Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WP - Benefits Bus or Hardwired RN
WP - Benefits Bus or Hardwired RN
2014-01-23 08:43:00
Bus or Hardwire
The Future is Digital
This comparison table summarizes how fieldbus brings value. Initially FOUNDATION fieldbus
was only about wiring savings and diagnostics, but over the past decade many other benefits of a
digital architecture, down to the field level, have been discovered. A digital bus infrastructure for
sensors and actuators provides capabilities not possible with hardwired analog and discrete (on/off)
devices. Some, but not all capabilities may partially possible with hybrids of discrete on/off and
hybrids of 4-20 mA analog and digital (HART, Brain, FoxCom, and DE etc.). Depending on the
mix of devices, the architecture may require more than one bus technology. This white paper is not
about FF vs. HART. Such a comparison cannot be made because HART is not used for control or
alarm monitoring. Hardwired control and alarm monitoring is done with 4-20 mA and on/off
signals.
For details refer to the Fieldbus Foundation brochure “FOUNDATION Fieldbus the Power of
Digital for your Process Devices”
http://www.fieldbus.org/images/stories/technology/aboutthetechology/overview/fieldbus_brochure.
pdf
Hardwired Fieldbus
(4-20 mA [with HART, Brain,
FoxCom, or DE], pulse, and
on/off)
Real-time control Analog Digital
Real-time logic On/Off Digital
Diagnostics reporting Slow (polling) Fast (report by exception)
1
Hardwired Fieldbus
(4-20 mA [with HART, Brain,
FoxCom, or DE], pulse, and
on/off)
Configuration and diagnostics Slow Fast, 31.25 kbit/s
reading (HART 1.2 kbit/s)
(Brain 1.2 kbit/s)
(DE 0.2 kbit/s)
(FoxCom 0.6 kbit/s)
Two-wire power constrained Yes (4 mA) No
Signal balance Grounded Isolated
Digital signal amplitude +/- 0.5 mA +/- 10 mA
Intelligent discrete devices No Yes
(On/off valves, electric
actuators etc.)
Device per pair of wires 1 10-16
Real-time signals per wire 1 Lots
(Electric actuators, two-wire
multi-input transmitters, gas
chromatographs etc.)
Types of I/O cards required Many 1 (FF interface card)
Types of barriers required Many 1
Signal marshalling cabinet Hardwired Virtual
Adding devices Hardwired Easy
Adding signals to devices Hardwired Easy
Change device type Hardwired Easy
Time synchronized control No (multiple aggregate scan Yes
times)
Control response period Slow (non-synchronized) Fast (Synchronized)
4-20 mA range skew Yes No
4-20 mA current calibration Yes No
skew
Signal distortion detection No Yes
Full sensor limit measurement No Yes
4-20 mA five point loop test Required Not required
PV validity indication No Yes
(Device failure distinguished (Trip)
from process problem)
Valve position feedback Rarely provided Yes
Multi-channel devices No Yes
Device diagnostics Advanced Very advanced
Firmware upgrade Circuit board replacement Centralized download
Binding Early (detail planning required) Late (easy changes)
Summary
This table summarizes how bus technology brings value.
2
Completion Higher Greater Increased Operations &
Quality Throughput Availability Maintenance
(Reduced
Downtime)
Multidrop X X
Multi- X
Channel
Devices
Complex X
Devices
Real X X
Number
Signal X
Integrity
Closed X X
Loop
Digital
Diagnostics X X
Firmware X
Download
Real-Time X
Status
Powerful X X
Devices
More Digital Signal
Diagnostics Fidelity
Complex
Devices
Real Number
Engineering
Unit
High‐Density Closed Loop
Devices Digital Control
The future is digital, don't built the plant old.
Further Reading
See separate technical white papers:
• FF Control-In-the-Field (CIF)
• FF differentiation from other bus technologies
• FF compared to remote-I/O
• FF discrete signal solutions
• FF diagnostics
• FF control is better
• FF status instead of burnout
• FF compared to proprietary protocols (for MOV)