Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CPC 4
CPC 4
In an interpleader suit, the actual dispute isn’t between the plaintiff and the defendant but
between the defendant who interpleads against each other. It is unlike an ordinary suit.
‘To interplead‘ means to litigate with each other to settle a point concerning a third party.
According to section 88 of the Civil Procedure Code, two or more persons claiming adversely
to each other the same debt, sum of money, or other property (movable or immovable) from a
person who does not claim any interest therein except the charges and costs incurred by him,
and such person is ready to pay or deliver the same to the rightful claimant may file an
interpleader suit.
For instance, X is in possession of some goods which is claimed by Y as well as Z. X does not
hold any interest in the goods and is willing to deliver the goods to the rightful owner of the
goods. X may institute an interpleader suit. Now, the court will decide the rightful owner
between Y and Z.
There must be some debt sum of money or other property movable or immovable in dispute.
There must be two or more persons claiming it against each other.
The person from whom such money or property is being claimed must not be claiming an
interest therein other than the charges and costs.
Such a third person must be ready and willing to pay or deliver it to the rightful claimant.
There must be no suit pending wherein the rights of the rival claimant can be properly
adjudicated.
Who May Institute an Interpleader Suit?
In National Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Dhirendra Nath Banerjee And Anr (1937), it was observed
that a person who has no interest in any debt, the sum of money or property except the
charges or cost and such person is willingly ready to pay or deliver the property to the rightful
claimant may file an interpleader suit.
The plaintiff claims no interest in the subject matter in dispute other than the charges and
cost.
The claims have been made by the defendants severally.
There is no collusion between the plaintiff and any of the defendants.
At the first hearing, the court may declare the plaintiff discharged from all liability, award him
the cost and dismiss him from the suit. And based on available evidence, the court may
adjudicate the matter. In case of lack of evidence, the court may frame issues and try them by
making one of the claimants, the plaintiff, in lieu of or in addition to the original plaintiff and
shall proceed in the suit in an ordinary manner.
It was held in Jagganath vs Tulka Hera (1908) that a suit does not become an interpleader
suit simply because the plaintiff requires the defendants to interplead with each other on one
of the plaint’s prayers
The Person Who May Not Institute Interpleader Suit
According to Rule 5 of Order 35 of the Civil Procedure Code:
An exception to this general rule is that where the claim is made through the principal or
landlord, the agent or tenant may file an interpleader suit against their principal or landlord,
respectively.