. Scr. 95 (2020) 045226 M Shahin et al
Figure 2. The Landau energy levels as a function of magnetic field Figure 3. The plot shows magnetic moment of energy states as a
for several values of the quantum number n and m. function of magnetic field for different values of the quantum
number n and m.
where we define
of the electronic energy spectrum of slightly deformed fullerene.
g1 = 2R + (8R 2 - 4r 2) 2 ,
1
Therefore, as a key result, the curvature of surface, where the
3 Dirac fermions movement obeys from its can effectively influ-
g2 = r 2 g3 + R 2 ,
4 ence dynamical properties of 2D Dirac materials. Another
⎛ eBr 2 ⎞ important physical quantity associated with energy spectrum is
g 3 = m ⎜1 - ⎟, the magnetization of states, given by equation (33). In figure 3,
⎝ 2Rc ⎠
we present this quantity versus the strength of magnetic field for
and various Landau levels. It is shown, that positive magnetization is
⎛ achieved in low magnetic field strength, B10, and negative
emr 3B ⎞
g4 = n2 + 2n ⎜R + ⎟. ones appear for a high magnetic field for all Landau levels. The
⎝ 2Rc ⎠ amount of magnetization strongly depends on the m quantum
number, and it significantly increases for states with largest m.
The excited states associated with increasing n number and fixed
lowest m=1 show no sizeable change in magnetization.
4. Conclusion Therefore, the magnetic moment of states has no further
dependency on the principal quantum number of Landau levels.
We have proposed an exact solvable model to analyze the
influence of a geometric deformation in a graphene layer with a
gauge field defect such as gravitational aspect. By the use of Acknowledgments
particular space-time metric associated with torus geometry, we
have introduced the proper covariant derivative to merge the 2D The authors are grateful to M T Ahmadi for discussions and
fermions with Dirac equation related to the curved space. Via the design of torus-shape of graphene.
Heun’s differential equation, it was provided the possibility to
exactly achieve the energy spectrum of torus-shape graphene as
its Landau levels, as shown in figure 2. The Landau levels have ORCID iDs
been presented in terms of magnetic gauge field for various
integer quantum numbers n and m. We see increasing discrete H Goudarzi https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9565-3925
energy levels with the increase of quantum numbers. There is no
degenerate levels for m number in magnetic field strength greater
than B≅5, whereas for B≅3, degeneracy of energy states
References
occurs for fixed n and various m numbers. In magnetic field
B≅9, there exist a non-continuity in derivative of energy, which
means that the Fermi velocity of charge carriers is suddenly [1] Novoselov K S et al 2004 Science 306 666
[2] Geim A K and Novoselov K S 2007 Nat. Mater. 6 183
changed. However, our results can be compared with those in [3] Goerbig M O 2011 Rev. Mod. Phys. 83 1193
[25, 26], where the authors used spheroidal space-time metric and [4] DiVincenzo D P and Mele E J 1984 Phys. Rev. B 29 1685
showed that a weak uniform magnetic field affects fine structure [5] Furtado C et al 1994 Phys. Lett. A 195 90
6
Phys. Scr. 95 (2020) 045226 M Shahin et al
[6] Lammert P E and Crespi V H 2004 Phys. Rev. B 69 035406 [18] Asgarifar S and Goudarzi H 2013 Phys. Scr. 87 025703
[7] Katsnelson M I and Novoselov K S 2007 Solid State Commun. [19] Cortijo A and Vozmediano M A H 2007 Europhys. Lett. 77
143 3–13 47002
[8] Cortijo A and Vozmediano M A H 2007 Nucl. Phys. B 763 [20] Iorio A and Lambiase G 2014 Phys. Rev. D 90 025006
293–308 [21] DeWitt B S 1957 Rev. Mod. Phys. 29 377
[9] Guinea F, Katsnelson M I and Vozmediano M A H 2008 Phys. [22] Birrell N D and Davies P C W 1982 Quantum Fields in Curved
Rev. B 77 075422 Space (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
[10] Vozmediano M A H, Katsnelson M I and Guinea F 2010 Phys. [23] Yin L-J et al 2017 Front. Phys. 12 127208
Rep. 496 109–48 [24] Pudlak M, Pincak R and Osipov V A 2006 Phys. Rev. B 74
[11] Bueno M J, Furtado C and de Carvalho A M M 2012 Eur. 235435
Phys. J. B 85 53 [25] Pudlak M, Pincak R and Osipov V A 2007 Phys. Rev. A 75
[12] Furtado C, Rosas A and Azevedo S 2007 Europhys. Lett. 79 025201
57001 [26] Pudlak M, Pincak R, Pincak R and Osipov V A 2007 Phys.
[13] Gonzalez J and Herrero J 2010 Nucl. Phys. B 825 426–43 Rev. A 75 065201
[14] Smotlacha J and Pincak R 2013 Eur. Phys. J. B 86 480 [27] Eshghi M, Mehraban H and Azar I A 2017 Physica E 94
[15] Cariglia M and Gibbons G W arXiv:1806.05047 106–12
[16] Roshanzamir-Nikou M and Goudarzi H 2017 Int. J. Mod. [28] Eshghi M, Mehraban H and Azar I A 2017 Eur. Phys. J. Plus
Phys. B 31 1750013 132 477
[17] Vozmediano M A H, de Juan F and Cortijo A 2008 J. Phys.: [29] Erdelyi A 1944 Certain expansions of solutions of the Heun
Conf. Ser. 129 012001 equation Q. J. Math. 15 62–9