Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 13

1 SAMUEL J.

MUIR (SBN 89883)


STEPHEN B. LITCHFIELD (SBN 284951)
2 COLLINS COLLINS MUIR + STEWART LLP
3 1999 Harrison Street, Suite 1700
Oakland, CA 94612
4 (510) 844-5100 – FAX (510) 844-5101

5 Attorneys for Defendant McLARAND, VASQUEZ & PARTNERS, INC.


(erroneously sued herein as MCLARLAND, VARQUEZ & PARTNERS, INC.)
6

8 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA —DOWNTOWN DISTRICT

10

11 CILKER APARTMENTS, LLC, ) CASE NO. 1-13-CV-258281 Complex


) [Assigned to Hon. Peter H. Kirwan; Dept. 1]
12 Plaintiffs, )
) McLARAND, VASQUEZ & PARTNERS,
13 vs. ) INC.’S RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR
14 ) ADMISSION, SET ONE, PROPOUNDED BY
WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION, ) JELD-WEN, INC.
15 MCLARLAND, VARQUEZ & PARTNERS, )
INC., GROUP M ENGINEERS, GENTRY )
16 ASSOCIATES CONSTRUCTION )
CONSULTANTS, LARCO INDUSTRIES, )
17 FITCH PLASTERING, COURTNEY )
18 WATERPROOFING, CELL CRETE, LOS )
NIETOS CONSTRUCTION, MADERA )
19 FRAMING, KELLY DOOR, TARA )
COATNGS, LDI, ADM PAINTING, )
20 ALLIANCE BUILDING PRODUCT, JOS. J. )
ALBANESE, ANDERSON TRUSS, )
21
CALIFORNIA CLASSIC PAVERS, CASEY-) Complaint Filed: 12/26/13
22 FOGIL CONCRETE CONTRACTORS, ) FAC Filed: 03/20/14
CENTRAL COAST STAIRS, ) SAC Filed: 09/25/15
23 COMMERCIAL ROOF MANAGEMENT, ) Trial Date: 06/13/16
DAVEY ROOFING, INC., DEMETRIS )
24 PAINTING II, INC., DOORWAY MFG., )
LANDSCAPE PROS, MULTI-BUILDING )
25
STRUCTURES, PARK WEST, PYRAMID )
26 BUILDERS, ROBECKS WELDING & )
FABRICATION, RYLOCK COMPANY, )
27 SUMMIT WINDOW & PATIO DOOR, )
VANGUARD and DOES 1-100, inclusive, )
28 )
Collins Collins
Muir + Stewart LLP 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16)
1999 Harrison Street
Suite 1700
1
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone (510) 844-5100
Fax (510) 844-5101
MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN
1 Defendants. )
_____________________________________ )
2 WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION, )
3 )
Cross-Complainant, )
4 )
vs. )
5 )
ROES 1 – 500, inclusive, )
6 )
7 Cross-Defendants. )
)
8
PROPOUNDING PARTY: Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant JELD-
9
WEN, INC. dba SUMMIT WINDOW & PATIO DOOR
10
RESPONDING PARTY: Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant
11
MCLARAND, VASQUEZ AND PARTNERS, INC.
12
SET NO.: ONE (1)
13
TO JELD-WEN, INC. AND TO THEIR ATTORNEY(S) OF RECORD HEREIN:
14
COMES NOW Defendant/Cross-Defendant/Cross-Complainant MCLARAND, VASQUEZ
15
AND PARTNERS, INC. (“Responding Party”) and hereby responds to Defendant/Cross-
16
Defendant/Cross-Complainant JELD-WEN, INC. dba SUMMIT WINDOW & PATIO DOOR’s
17
(“Propounding Party”) Request for Admissions, Set One, as follows:
18
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
19
The following responses are made solely for the purpose of this action. Each answer is subject
20
to all appropriate objections which would require the exclusion of any statement contained herein, if
21
the Request for Admission were propounded, or if the answer were made by, a witness present and
22
testifying in court. All such objections and grounds are reserved and may be interposed at the time of
23
trial.
24
This Responding Party has not yet completed its investigation of the facts related to this action,
25
and has not yet completed its discovery in this action, and consequently has not yet completed its
26
preparation for trial. The following responses are given without prejudice to the right to produce at
27
trial any and all subsequently-discovered evidence relating to the proof of presently known material
28
facts, if any, and to produce all evidence, whenever discovered, relating to the proof of subsequently-
Collins Collins
Muir + Stewart LLP 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16)
1999 Harrison Street
Suite 1700
2
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone (510) 844-5100
Fax (510) 844-5101
MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN
1 discovered material facts. Responding party responds to these Requests for Admission based upon the
2 information and belief presently known and available to the Responding Party and reserves the right to
3 supplement or modify these responses based upon subsequently discovered or acquired information
4 and/or documents.
5 Except for explicit facts submitted herein, no admissions of any nature whatsoever are implied
6 nor should they be inferred. The fact that Responding Party has responded to any Request for

7 Admission should not be taken as an admission or acceptance of the existence of any fact or facts set

8 forth or assumed by any interrogatory, or that such answer constitutes admissible evidence. This

9 Preliminary Statement is, by this reference, incorporated into each and every one of the following

10 Responses to these Requests for Admission.

11 RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION

12 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 1:

13 Admit the PLANS do not call for a MILCOR TRIM feature on any windows detailed

14 therein.

15 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 1:

16 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information

17 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is

18 unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, and calls for impermissible expert

19 opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. In addition, the phrase MILCOR TRIM, as
defined, is vague and ambiguous and subject to varying interpretations, such that RESPONDING
20
PARTY’s definition of MILCOR TRIM may differ from PROPOUNDING PARTY’s definition.
21
Without waiving any of the foregoing objections, Responding Party responds as follows:
22
RESPONDING PARTY is unable to admit or deny this Request because
23
PROPOPOUNDING PARTY’s definition of “PLANS” is not a complete representation of the
24
Contract Documents. A MILCOR TRIM, as defined in PROPOUNDING PARTY’s Request, is not
25
called out in the “PLANS,” as defined. However, the “PLANS,” as defined, do not include all the
26
documents and instructions that make up the Contract Documents, and are not representative of
27
how this portion of the Project was to be constructed.
28
Collins Collins
Muir + Stewart LLP 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16)
1999 Harrison Street
Suite 1700
3
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone (510) 844-5100
Fax (510) 844-5101
MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN
1 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 2
2 Admit the SPECIFICIATIONS do not call for a MILCOR TRIM feature on any windows
3 detailed therein.
4 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 2
5 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information
6 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is

7 unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, and calls for impermissible expert

8 opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. In addition, the phrase MILCOR TRIM, as

9 defined, is vague and ambiguous and subject to varying interpretations, such that RESPONDING

10 PARTY’s definition of MILCOR TRIM may differ from PROPOUNDING PARTY’s definition.

11 Without waiving any of the foregoing objections, Responding Party responds as follows:

12 Deny.

13 REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS NO. 3

14 Admit the PLANS do not call for a MILCOR TRIM feature on any sliding glass patio doors

15 detailed therein.

16 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 3

17 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information

18 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is
unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, and calls for impermissible expert
19
opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. In addition, the phrase MILCOR TRIM, as
20
defined, is vague and ambiguous and subject to varying interpretations, such that RESPONDING
21
PARTY’s definition of MILCOR TRIM may differ from PROPOUNDING PARTY’s definition.
22
Without waiving any of the foregoing objections, Responding Party responds as follows:
23
RESPONDING PARTY is unable to admit or deny this Request because
24
PROPOPOUNDING PARTY’s definition of “PLANS” is not a complete representation of the
25
Contract Documents. A MILCOR TRIM, as defined in PROPOUNDING PARTY’s Request, is not
26
called out in the “PLANS,” as defined. However, the “PLANS,” as defined, do not include all the
27

28
Collins Collins
Muir + Stewart LLP 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16)
1999 Harrison Street
Suite 1700
4
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone (510) 844-5100
Fax (510) 844-5101
MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN
1 documents and instructions that make up the Contract Documents, and are not representative of
2 how this portion of the Project was to be constructed.
3 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 4
4 Admit the SPECIFICATIONS do not call for a MILCOR TRIM feature on any sliding glass
5 patio doors detailed therein.
6 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 4

7 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information

8 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is

9 unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, and calls for impermissible expert

10 opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. In addition, the phrase MILCOR TRIM, as

11 defined, is vague and ambiguous and subject to varying interpretations, such that RESPONDING

12 PARTY’s definition of MILCOR TRIM may differ from PROPOUNDING PARTY’s definition.

13 Without waiving any of the foregoing objections, Responding Party responds as follows:

14 Deny.

15 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 5

16 Admit the PLANS call for aluminum windows and sliding glass patio doors.

17 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 5

18 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information
protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is
19
unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, compound, and calls for impermissible
20
expert opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. Without waiving any of the foregoing
21
objections, Responding Party responds as follows:
22
RESPONDING PARTY is unable to admit or deny this Request because
23
PROPOPOUNDING PARTY’s definition of “PLANS” is not a complete representation of the
24
Contract Documents. Aluminum windows and sliding glass patio doors are called out in the
25
“PLANS,” as defined. However, the “PLANS,” as defined, do not include all the documents and
26
instructions that make up the Contract Documents, and are not representative of what the contract
27
documents called for in this regard.
28
Collins Collins
Muir + Stewart LLP 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16)
1999 Harrison Street
Suite 1700
5
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone (510) 844-5100
Fax (510) 844-5101
MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN
1 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 6
2 Admit the SPECIFICATIONS call for aluminum windows and sliding glass patio doors.
3 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 6
4 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information
5 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is
6 unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, compound, and calls for impermissible

7 expert opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. Without waiving any of the foregoing

8 objections, Responding Party responds as follows:

9 Deny.

10 REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 7

11 Admit YOU never revised the PLANS to reflect the change in materials from aluminum to

12 vinyl window and sliding glass patio door products.

13 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 7

14 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information

15 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is

16 unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, compound, and calls for impermissible

17 expert opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. Without waiving any of the foregoing

18 objections, Responding Party responds as follows:


Deny.
19
REQUEST TO ADMISSION NO. 8
20
Admit YOU never revised the SPECIFICATIONS to reflect the change in materials from
21
aluminum to vinyl window and sliding glass patio door products.
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
Collins Collins
Muir + Stewart LLP 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16)
1999 Harrison Street
Suite 1700
6
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone (510) 844-5100
Fax (510) 844-5101
MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN
1 RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION NO. 8
2 Objection. Responding Party objects to this Request to the extent it requests information
3 protected by the attorney-client privilege or attorney work product doctrine. Further, this request is
4 unduly burdensome, overbroad, calls for a legal conclusion, compound, and calls for impermissible
5 expert opinion on a matter at issue between the parties. Without waiving any of the foregoing
6 objections, Responding Party responds as follows:

7 Deny.

8
DATED: March 8, 2016 COLLINS COLLINS MUIR + STEWART LLP
9

10

11 By: ________________________________

12 SAMUEL J. MUIR
Attorneys for McLARAND VASQUEZ &
13 PARTNERS, INC.
14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28
Collins Collins
Muir + Stewart LLP 19010 – RSPS TO RFA 1 FROM JELD-WEN (03-08-16)
1999 Harrison Street
Suite 1700
7
Oakland, CA 94612
Phone (510) 844-5100
Fax (510) 844-5101
MVP’S RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, FROM JELD-WEN
 

VERIFICATION TO FOLLOW
UNDER SEPARATE COVER
 

 
PROOF OF SERVICE
(CCP §§ 1013(a) and 2015.5; FRCP 5)

State of California, )
) ss.
County of Alameda )

I am employed in the County of Alameda. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 1999 Harrison
Street, Suite 1700, Oakland, California 94612.

On the below date, I served the foregoing document described as McLARAND, VASQUEZ & PARTNERS, INC.’S RESPONSES TO
SPECIAL INTERROGATORIES, SET ONE, PROPOUNDED BY JELD-WEN, INC.; McLARAND, VASQUEZ & PARTNERS, INC.’S
RESPONSES TO REQUEST FOR ADMISSION, SET ONE, PROPOUNDED BY JELD-WEN, INC. on the interested parties in this action by
placing same in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows:

See Service List Attached Hereto


(BY MAIL) - I caused such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United States mail in Oakland, California to be served
on the parties as indicated on the attached service list. I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for
mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Oakland,
California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or
postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

(BY CERTIFIED MAIL) – I caused such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to be placed in
the United States Mail in Oakland, California.

BY EXPRESS MAIL OR ANOTHER METHOD OF DELIVERY PROVIDING FOR OVERNIGHT DELIVERY

(BY ELECTRONIC FILING AND/OR SERVICE) – I filed and served a true copy, with all exhibits, electronically on designated
recipients listed on the attached Service List via 03/08/16 (Date) at a.m. (Time)
Glotrans, per E-Filing and E-Service Standing
Order of 08/28/06, on:

FEDERAL EXPRESS - I caused the envelope to be delivered to an authorized courier or driver authorized to receive documents with delivery fees
provided for.

(BY FACSIMILE) - I caused the above-described document(s) to be transmitted to the offices of the interested parties at the facsimile number(s)
indicated on the attached Service List and the activity report(s) generated by facsimile number (510) 844-5100 indicated all pages were transmitted.

(BY PERSONAL SERVICE) - I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand to the office(s) of the addressee(s).

Executed on MARCH 8, 2016 at Oakland, California.

(STATE) - I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct.

(FEDERAL) - I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made.

PAM KASSOFF
pkassoff@ccmslaw.com
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA; CASE NO. 1-13-CV-258281
CILKER APARTMENTS v. WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION, et al
OUR FILE NO. 19010

Jon B. Zimmerman Michael J. Pepek


Gregory B. Cohen Sam M. Danskin
ROBINSON & WOOD Michael A. Erlinger
227 N. 1st Street GREEN & HALL APC
San Jose, CA 95113 1851 E. 1ST Street, 10th Floor
(408) 298-7120 – FAX (408) 298-0477 Santa Ana, CA 92705
jbz@robinsonwood.com (714) 918-7000 – FAX (714) 918-6996
gbc@robinsonwood.com mpepek@greenhall.com
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF CILKER sdanskin@greenhall.com
APARTMENTS, LLC merlinger@greenhall.com
Sheila Ellis
sellis@greenhall.com
ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-COMPLAINANT
WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION; JOHN
ATHERTON

David Levy Laura K. Buttrell, Esq


VAN DE POEL, LEVY & ALLEN, LLP LAW OFFICE OF DAVID A WALLIS
1600 South Main Plaza, Suite 325 2251 Harvard, Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94596 Sacramento, CA 95815
(925) 934-6102 – FAX (925) 934-6060 (916) 921-9353 – FAX (916) 921-9040
dlevy@vanlevylaw.com Buttrl1@nationwide.com
ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT LDI MECHANICAL, INC. ATTORNEY(S) FOR ROBECKS WELDING & FABRICATION,
(sued herein as LDI) INC.

Michael L. Marx Richard N. Sieving, Esq.


Denise R. Sutherland Luke G. Pears-Dickson, Esq.
GOODMAN NEUMAN HAMILTON LLP THE SIEVING LAW FIRM, APC
417 Montgomery Street, 10th Floor 100 Howe Street, Suite #220N
San Francisco, CA 94104 Sacramento, CA 95825
(415) 705-0400 – FAX (415) 705-0411 (916) 444-3366 – FAX (916) 444-1223
mmarx@gnhllp.com rsieving@sievinglawfirm.com
DSutherland@gnhllp.com lpearsdickson@sievinglawfirm.com
ATTORNEY(S) FOR JOSEPH J. ALBANESE, INC ATTORNEY(S) FOR JELD-WEN, INC. , AN OREGON
CORPORATION DBA SUMMIT WINDOW & PATIO DOOR
(ERRONEOUSLY SUED HEREIN AS SEPARATE ENTITIES
SUMMIT WINDOW & PATIO DOOR AND DOE 3: JELD-
WEN, INC. DBA SUMMIT WINDOW & PATIO DOOR

Chad S. Tapp, Esq. Frank J. Perretta, Esq.


Cruz Rocha, Esq. MILLER MORTON CAILLAT & NEVIS, LLP
PORTER SCOTT 50 West San Fernando St., Suite 1300
350 University Ave., Suite 200 San Jose, California 95113
Sacramento, California 95825 (408) 292-1765; Fax: (408) 436-8272
(916) 929.1481 - FAX: (916) 927.3706 fjp@millermorton.com
ctapp@porterscott.com ATTORNEYS FOR CROSS-DEFENDANT, CROSS-
crocha@porterscott.com COMPLAINANT, WHITE RESIDENTIAL, INC.
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-DEFENDANT
PACIFIC COAST BUILDING PRODUCTS dba ANDERSON
TRUSS
Eileen T. Booth Jenna L. Fischer-Reyes
Crystal W. Leas LAW OFFICES OF MELISSA M. BALLARD
JACOBSEN & McELROY PC 1551 North Tustin Avenue, Suite 830
2401 American River Drive, Suite 100 Santa Ana, CA 92705
Sacramento, CA 95825 (714) 571-0407 – FAX (877) 369-5799
(916) 971-4100 – FAX (916) 971-4150 Direct: (714) 371-2758
ebooth@jacobsenmcelroy.com Mailing Address:
cleas@jacobsenmcelroy.com P.O. Box 2282
ATTORNEY(S) FOR PACIFIC COAST BUILDING PRODUCTS Brea, CA 92822-2282
dba ANDERSON TRUSS (erroneously sued herein as ANDERSON Jenna.fischer-reyes@thehartford.com
TRUSS; ROE 4; DOE 4) ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-DEFENDANT
ROBECK’S WELDING & FABRICATION, INC.

Michael J. Estep Maria M. Rohaidy


LAW OFFICES OF TIMOTHY R. WAGNER Alison S. Flowers
1655 Grant Street, Suite 800-B TAUBMAN, SIMPSON, YOUNG & SULENTOR APC
Concord, CA 94520 One World Trade Center, Suite 400
(925) 681-3600 – FAX (866) 386-1186 Long Beach, CA 90831-0400
Michael.estep@aig.com (562) 436-9201 – FAX (562) 590-9695
ATTORNEY(S) FOR PYRAMID BUILDERS, INC. mmr@tsyslaw.com
asf@tsyslaw.com
ATTORNEY(S) FOR AMPAM PARKS MECHANICAL, INC.

Jill J. Lifter G. Geoffrey Wood


Joseph Ryan Jenn N. Crittondon
RYAN & LIFTER APC ERICKSEN ARBUTHNOT
2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 400 One Concord Center
San Ramon, CA 94583-1367 2300 Clayton Road, Suite 350
(925) 884-2080 – FAX 884-2090 Concord, CA 94520-2145
jlifter@rallaw.com (510) 832-7770 – FAX (510) 832-0102
jryan@rallaw.com gwood@ericksenarbuthnot.com
ATTORNEY(S) FOR CELL-CRETE CORPORATION jcrittondon@ericksenarbuthnot.com
ATTORNEY(S) FOR DIMETRIUS PAINTING II, INC.
(ROE 11)

Thomas R. Kirvin Daniel A. Serot


LAW OFFICES OF SANTANA, TCHENG, VIERRA & SYMONDS VAN DE POEL, LEVY, ALLEN & ARNEAL, LLP
71 Stevenson Street, Suite 700 1600 South Main Plaza, Suite 325
San Francisco, CA 94105 Walnut, Creek, CA 94596
(415) 777-1308 – FAX (415) 896-9063 (925) 934-6102 – FAX (925) 934-6060
Tom0689.kirvin@libertymutual.com dserot@vanlevylaw.com
ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT CALIFORNIA CLASSIC ATTORNEY(S) FOR CROSS-DEFENDANT ADM
PAVER DESIGNS, INC., a dissolved California corporation, CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
incorrectly sued as CALIFORNIA CLASSIC PAVERS, and
Defendant-in-Intervention, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY

Thomas B. Wait Robert B. Luceck


Robert A. Hufnagel Alexander R. Moore
Matthew P. Malczynski BOORNAZIAN, JENSEN & GARTHE
WAIT & HUFNAGEL A Professional Corporation
250 West First Street, Suite 222 555 12th Street, Suite 1800
Claremont, CA 91711 Oakland, CA 94607
(909) 621-5672 – FAX (909) 399-0645 amoore@bjg.com
twait@wait-hufnagel.com ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT MADERA FRAMING, INC.
rhufnagel@wait-hufnagel.com (erroneously sued as Madera Framing)
mmalczynski@wait-hufnagel.com
ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT TARA COATINGS, INC.
(erroneously sued herein as TARA COATINGS)
Leonard T. Fink
Benjamin J. Angulo Rebecca J. Collaco
SPRINGEL & FINK LLP Brian H. Gunn
575 Market Street, Suite 2200 WOLFE & WYMAN LLP
San Francisco, CA 94105 2175 California Blvd., Suite 645
(415) 541-5363 – FAX (415) 541-5364 Walnut Creek, CA 94596-3502
lfink@springelfink.com (925) 280-0004 – FAX (925) 280-0005
bangulo@springelfink.com rjcollaco@wolfewyman.com
ATTORNEY(S) FOR CROSS-DEFENDANT COURTNEY, INC., bhgunn@wolfewyman.com
erroneously sued and served as COURTNEY WATERPROOFING, ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT ALLIANCE BUILDING
INC. PRODUCTS, INC.

Todd A. Jones Larry D. Letofsky


Gregory K. Federico Robyn S. McClain
ARCHER NORRIS APLC LETOFSKY – McCLAIN
301 University Avenue, Suite 110 3655 Nobel Drive, Suite 400
Sacramento, CA 95825-5537 San Diego, CA 92122
(916) 646-2480 – FAX (916) 646-5696 (858) 642-1372 – FAX: (858) 642-1379
tjones@archernorris.com lletofsky@letofskymcclain.com
gfederico@archernorris.com rmcclain@letofskymcclain.com
ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-DEFENDANT CO-COUNSEL FOR AMPAM PARKS MECHANICAL, INC.
ROBECK’S WELDING & FABRICATION, INC.

SPECIAL MASTER / DISCOVERY REFEREE: DOCUMENT DEPOSITORY:


Gerald Kurland, Esq. Aiken & Welch
JAMS/ADR 111 N. Market Street
1601 Cloverfield Blvd., Suite 370S San Jose, CA 95113
Santa Monica, CA 90404 (877) 451-1580
(310) 392-3044 – FAX (310) 396-7576
jkurland@jamsadr.com

Joseph A. Long, Esq. Thomas Yen, Esq.


Marcia A. Pollioni, Esq. LAW OFFICE OF MICHAEL POLLARD
LONG BLUMBERG, LLP 525 Market Street, Suite 2850
2950 Buskirk Avenue, Suite 315 San Francisco, CA 94105
Walnut Creek, CA 94597 (415) 227-2300 – FAX (415) 227-2360
(925) 941-0090 – FAX (925) 941-0085 Thomas.yen@zurichna.com
Pollioni Cell: (415) 730-0072 (Preferred) ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT CASEY-FOGLI
mpollioni@longblumberg.com CONCRETE CONTRACTORS; CASEY-FOGLI
jlong@longblumberg.com CONTRACTORS, INC.
ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-DEFENDANT LOS
NIETOS CONSTRUCTION

William D. Morrow Chad S. Tapp


Geoffrey Kraemer PORTER SCOTT
MORROW & WHITE 350 University Avenue, Suite 200
535 Anton Blvd., Suite 1150 Sacramento, CA 95825
Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (916) 929-1481 – FAX (916) 927-3706
(714) 979-7999 – FAX (714) 979-7770 ctapp@porterscott.com
billmorrow@morrow-white.com ATTORNEY(S) FOR PACIFIC COAST BUILDING
gkraemer@morrow-white.com PRODUCTS dba ANDERSON TRUSS (erroneously sued herein
cbraico@morrow-white.com as ANDERSON TRUSS; ROE 4; DOE 4)
cguest@morrow-white.com
ATTORNEY(S) FOR ADM CONSTRUCTION

Ayhan M. Menekshe Brett L. McKague


Steven W. Ferla Jeremy Schroeder
MENEKSHE LAW FIRM FLESHER / McKAGUE LLP
950 East Campbell Avenue 2202 Plaza Drive
Campbell, CA 95008 Rocklin, CA 95764
(408) 358-1200 – FAX (408) 358-1205 (916) 3589042 – FAX (916) 673-9672
ferla@menekshelaw.com blm@fbmllp.com
ASSOCIATED COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS- jjs@fbmllp.com
DEFENDANT CELL-CRETE CORPORATION ATTORNEY(S) FOR GENTRY ASSOCIATES
CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS

Todd A. Fischer
Bryan P. Kerney, Esq.
FISCHER KERNEY, LLP
888 Munras Avenue
Monterey, CA 93940
(831) 372-9200 – FAX (831) 372-9220
taf@fk-legal.com
bpk@fk-legal.com
CO-COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/CROSS-DEFENDANT
PYRAMID BUILDERS, INC.

Elizabeth W. Lawley, Esq. Frank J. Perretta, Esq.


HAIGHT BROWN & BONESTEEL, LLP MILLER, MORTON, CAILLAT & NEVIS, LLP
2485 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 450 50 West San Fernando Street, Suite 1300
Sacramento, CA 95833 San Jose, CA 95113
(916) 702-3200; Fax: (916) 702-3220 (408) 292-1765 – FAX (408) 436-8272
elawley@hbblaw.com fjp@millermorton.com
ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT MADERA FRAMING, INC. ATTORNEY(S) FOR CROSS-DEFENDANT/CROSS-
(erroneously sued as Madera Framing) COMPLAINANT WHITE RESIDENTIAL, INC.

Mary Kay Glaspy, Esq. Paul C. Glaspy, Esq.


LAW OFFICES OF GLASPY & GLASPY, INC. LAW OFFICES OF GLASPY & GLASPY, INC.
One Walnut Creek Center 1550 The Alameda, Suite 200
100 Pringle Avenue, Suite 750 San Jose, CA 95126
Walnut Creek, CA 94596 (408) 279-8844 – FAX (408) 279-6941
(925) 947-1300 – FAX (925) 947-1594 pglaspy@glaspy.com
mglaspy@glaspy.com ASSOCIATED COUNSEL FOR WESTERN NATIONAL
ASSOCIATED COUNSEL FOR WESTERN NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION
CONSTRUCTION

Leonard T. Fink, Esq. Mark C. Phillips, Esq.


Kathryn L. Kim, Esq. KRAMER, deBOER & KEANE, LLP
SPRINGEL & FINK LLP 425 Market Street, Suite 2200
18100 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 750 San Francisco, CA 94105
Irvine, CA 92612 (415) 933-7855 – FAX (415) 933-7850
(714) 957-5742 – FAX (714) 957-5762 mphillips@kdeklaw.com
lfink@springelfink.com ATTORNEY(S) FOR DEFENDANT PYRAMID BUILDERS,
kkim@springelfink.com INC.
ATTORNEY(S) FOR CROSS-DEFENDANT COURTNEY, INC.,
erroneously sued and served as COURTNEY WATERPROOFING,
INC.

You might also like