Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EE Slides 3
EE Slides 3
EE Slides 3
(0901420)
• To present various methods for estimating important factors (costs, revenue, useful
lives, residual values, etc.) in an engineering economy study.
WBS defines all project elements and their interrelationships, collecting and organizing
information, and developing relevant cost and revenue data and management activities.
WBS includes recurring (maintenance) and nonrecurring (initial construction) work elements.
Level of Effort: Level of Effort (LOE) is how much work is required to complete a task.
WBS Code: A unique identifier assigned to each element in a Work Breakdown Structure for the purpose of designating the
elements' hierarchical location within the WBS.
Work Package: A Work Package is a deliverable or work component at the lowest level of its WBS branch.
WBS Component: A component of a WBS which is located at any level. It can be a Work Package or a WBS Element as
there's no restriction on what a WBS Component is.
WBS Element: A WBS Element is a single WBS component, and its associated attributes located anywhere within a WBS.
• A WBS Element contain other WBS components or Work Packages.
The most serious source of errors in developing cash flows is overlooking important
categories of costs and revenues.
• Capital investment.
• Labor costs.
• Material costs.
• Maintenance costs.
• Overhead.
• Disposal costs.
• Sales revenue.
• Market (or salvage) value.
2. Unit technique
3. Factor technique
𝐼𝑛ҧ
𝐶𝑛 = 𝐶𝑘 ×
𝐼𝑘ҧ
Where:
k: reference year.
n: year to be estimated at.
Cn and Ck: cost or price in years n and k, respectively.
Īn and Īk are the index values for the years n and k, respectively.
𝐼2021
𝐶2021 = 𝐶2016 ×
𝐼2016
542
𝐶2021 = 525,000 × = $608,013
468
Muhammad T. Hatamleh, Extracted from Sullivan et al. (2018)
2. Unit technique
Examples:
• Cost per m2 of construction × area of construction.
• Operating cost per mile × number of miles.
While the unit technique is very useful for preliminary estimating purposes, such average values can be
misleading. In general, more detailed methods will result in greater estimation accuracy.
𝐶 = 𝐶𝑑 + f𝑚 𝑈𝑚
𝑑 𝑚
Where:
C = cost being estimated;
Cd = cost of the selected component d that is estimated directly;
fm = cost per unit of component m;
Um = number of units of component m.
• The factor technique is particularly useful when the complexity of the estimating situation does not
require a WBS but several different parts are involved. Check Example 3-5 in the book.
• These models are used in early design stages to get an estimate of a product or
project cost based on few physical characteristics (e.g. weight, volume, power).
• The outputs are used to gauge the impact of design decisions on the total cost.
𝐶𝐴 𝑆𝐴 𝑋 𝑆𝐴 𝑋
= or 𝐶𝐴 = 𝐶𝐵 ∗
𝐶𝐵 𝑆𝐵 𝑆𝐵
Where:
CA and CB : costs for plants A and B, respectively ($ as of the time for which the estimate is desired).
SA and SB : sizes of plants A and B, respectively (same physical units).
X: cost-capacity factor which depends on the type of plant.
Let
𝐶𝐴 = cost of new boiler today with capacity of (𝑆𝐴 = 1.42 S)
𝐶𝐵 = cost of old boiler today with capacity of (𝑆𝐵 = S).
0.8
1.42𝑆
𝐶𝐴, 𝑇𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑦 = 𝐶𝐵, 𝑇𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑦 ×
𝑆
𝐼𝑇𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑦
𝐶𝐵, 𝑇𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑦 = 𝐶𝐵, 𝐸𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑎𝑔𝑜 ×
𝐼𝐸𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑎𝑔𝑜
221
𝐶𝐵 = $181,000 × = $246,920.
162
0.8
1.42𝑆
𝐶𝐴 = $246,920 × = $326,879
𝑆
Muhammad T. Hatamleh, Extracted from Sullivan et al. (2018)
Power Sizing Technique Example
Suppose that an aircraft manufacturer desires to make a preliminary estimate of the cost of building a 600-MW
fossil-fuel plant for the assembly of its new long-distance aircraft. It is known that a 200-MW plant cost $100
million, 20 years ago when the approximate cost index was 400, and that cost index is now 1,200. The cost-
capacity factor for a fossil-fuel power plant is 0.79.
𝐼𝑇𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑦
𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑑 𝑝𝑙𝑎𝑛𝑡, 𝑇𝑜𝑑𝑎𝑦 = 𝐶𝐵, 20 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑎𝑔𝑜 ×
𝐼20 𝑦𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑠 𝑎𝑔𝑜
1200
𝐶𝐵 = $100 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛 × = $300 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛.
400
0.79
600 𝑀𝑊
𝐶𝐴 = $300 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛 × = $714 𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛
200 𝑀𝑊
𝑍𝑢 = 𝐾(𝑢𝑛 )
Where:
u = the output unit number;
Zu = the number of input resource units needed to produce output unit u;
K = the number of input resource units needed to produce the first output unit;
n = learning curve exponent = log 𝑠 / log 2
s = the learning curve slope parameter expressed as a decimal (s = 0.9 for a 90% learning curve).
log 0.8
𝑍10 = 100 × 10 log 2 = 47.65 hours
*** This is not the total time to produce 10 units … it’s the time to produce the 10th unit ***
𝟎.𝟔𝟓
289 1000
𝐶2014 = $25,000 × × = $41,764
200 800
• Manufacturing cost
𝑠 = 0.88 𝐾 = $12,000
log 0.88
𝑍50 = $12,000 × 50 log 2 = $5,832/unit