The Importance of Online Grammar Checkers and

Plagiarism Detectors to Make Your Writings Flawless.

Ralph Angelo Badang
Abstract: di pa tapos.

I. Introduction.
We live in a world where it seems like everyone is judging us. the moment we made a mistake,
we made wrong grammar in our essay or are accused of plagiarism, We correct our mistakes by
relying on Online Grammar Checkers and Plagiarism Checkers. The level of people's vocabulary
has decreased dramatically. In such a world, Those who use tools like grammar checkers and
plagiarism checkers will have opportunities and confidence that others do not. The use of
Grammar and Plagiarism Checker opens doors to productive futures. A lack of vocabulary closes
those doors. People have different abilities, needs, and interests. Yet everyone needs to be able
to use correct grammar in his or her personal life, in the workplace, and in further study. All
people deserve an opportunity to understand the power and beauty of online grammar and
plagiarism checkers. People need to know a set of online grammar and plagiarism checkers that
enable them to write flawlessly and fluently and pass their work/thesis with confidence.
This study looks at the importance of online grammar checkers and plagiarism detectors
and their frequent use in large urban schools and explored how that varied over the full range
of types of plagiarism, from using another author's ideas to submitting an entire document
copied verbatim from another author's work. The study also investigated whether or not
students thought it was crucial for writing to be original and flawless. It also looked at whether
students believe some types of plagiarism are more serious than others. The consequences of
students’ beliefs that plagiarism is a common practice and how institutions should address that
are discussed.
1. What is Plagiarism?
Numerous research on plagiarism fails to offer an operational definition of the term because
they appear to presume there is a single, universal notion of plagiarism that does not require
further explanation.
This can have an impact on research results, according to Powers (2009), because students'
self-reports of plagiarism are influenced by their unique perceptions of the behaviors that
might be construed as plagiarism.
Furthermore, there is frequent disagreement between teachers and students on what really
counts as plagiarism. (Kwong et al., 2010). Definitions of plagiarism from several of the studies
that provided one are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Definitions of plagiarism.

Belter & DuPre (2009): “One or more passages that was word-for-word the same as another source
without appropriate citation and quotation marks.” p. 259

Colnerud & Rosander (2009): “Using parts, or the whole, of a text written by another person without
acknowledgement; submitting the same paper or parts of it, for credit in more than one course,
falsification of information.” p. 506

Hard, Conway, & Moran (2006): “Presenting, as one's own, the ideas or words of another person or
persons for academic evaluation without proper acknowledgement.” p. 1059
Park (2003): “Plagiarism involves literary theft, stealing (by copying) the words or ideas of someone else
and passing them off as one’s own without crediting the source.” p. 472

Wang (2008): “Us[ing] somebody else’s work (words and thoughts) without attribution.” p. 743

Williams, Nathanson, & Paulhus (2010): “Any nonzero percentage detected by Turn-It-In (after
screening).” p. 294

Plagiarism is defined as the act of using another author's work without providing credit and
passing it off as one's own work. Determining the length of the copied material, whether or not
using only ideas from other authors constitutes plagiarism, and the degree to which the copied
words were taken verbatim are further typical definitional components.
For the sake of this study, the following definition of plagiarism was created: Plagiarism is the
act of presenting the thoughts or words of another author as your own in written assignments
or online postings. This would entail both submitting a whole work written by another author as
well as borrowing words or concepts in whole without citing the original author. Information
from the internet, from other students, and from both published and unpublished sources
would all fall under this category. On the survey they filled out, the students were given this
definition.
2. Research Perspective